Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

David Christensen writes: On 2/12/24 08:30, Linux-Fan wrote: David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple threads: https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml What algorithm did you implement? I copied the

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/12/24 08:30, Linux-Fan wrote: David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple threads: https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml What algorithm did you implement? I copied the algorithm from here:

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 3:02 PM Linux-Fan wrote: > > David Christensen writes: > > > On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: > >> I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple > >> threads: > >> https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml > >> > >> Before knowing about `fio` this way my

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple threads: https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml Before knowing about `fio` this way my way to benchmark SSDs :) Example: | $ big4 -b /dev/null 100 GiB | Ma_Sys.ma Big

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple threads: https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml Before knowing about `fio` this way my way to benchmark SSDs :) Example: | $ big4 -b /dev/null 100 GiB | Ma_Sys.ma Big 4.0.2, Copyright (c) 2014,

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/11/24 03:13, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, David Christensen wrote: Concurrency: threads throughput 8 205+198+180+195+205+184+184+189=1,540 MB/s There remains the question how to join these streams without losing speed in order to produce a single checksum. (Or one would have to

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/11/24 00:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote: In the other thread about the /dev/sdm test: Gene Heskett wrote: Creating file 39.h2w ... 1.98% -- 1.90 MB/s -- 257:11:32 [...] $ sudo f3probe --destructive --time-ops /dev/sdm Bad news: The device `/dev/sdm' is a counterfeit of type limbo Device

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 9:52 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > David Christensen wrote: > > Concurrency: > > threads throughput > > 8 205+198+180+195+205+184+184+189=1,540 MB/s > > There remains the question how to join these streams without losing speed > in order to produce a single checksum.

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/11/24 05:26, Linux-Fan wrote: David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 00:11, Thomas Schmitt wrote: [...] Increase block size: 2024-02-11 01:18:51 dpchrist@laalaa ~ $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1K 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB)

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, David Christensen wrote: > Concurrency: > threads throughput > 8 205+198+180+195+205+184+184+189=1,540 MB/s There remains the question how to join these streams without losing speed in order to produce a single checksum. (Or one would have to divide the target into 8 areas which get

Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 00:11, Thomas Schmitt wrote: [...] Increase block size: 2024-02-11 01:18:51 dpchrist@laalaa ~ $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1K 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 3.62874 s, 296 MB/s Here

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/11/24 00:11, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, David Christensen wrote: $ time dd if=/dev/urandom bs=8K count=128K | wc -c [...] 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 4.30652 s, 249 MB/s This looks good enough for practical use on spinning rust and slow SSD. Yes. Maybe the "wc" pipe

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, David Christensen wrote: > $ time dd if=/dev/urandom bs=8K count=128K | wc -c > [...] > 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 4.30652 s, 249 MB/s This looks good enough for practical use on spinning rust and slow SSD. Maybe the "wc" pipe slows it down ? ... not much on 4 GHz Xeon with

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, i wrote: > > In the other thread about the /dev/sdm test: Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Creating file 39.h2w ... 1.98% -- 1.90 MB/s -- 257:11:32 > > > [...] > > > $ sudo f3probe --destructive --time-ops /dev/sdm > > > Bad news: The device `/dev/sdm' is a counterfeit of type limbo > > > Device

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/10/24 10:28, Thomas Schmitt wrote: In the other thread about the /dev/sdm test: Creating file 39.h2w ... 1.98% -- 1.90 MB/s -- 257:11:32 but is taking a few bytes now and then. [...] $ ls -l total 40627044 [...] $ sudo f3probe --destructive --time-ops /dev/sdm Bad news: The device

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/10/24 02:38, Thomas Schmitt wrote: I have an own weak-random generator, but shred beats it by a factor of 10 when writing to /dev/null. As a baseline, here is a 2011 Dell Latitude E6520 with Debian generating a non-repeatable 1 GiB stream of cryptographically secure pseudo-random

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/10/24 13:30, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, gene heskett wrote: my fading eyesight couldn't see the diffs between () and {} in a 6 point font. I need a bigger, more legible font in t-bird. That's why i propose to copy+paste problematic command lines. Your mouse can read it, your mail

