Le Tue, 14 May 2002 09:04:23 +
François Boisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Le Mon, 13 May 2002 22:17:20 +0200
Francis Allouche [EMAIL PROTECTED] a dit:
route add -net 127.0.0.0
beastie:/home/francis# route add -net 127.0.0.0
SIOCADDRT: Argument invalide
Grrr...
Dans les
Qu'est-ce ca dit dans
/etc/hosts
et ifconfig?
Francis Allouche wrote:
Bonsoir à tous,
J'utilise une Debian Woody sur un poste isolé, connecté au net via un modem rtc.
Afin d'économiser mon temps de connexion, je souhaite mettre en place un
serveur de news local via leafnode. J'ai installé
Le Mon, 13 May 2002 15:24:03 -0400
dominique [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Qu'est-ce ca dit dans
/etc/hosts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 beastie
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
# (added automatically by netbase upgrade)
::1 ip6-localhost
Le lun 13/05/2002 à 21:25, Francis Allouche a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 beastie
si tu fais un telnet Beastie 119, ca risque pas de marcher ;-)
telnet beastie 119 c'est pas mieux ? (et oui ... la casse !!)
ou bien ajoute ce qu'il faut a ton /etc/hosts
en
On lun 13 Mae 2002 21:41:48, Grégoire Cachet wrote:
Le lun 13/05/2002 à 21:25, Francis Allouche a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 beastie
si tu fais un telnet Beastie 119, ca risque pas de marcher ;-)
telnet beastie 119 c'est pas mieux ? (et oui ... la
13 May 2002 21:41:48 +0200, Grégoire Cachet a écrit :
Le lun 13/05/2002 à 21:25, Francis Allouche a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 beastie
si tu fais un telnet Beastie 119, ca risque pas de marcher ;-)
telnet beastie 119 c'est pas mieux ? (et oui ... la
Le 13 May 2002 21:41:48 +0200
Grégoire Cachet [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Le lun 13/05/2002 à 21:25, Francis Allouche a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 beastie
si tu fais un telnet Beastie 119, ca risque pas de marcher ;-)
telnet beastie 119 c'est pas mieux
Le 13 May 2002 21:41:48 +0200
Grégoire Cachet [EMAIL PROTECTED] a dit:
Le lun 13/05/2002 à 21:25, Francis Allouche a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 beastie
si tu fais un telnet Beastie 119, ca risque pas de marcher ;-)
Ben on dirait que si:
[EMAIL
beastie:/home/francis# ifconfig
ppp0 Lien encap:Protocole Point-à-Point
inet adr:62.147.148.232 P-t-P:192.168.254.254
Masque:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1238 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
Le Mon, 13 May 2002 22:10:19 +
François Boisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
beastie:/home/francis# ifconfig
ppp0 Lien encap:Protocole Point-à-Point
inet adr:62.147.148.232 P-t-P:192.168.254.254
Masque:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST
El Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:01:45PM -0300, hffc dijo:
Debianeros :
Es posible desde una maquina xp con telnet, logueado como root apagar un
servidor linux. gracias
igual igual k en localh
shutdown -h now. Ya si quieres que se apage es tema de APM
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:01:45PM -0300, hffc wrote:
Debianeros :
Es posible desde una maquina xp con telnet, logueado como
root apagar un servidor linux. gracias
si
~ejg
pgpiYmBCVQqkT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Friday 08 March 2002 16:01, hffc
Debianeros :
Es posible desde una maquina xp con telnet, logueado como root apagar un
servidor linux. gracias
lo preguntas o lo afirmas?
segun parece lo afirmas, y estoy de acuerdo contigo.
si lo estas preguntando no importa si el windows es xp o
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 07:10:44PM +0100, Alexander Wasmuth wrote:
| alex@whizzo:~$ telnet blinkenlights.nl
| Trying 62.250.7.101...
| Connected to towel.blinkenlights.nl.
| Escape character is '^]'.
| SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_2.1.1
|
| Protocol mismatch.
| Connection closed by foreign host.
Reinhard Foerster wrote:
Normalerweise verwende ich kein telnet, aber warum wird da versucht eine
SSH-Verbindung (sehe ich das richtig?) aufzubauen und wo kann man das
konfigurieren? Ein kurzes Ausprobieren ergab bei allen normalen (Port
23) Telnetverbindungen einen solchen Fehler.
