On 2017-08-16 05:14 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Erik Brangs composed on 2017-08-16 10:31 (UTC+0200):
>
>> ...The binaries sometimes crash on my machine and the console shows error
>> messages from the nouveau driver. I asked upstream about this and they said
>> it was "likely a buggy GL
Erik Brangs composed on 2017-08-16 10:31 (UTC+0200):
> ...The binaries sometimes crash on my machine and the console shows error
> messages from the nouveau driver. I asked upstream about this and they said
> it was "likely a buggy GL implementation" in the graphics driver. The
> binaries work
Hi,
I'm using Anki as a flashcard software. It was available in Jessie but has been
removed for Stretch because upstream didn't release a version for current QT in
time for Stretch. It's unlikely that Anki can get backported to Stretch because
that would require a backport of QT [1]. So I need
On Wed 05 Jul 2017 at 11:10:44 (+0200), Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm glad you could finally fix the issue.
>
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:15:33 +0930
> "Wayne Hartell" wrote:
>
> > I know I just wrote a long e-mail on this, but I think I just figured
> > out in my
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:10:03 +0200, Jason Wittlin-Cohen wrote:
> You are running an out-of-date version of samba (2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u6
> vs. 4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1). In addition, you seem to be missing
> samba-common-bin, samba-dsdb-modules, and python-samba, all of which are
> dependencies
'sudo apt-get install --reinstall samba'
If that doesn't include install the removed packages, run, 'sudo
apt-get install samba-common-bin samba-dsdb-modules python-samba'
I, too, have been having problems that seem to point to samba. Note
that I am still running Jessie.
If I run 'sudo
Thanks a lot to all who have helped and/or contemplated my problem.
After:
---
apt-get install --reinstall samba
apt-get install samba-dbg samba-doc
---
BTW, here is what I see when I run dpkg -l | grep samba:
jason@storage-server:~$ dpkg -l | grep samba
ii python-samba 2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1
amd64Python bindings for Samba
ii samba 2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1
amd64
You are running an out-of-date version of samba (2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u6
vs. 4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1). In addition, you seem to be missing
samba-common-bin, samba-dsdb-modules, and python-samba, all of which are
dependencies of samba.
Try 'sudo apt-get install --reinstall samba'
If that
Am 15.07.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Ulf Volmer:
On 15.07.2017 13:56, Hans Kraus wrote:
yesterday, 14. July, about 9:30 pm my SAMBA shares on Debian simply
stopped working. I did not do anything on the system.
There were samba updates for jessie yesterday. First one was broken on
some systems so
Am 15.07.2017 um 16:05 schrieb Jason Wittlin-Cohen:
What does 'dpkg -l | grep samba' show?
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Hans Kraus > wrote:
Am 15.07.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Jason Wittlin-Cohen:
Did you run an apt-get
On 15.07.2017 13:56, Hans Kraus wrote:
> yesterday, 14. July, about 9:30 pm my SAMBA shares on Debian simply
> stopped working. I did not do anything on the system.
There were samba updates for jessie yesterday. First one was broken on
some systems so maybe it will help to do an upgrade again.
On 15-07-17, Hans Kraus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday, 14. July, about 9:30 pm my SAMBA shares on Debian simply
> stopped working. I did not do anything on the system.
>
> When I now try to connect to them from Windows 8.1 I do not see them
> in the "Connect Network Drive" window.
>
> When I enter
Hi,
yesterday, 14. July, about 9:30 pm my SAMBA shares on Debian simply
stopped working. I did not do anything on the system.
When I now try to connect to them from Windows 8.1 I do not see them
in the "Connect Network Drive" window.
When I enter the address manually I get the error "The
Hi,
I'm glad you could finally fix the issue.
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:15:33 +0930
"Wayne Hartell" wrote:
> I know I just wrote a long e-mail on this, but I think I just figured
> out in my own mind exactly what is going on and wanted to document it.
>
>
>
> As
On 05-07-17, Wayne Hartell wrote:
>
> Fungi4All wrote:
> > And this for the OP:
> > 1 But if there is such a basic problem with installation what is
> > so different that the rest of the new stretch installers did not
> > face?