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, gene heskett wrote: > my fading eyesight couldn't see > the diffs between () and {} in a 6 point font. I need a bigger, more > legible font in t-bird. That's why i propose to copy+paste problematic command lines. Your mouse can read it, your mail client can send it, and we have youngsters

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/10/24 05:39, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, Gene Heskett wrote: Is bash not actually bash these days? It is not doing for loops for me. Come on Gene, be no sophie. Copy+paste your failing line here. :)) Alexander M. posted it a few days ago but my fading eyesight couldn't see the diffs

Re: Unidentified subject!

>> AFAIK the bogus 128TB drives do properly report such ridiculous sizes: >> the reality only hits when you try to actually store that amount of >> information on them. >> [ I'm not sure how it works under the hood, but since SSDs store their >>data "anywhere" in the flash, they can easily

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, Gene Heskett wrote: > Is bash not actually bash these days? It is not doing for loops for me. Come on Gene, be no sophie. Copy+paste your failing line here. :)) IIRC the for-loop in question writes several copies of the same file. (

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/7/24 23:28, Stefan Monnier wrote: Well the 2T memory everybody was curious about 3 weeks ago got here early. From dmesg after plugging one in: [629240.916163] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 39 using xhci_hcd [629241.066221] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=048d,

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hi all, Am 08.02.2024 um 21:38 schrieb Andy Smith: Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:40:54PM +0100, Ralph Aichinger wrote: On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 15:36 +, Andy Smith wrote: I learned not to go there a long time ago and have seen plenty of reminders along the way from others' misfortunes

Re: Unidentified subject!

Charles Curley writes: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 18:02:36 -0500 > Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> > Test it with Validrive. >> > https://www.grc.com/validrive.htm >> >> Looks like proprietary software for Windows. > > badblocks, available in a Debian repo near you, might be a suitable > replacement.

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 18:02:36 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Test it with Validrive. > > https://www.grc.com/validrive.htm > > Looks like proprietary software for Windows. badblocks, available in a Debian repo near you, might be a suitable replacement. -- Does anybody read signatures any

Re: Unidentified subject!

> Test it with Validrive. > https://www.grc.com/validrive.htm Looks like proprietary software for Windows. Stefan

Re: Unidentified subject!

gene heskett writes: > Well the 2T memory everybody was curious about 3 weeks ago got here early. > > From dmesg after plugging one in: > [629240.916163] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 39 using xhci_hcd > [629241.066221] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=048d, > idProduct=1234,

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 16:28, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 04:22:49PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:17PM +, Andy Smith wrote: I really do mean all forms of USB that come over a USB port. That line was meant to read I really do mean all forms of storage

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 04:22:49PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:17PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > > I really do mean all forms of USB that come over a USB port. > > That line was meant to read > > I really do mean all forms of storage that come over a USB port.

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 16:16, Andy Smith wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:56:19PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: On 2/8/24 15:43, Andy Smith wrote: I wouldn't have much issue with taking a USB drive out of its caddy to get the SATA drive from inside, except that it would have to be an amazingly good deal to make

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 04:00:01PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: > I have been using USB attached HDDs and SSDs for 10 years now and > have never had one unexpectedly go off line. Your postings > suggest you don't know what your talking about. Okay then. Despite this uncharitable comment, I do

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:56:19PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: > On 2/8/24 15:43, Andy Smith wrote: > > I wouldn't have much issue with taking a USB drive out of its caddy > > to get the SATA drive from inside, except that it would have to be > > an amazingly good deal to make it worth voiding the

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 15:35, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 12:23:45AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: On 08/02/2024 22:36, Andy Smith wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 USB storage is for phones and cameras

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 15:43, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:57 AM Ralph Aichinger wrote: How does a breaking USB disk differ from a breaking SATA disk? I may be mistaken, but I believe AS is talking about USB thumb

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:17PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > I really do mean all forms of USB that come over a USB port. That line was meant to read I really do mean all forms of storage that come over a USB port. Thanks, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:57 AM Ralph Aichinger wrote: > > How does a breaking USB disk differ from a breaking SATA disk? > > I may be mistaken, but I believe AS is talking about USB thumb drives, > SDcards and the like. I

