Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-23 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 06:20:12PM -0800, Richard Taylor wrote: I've never had a problem with it... that surprises me. Surprised me too. It seemed to be working fine. A friend suggested printer settings saying he had the same problem. I wasn't trying to print mind you, but neither was he

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-23 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
StarOffice saves in Word format for me just fine. Of course, I only use simple documents. - Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:34:45AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:26:11PM -0800, Richard Taylor wrote: And... then, you got the Gnome

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-22 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:26:11PM -0800, Richard Taylor wrote: And... then, you got the Gnome Office stuff... www.gnome.org The most recently is at Ximian, www.ximian.com. Abiword is maturing but it's got a ways to go yet. Staroffice 5.2 impresses me not. I still can't get it to

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-22 Thread John Galt
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Michael P. Soulier wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: Richard Taylor wrote: There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect and so forth. On Linux? I didn't know. Same name? WordPerfect, yes, but Adobe

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-22 Thread Richard Taylor
From: Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:26:11PM -0800, Richard Taylor wrote: And... then, you got the Gnome Office stuff... www.gnome.org The most recently is at Ximian, www.ximian.com. Abiword is maturing but it's got a ways to go yet. Staroffice 5.2

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-21 Thread Holger Rauch
Hi! On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect and so forth. Ok, but it expired at the end of 2000 and Adobe doesn't seem to be willing to support it any longer. I also wouldn't put WordPerfect in the category of

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-21 Thread Guilherme Barile
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 11:35 AM Subject: Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux? Hi! On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect and so forth. Ok, but it expired at the end of 2000 and Adobe doesn't seem

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-21 Thread Mike Wills
Do what I did, keep a cheap pc for the hacking stuff and buy a mac for all your graphics needs :) also, when linux gets mature enough at this aspect, we can all install linux on our macs (the hardware is great). Even better yet... When OS X comes out on the Macintosh. It will be a Unix

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-21 Thread Jan Ulrich Hasecke
Hi Guilherme! Am Mit, 21 Feb 2001, schrieb Guilherme Barile: I think linux is great for servers, but there are still some things for which its not prepared yet (ie video.audio editing, graphics, layouting, etc). Hey, this is not Linux' fault. Macromedia and Adobe are not prepared for the

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-21 Thread Guilherme Barile
Wills [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux? Do what I did, keep a cheap pc for the hacking stuff and buy a mac for all your graphics needs :) also, when linux gets mature

QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-20 Thread Jonathan Gift
Hi, Would that be the Latext system? Considered professionally acceptable? Thanks, Jonathan -- Jonathan // Gift /~~(0) (_|

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-20 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: Hi, Would that be the Latext system? Considered professionally acceptable? LaTeX is nice, but it is *not* a desktop publishing programming like Quark. -- Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-20 Thread Richard Taylor
From: Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: Would that be the Latext system? Considered professionally acceptable? LaTeX is nice, but it is *not* a desktop publishing programming like Quark. There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-20 Thread Jonathan Gift
Richard Taylor wrote: There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect and so forth. On Linux? I didn't know. Same name? Thanks, Jonathan -- Jonathan // Gift /~~(0) (_|

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-20 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: Richard Taylor wrote: There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect and so forth. On Linux? I didn't know. Same name? WordPerfect, yes, but Adobe has cancelled the Beta of Frame on Linux,

Re: QuarkExpress equivalent on Linux?

2001-02-20 Thread Richard Taylor
From: Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: Richard Taylor wrote: There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect and so forth. On Linux? I didn't know. Same name? WordPerfect, yes, but Adobe has