Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> Bus 001 Device 006: ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth
> Dongle (HCI mode)
these are widely spread I have the same (at least from the usb id)
Bus 002 Device 004: ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth
Dongle (HCI mode)
what says rfkill list
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:05:19 +0800
Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> lsusb
...
> Bus 001 Device 006: ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd
> Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)
It doesn't hurt to search on the word Linux and the USB ID:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=linux+0a12:0001
That should give you some
I've just got a new bluetooth dongle that says V5.0 on the case. I think
it uses Cambridge Silicon Radio
lsusb
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0c45:6340 Microdia Camera
Bus 003 Device 002: ID 1a86:7523 QinHeng Electronics HL-340 USB-Serial
connected
to the same network without you having a very specific reason for doing
so and the knowledge to make it happen correctly, then you are asking
for problems.
$ nmcli d show
GENERAL.DEVICE: enp0s25
GENERAL.TYPE: ethernet
GENERAL.HWADDR
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 02:44:37PM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> I tried removing the 192.168.0.1 line along with the "search telus"
> line. I didn't notice any difference, but could this be because
> this stuff is buffered somewhere? Perhaps I need to kick something
> to make sure the new file
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:13:20 -0400
Cmdte Alpha Tigre Z wrote:
> El mié, 24 mar 2021 a las 10:45, Andrei POPESCU
> () escribió:
> >
> > On Mi, 24 mar 21, 10:34:54, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:24:28AM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 24/03/2021 05:32,
On 24/03/2021 12:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:20:23PM +, pioruns2019 wrote:
You can use DNS Benchmark by Steve Gibson, written like 20 years ago in
assembly language. This will test your various DNS configurations and
diagnose them:
Or, you could simply run
dig
Further to my 20-30 second delay when firing up slrnpull:
Here are some of your responses and my replies:
On Wed Mar 24 13:08:20 2021 wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:32:27PM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> [contents of /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/resolv.conf]
>> # Generated by
El mié, 24 mar 2021 a las 10:45, Andrei POPESCU
() escribió:
>
> On Mi, 24 mar 21, 10:34:54, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:24:28AM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24/03/2021 05:32, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > # Generated by NetworkManager
> > >
On 3/23/21 10:32 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
I read Usenet (including this mailing list via the newsgroup
linux.debian.user) on my laptop. so I can keep up from anywhere.
It works well, but at home it takes 20 or 30 seconds to connect
to my NNTP server, newsguy.com. If I take my laptop to the
On Mi, 24 mar 21, 10:34:54, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:24:28AM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> >
> > On 24/03/2021 05:32, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > # Generated by NetworkManager
> > > search telus
> > > nameserver 192.168.0.1
> > > nameserver 75.153.171.122
>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:20:23PM +, pioruns2019 wrote:
> You can use DNS Benchmark by Steve Gibson, written like 20 years ago in
> assembly language. This will test your various DNS configurations and
> diagnose them:
>
> https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm
>
> Use Wine to run it.
>
>
You can use DNS Benchmark by Steve Gibson, written like 20 years ago in
assembly language. This will test your various DNS configurations and
diagnose them:
https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm
Use Wine to run it.
wine DNSBench.exe
It will tell you what's wrong, if anything, with your DNS
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:24:28AM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> On 24/03/2021 05:32, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
[...]
> > # Generated by NetworkManager
> > search telus
> > nameserver 192.168.0.1
> > nameserver 75.153.171.122
> > nameserver 2001:568:ff09:10a::56
> > # NOTE: the libc resolver may
On 24/03/2021 05:32, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> I read Usenet (including this mailing list via the newsgroup
> linux.debian.user) on my laptop. so I can keep up from anywhere.
> It works well, but at home it takes 20 or 30 seconds to connect
> to my NNTP server, newsguy.com. If I take my laptop to
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:32:27PM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> I read Usenet (including this mailing list via the newsgroup
> linux.debian.user) on my laptop. so I can keep up from anywhere.
> It works well, but at home it takes 20 or 30 seconds to connect
> to my NNTP server, newsguy.com. If I
On 3/24/2021 6:32 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
I read Usenet (including this mailing list via the newsgroup
linux.debian.user) on my laptop. so I can keep up from anywhere.
It works well, but at home it takes 20 or 30 seconds to connect
to my NNTP server, newsguy.com. If I take my laptop to the
I read Usenet (including this mailing list via the newsgroup
linux.debian.user) on my laptop. so I can keep up from anywhere.