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:40:54PM +0100, Ralph Aichinger wrote: > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 15:36 +, Andy Smith wrote: > > I learned not to go there a long time ago and have seen plenty of > > reminders along the way from others' misfortunes to not ever go > > there again myself. > > How

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 12:23:45AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 08/02/2024 22:36, Andy Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > > > [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 > > > > USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:57 AM Ralph Aichinger wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 15:36 +, Andy Smith wrote: > > USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious > > computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say > > they use it all the time and it is fine. > > I am

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 08/02/2024 22:36, Andy Smith wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious computing. Do you mean that a proper backup drive should use uas (USB Attached

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 15:36 +, Andy Smith wrote: > USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious > computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say > they use it all the time and it is fine.  I am clearly in the latter camp. This mail is delivered via a Raspberry

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hi, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:14:24AM -0500, Gremlin wrote: > On 2/8/24 10:36, Andy Smith wrote: > > USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious > > computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say > > they use it all the time and it is fine. They will keep saying

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 10:36, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say they use it all

Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say they use it all the time and it is fine. They will

Re: Unidentified subject!

> Well the 2T memory everybody was curious about 3 weeks ago got here early. > > From dmesg after plugging one in: > [629240.916163] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 39 using xhci_hcd > [629241.066221] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=048d, > idProduct=1234, bcdDevice= 2.00 >

Re: new subject

On 6/21/22 15:19, gene heskett writes: dig "my-site-name" returns the proper ipv4 address.  I just used the address:6309 and it worked. So I edited the address bar to use the registered name:6309 and hit F5, a couple times, and that works. So now I need a stanza in apache2.conf that works.

Re: Unidentified subject!

Dan Ritter wrote: ... > You want to ignore the USB ports and focus on the attached > devices. udev is the mechanism here. > > For example, in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-ups I have: > > SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="0764", ATTR{idProduct}=="0501", > SYMLINK+="ups0", GROUP="nut" > > Which means

Re: On Subject drift [was: How long will this take?]

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:36:03PM +0200, Seeds Notoneofmy wrote: [...] Thanks for your kind words. > To learn is a personal effort. I've learnt from this and you have too. I > hope others have as well. The community will be better of it. Let's hope so, yes :-) Cheers -- t signature.asc

Re: On Subject drift [was: How long will this take?]

On 6/27/20 10:51 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: I'll take your question face value. While there are big similarities between both, I still see at least two (small!) differences. 1) The subject "how long will this take" at least gives a hint at something performance-related. The subject "have

Re: On Subject drift [was: How long will this take?]

Hi, 27 juin 2020 à 10:51 de to...@tuxteam.de: > I'll take your question face value. While there are big similarities > between both, I still see at least two (small!) differences. > > 1) The subject "how long will this take" at least gives a hint > at something performance-related. The subject

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi. Mail headers are mangled, but: On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 07:45:26AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > And the problem that you're trying to solve by such "predictable" audio > > devices is? > > AUDIODEV=hw:0,0 play MY/m85.WAV AUDIODEV=dmix:CARD=PCH,DEV=0 play MY/m85.WAV Use "aplay

Re: (No Subject)

On 12/11/18 3:45 PM, md wrote: md wrote: Using an old PATA-to-USB cable, I attached a 15 year old PATA DVD Drive It's better to include a subject so others can reference your problem and it's possible resolution in the future. Otherwise someone has to devote their time only to you. This

Re: CUPS problem on Jessie was Re: (no subject)

On 10/25/16, Norbert Kiszka wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 25 October 2016 08:06:02 Alan Hutchinson wrote: >> > Hi people just a small note to tell you that, I am having a problem in >> > Debian 8 Jessie ,I have bean trying to run cups.service and it just >> > wont >> > run, when using

Re: CUPS problem on Jessie was Re: (no subject)