Alexander Wasmuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
ich wollte mir gerade mal Star-Wars auf blinkenlights.nl via telnet
anschauen, aber:
| alex@whizzo:~$ telnet blinkenlights.nl
| Trying 62.250.7.101...
| Connected to towel.blinkenlights.nl.
| Escape character is '^]'.
|
Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
Normalerweise verwende ich kein telnet, aber warum wird da versucht eine
SSH-Verbindung (sehe ich das richtig?) aufzubauen und wo kann man das
konfigurieren? Ein kurzes Ausprobieren ergab bei allen normalen (Port
23) Telnetverbindungen einen solchen Fehler.
Dans son message du 22/1/2002, Charles Goyard écrivait:
Ainsi parlait Loïc Le Guyader :
Le 22 janvier 2002, Rénald CASAGRAUDE, à bout, prit son clavier pour
taper sur son écran:
Essaye : heu ssh je crois...
On a le droit? Il me semblait qu'on ne pouvais utiliser que ssf!
Faut
Ainsi parlait Bruno Treguier :
Le probleme est que ssh supporte egalement des protocoles dont la
longueur de clef est superieure a 128 bits !
[...]
Donc, dans sa version actuelle, sauf erreur de ma part, ssh est
toujours illegal en France... :-)
Est-ce la possession du logiciel où
Bonjour,
Il me semble que l'utilisation d'une clé 128 n'est pas illégale en france, à la
condition de fournir la clé à l'état.
C'est un militaire de carrière qui m'a indiqué cette affaire, car il pretend
que l'état doit pouvoir decoder facilement, tout ce qui entre et qui sort de
son
petit complément à mon dernier post :
Dans le cas ou la liaison ssh doit rester déans un réseau particulier
(comprenons que les données ne doivent pas passer par internet, ou sortir de
votre reseaux), vous pouvez utiliser une clé 128 bits sans aucune restriction.
Cordialement,
Nicolas S
Dans son message du 23/1/2002, Charles Goyard écrivait:
Ainsi parlait Bruno Treguier :
Le probleme est que ssh supporte egalement des protocoles dont la
longueur de clef est superieure a 128 bits !
[...]
Donc, dans sa version actuelle, sauf erreur de ma part, ssh est
toujours
Bruno, merci pour votre réponse :)
Cependant, sans mettre en doute vos dires (il suffit de regarder votre
signature), je crois que
ce fameux militaire et vous meme avez dis la meme chose :
Le probleme ne concerne pas les logiciels utilisant des clefs de 128 bits
(dont l'importation et
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 06:01:40PM +0100, nicolas S wrote:
Bruno, merci pour votre réponse :)
De rien !
Cependant, sans mettre en doute vos dires (il suffit de
regarder votre signature),
Ma signature dit seulement ou je travaille, pas si j'ai tort
ou raison ! Je parle ici en mon nom propre,
Oups. Désolé pour le copier/coller malheureux de
mon précédent message. Non seulement je fais des
romans fleuves, mais en plus je radote ! :-)
Cordialement,
Bruno
--
-- Service Hydrographique et Oceanographique de la Marine --- EPSHOM/INF
-- 13, rue du Chatellier --- BP 30316 ---
Le Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:35:21AM +0100, Romain Lerallut a écrit :
D'ailleurs, puisqu'on en parle, quelle est la différence de
sécurité entre ssh et telnet-ssl ? ( à part le cas où on retombe
en telnet normal)
C'est trés simple telnet-ssl utilise simplement une couche open-ssl par dessus
le
Le 22 janvier 2002, Rénald CASAGRAUDE, à bout, prit son clavier pour
taper sur son écran:
Essaye : heu ssh je crois...
On a le droit? Il me semblait qu'on ne pouvais utiliser que ssf!
--
| Debout! les damnés de la terre! | Du passé faisons table rase, | C'est l
| Debout! les forçats de la
Essaye : heu ssh je crois...
On a le droit? Il me semblait qu'on ne pouvais utiliser que ssf!
ben utilise le, il existe aussi ...
