kopecpa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>since yesterday (2023-10-25) I received an error during the apt update
>command:
Only since yesterday? Was it working fine previously?
>docker run -it debian:bullseye /bin/bash
>Unable to find image 'debian:bullseye' locally
>bullseye: Pulling from librar
As another data point, I've tried the following:
$ docker run -it debian apt update
$ docker run -it debian:bullseye apt update
$ docker run -it
debian@sha256:c141beaa9e0767774221cc82efe3a6712a1cc4f75d2699334dfd9a28a6f7357b
apt update
And these all complete successfully:
❯ docker run -it
Hello,
since yesterday (2023-10-25) I received an error during the apt update
command:
docker run -it debian:bullseye /bin/bash
Unable to find image 'debian:bullseye' locally
bullseye: Pulling from library/debian
69b3efbf67c2: Pull complete
Digest:
sha256:c141beaa9e0767774221cc82efe3a6712a1cc
On 5/31/23 14:42, john doe wrote:
On 5/31/23 11:36, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Yes, after purging apt-cacher-ng the problem was gone. And after i
reinstalled apt-cacher-ng and configured it that way:
For the sake of simplicity and troubleshooting, please modify
sources.list directly.
What does a
On 5/31/23 11:36, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Yes, after purging apt-cacher-ng the problem was gone. And after i
reinstalled apt-cacher-ng and configured it that way:
For the sake of simplicity and troubleshooting, please modify
sources.list directly.
What does acng.conf look like?
Note that thi
On Wed, 31 May 2023 11:36:19 +0200
Dennis Heddicke wrote:
> Acquire::http {Proxy "http://localhost:3142";};
> Acquire::https {Proxy "http://";};
I'm not comfortable with your second line there. First, you have for
https a non-secure http. I suspect they should match. Second, if you
are going to
. But
thank you for your help.
On 5/31/23 08:43, john doe wrote:
On 5/30/23 19:39, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Hello,
i have a problem with "apt update", everytime i execute the command, i
get the following error messages:
Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-secu
On 5/30/23 19:39, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Hello,
i have a problem with "apt update", everytime i execute the command, i
get the following error messages:
Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security
InRelease [48,0 kB]
Get:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm
Hello,
i have a problem with "apt update", everytime i execute the command, i
get the following error messages:
Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security
InRelease [48,0 kB]
Get:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm InRelease [193 kB]
On 10/20/2019 10:41 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:25:27AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I know the the command worked because I can access -i386 applications. However,
when I run:
comp@AbNormal:~$ sudo -s apt update
none of the Debian i386 repositories are li
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:25:27AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I know the the command worked because I can access -i386 applications.
> However, when I run:
>
> > comp@AbNormal:~$ sudo -s apt update
>
> none of the Debian i386 repositories are listed. Why is this the case?
I
I have just reinstalled Buster on my main computer.
While I was setting up my desktop I ran:
sudo -s dpkg --add-architecture i386
without any warning or error messages.
I know the the command worked because I can access -i386 applications.
However, when I run:
comp@AbNormal:~$ sudo -s
On Thu 21 Jan 2016 at 11:04:18 +, Brian wrote:
> If non-free firmware is provided during the course of using the installer
> the "official" sources.list includes non-free.
A misleading statement. The non-free archive is marked for inclusion but
the user must choose to have it written to sour
On Thu 21 Jan 2016 at 23:10:51 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:1
On Wed 20 Jan 2016 at 17:56:53 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:34:31 + Brian wrote:
>
> > On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> > > Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > > http.debian.net/debian/
> > > >
> > > > is e
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > > Amr Saber wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi there,
> > > > While I w
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:34:31 + Brian wrote:
> On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > http.debian.net/debian/
> > >
> > > is exactly the same as
> > >
> > > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> > >
> > > The
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > Amr Saber wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > apt-get couldn't ge
On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> Brian wrote:
>
> > http.debian.net/debian/
> >
> > is exactly the same as
> >
> > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> >
> > The .org indicates it is an official, supported mirror but it makes no
> > dif
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> Amr Saber wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
Brian wrote:
> On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 18:18:09 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > Amr Saber wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > apt-get couldn't get any pac
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:36:33PM -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> > The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> > and I can't find any version of it online
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-f
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 18:18:09 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> Amr Saber wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for ea
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
> Hi there,
> While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
> any way, The proble
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 09:39:26 +0530, Udyant Wig wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 02:08 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> >>> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
On 01/14/2016 02:08 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
>
>> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
>>> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
>>> and I can't find any version of it online
>>
>> deb http://ftp.