Dnia 2016-10-25, wto o godzinie 12:37 +0100, Lisi Reisz pisze: > Replying to give this a subject. > Lisi > > On Tuesday 25 October 2016 08:06:02 Alan Hutchinson wrote: > > -- > > Alan Hutchinson > > Hi people just a small note to tell you that, I am having a problem in > > Debian 8 Jessie ,I

CUPS problem on Jessie was Re: (no subject)

Replying to give this a subject. Lisi On Tuesday 25 October 2016 08:06:02 Alan Hutchinson wrote: > -- > Alan Hutchinson > Hi people just a small note to tell you that, I am having a problem in > Debian 8 Jessie ,I have bean trying to run cups.service and it just wont > run, when using system d,

Re: DHCP failure (was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Op Thu, 29 Sep 2016 01:18:02 +0200 schreef Dan Ritter : On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:30:04PM -0700, hol...@cox.net wrote: Clean install of deb8 (jessie)on my Thinkpad T4220i laptop. went well except for the fact that the network configuration with DCP failed. I was

Re: missing subject

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:34:13PM -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote: > Sorry. Hit the send key too soon. Subject should have been network > configuration. and you already got two proposals for a nicer Subject. Ain't we a nice bunch ;-) regards - -- t

DHCP failure (was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:30:04PM -0700, hol...@cox.net wrote: > Clean install of deb8 (jessie)on my Thinkpad T4220i laptop. went well > except for the fact that the network configuration > with DCP failed. > > I was given 3 options. > 1) try it again. This was hope over experience. > 2)

Re: Remove subject

On 12/05/15 17:34, Mis Ntmurth wrote: Ok thanks I will contact debian They don't participate in Internet censorship either. -- Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL) I haven't lost my mind... ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Remove subject

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: On 11 May 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote: [snip] I hear that a _lot_. shudder But I am hearing it more and more in cases like this above where only the negative makes sense. When it is written, some are, I am sure, typos.

OT: linguistic mis-usages (was Re: Remove subject)

On 05/15/2015 at 07:35 AM, Chris Bannister wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: Since we're well off-topic already, I can't resist citing a rather similar and increasingly prevalent negative usage that makes no sense. I quite often read the phrase: the

Re: Remove subject

On 05/12/2015 10:34 AM, Mis Ntmurth wrote: Ok thanks I will contact debian regards You're also good to contact GMAne http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/385152/match=problem+installing+gplflash Marc Info: http://marc.info/?l=debian-userm=127780632904466 Google:

Re: OT: linguistic mis-usages (was Re: Remove subject)

On 15 May 2015, The Wanderer wrote: On 05/15/2015 at 07:35 AM, Chris Bannister wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: Since we're well off-topic already, I can't resist citing a rather similar and increasingly prevalent negative usage that makes no

Re: Remove subject

Ok thanks I will contact debian regards 2015-05-11 22:45 GMT+02:00 Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de: [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed] Mis Ntmurth: Can you please remove the page where my name appears, at this page,

Re: Remove subject

On 11 May 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote: [snip] I hear that a _lot_. shudder But I am hearing it more and more in cases like this above where only the negative makes sense. When it is written, some are, I am sure, typos. But I am equally sure that soemtimes when I understand the positive the

Re: Remove subject

John Hasler: Jochen Spieker wrote: [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed] Lisi Reisz writes: This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I assume that it is a mistake and that Jochen intended to write Cc'ed to OP since I not am sure (s)he is subscribed Yes, that's

Re: Remove subject

On Monday 11 May 2015 22:30:13 Patrick Wiseman wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote: [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed] This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take

Re: Remove subject

On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote: [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed] This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take it to mean what I would phrase Cc'ed to OP since I am NOT sure (s)he is subscribed, ( or am sure (s)he is NOT subscribed) since

Re: Remove subject

Jochen Spieker wrote: [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed] Lisi Reisz writes: This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I assume that it is a mistake and that Jochen intended to write Cc'ed to OP since I not am sure (s)he is subscribed -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com

Re: Remove subject

[Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed] Mis Ntmurth: Can you please remove the page where my name appears, at this page, https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/06/msg02062.html this subject is very old and have no answer and no interest now. It appears you do not really

