Re: cups problems in bullseye

On Tue, 14 Dec, 2021 at 4:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: To: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Du, 12 dec 21, 11:14:37, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Andy, plz remove your PM when posting to debian-user, firefox makes > it very difficult to put the list address as the To: without starting a new, >

Re: cups problems in bullseye

On Du, 12 dec 21, 11:14:37, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Andy, plz remove your PM when posting to debian-user, firefox makes > it very difficult to put the list address as the To: without starting a new, > blank msg. It puts the list in the Cc: box and will not copy/paste it > to the To: box w/o

Re: Problems upgrading from Debian 10 to 11

On Du, 12 dec 21, 11:25:14, James Dutton wrote: > > I am struggling to understand why debian would not move to the bug > fixed version from upstream xorgxrdp ? > Just to clarify, Debian has picked version 0.2.12 fairly randomly, > without ever testing it. This is rather dismissive of the

Re: BUG: Debian 11 version of bibletime - was [Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:25 PM Richard Owlett wrote: > On 12/13/2021 01:43 PM, Erwan David wrote: > > Le 13/12/2021 à 19:18, Richard Owlett a écrit : > >> [SNIP] > > apt-file search bibletime show that package bibletime-data contains a > > handbook and howto subdirectory in > > > >

Re: BUG: Debian 11 version of bibletime - was [Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:24:31 -0600 Richard Owlett wrote: > > Le 13/12/2021 à 19:18, Richard Owlett a écrit : > >> [SNIP] > > apt-file search bibletime show that package bibletime-data contains > > a handbook and howto subdirectory in > > > > /usr/share/doc/bibletime-data > > NOT TRUE

Re: BUG: Debian 11 version of bibletime - was [Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"]

On Mon 13 Dec 2021 at 19:24:31 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: > On 12/13/2021 01:43 PM, Erwan David wrote: > > Le 13/12/2021 à 19:18, Richard Owlett a écrit : > > > [SNIP] > > apt-file search bibletime show that package bibletime-data > > contains a handbook and howto subdirectory in > > > >

Re: cups problems in bullseye

On Mon, 13 Dec, 2021 at 2:45 PM, Brian wrote: To: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Mon 13 Dec 2021 at 08:44:44 -0800, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec, 2021 at 9:35 AM, Brian > mailto:a...@cityscape.co.uk>> wrote: > >> Let's try a driverless network solution. OK with you? Please give the

Re: BUG: Debian 11 version of bibletime - was [Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"]

On 12/13/2021 01:43 PM, Erwan David wrote: Le 13/12/2021 à 19:18, Richard Owlett a écrit : [SNIP] apt-file search bibletime show that package bibletime-data contains a handbook and howto subdirectory in /usr/share/doc/bibletime-data NOT TRUE when running Debian 11 in southwest Missouri

Re: cups problems in bullseye

On Mon 13 Dec 2021 at 08:44:44 -0800, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec, 2021 at 9:35 AM, Brian wrote: > >> Let's try a driverless network solution. OK with you? Please give the >> output of 'driverleess'. > > ipp://Brother%20MFC-J6920DW._ipp._tcp.local/ > > That's the crippled,

Re: BUG: Debian 11 version of bibletime - was [Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"]

Le 13/12/2021 à 19:18, Richard Owlett a écrit : On 12/13/2021 09:09 AM, Kent West wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:57 AM Richard Owlett wrote: [snip] I installed both programs to the Debian 11 partition of my secondary machine. I ran into two problems. 1. In Xiphos, [snip] 2. Bible Time

Re: BUG: Debian 11 version of bibletime - was [Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"]

On 2021-12-13 1:18 p.m., Richard Owlett wrote: > On 12/13/2021 09:09 AM, Kent West wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:57 AM Richard Owlett >> wrote: >> >>> [snip] >>> >>> I installed both programs to the Debian 11 partition of my secondary

Re: BUG: Debian 11 version of bibletime - was [Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"]

into two problems. 1. In Xiphos, [snip] 2. Bible Time has Help options available via F1, F2, and F3. All report "Module not available". I then installed both programs to the Debian 10 partition to check for "operator error" &/or version differences. As I had t

