Re (2): Percentage noted by network manager.

2013-01-10 Thread peasthope
From: Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:07:38 + This being a Wireless connection, it's more likely to be signal strength. My original thought also. ... no attenuation = 100% ... I don't understand. Any received signal which is too weak to saturate the

Re: Re (2): Percentage noted by network manager.

2013-01-10 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:43:56AM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: From: Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:07:38 + This being a Wireless connection, it's more likely to be signal strength. My original thought also. ... no attenuation = 100% ... I

Re (3): Percentage noted by network manager.

2013-01-10 Thread peasthope
Darac others, From: Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:14:59 + I was rather meaning how much the signal is attenuated between the sender and receiver. My hypothesis. ... For the receiver to know the attenuation from the tranmitter, the header of each

Percentage noted by network manager.

2013-01-03 Thread peasthope
Network Nanager gives a que such as Wireless network connection 'ubcsecure' active: ubcsecure (66%). No mention of the percentage in http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkManager#Documentation , http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/users/ or https://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager . I'll guess it is

Re: Percentage noted by network manager.

2013-01-03 Thread Darac Marjal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/01/2013 17:42, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Network Nanager gives a que such as Wireless network connection 'ubcsecure' active: ubcsecure (66%). No mention of the percentage in http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkManager#Documentation ,