On 2009-06-25, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I updated my testing system, as usual, this morning, but then
suspended my machine (so everything worked as it had been all day).
This evening, I rebooted, and suddenly no sites could be found.
(Other machines on my network did not have the problem.)
Another thing.
And what's been happening usually is that when I'm browsing I brake in
the following URL with nothing printed on the screen:
http://domains.googlesyndication.com/apps/domainpark/domainpark.cgi?client=ca-dp-mdnhref=http%3A%2F%2F
Jeff D on 10/08/07 04:07, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
How exactly would I set the domain name on the machine - the name I
thought I'd chosen when setting up the system from CD?
At the moment on this
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients.
However it
doesn't recognise any internal
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients.
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't
recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Unknown host
isengard:~# nslookup gondor
Server:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't
recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Unknown host
On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Something is rewriting my resolv.conf at least every minute. I
suspected it must be dnsmasq attempting to do the DNS but I just
stopped dnsmasq, and yet resolv.conf is still being updated. I had
a look over my ps output but dont see anything
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
browsing, ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
Now I am trying to get DNS to work for local
Douglas Allan Tutty on 06/08/07 14:27, wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
browsing, ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Please send us your /etc/hosts file. Every box needs a minimal
/etc/hosts file with at least its own hostname (though I'v never used
DHCP). The box running dnsmasq should have all the hosts on your
network listed in /etc/hosts for dnsmasq to
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty on 06/08/07 14:27, wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was
David Brodbeck on 06/08/07 19:11, wrote:
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of
4
PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
browsing,
ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
Now I am trying to get DNS to work for local machines but it won't co-
operate. I
spent the last
Am Dienstag, 13. Juni 2006 16:00 schrieb Rüdiger Noack:
amelina.fatal-maps.de
funktioniert bei mir ohne probleme
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 04:00:51PM +0200, Rüdiger Noack wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host fatal-maps.de
fatal-maps.de A 85.214.55.122
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host amelina.fatal-maps.de
amelina.fatal-maps.de does not exist, try again
Ändert ein Wechsel des Nameservers etwas am
Ulf Volmer schrieb:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 04:00:51PM +0200, Rüdiger Noack wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host fatal-maps.de
fatal-maps.de A 85.214.55.122
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host amelina.fatal-maps.de
amelina.fatal-maps.de does not exist, try again
Ändert ein Wechsel des
Hello,
try entering your IPS's dns servers in the file:
/etc/resolv.conf
i.e.
echo nameserver xx.yy.zz.ww /etc/resolv.conf
where xx.yy.zz.www is the nameserver your ISP provides
for you.
It is strange however, that irc and pings work ...
Maybe that is a temporary error, or someone within
I need to see the Bind configuration files to resolve your problem.
Regards,
Eriberto
RituRaj escreveu:
... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3535954
451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain of
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:47:50PM -0800, RituRaj wrote:
I have DNS problem. THe mails from our company sent
outside have started buncing with following error. It
was working till yesterday...
... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3535954
451 4.1.8
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 21:55, Malte Bartenwerfer wrote:
moin,
ich habe einen router für t-dsl mit debian. allerdings habe ich unheimlich
probleme mit dem dns. wenn ich irgendwas anpinge, wo er erstmal die IP
rausbekommen muss, dauert das ewig
Ein paar Gegenfragen:
Erstmal: was heißt ewig?
Malte Bartenwerfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ich habe einen router für t-dsl mit debian. allerdings habe ich unheimlich
probleme mit dem dns. wenn ich irgendwas anpinge, wo er erstmal die IP
rausbekommen muss, dauert das ewig (egal ob von einem netzwerkrechner oder
vom router selber).
so du
Hallo Stefan,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:10:47 +0200 (CEST) Stefan Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Für Bind kann ich das nicht sagen, djbdns kann das definitiv.
IIRC muss man nur die IP-Adresse des DNS in eine Datei mit dem
Domainnamen schreiben. Ich kann, wenn ich wieder zuhause bin mal
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:01:18 +0200 Sebastian Heinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aus der manpage zu named.conf:
zone domain_name [ ( in | hs | hesiod | chaos ) ] {
type forward;
[ forward ( only | first ); ]
[ forwarders { [ ip_addr ; [ ip_addr ; ... ] ] }; ]
Thilo Engelbracht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Die Nameserver sollen von meinem ISP übernommen werden. Ich möchte sie NICHT
fest angeben, sondern unter /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider u.a. die Option
usepeerdns nutzen.