BUG: Debian 11 version of bibletime - was [Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"]

On 12/13/2021 09:09 AM, Kent West wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:57 AM Richard Owlett wrote: [snip] I installed both programs to the Debian 11 partition of my secondary machine. I ran into two problems. 1. In Xiphos, [snip] 2. Bible Time has Help options available via F1, F2, and F3. All

Re: cups problems in bullseye

On Mon, 13 Dec, 2021 at 9:35 AM, Brian wrote: To: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Sun 12 Dec 2021 at 11:14:37 -0800, Gene Heskett wrote: > I have reconfigured one of the 3 copies cups discovered for ipp-Everywhere > getting this in the printer menu: > > > Description:Brother MFC-J6920DW

Re: Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"

ine. The Xiphos had more desirable > features but was unusable as it defaulted to always displaying the > Strong's number for everything. I found the Debian 11 repository had a > more recent version. > > I installed both programs to the Debian 11 partition of my secondary > mach

Problems with "Bible Time" and "Xiphos"

er for everything. I found the Debian 11 repository had a more recent version. I installed both programs to the Debian 11 partition of my secondary machine. I ran into two problems. 1. In Xiphos, I was not able to download Bible and reference works from the SWORD library. I resorted to using

Re: cups problems in bullseye

On Sun 12 Dec 2021 at 11:14:37 -0800, Gene Heskett wrote: > I have reconfigured one of the 3 copies cups discovered for ipp-Everywhere > getting this in the printer menu: > > > Description:Brother MFC-J6920DW duplex copy Location:coyote.coyote.den > Driver:MFC-J6920DW - IPP Everywhere (color,

cups problems in bullseye

I have reconfigured one of the 3 copies cups discovered for ipp-Everywhere getting this in the printer menu: Description:Brother MFC-J6920DW duplex copy Location:coyote.coyote.den Driver:MFC-J6920DW - IPP Everywhere (color, 2-sided printing)

Re: Problems upgrading from Debian 10 to 11

On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 09:10, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Sb, 11 dec 21, 16:54:04, James Dutton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After upgrading from Debian 10 to Debian 11, xrdp stopped working. > > Someone else has a very good description of the problem here: > > https://c-nergy.be/blog/?p=17113 > > > >

Re: Problems upgrading from Debian 10 to 11

On Sb, 11 dec 21, 16:54:04, James Dutton wrote: > Hi, > > After upgrading from Debian 10 to Debian 11, xrdp stopped working. > Someone else has a very good description of the problem here: > https://c-nergy.be/blog/?p=17113 > > Essentially, the problem is fixed by upgrading xorgxrdp to a version

Re: Problems upgrading from Debian 10 to 11

On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 16:54:04 + James Dutton wrote: > When I compiled the latest xrdp from the latest sources, xrdp worked > again. Please can debian release a more up to date version of > xorgxrdp? You probably ought to file a bug against xrdp. -- Does anybody read signatures any more?

Problems upgrading from Debian 10 to 11

Hi, After upgrading from Debian 10 to Debian 11, xrdp stopped working. Someone else has a very good description of the problem here: https://c-nergy.be/blog/?p=17113 Essentially, the problem is fixed by upgrading xorgxrdp to a version newer than 0.2.12. When I compiled the latest xrdp from the

Re: akonadi - problems and more

On Thu 11 Nov 2021 at 19:53:18 (+0100), Hans wrote: > please apologize if I am too rough and direct. But since the launch of > akonadi > years ago in kmail and other applications, I have the feeling, that the whole > akonadi stuff is far away from the quality of debian. > > So even today,

akonadi - problems and more

Hi folks, please apologize if I am too rough and direct. But since the launch of akonadi years ago in kmail and other applications, I have the feeling, that the whole akonadi stuff is far away from the quality of debian. So even today, there is an issue (which I already files a bug for), that