--
MadCoder (53 53)
Economiquement, puisque l'entreprise qui investit retire tout
le bénéfice de la partie de la fonction de production de la
joint venture qui ne
Ainsi parlait Loïc Le Guyader :
Le 22 janvier 2002, Rénald CASAGRAUDE, à bout, prit son clavier pour
taper sur son écran:
Essaye : heu ssh je crois...
On a le droit? Il me semblait qu'on ne pouvais utiliser que ssf!
Faut sortir un peu ! :)
Le chiffrement des communications est limité à
Thierry Leurent wrote:
Salut,
Quel application dois-je utiliser pour me connecter a une autre machine
Je voudrais quelque-chose qui ressemble a telnet et qui utilise SSL
C'est une blague ???
Essaye : heu ssh je crois...
Salut,
salut,
Quel application dois-je utiliser pour me connecter a une autre machine
Je voudrais quelque-chose qui ressemble a telnet et qui utilise SSL
au risque de lancer un méchant troll, mais je comprends pas pourquoi les gens
s'obstinnent à utiliser telnet pour se connecter à des
Thus spake MadCoder on Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:12:37AM +0100:
t'as pas cherché bien loin toi ...
ssh ? ssf ?
Notons que la solution la plus immédiate au problème proche de
telnet, utilisant SSL est:
telnet-ssl ! :)
D'ailleurs, puisqu'on en parle, quelle est la différence de
sécurité entre
-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: Telnet y ftp.
Te aconsejo que compruebes los ficheros /etc/hosts.allow y
/etc/hosts.deny para permitir los accesos que por defecto están
restringidos.
Gracias por tu ayuda Bernardo, ¿como te va?.
He seguido tu
Te aconsejo que compruebes los ficheros /etc/hosts.allow y
/etc/hosts.deny para permitir los accesos que por defecto están
restringidos.
Gracias por tu ayuda Bernardo, ¿como te va?.
He seguido tu consejo y he leido las paginas man oportunas,
pero sigue sin funcionar.
Te mando el
Lo de tu hosts.allow parece que est bien. Quita el ":ALLOW" del final. Ah
puedes poner un comando del shell que se ejecute cada vez que se deniegue
el acceso, pero es opcional. Puedes dejarlo como:
in.ftpd: 192.168.1.2
in.telnetd : 192.168.1.2
Tambin puedes usar 192.168. o LOCAL en lugar de la
Jose Luis Alarcon wrote:
Saludos a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Por fin he conseguido a traves de interfaces sl0,
establecer procesos ping entre mis maquinas
Debian y Mandrake, en ambos sentidos.
Ahora llega la hora de usar aplicaciones
como telnet, ftp u otras similares.
Los intentos que he
on Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 11:55:07PM -0700, Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have looked at as much documentation as I can and I haven't found the
answer to this simple question:
My two computers with fixed IP's can ping each other but telnet says
unable to connect to remote host I
Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 11:55:07PM -0700, Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have looked at as much documentation as I can and I haven't found the
answer to this simple question:
My two computers with fixed IP's can ping each other but telnet says
unable to
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 16. 2001 01:54]:
My two computers with fixed IP's can ping each other but telnet says
unable to connect to remote host I would guess it might have to do
with file permissions. I just need this because of the X lockups I get
often enough to be a
Brian Clark wrote:
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 16. 2001 01:54]:
My two computers with fixed IP's can ping each other but telnet says
unable to connect to remote host I would guess it might have to do
with file permissions. I just need this because of the X lockups I get
often
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 16. 2001 02:38]:
should not setup or allow telnet at all. Is the setup for ssh exactly
the same as for telnet. I didn't see it in the example I found in the
HOWTO.
(~)% dpkg -l ssh | grep ssh
ii ssh 3.0.1p1-1.2 Secure
On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 02:36, Paul Scott wrote:
Thanks, I was aware of that and these two machines are right next to
each other and just used by me and my wife. OTOH I now realize that I
should not setup or allow telnet at all. Is the setup for ssh exactly
the same as for telnet. I
Not sure if this helps, since I am just now installing debian for the 1st
time. If the file /etc/securetty exists, delete it, and root should be
able to telnet in to that machine. (from RH6.2-zoot)
At 10:59 AM 12/16/2001 -0500, Marc Britten wrote:
On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 02:36, Paul Scott
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:04:57AM -0200, Lucio Rene Souza Cunha wrote:
Pessoal,
Alguem conhece um metodo para execucao de comandos em
telnet remoto, sem ser pelo modulo telnet do perl ? eu pensei que
funcionava a sintaxe ( comando.sh ; cat ) | nc host 23 , mas nao tenho
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Richardson, Martin wrote:
I would like to set up ssh and to disable telnet for security
reasons. Is this just a matter of installing the ssh components, and to
disable telnetd? in inetd.conf?