> >
>
> That's a good question. I'm not 100% sure what the problem
I know I just wrote a long e-mail on this, but I think I just figured out in
my own mind exactly what is going on and wanted to document it.
As others have said the /etc/apt/trusted.gpg file is the issue.
It seems that what is happening is this:
1. For some reason the first use
different circumstances. The main issue is that the /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
file seems to be problematic and once *removed* (rather than just made
readable) the problems are resolved.
One quasi-significant secondary issue is that the installation DVD doesn't
seem to be accepted as a valid source
> From: philwy...@kathenas.org
> This issue seems to be created by "synaptic".
> If you you "apt" in the terminal, you will be fine.
As mindblowing as this topic seems to be I can not help but
comment your response. It seems you must have not read
90% of the thread missing out on all the output
On 07/04/2017 11:28 AM, Michael Lange wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 23:58:17 +0930
"Wayne Hartell" wrote:
I did not read this last post or the whole thread very carefully, but
now something hit my eyes:
4. sudo apt-get update
[generated errors]
Op 04-07-17 om 12:23 schreef Phil Wyett:
This issue seems to be created by 'synaptic'.
If you you 'apt' in the terminal, you will be fine.
If you use 'software-properties-gtk' to adjust repositories, you will
be fine.
The issue is created if you run 'synaptic' and then adjust
repositories via
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 23:58:17 +0930
"Wayne Hartell" wrote:
I did not read this last post or the whole thread very carefully, but
now something hit my eyes:
> 4. sudo apt-get update
> [generated errors]
> Err:16 http://ftp.iinet.net.au/debian/debian
>
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 12:19:24 +0100
Phil Wyett wrote:
> Additional info. Why via synaptic the 'trusted.gpg' file is being
> created needs investigation.
>
> The file is a 32 byte file (way to small to be a valid key) is not
> even viewable by normal key view methods i.e.
Hi Wayne,
I ran into the same issue with trusted.gpg. I opened the file in nano and
it was completely empty. My guess is that apt is looking to this file for
the public keys of the various servers, and it complains when it can't find
them. In fact, the keys are stored in the
> On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 20:50 +0930, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> > > Er ... sorry that last email should read " Phil Wyett's
> > > suggestion" in
> >
> > this thread.
> >
> > Yes, trying Phil's suggestion and will report back once I have had the
> > time to explore it properly (several systems
now 100% for sure what I am looking at. Certainly the keys
complained about are listed.
Regards,
Wayne.
Hi Wayne,
I have not tested that install dvd. But I did have problems with the
live-dvd, I've used rc3 and it was great, maybe try it or use the zip
file I attached to my other post for a qu
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 20:50 +0930, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> > Er ... sorry that last email should read " Phil Wyett's
> > suggestion" in
>
> this thread.
>
> Yes, trying Phil's suggestion and will report back once I have had
> the time
> to explore it properly (several systems now exhibiting
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 20:50 +0930, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> > Er ... sorry that last email should read " Phil Wyett's
> > suggestion" in
>
> this thread.
>
> Yes, trying Phil's suggestion and will report back once I have had
> the time
> to explore it properly (several systems now exhibiting
> Er ... sorry that last email should read " Phil Wyett's suggestion" in
this thread.
Yes, trying Phil's suggestion and will report back once I have had the time
to explore it properly (several systems now exhibiting this problem). As a
teaser, it seems that even software-properties-gtk
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 06:56 -0400, SDA wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:17:53PM +0930, Wayne Hartell wrote:
>
> Er ... sorry that last email should read " Phil Wyett's
> suggestion" in
> this thread.
>
Hi,
Additional info. Why via synaptic the 'trusted.gpg' file is being
created needs
ere's a chance it could be the former.
> >
>
> Hmmm I use Jessie for last years, with no any experience with Strech yet. But
> I feel you have some problem(s) with sources.list or with apt
> file(s) privileges somehow/somewhere.
>
> In this link before, there is something
> The OP did not say, but I believe the problem is coming from a 9.1-live-dvd
> install, I had to same problem using it. The problem does not occur using the
> net-install. I have not tested any other installers but the rc3-live did not
> seem to have the problem, cause I > used it and
always
allow sudo for your user after that?