Re: Problems with an X220 potentially related to linux-4.9.0-16-amd64 update

Christian, Tomas, Thanks for your answers! I've been running 4.9.0-15-amd64 for the last few days and haven't observed anything untoward so far. I guess the next step would be rebooting into 4.9.0-16-amd64 again to verify that it's still the kernel version making the difference. I'll mail my

Re: Problems with an X220 potentially related to linux-4.9.0-16-amd64 update

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 02:53:13PM +0200, Christian Britz wrote: > > > Ivan Krylov wrote: > >Does anyone have any hints on how to diagnose this further? > > > Switching to the old kernel version for some days? Yes, your old kernel should still be around, so it would be easy to select it at the

Re: Problems with an X220 potentially related to linux-4.9.0-16-amd64 update

Ivan Krylov wrote: Does anyone have any hints on how to diagnose this further? Switching to the old kernel version for some days?

Problems with an X220 potentially related to linux-4.9.0-16-amd64 update

rtition, `stress` with -c/-i/-m, some computations I usually work on), but was unable to reproduce any problems. I also tried hibernating and resuming the laptop, which gave me "Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 3c on CPU 0". Not sure if it's related to the current bunch of problems

Re: Upgrade problems?

frank ? >>> >>> Will chown work ? >> >> Also looks like / is not writeable by root, what have you done to your >> system? >> >> Didn't you have directory permissions problems before? A quick search >> throws up https://lists.debian.org/debian-u

Re: Upgrade problems?

hange: 2021-06-27 10:10:28.333447227 -0400 >> Birth: 2021-06-11 13:38:48.0 -0400 >> >> Looks like owned by root but access by frank ? >> >> Will chown work ? > > Also looks like / is not writeable by root, what have you done to your > system? > > Didn't yo

Re: Upgrade problems?

On 7/21/21 12:24 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:04:13PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: frank@fedora ~$ stat /   File: /   Size: 4096    Blocks: 8  IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 806h/2054d  Inode: 2   Links: 18 Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x) 

Re: Upgrade problems?

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 12:57 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:39:49PM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > > > Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: ( 1000/ frank) > > > Actually, access 555 means everyone can Read and Execute, but nobody can > > Update. > > > >

Re: Upgrade problems?

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:39:49PM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: ( 1000/ frank) > Actually, access 555 means everyone can Read and Execute, but nobody can > Update. > > Root usually overrides that, which could explain why it still

Re: Upgrade problems?

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 12:12 PM Frank McCormick wrote: > On 2021-07-21 10:52 a.m., Kushal Kumaran wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 09:26:41 AM, Frank McCormick < > debianl...@videotron.ca> wrote: > >> Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye. > >> > >> > >> Setting

Re: Upgrade problems?

e owned by root but access by frank ? > > Will chown work ? Also looks like / is not writeable by root, what have you done to your system? Didn't you have directory permissions problems before? A quick search throws up https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/10/msg00059.html -- Tixy

Re: Upgrade problems?

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:04:13PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: > frank@fedora ~$ stat / >   File: / >   Size: 4096    Blocks: 8  IO Block: 4096 directory > Device: 806h/2054d  Inode: 2   Links: 18 > Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: ( 1000/

Re: Upgrade problems?

On 2021-07-21 10:52 a.m., Kushal Kumaran wrote: On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 09:26:41 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye. Setting up systemd (247.3-6) ... Detected unsafe path transition / → /run during canonicalization of /run.

Re: Upgrade problems?

On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 09:26:41 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: > Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye. > > > Setting up systemd (247.3-6) ... Detected unsafe path transition / → > /run during canonicalization of /run. Detected unsafe path transition > / → /run during

Upgrade problems?