On 01/13/2016 06:10 PM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Jose Martinez:
Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
mozilla.debian.net repository??
I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
J.
Hmmm...What a novel idea!!
--
Qu
On Thursday 14 January 2016 00:10:17 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Jose Martinez:
> > Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
> > mozilla.debian.net repository??
>
> I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
> http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
You beat me to it,
Jose Martinez:
>
> Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
> mozilla.debian.net repository??
I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
J.
--
When you put a gun to my head you aren't fooling anyone.
[Agree] [Disagree]
On 01/13/2016 05:38 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked t
I really cant thank you all enough :)
On 14 Jan 2016 01:39, "Lisi Reisz" wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
> > On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > > couldn't
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for each package)
On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
You can search for packages here:
On 01/13/2016 02:38 PM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
>Hi there,
>While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
>couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
>spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
>any way, The problem is
On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> > The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> > and I can't find any version of it online
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free
On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> and I can't find any version of it online
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contr
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
and I c
Thank you guys for the fast response. I guess Sven is right. This makes
my problem a 'somebody else's problem' (our webserver admins).
regards
Eugen
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 22:58 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-03-18 21:54 +0100, Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with one
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-03-18 21:54 +0100, Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
I have a problem with one of my private apt repositories. I created
the repo using reprepro on my public www directory.
I can access the repository with my browser (you can find it below
http://www.desy.de/~wintersb/a
On 2013-03-18 21:54 +0100, Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
> I have a problem with one of my private apt repositories. I created
> the repo using reprepro on my public www directory.
> I can access the repository with my browser (you can find it below
> http://www.desy.de/~wintersb/apt/debian ). Aft
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:54:27 +0100
Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
> Hi folks
> I have a problem with one of my private apt repositories. I created
> the repo using reprepro on my public www directory.
> I can access the repository with my browser (you can find it below
> http://www.desy.de/~winter
Hi folks
I have a problem with one of my private apt repositories. I created
the repo using reprepro on my public www directory.
I can access the repository with my browser (you can find it below
http://www.desy.de/~wintersb/apt/debian ). After adding some packages I
tried to add a new line to s
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:52:48 +
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +, Richard wrote:
> > Hi
> > All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
> >
> > Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
> > insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and
> > ove
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +, Richard wrote:
> Hi
> All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
>
> Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
> insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and
> overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'K01vmware' missing LSB tags and over
Hi
All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and
overrides
insserv: warning: script 'K01vmware' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: warning: script 'vmware' missing LSB tags and overrides
Lázaro Morales wrote:
> Err http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release.gpg
> Could not connect to security.debian.org:80 (149.20.20.6). - connect
> (110: Connection timed out) [IP: 149.20.20.6 80]
Is this machine behind some type of firewall that is blocking outbound
connections? Look
Thanks for your replies,
After posting in the mailing list, I tried commenting line containing
debian-volatile, but I get this new error:
Err http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release.gpg
Could not connect to security.debian.org:80 (149.20.20.6). - connect
(110: Connection timed
Hi, ¿do you have debian-volatile in sources.list?
Delete (or comment) that line and try again.
See
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=60268
Greetings,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 02:24:03PM -0400, Lázaro Morales wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After a fresh install of Debian Squeeze I try to update
On Mon 01 Aug 2011 at 14:24:03 -0400, Lázaro Morales wrote:
> After a fresh install of Debian Squeeze I try to update the system's
> packages cache with:
>
> # apt-get update
>
> And I get the following error:
>
> Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/methods/
> Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/
Hello,
After a fresh install of Debian Squeeze I try to update the system's
packages cache with:
# apt-get update
And I get the following error:
Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/methods/
Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/methods/
E: Method has died unexpectedly!
E: Sub-process returne
On Friday 15 April 2011 23:49:24 Christian Jakob wrote:
> Can anyone change status of this post to SOLVED ?!
You can - just add SOLVED to the subject line!! It is usually put at the
beginning.
I have done it for you. It is no more complicated than it is to start the
thread in the first place,
>>There is only one question left:
>>Why did this happen? What could I have done, that these values changed to
>>-1?
>
>I don't know any tool that edits that file. I always edit it with (sudo -e
>/etc/apt/preferences). So, my assumption is that you made the change
>yourself, perhaps without knowing
In <1393449085.44289.1302886728608.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb037>, Christian Jakob
wrote:
>>You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT
>>refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none
>>of your packages have installation candidates.