Yes I did verify using SHA-256.
f0a87f42ba0090314a4d3e45afe43d7fe7c115305bed266fe51a650c58cf3cab
debian-9.0.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
My clean installs of Jessie never had any problems; just clean stretch
installs.
If I can't find any other solution I will try a
> > Read this:
> >
> > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/75807/no-public-key-available-on-apt-get-update
> >
>
> Thanks. Yeah I have tried importing keys (even though they already exist as
> confirmed with 'apt-key list' and it makes no difference. All the keys
> complained about are
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:17:53PM +0930, Wayne Hartell wrote:
Er ... sorry that last email should read " Phil Wyett's suggestion" in
this thread.
On 07/04/2017 03:23 AM, Phil Wyett wrote:
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 12:02 +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
On 04-07-17, Wayne Hartell wrote:
Wayne Hartell composed on 2017-07-04 15:46 (UTC+0930):
...I managed to solve this error after checking that the
permissions on /etc/apt/trusted.gpg were 0600 and
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:17:53PM +0930, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> Thanks. Yeah I have tried importing keys (even though they already exist
> as confirmed with 'apt-key list' and it makes no difference. All the keys
> complained about are already present.
>
> I don't have enough experience nor
> > W: GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch Release: The following
> > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
> > NO_PUBKEY 8B48AD6246925553 NO_PUBKEY 7638D0442B90D010 NO_PUBKEY
> > CBF8D6FD518E17E1 NO_PUBKEY EF0F382A1A7B6500
> > W: The repository
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 18:47:14 +0930
"Wayne Hartell" wrote:
> > Wayne Hartell composed on 2017-07-04 15:46 (UTC+0930):
> >
> > > ...I managed to solve this error after checking that the
> > > permissions on /etc/apt/trusted.gpg were 0600 and edited them to be
> > >
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 12:02 +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> On 04-07-17, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> > > Wayne Hartell composed on 2017-07-04 15:46 (UTC+0930):
> > >
> > > > ...I managed to solve this error after checking that the
> > > > permissions on /etc/apt/trusted.gpg were 0600 and edited them
> > >
> W: GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch Release: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
> NO_PUBKEY 8B48AD6246925553 NO_PUBKEY 7638D0442B90D010 NO_PUBKEY
> CBF8D6FD518E17E1 NO_PUBKEY EF0F382A1A7B6500
> W: The repository
On 04-07-17, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> > Wayne Hartell composed on 2017-07-04 15:46 (UTC+0930):
> >
> > > ...I managed to solve this error after checking that the
> > > permissions on /etc/apt/trusted.gpg were 0600 and edited them to
> > > be 0644. (Is this the correct default permission for the file
> 1. Comment out DVD repository from /etc/apt/sources.list (add # before deb
> cdrom:...).
> 2. Try to # apt-get update
> 3. Check if it work. If not, manualy download latest debian-archive-keyring
> for stretch (from repository) and install it like
> this: #dpkg -i
Dnia 2017-07-04, wto o godzinie 19:02 +0930, Wayne Hartell pisze:
> > On 04-07-17, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Did you try to change mirror you use in your sources.list?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I did and it doesn't help (I get the same error with multiple
> > > different sources).
> > >
> >
> On 04-07-17, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> > >
> > >Did you try to change mirror you use in your sources.list?
> > >
> >
> > I did and it doesn't help (I get the same error with multiple
> > different sources).
> >
> > GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates InRelease: The
> >
he less, since I am clutching at straws now.
FYI - I just tested a brand new clean install, this time NOT using a local
mirror during installation and it's the same problems again. I have to
conclude that there's something wrong with the installation, at least for
the combination of options I am c
> Wayne Hartell composed on 2017-07-04 15:46 (UTC+0930):
>
> > ...I managed to solve this error after checking that the
> > permissions on /etc/apt/trusted.gpg were 0600 and edited them to be
> > 0644. (Is this the correct default permission for the file trusted.gpg?)...
>
> I have to guess 644
How about this solution, it worked in similar case:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/05/msg00467.html
On 04-07-17, Wayne Hartell wrote:
> >
> >Did you try to change mirror you use in your sources.list?
> >
>
> I did and it doesn't help (I get the same error with multiple different
> sources).