It works well, but at home it takes 20 or 30 seconds to connect
to my NNTP server, newsguy.com. If I take my laptop to the office
and run slrnpull there, it connects
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:26:06AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 14:35:54, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > > On
On Mi, 10 mar 21, 08:49:06, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> Looking at /usr/share/doc/systemd/README.Debian prompts me to ask:
> "What logs might be created when attempting to run a netinst.iso?"
The Debian Installation Guide should have more information on the
Installer's logs and where they are to
On 03/10/2021 07:29 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 10 mar 21, 04:26:06, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
The boot process has three major stages.
1. POST: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power-on_self-test
2. Bootloader (grub, etc.)
3. Operating System (in
On Mi, 10 mar 21, 04:26:06, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > The boot process has three major stages.
> >
> > 1. POST: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power-on_self-test
> > 2. Bootloader (grub, etc.)
> > 3. Operating System (in this case Debian)
> >
>
On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 09 mar 21, 14:35:54, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
before chasing down this rabbit
On Ma, 09 mar 21, 14:35:54, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote:
> > > > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > before chasing down this rabbit hole, see
On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an
upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports
site (for your
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 15:00:07 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote:
> > > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an
> > > upgrade for your current
On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:57:47 +0200
Anssi Saari wrote:
> Richard Owlett writes:
>
> > The more I think about my observed symptoms, it would seem logical
> > to be kernel related.
> >
> > If the Linkzone is physically connected when PC is turned on, the
> > boot process will hang until the
On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote:
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an
> > upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports
> > site (for your processor and distribution
Richard Owlett writes:
> The more I think about my observed symptoms, it would seem logical to
> be kernel related.
>
> If the Linkzone is physically connected when PC is turned on, the boot
> process will hang until the Linkzone is disconnected.
I have a guess then. Maybe the Linkzone comes up
On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an
upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports
site (for your processor and distribution type). i just
had an issue with a new device not being recognized and
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
> If it's a kernel issue, I'll just wait for Debian 11. I had essentially
> tried the 10.8 netinst to get instant gratification of moving from 32 to
> 64 bits in one day rather than one week.
certainly understandable. :) hope it works well for you!
songbird
On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an
upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports
site (for your processor and distribution type). i just
had an issue with a new device not being recognized and
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an
upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports
site (for your processor and distribution type). i just
had an issue with a new device not being recognized and
updated my kernel (for stretch) and it worked
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 06:06:17AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/03/2021 09:22 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 .
> > I've wish to install 64 bit flavor on a second machine.
> > debian-10.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso was successfully downloaded
On 03/03/2021 09:22 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 .
I've wish to install 64 bit flavor on a second machine.
debian-10.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso was successfully downloaded & saved.
It was copied to a USB flash drive and installation attempted.
On Sat 06 Mar 2021 at 11:46:33 (+), Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Looking at the threads from you over the last year+: I think I see a common
> pattern.
>
> * You're the person that buys DVD sets from [somewhere] to install from, I
> think
Thats right.
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 21:47:25 +
Joe wrote:
...
> If it's user-installed non-free firmware for network interfaces, that is
> the state of manufacturing today: we're back to Winmodems and you're
> stuck with it. I have one of the last netbooks to come with an Ethernet
> port. A USB-Ethernet
>
> I'm not sure what protocol would be running over the USB2 interface - maybe
> PPTP - equivalent to some of the dial-up protocols.
>
A small note: PPTP works on top of IP, it is a VPN protocol.
It encapsulates PPP protocol (which I believe you were talking about).
PPP can run IP over
up front and it's a defined goal - we can break
> > it into steps]
>
> That problem was solved long ago. Its called Synaptic.
>
Just checked: Synaptic is maintained :)
> >
> > 4. ** Will it need to dual boot another OS eventually **
>
> It will be mu
eventually **
It will be multiboot from the start. I've been doing that with no
problems since Squeeze.
5. Give it a friendly name we can refer back to in subsequent exchanges :-)
"Dell" as it is the only Dell laptop I own. My other machines are
ThinkPads and one custom ordered desktop
like WiFi?
It does not have any benefit and I see it as a potential gross security
chasm. It's not worth any effort to use.
* You have more than one machine such that references to them get confusing.
I've only referred to more than one machine to demonstrate that my
problems are machine i
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 22:46, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Looking at the threads from you over the last year+:
> I think I see a common pattern.