Got a bunch of strange errors during this morning upgrade of Bullseye. Setting up systemd (247.3-6) ... Detected unsafe path transition / → /run during canonicalization of /run. Detected unsafe path transition / → /run during canonicalization of /run/lock. Detected unsafe path transition /

Re: Docker installation problems [Solved]

I reinstalled using the docker.com instructions and it works. I also installed Portainer. It also works. I appreciate all of the help. Now all I have to do is learn to use it. Thanks again. Gary R On 7/8/21 10:44 AM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: On 7/8/21 6:48 PM, Gary L. Roach wrote: On

Re: Docker installation problems

On 7/8/21 6:48 PM, Gary L. Roach wrote: On 7/7/21 4:43 PM, IL Ka wrote: I suspect that something might be wrong with the /etc/apt/daemon.json file but am not sure what. try # dockerd https://docs.docker.com/config/daemon/#start-the-daemon-manually

Re: Docker installation problems

On 7/8/2021 6:48 PM, Gary L. Roach wrote: On 7/7/21 4:43 PM, IL Ka wrote:     I suspect that something might be wrong with the /etc/apt/daemon.json     file but am not sure what. try # dockerd https://docs.docker.com/config/daemon/#start-the-daemon-manually

Re: Docker installation problems

> > failed to create API server: Could not load X509 key pair (cert: > "/var/docker/server.pem", key: "/var/docker/serverkey.pem"): open > /var/docker/server.pem: no such file or directory > > On my system the /var/docker directory doesn't exist. Further, server.pem > doesn't exist anywhere on my

Re: Docker installation problems

On 7/7/21 4:43 PM, IL Ka wrote: I suspect that something might be wrong with the /etc/apt/daemon.json file but am not sure what. try # dockerd https://docs.docker.com/config/daemon/#start-the-daemon-manually Do you

Re: Docker installation problems

> > I suspect that something might be wrong with the /etc/apt/daemon.json > file but am not sure what. > > try # dockerd https://docs.docker.com/config/daemon/#start-the-daemon-manually Do you see any errors?

Docker installation problems

Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 10 KDE Plasma Version: 5.14.5 Qt Version: 5.11.3 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.54.0 Kernel Version: 4.19.0-17-amd64 OS Type: 64-bit Processors: 4 × AMD FX(tm)-4350 Quad-Core Processor Memory: 15.6 GiB of RAM Hi All, I'm still having installation problems

Re: Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

Hi, you can run Debian on Virtualbox, but WSL is integrate in Windows, you can run application from app menu.

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

> > > > Is WSL a hard requirement? As far as I know Debian runs quite well in > Virtualbox (make sure you install the guest additions). > Yes, I use it alot) It also runs well on the Hyper-V (which is a part of Windows), just make sure to disable secure boot in VM.

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On Ma, 29 iun 21, 09:28:00, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > First, let me assure the list that I am not trying to ignite a flame war. > > > > I have a legitimate reason for installing Debian Buster on my Windows 10 > laptop using Windows Subsystem Linux and X410. I have a very important >

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

Hi, On 2021-06-30 4:32 a.m., Curt wrote: > On 2021-06-29, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >> >> The Application Manager Logout function will only allow Logout; Restart and >> Shutdown are grayed out. > > ... > >> On the System level, clicking on the Synaptic Package Manager entry in the >> pulldown

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On 2021-06-29, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > The Application Manager Logout function will only allow Logout; Restart and > Shutdown are grayed out. ... > On the System level, clicking on the Synaptic Package Manager entry in the > pulldown manual does not open the app; sudo synaptic in the

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

past, and would prefer not to > >>> do so to solve the problems > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>  - juz sayin'  : some years back , i had need for a Windows > >> program : put Virtual-Box on Linux desktop :

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On 6/29/2021 9:07 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: On 06/29/2021 12:46 PM, ellanios82 wrote: On 6/29/21 6:36 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: have dual booted platforms in the past, and would prefer not to do so to solve the problems  - juz sayin'  : some years back , i had need

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On 2021-06-29 16:36, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: Thanks for the reply. I have dual booted platforms in the past, and would prefer not to do so to solve the problems. You could get another laptop the same and velcro them together. To use the windows program turn it over. With a short bit of RJ45

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

Hi, On 2021-06-29 3:22 p.m., Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > I'm replying, without copying the list.  The program is GWOVina written > by Shirley W. I. Shu and her research Group at the University of Macau. > Shirley has been very helpful to me in getting her program up and > running om my Linux