>
> GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates InRelease: The
> following signatures
Wayne Hartell composed on 2017-07-04 15:46 (UTC+0930):
> ...I managed to solve this error after checking that the permissions on
> /etc/apt/trusted.gpg were 0600 and edited them to be 0644. (Is this the
> correct default permission for the file trusted.gpg?)...
I have to guess 644 is correct, as
r is an abbreviated hand typed reproduction; not the
>> actual output. I can provide the full list of errors if it helps.
>>
>>
>>
>> In another thread I read something about ensuring that the
>> "debian-archive-keyring" is installed, and it is,
key is not available: NO_PUBKEY
>
>
>
> The above error is an abbreviated hand typed reproduction; not the actual
> output. I can provide the full list of errors if it helps.
>
>
>
> In another thread I read something about ensuring that the
> "debian-arch
eyring" is installed, and it is, version 2017.5.
I just checked on second clean stretch install and it's the same situation;
same exact problems.
I am wondering what I might be doing wrong?
Regards,
Wayne.
n't understand. I can't believe a DE doesn't have a menu system.
> >>Does it not have an Edit Preferences or some such. Then look for
> >>Startup Programs in whatever Edit Preferences throws up, menu or
> >>dialog box.
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>David.
> &g
ike GNOME 2 it will under System -> Preferences ->
Startup Applications from the top panel.
In Mate 1.16.2 (Stretch):
System->Preferences->Personal->Startup Applications
In Mate 1.8.1 (Jessie):
System->Preferences->Startup Applications
I think there were two pro
On 2017-06-29, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 27 Jun 2017 at 08:26:47 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
>> I am using the MATE desktop on Debian Stretch.
>> I wish to run a user specific script each time a specific user logs in.
>> The script is known to work because I
On Tue 27 Jun 2017 at 08:26:47 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I am using the MATE desktop on Debian Stretch.
> I wish to run a user specific script each time a specific user logs in.
> The script is known to work because I manually run it each and every
> time I login.
>
> The MATE help system
I am using the MATE desktop on Debian Stretch.
I wish to run a user specific script each time a specific user logs in.
The script is known to work because I manually run it each and every
time I login.
The MATE help system lacks a usable index making finding a specific
option difficult.
One
please ignore & excuse the noise
0x17F9F9B7.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat 24 Jun 2017 at 06:42:34 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 06/23/2017 02:42 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> >Richard Owlett composed on 2017-06-23 06:25 (UTC-0500):
> >.
> >>>I've identified one problem source.
> >>>At least sometimes after a power off shut down it comes up with the
> >>>laptop
On 06/23/2017 02:42 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2017-06-23 06:25 (UTC-0500):
.
I've identified one problem source.
At least sometimes after a power off shut down it comes up with the
laptop display selected as primary.
How can I force it to always come up with the VGA
Richard Owlett composed on 2017-06-23 06:25 (UTC-0500):
.
>> I've identified one problem source.
>> At least sometimes after a power off shut down it comes up with the
>> laptop display selected as primary.
>> How can I force it to always come up with the VGA monitor as primary?
.
Maybe
On 06/23/2017 10:06 AM, Greg L wrote:
I wanted to report missing backgrounds (wallpaper) in Debian Stretch
stable. Which individual or email address shall I report this to? I
appreciate your help. Thank you.
Most likely report it against whichever desktop environment you are using.
If you
Great, thank you.
On Jun 23, 2017 8:38 AM, "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh"
wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Greg L wrote:
> > I wanted to report missing backgrounds (wallpaper) in Debian Stretch
> > stable. Which individual or email address shall I report this to? I
> > appreciate
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Greg L wrote:
> I wanted to report missing backgrounds (wallpaper) in Debian Stretch
> stable. Which individual or email address shall I report this to? I
> appreciate your help. Thank you.
Since this is unrelated to software defects, and you already contacted
the list
I wanted to report missing backgrounds (wallpaper) in Debian Stretch
stable. Which individual or email address shall I report this to? I
appreciate your help. Thank you.