You could get rid of telnetd completely with something like
dpkg --purge
Richardson, Martin wrote:
I would like to set up ssh and to disable telnet for security
reasons. Is this just a matter of installing the ssh components, and to
disable telnetd? in inetd.conf?
Yes. Actually, you may as well remove the telnetd package entirely if
you don't expect to use
on Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 01:03:32AM +1000, Richardson, Martin ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
G'Day all,
I would like to set up ssh and to disable telnet for security
reasons. Is this just a matter of installing the ssh components, and to
disable telnetd? in inetd.conf?
Mostly.
$
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:31:06AM -0700, michael young muttered:
-- i know i know...but i still would like to use it. i have telnetd installed,
hosts.allow and deny dont have anything in them, /etc/inet.d shows telnet
running bec. telnet works when the hostname/eth0 ip is used but not with the
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 12:35:48AM -0500, David Turetsky wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:31:06AM -0700, michael young muttered: -- i know
i know...but i still would like to use it. i have telnetd installed,
hosts.allow and deny dont have anything in them, /etc/inet.d shows telnet
running
From: David Turetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use telnet all the time. I'd be very interested in hearing about a
better alternative
ssh.
I have the telnet client installed but not the server (In fact I have no
inetd services installed). If I needed to telnet into work then I'd expect
the network
Mark Lanett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: David Turetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use telnet all the time. I'd be very interested in hearing about a
better alternative
ssh.
I have the telnet client installed but not the server (In fact I have no
inetd services installed). If I needed
On 06-Oct-2001 michael young wrote:
i know i know...but i still would like to use it. i have telnetd installed,
hosts.allow and deny dont have anything in them, /etc/inet.d shows telnet
running bec. telnet works when the hostname/eth0 ip is used but not with the
inet addr... I would like to
je m'excuse, je pensais que tous allait bien.
j'ai réinstallé la debian
j'ai fait aptget install telnetd
et je pensais que les connexion telnet serais autorisé:
En faite non, les connexion ne fonctionnent pas
et pourtant je retrouve les lignes dans inetd.conf etc /services
je suis deçu
Le ven 05 oct 2001 10:41:20 GMT, kamel a écrit :
je m'excuse, je pensais que tous allait bien.
j'ai réinstallé la debian
j'ai fait aptget install telnetd
et je pensais que les connexion telnet serais autorisé:
En faite non, les connexion ne fonctionnent pas
et pourtant je retrouve les lignes
* kamel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
je m'excuse, je pensais que tous allait bien.
j'ai réinstallé la debian
j'ai fait aptget install telnetd
et je pensais que les connexion telnet serais autorisé:
En faite non, les connexion ne fonctionnent pas
et pourtant je retrouve les lignes dans
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:43:27 +0200
Pierre Gambarotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PG $ telnet localhost
PG Trying 127.0.0.1...
PG Connected to calvin.
PG Escape character is '^]'.
PG Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable calvin
PG Connection closed by foreign host.
Apparemment la connexion
* Georges Mariano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Apparemment la connexion s'établie et (intuitivement), c'est lors
de la création du contexte utilisateur que ça foire...
C'est peut etre plus grave :
J'ai lance manuellement un telnetd avec :
#in.telnetd -debug 4200
Le processus tourne bien.
Si
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:07:07AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| While we're on the topic, I can't telnet or FTP to any of my other
| machines on my LAN. They're in stock hosts.allow/hosts.deny
| configuration, I haven't changed any of that. I know it worked once
| before. Is there something
No firewall, I can ping them. How do I start the telnet and FTP daemons?
-- Deven
In a message dated 8/29/01 9:23:47 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Can you ping them? Do any of the machines have firewall rules that
may be blocking traffic? Do the server machines have
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:25:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled...
No firewall, I can ping them. How do I start the telnet and FTP daemons?
-- Deven
Do you have them installed?
FTP is wu-ftpd.
Telnet is telnetd. There's also a telnetd-ssl(?), that is more secure.