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On 06/29/2021 12:46 PM, ellanios82 wrote: On 6/29/21 6:36 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: have dual booted platforms in the past, and would prefer not to do so to solve the problems - juz sayin' : some years back , i had need for a Windows program : put Virtual-Box on Linux desktop

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

Hi, On 2021-06-29 9:28 a.m., Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > First, let me assure the list that I am not trying to ignite a flame war. > >   > > I have a legitimate reason for installing Debian Buster on my Windows 10 > laptop using Windows Subsystem Linux and X410. I have a very important >

RE: Buster on Win 10 Problems

-Original Message- From: ellanios82 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 12:46 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems On 6/29/21 6:36 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > have dual booted platforms in the past, and would prefer not to do so > to

RE: Buster on Win 10 Problems

-Original Message- From: to...@tuxteam.de Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 12:43 PM To: Stephen P. Molnar Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:39:59AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > On 06/29/2021 11:12 AM,

RE: Buster on Win 10 Problems

-Original Message- From: David Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 12:39 PM To: debian-user Subject: Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 23:28, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > I have a very important application for my Computational Chemistry > research program th

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On 6/29/21 6:36 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: have dual booted platforms in the past, and would prefer not to do so to solve the problems .  - juz sayin'  : some years back , i had need for a Windows program : put Virtual-Box on Linux desktop : result was Alfa-Alfa-Perfect

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:39:59AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > On 06/29/2021 11:12 AM, Marco M�ller wrote: > >On 29.06.21 15:28, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: [...] > >I suppose you are using the WSL2. > >When I recently have had a look at it, the first mayor thing of > >importance

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 23:28, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > I have a very important application for my Computational Chemistry > research program that has never been ported to Linux. 1) Do you have the source code? 2) Does it require a graphical user interface? 3) What language is it written in?

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

> > I've never had much luck with emulations/APIs. I gave up on wine (maybe > it's better now) because so many things nearly worked. I've had trouble > with virtual machines with getting good enough access to the hardware. > > WSL-2 is not an emulator but a real virtual machine that runs Linux

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:36:48 -0400 "Stephen P. Molnar" wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I have dual booted platforms in the past, and would prefer not to do > so to solve the problems. > > These problems are not show stoppers, but rather annoying. > >

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:36:48AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I have dual booted platforms in the past, and would prefer not to do so to > solve the problems. > > These problems are not show stoppers, but rather annoying. > > On 06/29/202

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

have a very important application for my Computational Chemistry research program that has never been ported to Linux. After much thrashing about and hair pulling (little enough to begin with) I succeeded. However, there are several problems, minor but annoying. I�m using the xfe4 desktop

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

Thanks for the reply. I have dual booted platforms in the past, and would prefer not to do so to solve the problems. These problems are not show stoppers, but rather annoying. On 06/29/2021 10:29 AM, Peter Ehlert wrote: Have you investigated the possibility of Dual Booting? it's a bit

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

Computational Chemistry research program that has never been ported to Linux. After much thrashing about and hair pulling (little enough to begin with) I succeeded. However, there are several problems, minor but annoying. I’m using the xfe4 desktop. The Application Manager Logout function will only

Re: Buster on Win 10 Problems

, there are several problems, minor but annoying. I’m using the xfe4 desktop. The Application Manager Logout function will only allow Logout; Restart and Shutdown are grayed out. On the System level, clicking on the Synaptic Package Manager entry in the pulldown manual  does not open the app; sudo

Buster on Win 10 Problems

been ported to Linux. After much thrashing about and hair pulling (little enough to begin with) I succeeded. However, there are several problems, minor but annoying. I'm using the xfe4 desktop. The Application Manager Logout function will only allow Logout; Restart and Shutdown

Re: Thunderbird problems

On 6/15/21 8:05 AM, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: On 15.06.2021 06:46, Robbi Nespu wrote: On 6/15/21 6:24 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: ... I didn't had any issues with Thunderbird before and after update. It works normally as usual. I think, the root cause for this issue could be elsewhere.