On 06/20/2017 07:14 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/18/2017 05:45 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/17/2017 03:02 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2017-06-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian Testing on a Lenovo T510 Thinkpad whose screen is too
small and is in the "short and
On 06/20/2017 07:20 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
On 06/20/2017 05:14 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/18/2017 05:45 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/17/2017 03:02 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2017-06-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian Testing on a Lenovo T510 Thinkpad whose
On 06/20/2017 05:14 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/18/2017 05:45 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/17/2017 03:02 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2017-06-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian Testing on a Lenovo T510 Thinkpad whose screen is too
small and is in the "short and
Richard Owlett composed on 2017-06-20 07:14 (UTC-0500):
> How can I force it to always come up with the VGA monitor as primary?
.
If you are interested, might like to try to create an xorg.conf that will do
what you want. In order to make such attempt I will need:
1-to see an unadulterated[1]
On 20/06/17 21:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/20/2017 02:06 PM, JPlews wrote:
On 20/06/17 13:14, Richard Owlett wrote:
I had understood ARandR would use it automatically. It evidently
doesn't.
This is my experience too, including some of the randomness, after
reboots the DE is setting
On 06/20/2017 02:41 PM, deloptes wrote:
I've identified one problem source.
At least sometimes after a power off shut down it comes up with the
laptop display selected as primary.
How can I force it to always come up with the VGA monitor as primary?
I created
On 06/20/2017 02:06 PM, JPlews wrote:
On 20/06/17 13:14, Richard Owlett wrote:
I had understood ARandR would use it automatically. It evidently doesn't.
This is my experience too, including some of the randomness, after
reboots the DE is setting things, I find Gnome really weak in this area.
>
> I've identified one problem source.
> At least sometimes after a power off shut down it comes up with the
> laptop display selected as primary.
> How can I force it to always come up with the VGA monitor as primary?
>
> I created /home/richard/.screenlayout/VGA-as-master.sh with preferred
>
On 20/06/17 13:14, Richard Owlett wrote:
I had understood ARandR would use it automatically. It evidently doesn't.
This is my experience too, including some of the randomness, after
reboots the DE is setting things, I find Gnome really weak in this area.
The window oddness you describe
Hi,
had similar problem with debian9. After basic installation I installed
serveral services und system haltet while running apt-get install.
We're running debian as virtual machines on ESX 6.5.
So, I've figured out, when you install a brand new Server together with
ESX6.5 mode and vmxnet3
On 06/18/2017 05:45 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/17/2017 03:02 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2017-06-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian Testing on a Lenovo T510 Thinkpad whose screen is too
small and is in the "short and wide" category.
I prefer my 17" diagonal external
On 2017-06-19 11:03 -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
> Sven Joachim (svenj...@gmx.de) wrote:
>
> |> On my system, only /var/lib/apt/lists/partial is owned by
> |> the _apt user, and it's not world-readable:
>
>|> All the regular files in /var/lib/apt/lists are owned by
>
Sven Joachim (svenj...@gmx.de) wrote:
|> On my system, only /var/lib/apt/lists/partial is owned by
|> the _apt user, and it's not world-readable:
|> All the regular files in /var/lib/apt/lists are owned by
|> root:root and have standard 0644 permissions
Thank
On 2017-06-18 13:30 -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
> Posting here in case this might help others who may be encountering the
> same problem.
>
> I really appreciate the enhanced security provided for apt in the new
> release. But one of the changes caused me a small headache in upgrading.
>
Posting here in case this might help others who may be encountering the
same problem.
I really appreciate the enhanced security provided for apt in the new
release. But one of the changes caused me a small headache in upgrading.
Following the upgrade, running `apt get update'resulted in
On 06/17/2017 03:02 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2017-06-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian Testing on a Lenovo T510 Thinkpad whose screen is too
small and is in the "short and wide" category.
I prefer my 17" diagonal external with a nominal 4:3 aspect ratio.
I am using
On 2017-06-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm using Debian Testing on a Lenovo T510 Thinkpad whose screen is too
> small and is in the "short and wide" category.
> I prefer my 17" diagonal external with a nominal 4:3 aspect ratio.