>>
>>Check /
>You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT
>refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none of
>your packages have installation candidates.
>
>Check /etc/apt/preferences and /etc/apt/preferences.d/*; you've got at least
>on stanza wrong in
In <406058322.9701.1302882000282.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034>, Christian Jakob
wrote:
>root@debian # apt-cache policy
>Package files:
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> release a=now
> -1 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Packages
> release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian-Security,c=c
TO: scot..
>Um, fsck did what?
First there came a WARNING: sd2 is mounted ... blabla
Then something like this:
/dev/sda2: recovering journal
/dev/sda2: clean, ... files, ... blocks
For me this looked like fsck didn't do anything...
But, I think there is no hardwa
On 15/04/11 01:07, Christian Jakob wrote:
> fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
Um, fsck did what?
Did it simply optimise directories - or did the file system need repairing?
Did it test the ability of the drive to retain data - find some sections
where failing and add them to t
On 14/04/11 15:46, Christian Jakob wrote:
>> Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
>> scons and posting the output?
>
> root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package scons.
(Reading database ... 175 901 files and directories cur
(TOFU corrected. In general, this list prefers well-trimmed posts with
replies interleaved or underneath the quoted context. Some prefer top-
posting, but I think everyone with an opinion desires posts to be well-
trimmed.)
In <998647986.2435386.1302844626401.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb033>, Christia
root@debian # apt-get update
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release.gpg
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release
Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex
I
In <1038309152.3627061.1302793651098.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb038>, Christian
Jakob wrote:
>fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
>
>root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
>root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
>Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
>Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
>L
fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
Paket aptitude ist nicht verfügbar, wird aber von einem
>Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
>scons and posting the output?
root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket scons.
(Lese Datenbank ... 175901 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Entpacke scons (aus scons_1.0.0-1_
On 14/04/11 02:59, Christian Jakob wrote:
>> scott@work:~$ python -V
>> Python 2.5.2
>
> this is the same as mine...
>
> root@debian # python -V
> Python 2.5.2
You appear to have all the listed dependancies
>
>> Have you manually installed scons?
>> Did it throw up any errors?
>
> No I d
>Had you temporarily used other repositories around that time?
No, /etc/apt/sources.list~ is empty.
>The dependencies for scons are python... could it be that you have some
>non-standard python on your system??
>Occasionally I've had install problems because I'd forgotten that I'd
>temporarily ma
On 13/04/11 02:26, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
>
>> There's the clue.
>> If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
>> install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
>> about
>
> Yes, I can not remembe
Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
>There's the clue.
>If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
>install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
>about
Yes, I can not remember what I did wrong last time I used Debian.
Maybe it is im
On 12/04/11 15:38, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Good morning,
>
>
> No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/months and not only with this
> package...
There's the clue.
If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something y
akob wrote:
> Hi @all,
>
>
> Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a
> really unusual problem with apt-get.
> I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
> Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date (see below).
&
On 12/04/11 04:48, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Hi @all,
>
>
> Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a
> really unusual problem with apt-get.
> I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
> Internet connection works fine and
Hi @all,
Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a really
unusual problem with apt-get.
I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date (see below).
I think the following lines will help you
Op 13-07-10 19:12, PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
> --Forwarded Message Attachment--
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41 +0200
> From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
>
> PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
>>>&g
From: prakhar_aaid...@hotmail.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:42:21 +0530
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41
+0200
From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41
+0200
From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
>>>You might also add:
>>>export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
>>
>>
PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
You might also add:
export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
Ok.
But now there is a slight problem, when ever I use "sudo apt-get update",
it does not work. but if I become root first, using "su", and then so the same
thing, it works.
I tried closing all the terminals and opening
Dear Liam,
>Probably one of your configuration files was replaced during the upgrade. The
>original will have been preserved with the extension
>.dpkg-old.
I installed the OS again, did not upgrade it.
>You might also add:
>export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
Ok.
But now there is a slight proble
On 2010-07-13, PRAKHAR gaur wrote:
> --_7a55ae90-0232-4da2-b05b-00081b0cad13_
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Dear Liam=2C=20
>
> apt-get used to work before so I was not able to figure out there might be =
> a problem with the p
On 2010-07-13, PRAKHAR gaur wrote:
> --_5b50f58c-d645-427a-a81a-d158616ad201_
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear All=2C
>
> I am using Debian 5.0.5=2C on a x86 machine. The Network is through a DHCP =
> server. For co
Dear All,
I am using Debian 5.0.5, on a x86 machine. The Network is through a DHCP
server. For connection to internet we have a Proxy server.