Re: Remove subject

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote: [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed] This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take it to mean what I would phrase Cc'ed to OP since I am NOT

Re: change subject of emails on ISP's IMAP server

Curt cu...@free.fr writes: On 2014-12-16, Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote: Apparently, this is what imapfilter will do. You'll need to write a lua script to tell it what to do, but it looks like it comes with some hackable examples. Thanks. I see the following example in some of the

Re: change subject of emails on ISP's IMAP server

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:38:03PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:53:51PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote: When my ISP encounters an email that it cannot scan for viruses, it prepends ***UNCHECKED*** to the subject. This occurs on every encrypted email I receive. It's highly

Re: change subject of emails on ISP's IMAP server

On 2014-12-16, Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote: Apparently, this is what imapfilter will do. You'll need to write a lua script to tell it what to do, but it looks like it comes with some hackable examples. Thanks. I see the following example in some of the imapfilter docs. I'll The problem

Re: change subject of emails on ISP's IMAP server

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:53:51PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote: When my ISP encounters an email that it cannot scan for viruses, it prepends ***UNCHECKED*** to the subject. This occurs on every encrypted email I receive. It's highly annoying, and the ISP refuses to fix this. What tools can I

Re: change subject of emails on ISP's IMAP server

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:47:55PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: On 12/12/2014 at 08:53 PM, Rob Owens wrote: When my ISP encounters an email that it cannot scan for viruses, it prepends ***UNCHECKED*** to the subject. This occurs on every encrypted email I receive. It's highly annoying,

Re: change subject of emails on ISP's IMAP server

On 20141213_1034-0500, Rob Owens wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:47:55PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: On 12/12/2014 at 08:53 PM, Rob Owens wrote: When my ISP encounters an email that it cannot scan for viruses, it prepends ***UNCHECKED*** to the subject. This occurs on every

Re: change subject of emails on ISP's IMAP server

On 12/12/2014 at 08:53 PM, Rob Owens wrote: When my ISP encounters an email that it cannot scan for viruses, it prepends ***UNCHECKED*** to the subject. This occurs on every encrypted email I receive. It's highly annoying, and the ISP refuses to fix this. What tools can I use to detect

Re: Unidentified subject!

El día 18 de julio de 2013 10:58, kyd.is.b...@gmail.com escribió: Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:28:04 -0300 From: pizta...@crow.satelite.com To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: debian 7 erro al actualizar alquitar google chrome Message-ID: 20130718152804.ga16

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 08:55 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: On 2013-06-23 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 23:36 -0400, Gary Dale wrote: If you have important data on the laptop, you should plug in an external drive and dd the entire laptop drive to an image file

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 22/06/13 04:38 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: Hi Guys, I need your help. 1. I set out to install Debian from Windows 7 2. I downloaded the win 32 Debian Installer and went through the procedures 3. On reaching the partitioning option I got a little confused I had used the RAID5 Partition then

Re: Unidentified subject!

From: Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Saturday, 22 June 2013, 21:47 Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! On 22/06/13 04:38 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: Hi Guys, I need your help. 1. I set out to install Debian from Windows 7

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 22/06/13 08:32 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: *From:* Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com *To:* debian-user@lists.debian.org *Cc:* debian-user@lists.debian.org *Sent:* Saturday, 22 June 2013, 21:47 *Subject:* Re: Unidentified subject! On 22/06/13 04:38 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: Hi Guys, I

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 01:32 +0100, Lagun Adeshina wrote: All I did was try to install Debian 7 and the RAID5 was just some option that came up during partitioning. I read about it and understood it was supposed to keep whole old stuff sale. That was my understanding and I'm left with no OS

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 23:36 -0400, Gary Dale wrote: If you have important data on the laptop, you should plug in an external drive and dd the entire laptop drive to an image file on the external drive (which must have at least as much free space as the laptop drive's size). A very good

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2013-06-23 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 23:36 -0400, Gary Dale wrote: If you have important data on the laptop, you should plug in an external drive and dd the entire laptop drive to an image file on the external drive (which must have at least as much free space as the

Re: Unidentified subject!