This has been going on since 2015 or so.
> Given that we can't actually sit by your side to do this: answers to some of
> these in order may help us
Hi Richard,
Looking at the threads from you over the last year+: I think I see a common
pattern.
* You're the person that buys DVD sets from [somewhere] to install from, I
think
* You have issues with the install processes
* You're prepared to stick to old software that works but have
On Mon 01 Feb 2021 at 06:46:40 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have just installed Debian 10.7 to my Lenovo T510 Thinkpad having
> copied debian-10.7.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso to a flash drive [the machine is
> intentionally isolated from the internet].
So you have a 10.7 amd64 DVD available.
On Wed
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 21:47:25 +
Joe wrote:
> In the beginning, the problem was inability to write an .iso to a USB
> stick or to use Google. Since then, things seem to have evolved. There
> are too many posts in this thread to read each one of yours to see
> what is currently the problem, and
On 03/05/2021 03:47 PM, Joe wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:12:50 -0600
Richard Owlett wrote:
Please PLEASE *PLEASE* read what I *ACTUALLY* wrote
!!! *BEFORE* replying to what you WISH I had written !
In the beginning, the problem was inability to write an .iso to a USB
stick or to use
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:12:50 -0600
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Please PLEASE *PLEASE* read what I *ACTUALLY* wrote
> !!! *BEFORE* replying to what you WISH I had written !
>
>
In the beginning, the problem was inability to write an .iso to a USB
stick or to use Google. Since then, things seem
Please PLEASE *PLEASE* read what I *ACTUALLY* wrote
!!! *BEFORE* replying to what you WISH I had written !
On 3/5/21 4:09 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/04/2021 04:46 PM, David Christensen wrote:
2. I _actively_ abhor activating *any* WiFi device. [long OT story]
My system currently has [from image of DVD1]:
1. Debian 10.0 with minimum default configuration of MATE.
That is a security
On Friday 05 March 2021 03:14:51 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:33:14AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > AIUI compilers have been studied so extensively that their
> > > production is largely automated.
> >
> > Oh, no. There are some parts we know how to automate, but by
On 03/04/2021 04:46 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 3/4/21 4:27 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
What I do now is make yet another attempt to convey my problem.
My universe consists of:
1. myself.
2. a laptop onto which I wish to install Debian using a netinst.iso .
3. an Alcatel Linkzone
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:33:14AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > AIUI compilers have been studied so extensively that their production is
> > largely automated.
>
> Oh, no. There are some parts we know how to automate, but by and large
> it's all hand written code.
:-)
> AIUI compilers have been studied so extensively that their production is
> largely automated.
Oh, no. There are some parts we know how to automate, but by and large
it's all hand written code.
> Create an EBNF specification, feed it through a tool
> chain (lex, yacc, cc, as, ld, etc.), and
On 3/4/21 9:28 PM, David Christensen wrote:
(One more step of 'cT = cT(a)' may be required
Correction: cT = cT(T)
David
On 3/4/21 6:50 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The abstract states:
"In the DDC technique, source code is compiled twice: once with a
second (trusted) compiler (using the source code of the compiler’s
parent), and then the compiler source code is compiled using the
result of the first compilation.
> The abstract states:
>
> "In the DDC technique, source code is compiled twice: once with a
> second (trusted) compiler (using the source code of the compiler’s
> parent), and then the compiler source code is compiled using the
> result of the first compilation. If the result is
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 23:34:25 +0100
wrote:
>
> Yes, but... letting your compiler plant bugs into someone else's
> software to phone back to *you*... chutzpah. Had to be Microsoft.
>
>
Not necessarily, nearly all writers of Windows software believe that
they own your computer while their
On 3/4/21 4:27 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
What I do now is make yet another attempt to convey my problem.
My universe consists of:
1. myself.
2. a laptop onto which I wish to install Debian using a netinst.iso .
3. an Alcatel Linkzone sold me by T-Mobile, my ISP.
T-Mobile
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 05:18:38PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > The part that I find more interesting is the "emergent evil" thing.
> > Somehow the techies found that it is OK to do that and they did,
> > in the best of their intentions.
>
> I'm not surprised: it's quite common to want to get
On 3/4/21 12:43 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Read David A. Wheeler's work [1] and put yourself in the 2010s :-)
> [1] https://dwheeler.com/trusting-trust/
The abstract states:
"In the DDC technique, source code is compiled twice: once with a
second (trusted) compiler (using the
> The part that I find more interesting is the "emergent evil" thing.
