Re: x11amp still available?

1999-07-09 Thread Oleg Krivosheev
hi On Fri, 9 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp. > >> xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles. > > > > that looks like quite consistent numb

Re: x11amp still available?

1999-07-09 Thread fsavage
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp. >> xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles. > > that looks like quite consistent number. On my cyrix-333 > i usually got 18-19%. I installed the la

RE: x11amp still available?

1999-07-05 Thread Christian Dysthe
As far as I know, X11amp is being replaced with XMMS. Take a look at: www.xmms.org Trying to access www.X11amp.org will take you to XMMS also. On 05-Jul-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp. > xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles. I don't >

Re: x11amp still available?

1999-07-05 Thread Oleg Krivosheev
hi On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp. > xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles. that looks like quite consistent number. On my cyrix-333 i usually got 18-19%. > I don't > think x11amp used more than a couple percent. i be

Re: x11amp still available?

1999-07-05 Thread Dan Everton
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 02:03:16AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp. > xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles. I don't > think x11amp used more than a couple percent. One of the bugs in x11amp was that it used to mask the CPU usage of the