Re: Thunderbird problems

On 15.06.2021 06:46, Robbi Nespu wrote: On 6/15/21 6:24 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: The latest version of Thunderbird which was updated recently is giving me problems connecting to gmail. How can I downgrade Thunderbird on this machine? I am running Bullseye Let me guess, you unable

Re: Thunderbird problems

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:22:41 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: > I filed a bug report with Mozilla. Perhaps I should do the same with Debian? Of course, Mozilla cannot solve Debian bugs and it looks like the bug is from Debian. It is possible the bug is from Thunderburd (not Mozilla as Thunderbird

Re: Thunderbird problems

On 6/14/21 9:46 PM, Robbi Nespu wrote: On 6/15/21 6:24 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: The latest version of Thunderbird which was updated recently is giving me problems connecting to gmail. How can I downgrade Thunderbird on this machine? I am running Bullseye Let me guess, you unable

Re: Thunderbird problems

On 6/15/21 6:24 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: The latest version of Thunderbird which was updated recently is giving me problems connecting to gmail. How can I downgrade Thunderbird on this machine? I am running Bullseye Let me guess, you unable to connect imap and smtp right? I having

Thunderbird problems

The latest version of Thunderbird which was updated recently is giving me problems connecting to gmail. How can I downgrade Thunderbird on this machine? I am running Bullseye -- Frank McCormick

Re: Problems opening Linuxquestions link [WAS Re: Attempt to use the chipset NVIDIA Corp MCP79 [GeForce 8200M G] (rev b1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) with Dix. Teacher-Guide, Mr. Felix Miata]

gt; thread please? >> > Pasting that link into Google Search found it for me with no particular > problems - Felix Miata talking to a Jeremy Ardley about similar problems, > I think and how to sort out driver issues. > Are you sure? I cannot access it through Google from my side and

Problems opening Linuxquestions link [WAS Re: Attempt to use the chipset NVIDIA Corp MCP79 [GeForce 8200M G] (rev b1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) with Dix. Teacher-Guide, Mr. Felix Miata]

> > > A visit to the following may prove fruitful moving forward: > > <https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/blog/mrmazda-1035595/amd-intel-and-nvidia-x-graphics-driver-primer-38306/> > [...] > > But the website requires creation of an account in order for me to > read the post. I wou

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

granted you was at the address you were expecting. Gruß Gott Here is an changelog > https://en.avm.de/fritz-lab/fresh-from-development/updates-improvements/ > > > *Improved *- Update process more robust for potential DNS problems > Or here in the German changelog > > https:/

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

will reply to this mail if the problem will reoccur. Here is an changelog https://en.avm.de/fritz-lab/fresh-from-development/updates-improvements/ *Improved *- Update process more robust for potential DNS problems Or here in the German changelog https://avm.de/service/downloads/update-news

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On 3/31/21 3:22 PM, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, 8:08 AM Moritz Kempe > wrote: On 3/31/21 1:55 PM, Lee wrote: > On 3/31/21, Moritz Kempe mailto:deblist%2bdeb...@moke12g.de>> wrote: >> On 3/31/21 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, 8:08 AM Moritz Kempe wrote: > On 3/31/21 1:55 PM, Lee wrote: > > On 3/31/21, Moritz Kempe wrote: > >> On 3/31/21 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Moritz Kempe wrote: > -- Firefox Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site.

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On 3/31/21 2:44 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Moritz Kempe wrote: grep ^hosts: /etc/nsswitch.conf -- hosts:  files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mymachines I don't know what "mymachines" is. I don't see it in the man page. What happens if

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On 3/31/21 1:55 PM, Lee wrote: On 3/31/21, Moritz Kempe wrote: On 3/31/21 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Moritz Kempe wrote: -- Firefox Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site. We can’t connect to the server at github.com. -- Chromium This site

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Moritz Kempe wrote: > > grep ^hosts: /etc/nsswitch.conf > -- > hosts:  files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mymachines I don't know what "mymachines" is. I don't see it in the man page. What happens if you get rid of the "mymachines" field?