> Somehow the techies found that it is OK to do that and they did,
> in the best of their intentions.
I'm not surprised: it's quite common to want to get some kind of
information about how your program performs (i.e. things
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:05:38 +0100
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 11:16:25AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
...
> > I know I can't avoid the risk
> > entirely, but this is one of the reasons I try hard to limit my use of
> > software to stuff in the repos. I understand it's no magic
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 11:16:25AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
[...]
> > - Sometime 2017 [1], Microsoft put out a version of Visual Studio
> > which baked "phone home" functionality into its compiled "products".
[...]
> > I call this pattern "Emergent Evil".
>
> Outrageous, certainly - this
On Thu 04 Mar 2021 at 06:27:30 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/03/2021 09:22 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 .
> > I've wish to install 64 bit flavor on a second machine.
> > debian-10.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso was successfully downloaded &
Hey, bathroom scales are something (I think) I am qualified to talk about, at
least from the POV of a user ;-)
On Thursday, March 04, 2021 10:05:29 AM Joe wrote:
> On a rather smaller scale, my electronic bathroom scale has a feature
> whereby if a person gets back onto the scale within thirty
Richard Owlett composed on 2021-03-04 05:54 (UTC-0600):
> David Christensen wrote:
>> I think 90% of the OP's problems stem from the fact that he does not
>> have good Internet service.
> I'
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:14:08 +0100
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:21:46AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:17:59 +0100
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:10:45AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
> > > > Joe wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:05:29 +
Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:10:45 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
> > Joe wrote:
...
> > > Indeed. The new heartbeat/data return function in OpenSSL, itself
> > > the core of much Open Source security, was suggested by
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:21:46AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:17:59 +0100
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:10:45AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
> > > Joe wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > Undoubtedly. But there is also no doubt
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:10:45 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Undoubtedly. But there is also no doubt that gcc and every other
> > serious compiler in the West has been compromised. Why would they
> > *not* be?
>
> Do you have any evidence
oor?
> Assunto: Re: Trusting trust [was: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems]
> De: to...@tuxteam.de
> Enviado em: 4 de março de 2021 10:18
> Para: cele...@gmail.com
> Cópia: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:10:45AM -0500, Celejar wrote: &g
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:17:59 +0100
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:10:45AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Undoubtedly. But there is also no doubt that gcc and every other
> > > serious compiler in the West has been
I discover it on October 2019 nobody listen to me
Enviado via UOL Mail
Assunto: Re: Trusting trust [was: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems]
De: to...@tuxteam.de
Enviado em: 4 de março de 2021 10:18
Para: cele...@gmail.com
Cópia: debian-user
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:10:45AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Undoubtedly. But there is also no doubt that gcc and every other
> > serious compiler in the West has been compromised. Why would they *not*
> > be?
>
> Do you have any
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
Joe wrote:
...
> Undoubtedly. But there is also no doubt that gcc and every other
> serious compiler in the West has been compromised. Why would they *not*
> be?
Do you have any evidence for this, or is it just your assumption,
because "why would they not be?"
On 03/04/2021 06:27 AM, Tixy wrote:
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 05:54 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
3. an Alcatel Linkzone sold me by T-Mobile, my ISP.
T-Mobile erroneously ASSUMES that *all* customers will use it as a
WiFi Hotspot to create a LAN of up to 15 devices.
I,
On 03/03/2021 09:22 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 .
I've wish to install 64 bit flavor on a second machine.
debian-10.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso was successfully downloaded & saved.
It was copied to a USB flash drive and installation attempted.
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 05:54 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
>3. an Alcatel Linkzone sold me by T-Mobile, my ISP.
> T-Mobile erroneously ASSUMES that *all* customers will use it as a
> WiFi Hotspot to create a LAN of up to 15 devices.
> I, however, disable the WiFi as that
something like apt-offline?
This is related to my recent reply to a fork of this thread. You
want a LAN. The residential gateways provided by internet service
providers typically include Wi-Fi and 4 Gigabit ports, which is
sufficient for a small LAN.
I think 90% of the OP's problems stem from the fact
On 2021-03-04 09:41, Joe wrote:
Of course. Any externally-supplied network device is inherently
untrusted. It is unwise to give any IoT device access to your network,
it is fail-safe to assume that every such device reports back as much
as possible to some Chinese company.