I was using Debian 5.0.4 on it apt-get used to work fine, but since this new
installation of 5.0.5, there is some problem.
$ sudo apt-get install
* Long Wind [2009-04-01 09:42:23 +0800]:
> When apt-get installs a package
> it will install packages that the package depends
> When I remove the package, the depended packages are not removed.
>
> Is there a command (or a way) to remove the depended packages?
Try with apt-log: http://mavior.e
On 2009-03-31 20:42, Long Wind wrote:
When apt-get installs a package
it will install packages that the package depends
When I remove the package, the depended packages are not removed.
Really? Whenever that happens to me, apt-get suggests that I run
"apt-get autoremove" to delete such packag
* Michael Ekstrand [2009-03-31 21:20:51 -0500]:
> Do be careful, though, that you don't let it remove important things
> that you use :).
Like, all of gnome. I've done that before...
--
Cheers,
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Long Wind writes:
> When apt-get installs a package
> it will install packages that the package depends
> When I remove the package, the depended packages are not removed.
>
> Is there a command (or a way) to remove the depended packages?
Use Aptitude. When Aptitude installs a package, the depen
When apt-get installs a package
it will install packages that the package depends
When I remove the package, the depended packages are not removed.
Is there a command (or a way) to remove the depended packages?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
I'm trying to generate a custom install CD based on Etch. I've set up a
local repository with reprepro, and I've installed and adapted
simple-cdd to my needs.
Everything was working just fine until I decided to include signatures
(Release.gpg files). Now here's the problem.
When
Hi,
I'm trying to generate a custom install CD based on Etch. I've set up a
local repository with reprepro, and I've installed and adapted
simple-cdd to my needs.
Everything was working just fine until I decided to include signatures
(Release.gpg files). Now here's the problem.
When
ists/sarge/Release
>
> Read this too:
>
> http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
> On 09/25/2007 12:49 PM, Steve Lam wrote:
> > I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and
> it
> > bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian
&g
On 09/25/2007 12:49 PM, Steve Lam wrote:
I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn
eb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main
contrib
#deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main
contrib non-free
--- Jeff D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Steve Lam wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and
> it
> > bugs me fo
Cats Preferred Techno.
>
>
> --
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Steve Lam wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and
> it
> > bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian
> with
> > the command 'apt-get update' and it fail
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Steve Lam wrote:
I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn
I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn't help me at all. I've tried apt-s
Full disclosure: This is on my laptop which is running Dapper. While I know that "ubuntu isn't debian", the error is actually coming from dpkg so I think it's relatively appropriate to ask here :)I just tried installing the gpsd package but it apparently had some issues installing. Now any time I
Kaspar Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Liam and Ismael,
>
> Thanks a lot for your answers; I read the article
>
>http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
>
> about apt pinning and set up my /etc/apt/preferences
> according to this -- great.
>
> Also, I used apt-show-versions to f
Liam and Ismael,
Thanks a lot for your answers; I read the article
http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
about apt pinning and set up my /etc/apt/preferences
according to this -- great.
Also, I used apt-show-versions to find the packages from
unstable:
backup:/mnt# apt-get remove gc
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:09:05 +0200
Kaspar Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a very basic problem and would be glad to be pointed into
> the right direction: Some time ago, I installed debian-sarge and
> was forced to install a version of samba that was only available
>
Kaspar Fischer escribe:
> How can I do this, i.e., tell apt-get to uninstall everything
> from unstable and install "the same" packages from the stable
> tree? I currently end up having tons of dependency/etc. problems.
Google for apt pinning. In an ideal world, you can roll back your
system to st
Hi everybody,
I have a very basic problem and would be glad to be pointed into
the right direction: Some time ago, I installed debian-sarge and
was forced to install a version of samba that was only available
in the unstable tree. Now that an updated version is already
available in the stable tre
Am 2006-03-15 13:23:07, schrieb Michael Ott:
> Hello!
>
> I want to install java on my Sarge.
>
> I put the line finding in the Debian Java FAQ and start
> apt-get update.
>
> And i got this error message:
> Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org stable/main Release
> Err ftp://ftp.tux.org stable/non-free
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