>
> I am using ARandR Screen Layout Editor
Hi all,
I performed a dist-upgrade from jessie to stretch on my desktop. It
did not went well. I manage to solve many problems except the texlive
issue. I finally remove anything tex related and try to slowly install
it back. I started with tex-common. That went well. Then with
texlive-base
768 and normal orientation
vga monitor as 1280 x 1024 and normal orientation
With those settings it _can_ and *FREQUENTLY* does display what I want.
Generally it chooses not to :/
I have two problems which I presume to be closely intertwined.
After a cold boot, if I open a text file with pluma it fill
this
>> list). The only problem now is about latin accented characters such as
>> bontà, perché, ragù, ecc... In my home directory I have many files such
>> named, but when I want to copy them into the above vfat driver there are
>> encoding problems: those characte
ist). The only problem now is about latin accented characters such as
>> bontà, perché, ragù, ecc... In my home directory I have many files such
>> named, but when I want to copy them into the above vfat driver there are
>> encoding problems: those characters are messing and `
racters such as bontà,
> perché,
> ragù, ecc... In my home directory I have many files such named, but
> when I
> want to copy them into the above vfat driver there are encoding
> problems: those
> characters are messing and `Bad file decriptor' error messages
> sometimes
>
> perché, ragù, ecc... In my home directory I have many files such named, but
> when I want to copy them into the above vfat driver there are encoding
> problems: those characters are messing and `Bad file decriptor' error
> messages sometimes appear. I've never had this problem before, i
such named, but when I
want to copy them into the above vfat driver there are encoding problems: those
characters are messing and `Bad file decriptor' error messages sometimes
appear. I've never had this problem before, in my Linux home directory.
Please suggest whoever can how to face and solve
com>:
> Original Message
>
> Subject: Re: puppy Linux reports problems with USB/network drive
> UTC Time: May 21, 2017 11:33 AM
> From: pas...@plouf.fr.eu.org
>
> Le 21/05/2017 à 04:56, Albert Hodge a écrit :
> >
> > When I plugged it into
Original Message
Subject: Re: puppy Linux reports problems with USB/network drive
UTC Time: May 21, 2017 11:33 AM
From: pas...@plouf.fr.eu.org
Le 21/05/2017 à 04:56, Albert Hodge a écrit :
>
> When I plugged it into the USB port it gave a warning message, that the
>
Le 21/05/2017 à 04:56, Albert Hodge a écrit :
When I plugged it into the USB port it gave a warning message, that the
NTFS -3g driver was able to mount the NTFS partition but says, Dirty
volume mount was forced by the "force" mount option. It is mounted
read/write, but advice is only write to
Greetings;
I found the problem, something had replaced the index.html, which was a
link to the front-page.html of my web site with the default apache
index.html.
Restored that by rm'ing the renamed copy of it, then cp'd the ~ version
back to the real one, voila! Web page functions normally.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Pierre Frenkiel
> wrote:
> > Nevertheless, I don't see why this package is not
> > upgraded in Jessie: it just gives a list, and have then no dependency
> > problem.
>
> Packages in
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Pierre Frenkiel
wrote:
> Nevertheless, I don't see why this package is not
> upgraded in Jessie: it just gives a list, and have then no dependency
> problem.
Packages in Debian Stable are upgraded only when it fixes a security
Thanks Kamaraju, that looks awesome.
So extrapolating from the pattern of the dates, i would guess that
'stretch' should be actually released on the creation date of
'buster', 2018-07-01.
(And i should note, just for the record, that indeed the wikipedia
article on debian versions had more
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017, Frank wrote:
What makes you think it shouldn't matter? Jessie has version 0.26 of the
distro-info-data package. That line must have been added in a later version.
Stretch has 0.33 and jessie-backports 0.32~bpo8+1.
you are right: installing version .33 actually gives the
Op 08-04-17 om 09:23 schreef Pierre Frenkiel:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
. . .
% cat /usr/share/distro-info/debian.csv
. . .
11,Bullseye,bullseye,2020-11-05
hi,
can you explain why I don't have this line?
I am on Jessie, but that should not matter.
What makes you
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
. . .
% cat /usr/share/distro-info/debian.csv
. . .
11,Bullseye,bullseye,2020-11-05
hi,
can you explain why I don't have this line?
I am on Jessie, but that should not matter.
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
901 - 1000 of 18554 matches
Mail list logo