* Steve Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [25.08.08 08:31]:
This has never been true and is still not true. It is, of course, the
easiest way to weed out the mutt zealots who have never touched a true
multi-account client from those mutt users who have and know the difference.
Then please state
Sebastian Günther wrote:
Look at account-hook and folder-hook and in combination with a nice
source statement, you everything some bloated GUI mailer has. Even more
you can easily adjust your profile on folder basis.
This has never been true and is still not true. It is, of course, the
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Are you sure about this ?
As of the last time I tested mutt imap, yes, without question. In fact I
had gone so far as to take a screencast of mutt deleting 200 messages by
copying it to the local machine then uploading it to the trash folder.
However, those
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:44:53PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
It's all fine IMHO.
Now enable trash and see what it does there. It is entirely possible they
have fixed that issue since the last time I tried mutt over imap (which was,
incidentally, not all that
On Wed,20.Aug.08, 16:19:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
[...]
I prefer that it handle multiple accounts sanely.
I haven't looked into it, but 'muttprofile' seems interesting. Of
course, it will probably need a lot of fiddling first.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't
* Andrei Popescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [23.08.08 09:49]:
On Wed,20.Aug.08, 16:19:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
[...]
I prefer that it handle multiple accounts sanely.
I haven't looked into it, but 'muttprofile' seems interesting. Of
course, it will probably need a lot of fiddling first.
mutt
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:19:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
One of the many faults I find with mutt is its IMAP implementation. In
two words, it fails. Copying individual messages from the current folder to
any other folder, especially trash, by downloading the message and then
On Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 16:19:57 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
With that one glaring wart hidden I have to say that I've upgraded mutt to
viable again. I still don't like having to search for my new mail.
If you use the mutt-patched package you can take advantage of the
sidebar to have a
Daniel Burrows wrote:
Do you know how this compares to offlineimap? I've been using that
to synchronize mailboxes more-or-less happily for the last few years.
I do not, no. I have not used offlineimap so cannot make any comparison.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Johann Spies wrote:
My experience is not that it is 'horribly slow and
inefficient'. Are you sure that it is not a network-related slowness?
Of course it is, the fact that mutt is using the network to
download-then-upload the messages is the entire problem! Which is going to be
faster:
Steve Kemp wrote:
If you use the mutt-patched package you can take advantage of the
sidebar to have a toggleable list of mailboxes on the left side of
the screen.
I've further updated that to allow it to show you only folders with
new messages. See here for details, and here for
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:19:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
One of the many faults I find with mutt is its IMAP
implementation. In two words, it fails. Copying individual messages
from the current folder to any other folder, especially trash, by
downloading the message and then
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:55:35AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Of course it is, the fact that mutt is using the network to
download-then-upload the messages is the entire problem! Which is
going to be
faster:
A: Downloading 2000 messages totaling 10Mb over a 300kps connection
then
Hello Steve,
Thanks for your heads up on mbsync. I might try it with my GMail accounts, since
I still have them on POP precisely for the reason that mutt isn't really capable
of handling IMAP fine. But...
Quoth Steve Lamb
... The lack of multi-account functionality...
What exactly are your
?? ?. wrote:
The problem is that Mutt is agnostic to 'accounts', I'll give you that one,
but
I don't think it'd a useful feature -- think about it, what's an account other
than a From: field?
For those that needs it different SMTP servers with different SMTP
settings,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:19:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Enter a tool which made mutt viable for my needs, mbsync (debian package -
isync). It is a tool which syncronizes a local Maildir folder with a remote
imap folder. In essence it is a local imap
16 matches
Mail list logo