,[ /etc/default/dnsmasq ]
| # change this line if you want dns to get its
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Rob Weir wrote:
How do your logs look? Do they give any more info about wht postfix is
bouncing it? Are you running a spamfilter or something that's a little
overzealous?
I am running spamassassin (if you have a public mail server you've got to
nowadays.) but postfix
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:04:56AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
Again this appears to be the only site which is having any problems but
it's a big one. Before I begin the arduous process of finding a clueful
human at Yahoo to talk to, can anyone spot mistakes in my setup which
could be
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 12:20, Jens Zechlin wrote:
Hallo,
ich habe hier ein DNS-Problem, bei dem ich nicht weiss, ob das
ueberhaupt vernuenftig loesbar ist, aber vielleicht hat ja irgendjemand
von Euch eine Idee.
Also, die Situation ist folgende: Ich habe hier einen Debian-Server, den
Hallo Jens.
Und so begab es sich, daß Jens Zechlin schrieb:
Nun die Frage, kann ich dem bind9 irgendwo sagen, dass er nur fuer die
Domain 'firma.de' den Firmen-DNS nutzen soll und fuer den Rest die
eingestellten anderen DNS-Server?
Für Bind kann ich das nicht sagen, djbdns kann das
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:01:18 +0200 Sebastian Heinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aus der manpage zu named.conf:
zone domain_name [ ( in | hs | hesiod | chaos ) ] {
type forward;
[ forward ( only | first ); ]
[ forwarders { [ ip_addr ; [ ip_addr ; ... ] ] }; ]
Hallo Stefan,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:10:47 +0200 (CEST) Stefan Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Für Bind kann ich das nicht sagen, djbdns kann das definitiv.
IIRC muss man nur die IP-Adresse des DNS in eine Datei mit dem
Domainnamen schreiben. Ich kann, wenn ich wieder zuhause bin mal
Örjan Persson:
ifall jag från min burk kör en 'dig domän' så visar den felaktig
data, den gamla alltså. från alla andra jag testat visar rätt.
Hur länge sedan var det det ändrades? Det brukar kunna ta ett tag från
det att något faktiskt ändras tills det får genomslag överallt,
eftersom du har
Tillsvidare kan du väl bara lägga in en korrekt rad i /etc/hosts
mvh op
--
Today is the last day of your life so far.
Quoting Örjan Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [18 Oct-01 17:37]:
doh.. har faktiskt hittat vad som var fel, hade
satt ns.algonet.se som forwarder i named.conf,
hmm undrar varför, måste vara något år sen :)
Eller så kan man fundera på varför algonet inte städar bort sina
gamla DNS records :)
--
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:51:02AM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:51:02AM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with
fetchmail, to remore hosts
on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with fetchmail, to
remore
hosts with apt, telnet, ssh, irc, lynx or mozilla. Messages are:
unable to resolve host...
something wicked happened...
domain
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with fetchmail, to
remore
hosts with apt, telnet, ssh, irc, lynx or mozilla. Messages are:
unable to resolve host...
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:51:02AM -0500, Giulio Morgan wrote:
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with fetchmail, to
remore
hosts with apt, telnet,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:16:43PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
I'm stumped. Connects from my mail delivery system are being refused by
hotmail, oreilly.com, brics.dk, and a number of other sites. I suspect
that I've done something stupid in my DNS and am being rejected by sites
that set ALL:
Been reading RFC2317, eh?
It might be freaking out because if the CNAME domain. Try this and see if
it fixes it:
perens.108.15.216.in-addr.arpa. IN NS NS2.perens.com.
186.108.15.216.in-addr.arpa.IN CNAME 186.perens.108.15.216.in-addr.arpa.
Then you master perens.108.15.216.in-addr.arpa.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 07:45:25PM -0400, Spinfire Magenta wrote:
My own experiences with GraniteCanyon and Centralinfo.net left me
using Centralinfo. Granite canyon was more flakey and went up and
down like a cheap whore on a busy night.
Not having any experience with either one, I can't
Anson Ng wrote:
Hi, (I'm sorry for the long email, but since I've to tell situation)
I've registered a domain name impko.com at Network Solutions. But
since I haven't setup my DNS server and running properly, I parked it to
Network solutions for the time being. I want to host the domain
What about using GraniteCanyon (www.granitecanyon.com) or Centralinfo.net?
Wouldn't those work?
I did not know that NSI allowed domain registrants to park domains with them.
