Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:18:55 + Brian wrote: Hello Brian, >On Tue 20 Mar 2018 at 20:54:47 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: >> Who is still offering pop3? >Gmail and gmx and probably lots of others. Most others, I suspect. I won't use IMAP at all. -- Regards _

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Tue 20 Mar 2018 at 20:54:47 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2018-03-20 hackte Joe in die Tasten: [...] > > This has reduced with the decline of small (and > > large!) businesses running their own private SMTP servers but > > downloading their mail from a single shared external POP3

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 08:30:50AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 20 Mar 2018 at 08:28:20 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote: > > P.S. someone said that bounces are generated using the Reply-To: header. > > This is incorrect (or at least, would be a violation of the protocols). > > Bounces are sent

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Tue 20 Mar 2018 at 08:28:20 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote: > P.S. someone said that bounces are generated using the Reply-To: header. > This is incorrect (or at least, would be a violation of the protocols). > Bounces are sent to the envelope sender address (the one given by the > sender during

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:21:03AM +, Joe wrote: > A SMTP server, by default, accepts email only for recipients which have > an account on it. If only. No, that's part of the problem. An SMTP server, *by default*, has no knowledge of which local-recipient-parts are valid and which are not.

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:21:03AM +, Joe wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:52:48 +0100 > wrote: > > > > > > > "never" is too strong a word. This is a corollary of the fundamental > > law "all generalizations suck". > > > How

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:52:48 +0100 wrote: > > > "never" is too strong a word. This is a corollary of the fundamental > law "all generalizations suck". > How do you determine the exceptions? A SMTP server, by default, accepts email only for recipients which have an account

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:21:57PM +, Joe wrote: [...] > > This is precisely why e-mail server should never send bounces to > > non-local senders. When sender is spoofed as in this case then is hit > > with thousands of DSNs. [delivery status

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:31:48 + Karol Augustin wrote: > On 2018-03-19 12:58, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Hello and Listmaster/owner, > > > > I have send on "Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:17:40 -0400" a message > > to the list and now I got already 2800 Spams on one go! > > >

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On 2018-03-19 20:50, Nick Boyce wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:31:48 + > Karol Augustin wrote: > >> On 2018-03-19 12:58, Michelle Konzack wrote: >> > Hello and Listmaster/owner, >> > >> > I have send on "Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:17:40 -0400" a message >> > to the list

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:31:48 + Karol Augustin wrote: > On 2018-03-19 12:58, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Hello and Listmaster/owner, > > > > I have send on "Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:17:40 -0400" a message > > to the list and now I got already 2800 Spams on one go! > > >

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On 2018-03-19 12:58, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello and Listmaster/owner, > > I have send on "Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:17:40 -0400" a message > to the list and now I got already 2800 Spams on one go! > > The EMail responsabble for this shit is . > > Please can you remove

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:54:10PM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote: > On 19/03/18 17:38, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > > Comments at end. > > > Where they should be. If you can avoid the HTML, and change your sig.sep to > , you're on your way to becoming

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On 19/03/18 17:38, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Comments at end. > Where they should be. If you can avoid the HTML, and change your sig.sep to , you're on your way to becoming a hero on this list.

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

Comments at end. On 3/19/18 12:22 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:35:04PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello Richard and *, Am 2018-03-19 hackte Richard Owlett in die Tasten: I didn't. But as my ISP has an excellent

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On 2018-03-19, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > > Did anyone else receive more than the one very obviously spoofed > Debian-User email over the weekend? I received just now, after a followup to Brian in this group via the gmane service, a bounce: Delivery has failed to these

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:35:04PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Richard and *, > > Am 2018-03-19 hackte Richard Owlett in die Tasten: > > I didn't. But as my ISP has an excellent spam filter I don't see what > > many others see. I suspect

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 17:35 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > I am sure, this attacker is here on the list, because it started with > my anser to "[LEARNING OUTCOME] Wi-Fi WPA Hacking Tool is Totally > Useless on New Wireless Routers". > Replying solely because I live/lust for parties like these

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

Hello Richard and *, Am 2018-03-19 hackte Richard Owlett in die Tasten: > I didn't. But as my ISP has an excellent spam filter I don't see what > many others see. I suspect the key is interpreting the header > information the OP gave. Is there a guide for an average user to > interpreting that

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Monday 19 March 2018 11:07:39 Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > On 3/19/18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:40:10AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> On Monday 19 March 2018 09:14:19 Jonathan Dowland

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On 03/19/2018 10:07 AM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: On 3/19/18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:40:10AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 19 March 2018 09:14:19 Jonathan Dowland wrote: This does not belong on

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On 3/19/18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:40:10AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Monday 19 March 2018 09:14:19 Jonathan Dowland wrote: >> >> > This does not belong on debian-user (and indeed posting it

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On 03/19/2018 09:40 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 19 March 2018 09:14:19 Jonathan Dowland wrote: This does not belong on debian-user (and indeed posting it will only make matters worse for you and us) Jonathon, why berate the poor user for what may your servers malperformance, which

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:40:10AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 19 March 2018 09:14:19 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > This does not belong on debian-user (and indeed posting it will only > > make matters worse for you and us) > > Jonathon,

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

On Monday 19 March 2018 09:14:19 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > This does not belong on debian-user (and indeed posting it will only > make matters worse for you and us) Jonathon, why berate the poor user for what may your servers malperformance, which since I am subscribed and didn't get them, I'd

Re: More then 2800 spams from the list...

This does not belong on debian-user (and indeed posting it will only make matters worse for you and us) -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.