Most certainly. The
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:43:57 +0100
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:42:36PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > So, you designed, built, and programmed your "single other machine"
> > using machines that you designed, built [...]
>
> This is disingenuous.
>
> The whole game
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:08:40PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thompson.pdf
>
> Not sure how this is relevant. This is like talking about the security
> of locks when the other guy is openly telling you he has a copy of
> the key.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:42:36PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
[...]
> So, you designed, built, and programmed your "single other machine"
> using machines that you designed, built [...]
This is disingenuous.
The whole game is about trust. I trust gcc more than I trust MSVC.
That may be a
> https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thompson.pdf
Not sure how this is relevant. This is like talking about the security
of locks when the other guy is openly telling you he has a copy of
the key.
Stefan
On 3/3/21 6:43 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Or, get Internet service that includes a modem/ gateway with an Ethernet
port. This is probably the best answer in the long run.
Unless that modem/gateway is under the control of the ISP, in which case
you're fundamentally inviting your ISP onto your
>>> Or, get Internet service that includes a modem/ gateway with an Ethernet
>>> port. This is probably the best answer in the long run.
>> Unless that modem/gateway is under the control of the ISP, in which case
>> you're fundamentally inviting your ISP onto your local network, IOW into
>> your
On 3/3/21 1:53 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Or, get Internet service that includes a modem/ gateway with an Ethernet
port. This is probably the best answer in the long run.
Unless that modem/gateway is under the control of the ISP, in which case
you're fundamentally inviting your ISP onto your
ided by internet service
> providers typically include Wi-Fi and 4 Gigabit ports, which is
> sufficient for a small LAN.
I think 90% of the OP's problems stem from the fact that he does not
have good Internet service. In fact, I get the impression of dial-up.
I would expect that if
> Or, get Internet service that includes a modem/ gateway with an Ethernet
> port. This is probably the best answer in the long run.
Unless that modem/gateway is under the control of the ISP, in which case
you're fundamentally inviting your ISP onto your local network, IOW into
your private
On 3/3/21 7:36 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/03/2021 08:35 AM, David Christensen wrote:
On 3/3/21 1:24 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
2. I'm pushing at my data cap {including unused from previous months}.
Have you considered setting up a local package proxy server? I used
approx(8) in the
On 3/3/21 7:22 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 .
I've wish to install 64 bit flavor on a second machine.
debian-10.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso was successfully downloaded & saved.
It was copied to a USB flash drive and installation attempted.
Only did
On 03/03/2021 08:35 AM, David Christensen wrote:
On 3/3/21 1:24 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
2. I'm pushing at my data cap {including unused from previous months}.
Have you considered setting up a local package proxy server? I used
approx(8) in the past, and believe there are other choices:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 06:35:00 -0800
David Christensen wrote:
> On 3/3/21 1:24 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > 2. I'm pushing at my data cap {including unused from previous months}.
>
> Have you considered setting up a local package proxy server? I used
> approx(8) in the past, and believe
I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 .
I've wish to install 64 bit flavor on a second machine.
debian-10.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso was successfully downloaded & saved.
It was copied to a USB flash drive and installation attempted.
Only did minimal install as I could not connect to
On 3/3/21 1:24 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
2. I'm pushing at my data cap {including unused from previous months}.
Have you considered setting up a local package proxy server? I used
approx(8) in the past, and believe there are other choices:
https://packages.debian.org/buster/approx
On 03/03/2021 03:41 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/02/2021 08:39 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 15:42:27 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/02/2021 02:31 PM, Brian wrote:
On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 14:09:18 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've one fine machine running i386 flavor
On 03/02/2021 08:39 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 15:42:27 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/02/2021 02:31 PM, Brian wrote:
On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 14:09:18 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 .
I've wish to install 64 bit
On 03/02/2021 04:50 PM, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 3/3/21 08:42, Richard Owlett wrote:
Any one know exactly what I need to add that would normally just be
silently installed. I just took it as part of "universal" in USB.
I'd suggest using a live non-free ISO and then install any necessary
On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 15:42:27 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/02/2021 02:31 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 14:09:18 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> > > I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 .
> > > I've wish to install 64 bit flavor on a second machine.
>
On 03/02/2021 07:29 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/02/2021 04:13 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:42:27PM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/02/2021 02:31 PM, Brian wrote:
On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 14:09:18 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've one fine machine running i386
301 - 400 of 18554 matches
Mail list logo