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On 3/31/21, Moritz Kempe wrote: > On 3/31/21 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Moritz Kempe wrote: >>> -- Firefox Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site. We can’t >>> connect to the server at github.com. >>> -- Chromium This site can’t be reachedCheck

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On 3/31/21 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Moritz Kempe wrote: -- Firefox Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site. We can’t connect to the server at github.com. -- Chromium This site can’t be reachedCheck if there is a typo in github.com.

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Moritz Kempe wrote: > -- Firefox > Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site. > > We can’t connect to the server at github.com. > -- Chromium > This site can’t be reachedCheck if there is a typo in github.com. > DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN >

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

haven't mentioned it because it, doesn't seemed like there was any connection between these changes. On all other devices this works just fine. And even when i change my dns server to the default one, the raspberry pi still has these problems. (I tested this before i wrote the first mail) Those DNS

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

haven't mentioned it because it, doesn't seemed like there was any connection between these changes. On all other devices this works just fine. And even when i change my dns server to the default one, the raspberry pi still has these problems. (I tested this before i wrote the first mail) Those DNS

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

Moritz Kempe wrote: [...] > I noticed the problem, while i was browsing the internet and got confused > because after a while some domains could not longer be found/connected to by > the browser. (On both, Firefox and Chromium) I had similar issues, when I changed DNS configuration at my DSL

Re: DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, 5:33 PM Moritz Kempe wrote: > Hello, > > since i upgraded my Raspberry Pi 400 (with regular Debian 10, not > Raspberry PI OS) to the latest buster version, i am experiencing > problems with dns, which i cannot replicate with any of my other devices > (De

DNS problems on Raspberry Pi 400 (Debian 10.9)

Hello, since i upgraded my Raspberry Pi 400 (with regular Debian 10, not Raspberry PI OS) to the latest buster version, i am experiencing problems with dns, which i cannot replicate with any of my other devices (Debian Stretch amd64 workstation, Debian Buster amd64 server, Raspberry Pi 3b

Re: bluetooth problems Cambridge Silicon Radio

d. Are you using it on USB3 port? Is it a LE device? there are rumors that both were causing problems?

Re: bluetooth problems Cambridge Silicon Radio

On 26/3/21 8:33 am, deloptes wrote: Jeremy Ardley wrote: Mar 25 15:30:46 client.bronzemail.com kernel: usb 1-3.2: new full-speed USB device number 7 using xhci_hcd Mar 25 15:30:47 client.bronzemail.com kernel: usb 1-3.2: New USB device found, idVendor=0a12, idProduct=0001, bcdDevice=88.91 Mar

Re: bluetooth problems Cambridge Silicon Radio

Jeremy Ardley wrote: > Mar 25 15:30:46 client.bronzemail.com kernel: usb 1-3.2: new full-speed > USB device number 7 using xhci_hcd > Mar 25 15:30:47 client.bronzemail.com kernel: usb 1-3.2: New USB device > found, idVendor=0a12, idProduct=0001, bcdDevice=88.91 > Mar 25 15:30:47

Re: bluetooth problems Cambridge Silicon Radio

On 25/3/21 3:18 pm, deloptes wrote: Jeremy Ardley wrote: sudo rfkill ID TYPE  DEVICE  SOFT  HARD 2 bluetooth hci0   unblocked unblocked what says dmesg -T when you plugin the dongle? what says syslog (journalctl)? sudo dmesg -T [Thu Mar 25 15:30:43 2021] usb 1-3.2: USB

Re: bluetooth problems Cambridge Silicon Radio

Jeremy Ardley wrote: > sudo rfkill > ID TYPE  DEVICE  SOFT  HARD > 2 bluetooth hci0   unblocked unblocked what says dmesg -T when you plugin the dongle? what says syslog (journalctl)?

Re: bluetooth problems Cambridge Silicon Radio

On 25/3/21 2:45 pm, deloptes wrote: Jeremy Ardley wrote: Bus 001 Device 006: ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode) these are widely spread I have the same (at least from the usb id) Bus 002 Device 004: ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >