Petter Adsen wrote:
Reco wrote:
May I suggest using etckeeper for this? The tool is invaluable if one
needs to answer a question such as what exactly did I changed a
couple of days ago?. The usual caveat is that using etckeeper
requires at least casual knowledge of any RCS that's
On Tue, 26 May 2015 18:18:15 +0300
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:42:50PM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
And even worse, after starting to mess with this, browsing is
_abysmal_. After taking a few speed tests online (speed.io etc),
upload/download and ping times
On Sun, 24 May 2015 16:01:41 +0300
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:47:48 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
Thanks to you, I now get ~880Mbps, which is a lot better. It seems
On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:53:17 +0300
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:28:36 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
Petter Adsen
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:42:50PM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 16:01:41 +0300
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:47:48 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:57:52PM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in
that process i ran iperf to get an overview of general
network performance. I have two Jessie hosts connected to a
dumb switch with Cat-5e. One
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:20:04 +0300
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:28:36 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
process i ran iperf to get an overview of general network performance.
I have two Jessie hosts connected to a dumb switch with Cat-5e. One
host uses a
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:28:36 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
process i ran iperf to get an overview of general network
On Sun, 24 May 2015 12:02:32 +0300
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
process i ran iperf to get an overview of general network
performance. I
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
Thanks to you, I now get ~880Mbps, which is a lot better. It seems
increasing the MTU was what had the most effect, so I won't bother
with TCP window size.
Now, this is a little odd:
petter@monster:/etc$ iperf -i 1 -c
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:28:36 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home,
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:47:48 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
Petter Adsen pet...@synth.no wrote:
Thanks to you, I now get ~880Mbps, which is a lot better. It seems
increasing the MTU was what had the most effect, so I won't bother
with
13 matches
Mail list logo
