On 27-Oct-97 Richard G. Roberto wrote:
> I fear
> that I've come to a conclusion that may bring a fair bit of
> flame mail my way, but Dave Cinege has to be dealt with. We
> must revoke his license to victimize the community at large.
There is an expression in the US ... you have the right to sw
On 28-Oct-97 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> You think the congress can put together a distribution like
> Debian?
>
> manoj
Yes ... and they would call it Slacklaw.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [
Hi,
>>"M" == M W Blunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
M> On 27 Oct 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> What problems are term limits supposed to solve, exactly?
M> They prevent the voters from re-electing someone that due to his
M> entrenchment in the system, has more power than a freshman would
M>
Hi,
>>"Britton" == Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Britton> I actually like this proposal. I have no problem with Bruce,
Britton> he has done a gret job. I just don't see the point in making
Britton> the process of succession so competitive. The limits need
Britton> not be short. Richards
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Glenn Amerine wrote:
> > "M" == M W Blunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> M> On 27 Oct 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> What problems are term limits supposed to solve, exactly?
>
> M> They prevent the voters from re-electing someone that due to
> M>
> "M" == M W Blunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
M> On 27 Oct 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> What problems are term limits supposed to solve, exactly?
M> They prevent the voters from re-electing someone that due to
M> his entrenchment in the system, has more power than a fr
On 27 Oct 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> What problems are term limits supposed to solve, exactly?
They prevent the voters from re-electing someone that due to his
entrenchment in the system, has more power than a freshman would
have. Greedy and self serving voters vote for the incumba
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Richard G. Roberto wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > PROPOSAL FOR TERM LIMITS
> >
> > I propose that all elected posts in the Debian organization
> > be subject to the following term limits:
I actually like this proposal. I have no pr
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Richard G. Roberto wrote:
[snip]
> PROPOSAL FOR TERM LIMITS
>
> I propose that all elected posts in the Debian organization
> be subject to the following term limits:
[snip]
So, Richard. Are you ready to commit a lot of your private time to
becoming project leader for a yea
Richard G. Roberto writes:
> This is a testimony to how frightening an individual Dave Cinege really
> is.
Tedious, yes, but frightening? Hardly.
> We must revoke his license to victimize the community at large.
No one is being "victimized" by Mr. Cinege's blitherings. The only thing
truly off
Hi,
I think term limits may not be the panacea that people think
they are.
1) Unlike general elections, incumbents do not have more money to
spend than challengers
2) Unlike general elections, incumbents do not get more into the
constituents eye (any body can mail on the lists
Sorry to have come into this so late, but I was tuned in to a
different soap opera ;)
This is not the first time someone has requested that Bruce
be "impeached" or removed from his post as project leader,
or president, or whatever it is currently. This is the
first time Dave Cinege has done it.
12 matches
Mail list logo