Le samedi 08 juin 2013 à 18:09, fred a écrit : Bonjour, Bonjour, j'ai quelques difficultés avec la correction d'orthographe sous mutt. Pas d'idée quant à ton problème puisque je n'utilise pas la correction orthographique de mutt. Une autre solution pour arriver au même résultat, tu peux

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:44:26AM +0100, Gaëtan PERRIER wrote: Dans le cas présent ce n'est pas un logiciel qui est non maintenu mais une version du dit logiciel. Ça fait une grande différence. C'est difficile avec du logiciel libre de definir un logiciel non maintenu, dans le meilleur des

Re: Unidentified subject!

Bonjour Que devons nous faire ? Enlever iceweasel de debian ? Julien. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 11/03/2013 10:15, j...@free.fr wrote: Bonjour Que devons nous faire ? Enlever iceweasel de debian ? Julien. Oui, moi je propose que iceweasle soit enlevé et Mozilla firefow et Mozilla thunderbird soit adoptés. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +, caleb KHM wrote: Oui, moi je propose que iceweasle soit enlevé et Mozilla firefow et Mozilla thunderbird soit adoptés. Pourquoi ? Devons nous aussi retirer tout les logiciels non maintenus ? Comment definissons nous le non maintenu pour un logiciel

Re: Unidentified subject!

Le lundi 11 mars 2013 à 10:16, caleb KHM a écrit : On 11/03/2013 10:15, j...@free.fr wrote: Que devons nous faire ? Enlever iceweasel de debian ? Oui, moi je propose que iceweasle soit enlevé et Mozilla firefow et Mozilla thunderbird soit adoptés. Ça ne résoudra rien. Qu'il s'agisse de

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 11/03/2013 10:54, Sébastien NOBILI wrote: Le lundi 11 mars 2013 à 10:16, caleb KHM a écrit : On 11/03/2013 10:15, j...@free.fr wrote: Que devons nous faire ? Enlever iceweasel de debian ? Oui, moi je propose que iceweasle soit enlevé et Mozilla firefow et Mozilla

Re: Unidentified subject!

Bonjour à tous les utilisateurs et développeurs de Debian : Dans son message du 10/03/13 à 18:56, Seb a écrit : De plus, Firefox et Thunderbird violent le premier point du contrat social (http://www.debian.org/social_contract). Exact, ce sont les nom et logo de chaque produit Mozilla qui

Re: Unidentified subject!

Le Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:40:02 +0100 j...@free.fr a écrit: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +, caleb KHM wrote: Oui, moi je propose que iceweasle soit enlevé et Mozilla firefow et Mozilla thunderbird soit adoptés. Pourquoi ? Devons nous aussi retirer tout les logiciels non maintenus ?

Re: Unidentified subject!

Mouais mais ça pose quand même pas mal de problèmes. Par exemple si on prend iceweasel qui lors du début du freeze était en version 10 ESR. Vous me direz c'est une version ESR donc support à long terme. Oui sauf que le support des ESR est de 1 an et qu'il s'est terminé en février je crois. L'ESR

Re: Unidentified subject!

Bonsoir, Le dimanche 10 mars 2013 à 18:57, stephane.garg...@laposte.net a écrit : Et je ne pense pas que, pour leur crédibilité, les Développeurs (et autres Responsables) Debian aient la naïveté (et encore moins l'inconscience) de recommander Stable à tous ceux (administrateurs de serveur ou

Re: (no subject)

Maybe usbmount package might help you out. --- jude jdash...@shellworld.net Microsoft, windows is accessible. why do blind people need screen readers? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:05:12 +0300, David Baron wrote: Aren't we all sick of seeing this? Well, is a bit annoying, yes. The listings with the messed up headers are next to useless. The only way to get sane headers is to post on-line, I suppose. Someone in the Debian universe has to be

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

On Monday 03 September 2012 16:05:12 David Baron wrote: Aren't we all sick of seeing this? The listings with the messed up headers are next to useless. The only way to get sane headers is to post on-line, I suppose. Someone in the Debian universe has to be able to fix this list! I have no

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >