Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-31 Thread Daniel Schmidt
Ralf Lehmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Nun fiel mir auf das andere Distris das Debian als basis nutzen. Nun meine Frage : Sind diese Distris das bessere Debian, da sie auf mehr Komfort setzen ? Kann man Sie auch gut auf einem Server einsetzen? Knoppix ist m.E. eine nette Live-CD, die

Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi groups.google.com als Forum zu bezeichnen, ist nicht ganz richtig... Die Google-Groups sind ein Usenet-Archiv. Christian Schmidt wrote: Nimm doch das Forum auf http://groups.google.com oder http://www.google.com. Da sollte man eigentlich alle moeglichen Archive finden... Gruss burnstone

Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-31 Thread Helmut Wollmersdorfer
Ralf Lehmeier wrote: Nun fiel mir auf das andere Distris das Debian als basis nutzen. Nun meine Frage : Sind diese Distris das bessere Debian, da sie auf mehr Komfort setzen ? Jede Distri hat ihre Vor- und Nachteile. Was mir so aus eigener Erfahrung zu Knoppix einfällt: - Knoppix ist auf

Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-31 Thread Christian Schmidt
Hallo list, bitte Realnamen verwenden. [EMAIL PROTECTED], 31.01.2005 (d.m.y): groups.google.com als Forum zu bezeichnen, ist nicht ganz richtig... Die Google-Groups sind ein Usenet-Archiv. Dessen bin ich mir voellig bewusst, hatte allerdings die Ironietags vergessen. Gruss, Christian

Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-30 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Moin! * Ralf Lehmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050130 18:25]: Ich habe in diesem forum schon viele neue Anregungen und Einsichten in das Debian erhalten. Wenn man davon absieht, dass das hier kein Forum, sondern eine Mailingliste ist, ist das doch ganz schön ;) Nun fiel mir auf das andere

Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-30 Thread Michael Ott
Hallo Ralf! Ich habe in diesem forum schon viele neue Anregungen und Einsichten in das Debian erhalten. Mailing-Liste! Nicht Forum. Obwohl es manchmal praktisch wäre, die Postings aus der Mailingliste in einem Forum nochmal zu suche Nun fiel mir auf das andere Distris das Debian als basis

Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-30 Thread patrik matt
Michael Ott schrieb: Hallo Ralf! Ich habe in diesem forum schon viele neue Anregungen und Einsichten in das Debian erhalten. Mailing-Liste! Nicht Forum. Obwohl es manchmal praktisch wäre, die Postings aus der Mailingliste in einem Forum nochmal zu suche Nun fiel mir auf das andere

Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-30 Thread Christian Schmidt
Hallo Ralf, Ralf Lehmeier, 30.01.2005 (d.m.y): Ich habe in diesem forum schon viele neue Anregungen und Einsichten in das Debian erhalten. Nun fiel mir auf das andere Distris das Debian als basis nutzen. Nun meine Frage : Sind diese Distris das bessere Debian, da sie auf mehr Komfort

Re: Knoppix das bessere Debian?

2005-01-30 Thread Christian Schmidt
Hallo Michael, Michael Ott, 30.01.2005 (d.m.y): Mailing-Liste! Nicht Forum. Obwohl es manchmal praktisch wäre, die Postings aus der Mailingliste in einem Forum nochmal zu suche Nimm doch das Forum auf http://groups.google.com oder http://www.google.com. Da sollte man eigentlich alle

Re: Knoppix boot vs debian boot

2004-10-30 Thread David Baron
Well, I (horrors!) did the Knoppix HD installation. The HW detection is somewhat different but works fine. I had to manually set up my ADSL (the modem did not support PPPoE) and my sound cards were misdetected so I manually set up ALSA. But it was a good beginning. I have since upgraded off

Re: Knoppix boot vs debian boot

2004-10-29 Thread Peter Hugosson-Miller
Jerome Lacoste wrote: Hi, long time Debian user, I often use Knoppix for rescue and test operations. There are things that makes the Knoppix boot lean and clean, e.g. the hardware autodetection, etc... But I don't have that on my unstable boxes. So I am wondering if it's a Knoppix special feature

Re: Knoppix boot vs debian boot

2004-10-29 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Jerome Lacoste ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: long time Debian user, I often use Knoppix for rescue and test operations. There are things that makes the Knoppix boot lean and clean, e.g. the hardware autodetection, etc... But I don't have that on my unstable boxes. So I am wondering

Re: Knoppix boot vs debian boot

2004-10-29 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote: Jerome Lacoste wrote: Hi, long time Debian user, I often use Knoppix for rescue and test operations. There are things that makes the Knoppix boot lean and clean, e.g. the hardware autodetection, etc... But I don't have that on my unstable boxes. So I am wondering if

Re: Knoppix boot vs debian boot

2004-10-29 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Peter Hugosson-Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Jerome Lacoste wrote: long time Debian user, I often use Knoppix for rescue and test operations. There are things that makes the Knoppix boot lean and clean, e.g. the hardware autodetection, etc... But I don't have that on my

personal decision re knoppix or regular debian

2004-09-05 Thread Scotty Fitzgerald
just a note, I decided to buy a real copy of Woody. I figure I have enough to learn without being pushed through hoops over bugs. --- Scotty -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-03 Thread Ben Levin
There's instructions to make a live cd at http://www.linux-live.org/ On Wednesday 01 September 2004 08:38 pm, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote: Is there a webpage or faq, or can somebody clue me in to, whether I should get a regular debian?! Would there be an advantage to, say, picking up a copy of

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-03 Thread Golovko
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:38:04 GMT, Scotty Fitzgerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a webpage or faq, or can somebody clue me in to, whether I should get a regular debian?! Would there be an advantage to, say, picking up a copy of Debian Bible and installing that instead over knoppix

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-02 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Scotty Fitzgerald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I am learning Linux due to my incredible hate of Gates' policies and security vulnerability. I picked up a book with knoppix CD included, to test the waters. I really love it, and managed to install debian unstable onto my hard disk and

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-02 Thread Richard Lyons
On Thursday 02 September 2004 01:38, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote: Hi, I will try to make this newbie post really quick, I am learning Linux due to my incredible hate of Gates' policies and security vulnerability. You have joined the right club! I picked up a book with knoppix CD included,

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-02 Thread Scotty Fitzgerald
Thank you for your replies. So, there are security issues!! I suppose this means that the declaration of Sarge being stable will force security conscious users to migrate to Sarge ( a lot like Gates Co forces people to move by making a service pack update and refusing support to old service

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-02 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:11:58AM +, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote: Thank you for your replies. So, there are security issues!! I suppose this means that the declaration of Sarge being stable will force security conscious users to migrate to Sarge ( a lot like Gates Co forces people to

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-02 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html . On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:11:58 +, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote: I suppose this means that the declaration of Sarge being stable will force security conscious users to migrate to Sarge ( a lot like Gates Co forces people to move by

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-02 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:11:58AM +, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote: Thank you for your replies. So, there are security issues!! I suppose this means that the declaration of Sarge being stable will force security conscious users to migrate to Sarge ( a lot like Gates Co forces people to

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-02 Thread Robert Parker
On Thursday 02 September 2004 20:11, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote: Thank you for your replies. I am thinking of ordering the (big) seven disk set from an outfit like linuxcdrs.com. The 7 cd set is most likely Woody probably Rev 2 (3.0r2) which I run. It has considerable virtue, not least

Re: knoppix vs standard debian?

2004-09-02 Thread Silvan
On Wednesday 01 September 2004 08:38 pm, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote: Is there a webpage or faq, or can somebody clue me in to, whether I should get a regular debian?! Would there be an advantage to, say, picking up a copy of Debian Bible and installing that instead over knoppix debian? If it's

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-31 Thread Peter Baumgartner
Am Montag, 30. August 2004 12:02 schrieb Christoph Wegscheider: Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Wäre toll wenn du (falls nicht schon getan) einen Bugreport für debian-installer schreiben würdest, damit das behoben werden kann reportbug debian-installer OK, kann ich aber erst

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-29 Thread Werner Mahr
Am Sonntag, 29. August 2004 01:17 schrieb Heino Tiedemann: Ka, man sollte aber _vorher_ downgraden. Wenn man in der sources.list einfach stable und unstable rausnimmt, und nur testing drinlässt, dann hat man einen üblen zustand. Wieso? Die Pakete aus Woody werden upgedated, und was dann

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-29 Thread Andreas Knöll
Christoph Wegscheider schrieb am Fri, 27 Aug 2004: Kanotix soll übrigens auf purem sid aufbauen und relativ einfach zu installieren sein. Ich habe Kanotix BH 6 auf zwei Rechnern (PIII/500MHz parallel zu W'98; IBM TP 23) über einen HD-Install problemlos zum laufen bekommen. Für die Updates

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-28 Thread Werner Mahr
Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 17:27 schrieb Robin Haunschild: Ja! Du müßtest vieles Downdaten und das ist nicht trivial. ;) Sofern die neueren Versionen keine Probleme machen (und davon ist auszugehen), kann man auch einfach warten bis eine neuere Version verfügbar ist. -- MfG usw. Werner

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-28 Thread Andreas Janssen
Werner Mahr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 17:27 schrieb Robin Haunschild: am Freitag, 27. August 2004 16:46 schrieb Christian Synoradzki: [Knoppix nach Sarge?] Ja! Du müßtest vieles Downdaten und das ist nicht trivial. ;) Sofern die neueren Versionen keine

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-28 Thread Werner Mahr
Am Samstag, 28. August 2004 20:00 schrieb Andreas Janssen: Angesichts der Tatsache, das Teile von Sarge schon eingefroren sind und die Veröffentlichung bevorsteht kann man da wohl lange warten. Mit Knoppix=unstable hätte man wahrscheinlich mehr Erfolg. Es ging mir ja auch um einen Mix aus

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-28 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Werner Mahr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Samstag, 28. August 2004 20:00 schrieb Andreas Janssen: Angesichts der Tatsache, das Teile von Sarge schon eingefroren sind und die Veröffentlichung bevorsteht kann man da wohl lange warten. Mit Knoppix=unstable hätte man wahrscheinlich mehr Erfolg.

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-27 Thread Robin Haunschild
Hallo, am Freitag, 27. August 2004 16:46 schrieb Christian Synoradzki: Hallo Liste, Hätte da mal ne Frage. Was hätte ich für Nachteile wenn ich mir Knoppix 3.6 auf die Festpaltte kopiere und dann auf sarge/testing update ? Ja! Du müßtest vieles Downdaten und das ist nicht trivial. ;) So

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-27 Thread Christoph Wegscheider
Christian Synoradzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was hätte ich für Nachteile wenn ich mir Knoppix 3.6 auf die Festpaltte kopiere und dann auf sarge/testing update ? So würde ich doch, das ganze Installieren und konfigurieren umgehen und hätte schnell ein vernünftiges, vorkonfiguriertes

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-27 Thread Rudi Effe
Am Freitag 27 August 2004 17:30 schrieb Christoph Wegscheider: Kanotix soll übrigens auf purem sid aufbauen und relativ einfach zu installieren sein. das wäre vielleicht noch interessant. meinerseits habe ich im letzen oktober knoppix 3.3 per hdinstall installiert. mit dist-upgrade etc. habe

Re: Knoppix 3.6 auf debian Sarge updaten

2004-08-27 Thread Jochen Skulj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 17:30 schrieb Christoph Wegscheider: Kanotix soll übrigens auf purem sid aufbauen und relativ einfach zu installieren sein. Das ist so. Kanotix besteht nur aus Paketen aus Sid, sodass man problemlos sein System per

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-10 Thread David Baron
I still have no DRI. Daenzer packages are hard enough to compile. A friend finally go it compiled for 2.4.22-xfs but it does not catch. There are now binaries around that ask a few questions and attempt the compile for you. This does not mean it will procede nor does it mean the module will do

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-10 Thread Number Six
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:54:43AM +0100, David Baron wrote: I still have no DRI. Daenzer packages are hard enough to compile. A friend When people report glxgears framerates, are they reporting it with the small window that comes up by default? Or when the window is maximised? $ fglrxinfo

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-09 Thread Johann Spies
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:07:40AM -0600, Kent West wrote: glxinfo | more and then about the fourth line down to see if you have DRI enabled. Thanks - also for the others for their answers. A further question: I see that DRI is not enabled for me. How do I enable it? I have the

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-09 Thread Kent West
Johann Spies wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:07:40AM -0600, Kent West wrote: glxinfo | more and then about the fourth line down to see if you have DRI enabled. Thanks - also for the others for their answers. A further question: I see that DRI is not enabled for me. How do I enable

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-09 Thread Micha Feigin
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:25:31AM -0600, Kent West wrote: Johann Spies wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:07:40AM -0600, Kent West wrote: glxinfo | more and then about the fourth line down to see if you have DRI enabled. Thanks - also for the others for their answers. A

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beat Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-07 Thread David Baron
On Friday 05 March 2004 17:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, found the first problem. Don't run setiathome while glxgears is running. 1800 fps now. Much more respectable. Oh, yeah!! An admitted CPU hog. Don't let the ETs steal your CPU-cycles :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-05 Thread Nicolas Kratz
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote: Hi all, I've got a Dell D600 laptop with a ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 M9 graphics card. Different laptop, but same graphics card here. Now, I am somewhat frustrated about the fact that Knoppix beats the shit out of sid when it comes

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-05 Thread Mike Dresser
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, [iso-8859-1] Pål Dahle wrote: Hi all, I've got a Dell D600 laptop with a ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 M9 graphics P4 2.53, Geforce4 MX 440(hey, i didn't want it, it was given to me at work) With DRI on Sid, i get around 175 fps. Without DRI on Knoppix, i get around 350. Both

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-05 Thread Johann Spies
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote: DRI | Knoppix Sid yes |1330 800 no | 380 320 Sorry for showing my ignorance, but how do you measure this? Regards Johann -- Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036 Informasietegnologie, Universiteit van

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-05 Thread Mike Dresser
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Mike Dresser wrote: I'm sure I've done something wrong on both problems :) Well, found the first problem. Don't run setiathome while glxgears is running. 1800 fps now. Much more respectable. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-05 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:24:11PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote: DRI | Knoppix Sid yes |1330 800 no | 380 320 Sorry for showing my ignorance, but how do you measure this? Just run

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-05 Thread Nicolas Kratz
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:24:11PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote: DRI | Knoppix Sid yes |1330 800 no | 380 320 Sorry for showing my ignorance, but how do you measure this? You're not ignorant in the least.

Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears

2004-03-05 Thread Kent West
Johann Spies wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote: DRI | Knoppix Sid yes |1330 800 no | 380 320 Sorry for showing my ignorance, but how do you measure this? Regards Johann glxinfo | more and then about the fourth line down to see if

XFree86 4.3.0 startup time (was: Re: Knoppix 3.3 beats Debian sid badly in glxgears)

2004-03-05 Thread Andreas Bach Aaen
Fredag den 5. marts 2004 15:20 skrev Mike Dresser: The other annoying thing is that XFree 4.3.0 takes about 35 seconds to start, compared to the 8 of 4.2.x Your are not the only one that have got this slow start up of the XFree86 on unstable. I see this too on my Intel Graphics Exteme

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-11 Thread Bijan Soleymani
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 03:22:14PM -0700, s. keeling wrote: I blame Microsoft directly for having created an environment in which malware thrives. The virus and worm writers are merely supplying the payload that exploits that environment. And we all end up paying for the mess everytime some

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-11 Thread Richard Hoskins
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't like Microsoft because they make proprietary software, not because their proprietary software isn't good enough. For most people in most situations it's good enough. If you don't believe me look around. I don't have to look further than my

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-10 Thread Adam Funk
On Monday 09 February 2004 23:10, Paul Morgan wrote: The point being that if you install debian, and ask questions which show that you're thinking and trying to learn, debian folks will bend over backwards and stay up all night helping you out, for free. There are many in here who will attest

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-10 Thread Pedro M.
Katipo wrote: On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 23:04:57 -0500 Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: Snip I just have to say that I find this cluebie/stupid nonsense you keep

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-10 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Sam Halliday: i cant believe i just replied to an anti-microsoft troll on debian-user Rest assured, you didn't. On my more reasonable days, I can agree that there may actually be a small number of situations where someone will have no alternative to using crapware. Poor

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-10 Thread Mike M
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:22:08PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:25:33AM -0500, Mike M wrote: What interests me at this point is if and when there will be a live-cd == Debian (stable, testing, unstable) When it's time to railroad, people start railroading. That's

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Katipo
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:58:48 -0500 Adam Aube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 08 February 2004 03:19 pm, Sneferu wrote: I'd say that the solutions to all this problems is mepis.org ;-) Agreed - MEPIS is the Linux distro I would recommend to a newbie. In a Spawn of Debian faceoff, it

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Katipo
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 23:04:57 -0500 Jeff Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: Snip I just have to say that I find this cluebie/stupid nonsense you keep spouting very offputting

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Haines Brown
Dale Welch wrote: And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing your diapers . . . To whom does your refer? If to Kent, then Nope. after all i was born a few months after Kennedy was shot... Kent was born a few months before Kennedy was shot. Age is

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Adam Aube
On Monday 09 February 2004 02:50 am, Katipo wrote: Yes, I read that article. I'm afraid that I don't place much credence in the reviewers' assessment ability. To quote the author from the final article in the series: Another thing for certain: just looking at the score doesn't begin to do

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 08:06, Haines Brown wrote: Dale Welch wrote: And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing your diapers . . . To whom does your refer? If to Kent, then Nope. after all i was born a few months after Kennedy was shot... Kent

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Mike M
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:04:57PM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote: On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: snip Then they should use it. I couldn't care less whether someone uses Debian, Knoppix, SuSE, Mandrake, or even Windows. Cluebies have been shooting themselves in the

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Mike M
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:05:15PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: I would like at some point to build a version based on stable. Perhaps late this year after my 2nd brain surgery :-) I've subscribed to a brain surgery user list. I can do your surgery and then you can get started on the

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Mike M
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:13:07PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:32:54PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: For him and many other people having an easy install OS is imperative. No. John Q. Public has no business pretending he's competent to install a complex operating

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:33:15 +0800, Katipo wrote: How much further ahead would Debian be if it already incorporated Knoppixs' hardware recognition, Adamantixs' security features and Xandros' drag and drop capability? Instead I have sat back and watched as supposedly mature aged individuals

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Paul Morgan: You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti M$ remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and tired. Microsoft software sucks, bigtime! Anyone looking at the amount

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Sam Halliday
s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Paul Morgan: You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile antiM$ remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and tired. Microsoft software sucks, bigtime! Anyone

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:50:17 -0700, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Paul Morgan: You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti M$ remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and tired.

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Damon L. Chesser
s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Paul Morgan: You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti M$ remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and tired. Microsoft software sucks, bigtime! Anyone

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 21:11:15 +, Sam Halliday wrote: i cant believe i just replied to an anti-microsoft troll on debian-user :-/ I'll note it in my diary, Sam : -- paul It is important to realize that any lock can be picked with a big enough hammer.

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:04:34 -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: [snip] If the idea is to dumb things down so that the stupids don't have to think, eventually all that will be left are the stupids. [snip] Ha! Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it. I've just

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Katipo
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:25:17 -0600 Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Paul Morgan: Snip This is the first time I have to disagree with you S. Keeling. Users of CAD (espe. AutoCad) realy have to use windose. No maker of professional CAD is

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Katipo
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:59:43 -0500 Paul Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:50:17 -0700, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Paul Morgan: You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti M$ remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:43:41 +0800, Katipo wrote: On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:59:43 -0500 Paul Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:50:17 -0700, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Paul Morgan: You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti M$

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Nate Duehr
On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:25 PM, Damon L. Chesser wrote: This is the first time I have to disagree with you S. Keeling. Users of CAD (espe. AutoCad) realy have to use windose. No maker of professional CAD is porting to linux. I know a shop here that builds buildings and they all use Autocad.

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 16:25, Damon L. Chesser wrote: s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Paul Morgan: You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti M$ remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Sam Halliday
Nate Duehr wrote: Damon Chesser wrote: This is the first time I have to disagree with you S. Keeling. Users of CAD (espe. AutoCad) realy have to use windose. No maker of professional CAD is porting to linux. I know a shop here that builds buildings and they all use Autocad. Their

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Damon L. Chesser
Nate Duehr wrote: On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:25 PM, Damon L. Chesser wrote: This is the first time I have to disagree with you S. Keeling. Users of CAD (espe. AutoCad) realy have to use windose. No maker of professional CAD is porting to linux. I know a shop here that builds buildings and they

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Nate Duehr
On Feb 9, 2004, at 5:29 PM, Sam Halliday wrote: now please can we stop this thread and get back to debian related issues? This from the person who took the time to answer the original poster's anti-Microsoft comments with non-Linux/non-Debian advocacy on a Linux list??? You started it, sir. I

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:04:17AM -0500, Mike M wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:04:57PM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote: On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: snip Then they should use it. I couldn't care less whether someone uses Debian, Knoppix, SuSE, Mandrake, or even

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:25:33AM -0500, Mike M wrote: I think live-cds demonstrate the easy-to-install GPOS are feasible. No one said they weren't feasable. The installation isn't the issue. The *maintenance* of it is. Put another way... we already have umpteen zillion poorly-administered

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Sam Halliday
Nate Duehr wrote: While you may be very intelligent regarding CAD software, you sure seem willing to attack people like myself who are only pointing out alternatives that ARE Linux-related on a Linux mailing list, and then claiming that *I* took the conversation off-topic? Wow. Quite bold

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:29:35AM +, Sam Halliday wrote: varicad is a joke for serious work... speak to an expert, and they will tell you the same thing. even autocad is described as too simplistic by a few mechanical engineers i know, and architects (REAL architects, not extension to

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Sam Halliday
Antonio Rodriguez wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:29:35AM +, Sam Halliday wrote: varicad is a joke for serious work... speak to an expert, and they will tell you the same thing. even autocad is described as too simplistic by a few mechanical engineers i know, and architects (REAL

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Lance Simmons
* Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040207 18:05]: I think there is a place for Knoppix in introducing newbies to Debian. I'm not a Debian newbie, but in the past year I've used Knoppix for new installs on a few pieces of unfamiliar hardware. When an old laptop falls into your hands, and you

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:15:38AM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote: When an old laptop falls into your hands, and you don't have any documentation on it, it's easier to use Knoppix and then upgrade to Debian than it is to do the work needed to install Debian directly. So long as the end result is

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Bijan Soleymani
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:44:28AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: Feh. While it may well work for you, who has clue, anyone who suggests to a cluebie that using Knoppix is a way to get Debian should be shot. Well a lot of new users like Knoppix and would like to have it on the hard disk. Is it ok

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:44:28AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: Feh. While it may well work for you, who has clue, anyone who suggests to a cluebie that using Knoppix is a way to get Debian should be shot. Well a lot of new users like Knoppix

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Bijan Soleymani
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:40:33PM +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote: Using Knoppix on the hard disk means no security updates, a system only upgradable to unstable, and a lot of possible problems for beginners. It all depends on what kind of beginner. When I was new to Debian my major problems were

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Sneferu
I'd say that the solutions to all this problems is mepis.org ;-) Can still be used as livecd, and if you like what you see just double click pe Install icon on the desktop... I don't think that a debian-like-system can be any easy than this...my 13 years old cousin got it up-n-working in less

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Lance Simmons
* Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040208 10:44]: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:15:38AM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote: When an old laptop falls into your hands, and you don't have any documentation on it, it's easier to use Knoppix and then upgrade to Debian than it is to do the work needed to

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Adam Aube
On Sunday 08 February 2004 03:19 pm, Sneferu wrote: I'd say that the solutions to all this problems is mepis.org ;-) Agreed - MEPIS is the Linux distro I would recommend to a newbie. In a Spawn of Debian faceoff, it beat Lindows, Xandros, and Libranet.

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: Well a lot of new users like Knoppix and would like to have it on the hard disk. Is it ok for them to use it, or will the secret police come and shoot them for not using pure Debian instead too. Then they should use it. I

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Paul Morgan
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:16:33 -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:44:28AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: Feh. While it may well work for you, who has clue, anyone who suggests to a cluebie that using Knoppix is a way to get Debian should be shot. Well a lot of new users like

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Dale Welch
And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing your diapers... since i learned basic on a trash-80 model-1 when i was barely a teenager (ok so some would say i am just as bad calling the trs-80 by the popular term of trash-80 --- i knew some guys who ran a good bbs on a

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Kent West
Dale Welch wrote: And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing your diapers . . . To whom does your refer? If to Kent, then Nope. after all i was born a few months after Kennedy was shot... Kent was born a few months before Kennedy was shot. -- Kent -- To

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Dale Welch
I apologize to my elder... it was not to you though i realize i quoted you. :-) It was to Marc i spoke and perhaps others... that particular attitude while strong in my generation... is even stronger in a younger crowd. ;-) But perhaps marc has fooled me and is older than either of us. But

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Jeff Elkins
On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: Well a lot of new users like Knoppix and would like to have it on the hard disk. Is it ok for them to use it, or will the secret police come and shoot them for not using

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Nano Nano
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:05:15PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: ---dale ---it is ok to have no rules... so long as everyone follows the rules Evey asks: All this riot and uproar, V...is this anarchy? Is this the land of do-as-you-please? He responds: No. This is only the land of

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:32:54PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing your diapers... Well, let's see. I was born in 1964. I've been doing computers since 1980 or so. The first machine I owned was an 8080A-based machine called an

  1   2   >