--
Andrew
on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:19:27PM +, Pollywog spewed forth on stone
tablets:
What about using GraniteCanyon (www.granitecanyon.com) or Centralinfo.net?
Wouldn't those work?
My own experiences with GraniteCanyon and Centralinfo.net left me
using Centralinfo. Granite canyon was more flakey
On 30-Aug-2000 Spinfire Magenta wrote:
on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:19:27PM +, Pollywog spewed forth on stone
tablets:
What about using GraniteCanyon (www.granitecanyon.com) or Centralinfo.net?
Wouldn't those work?
My own experiences with GraniteCanyon and Centralinfo.net left me
using
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:09:27PM -0400, Anson Ng wrote:
I want to host the domain for my LAN, which consists of a Linux box
(24.123.456.789) running www, mail, news, ftp for public access and the
internal LAN (192.168.1.x). Last night, I configured a primary DNS server
for impko.com, but
Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
Hi all,
I have a little problem with my provider DNS: mine is much faster, but I need
to
access the provider's if I want to have the news groups and mail sending
allowed, because my identification is made by these DNS (I'm on a cable
network).
So how could I
Shao Zhang wrote:
Hi all,
when I download netscape, I got the following error from Netscape
4.5:
Bad Domain
DNS NAME:
Host Name: november.uws.EDU.AU
IP Address: 137.154.230.60
Your DNS name probably won't be accepted. Click here for more info.
I clicked more info
Damon Buckwalter wrote:
Shao Zhang wrote:
Hi all,
when I download netscape, I got the following error from Netscape
4.5:
Bad Domain
DNS NAME:
Host Name: november.uws.EDU.AU
IP Address: 137.154.230.60
Your DNS name probably won't be accepted. Click here for
Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can download the Netscape binary from ftp.netscape.com or use the
one in slink, and in either case, you can upgrade to 128bit encryption
using fortify.net's software. http://fortify.net is your friend.
There are fortify packages in non-US.
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Damon Buckwalter wrote:
[ snip ]
: Why not just install the netscape packages? They're in potato, and
: slink too I belive. The Export Version of Netscape contains only
: 40-bit encryption, instead of 128-bit, that's the only difference.
... and Fortify patches most
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Damon Buckwalter wrote:
Shao Zhang wrote:
Hi all,
when I download netscape, I got the following error from Netscape
4.5:
Bad Domain
DNS NAME:
Host Name: november.uws.EDU.AU
IP Address: 137.154.230.60
Your DNS name probably won't be
Dennis Dai wrote:
Hi all,
I have a debian box connecting to our intranet which has an DNS server.
I also have a modem that I can dial to my ISP to browse the Internet.
So, I have to have 2 entries in /etc/resolv.conf, one for intranet and
the other for my ISP.
The problem is that whenever
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 03:35:16PM -0500, Tommy Lakofski wrote:
That's a bit of a broad sweeping statement. I guess you'll be using 7-bit
ASCII in the year 2050 then.
Most already use ISO-8895-1 for news/mail. This is liable to be
replaced by UTF-? (I'm not up to scratch on Unicode things).
Kevin Traas wrote:
If you've got a suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
I've just had a client contact me. Their getting the following in
/var/log/messages:
Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: axionet.com IN MX points to a
CNAME (mail.axionet.com)
Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]:
I've just had a client contact me. Their getting the following in
/var/log/messages:
Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: axionet.com IN MX points to a CNAME
(mail.axionet.com)
Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: axionet.com IN MX points to a CNAME
(smtp.axionet.com)
Oh, and
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
If you've got a suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
If you've got a suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
Yeah, apologies to everyone about that
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Scott Ellis wrote:
Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
That's a bit of a broad sweeping statement. I guess
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Tommy Lakofski wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Scott Ellis wrote:
Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
I started it.. grin
Later,
Kevin Traas
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tommy Lakofski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kevin Traas [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Debian
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: DNS Problem
On Tue, 2 Dec
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
: I've just had a client contact me. Their getting the following in
: /var/log/messages:
:
: Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: axionet.com IN MX points to a CNAME
: (mail.axionet.com)
: Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: axionet.com IN MX points
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
It's fine with me if you carry on with the war, but I'd appreciate being
left out of it even though I started it.. grin
OK, no war. Just seems a little shortsighted to throw out the message
because of the medium.
TL
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Tommy Lakofski wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Scott Ellis wrote:
Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 03:16:07PM -0500, Scott Ellis wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
If you've got a suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually
68 matches
Mail list logo