Be very careful
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:49:59PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:25:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled...
| No firewall, I can ping them. How do I start the telnet and FTP daemons?
|
|
| Do you have them installed?
| FTP is wu-ftpd.
or ftp could be proftpd or
Einar Matveinen, miércoles 04 de julio de 2001 a la(s) 11:14:27 +0200:
Bueno, ya está habilitado el telnet...
Ahora sólo te falta el ssh ;^).
--
David Serrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Linux Registered User #87069
pgpT1GJvnuTnC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:51:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour tout le monde; j'ai un probl?me que je n'arrive pas ? r?soudre:faire
un telnet sur un ?quipement priv?;je tape telnet 10.x.x.x et il ?cris Trying
to connect Pourtant j'arrive ? faire un telnet vers une autre machine
Ok, now that we've all got a nice windows ssh, how about DOS.
I need an SSH client (or else a telnet client) that works from DOS on a
286. I'm currently using NCSA telnet, but it has some trouble the
keymap.
--
Casper Gielen
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
People just generally
Bonjour,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour tout le monde; j'ai un problème que je n'arrive pas à résoudre:faire
un telnet sur un équipement privé;je tape telnet 10.x.x.x et il écris Trying
Oui, j'ai avais le meme problem. C'est un bug dans le deb. A
/etc/inetd.conf changes le user.group est
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:11:53PM -0700, Nick Jennings wrote:
I preffer installing cygwin, it comes with the unix versions of
telnet ssh, full ansi support. It's a feature rich unix shell for
windows, and it's painfully simple to install.
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/
it comes with ssh
Hi all!
Thanks for all the reactions, i've got Putty off the web (Sebastian, there
is a newer version than the one you sent me but thanks anyway!) and i love
it! all the things i wanted are there, works great and: 200 Kb (no typo!)
Good stuff comes in small packages..
Thanks to all!
Nico de
nico de haer wrote:
Hi all!
Thanks for all the reactions, i've got Putty off the web (Sebastian, there
is a newer version than the one you sent me but thanks anyway!) and i love
it! all the things i wanted are there, works great and: 200 Kb (no typo!)
Good stuff comes in small
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:36:33AM +0200, Matteo S. wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:11:53PM -0700, Nick Jennings wrote:
I preffer installing cygwin, it comes with the unix versions of
telnet ssh, full ansi support. It's a feature rich unix shell for
windows, and it's painfully simple to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Hi All,
I'm looking for a telnet client for windows 9x that provides me with:
1. Properly working keyboard (including F1 to F10)
2. SSL (would be a BIG BIG plus)
3. Color (well, eugm..
:: nico de haer writes:
Hi All,
I'm looking for a telnet client for windows 9x that provides me with:
1. Properly working keyboard (including F1 to F10)
2. SSL (would be a BIG BIG plus)
3. Color (well, eugm.. would-be-nice)
Does anyone have a good idea? (prefferably in the form of an
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, nico de haer wrote:
Hi All,
I'm looking for a telnet client for windows 9x that provides me with:
1. Properly working keyboard (including F1 to F10)
2. SSL (would be a BIG BIG plus)
3. Color (well, eugm.. would-be-nice)
Go putty. Lots of options.
Greetz,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 10:32:24PM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, nico de haer wrote:
Hi All,
I'm looking for a telnet client for windows 9x that provides me with:
1. Properly working keyboard (including F1 to F10)
2. SSL (would be a BIG BIG plus)
3. Color (well,
hi ya nico
try looking at th various windows clients
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/SSH
- windows client section on the bottom
have fun
alvin
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, nico de haer wrote:
Hi All,
I'm looking for a telnet client for windows 9x that provides me with:
1. Properly working
I preffer installing cygwin, it comes with the unix versions of
telnet ssh, full ansi support. It's a feature rich unix shell for
windows, and it's painfully simple to install.
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 09:56:22PM +0200, nico de haer wrote:
Hi All,
I'm
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:12:17AM +0800, Ken Ng wrote:
I update Kernel 2.4.5 , but telnet responses very slow ...
What do you mean by slow. Is the act of initiating a connection slow,
or is the connection slow for the duration?
If initiating a connection is slow then the
I'm trying to setup a telnet daemon on a box running stable (I know, and
I want to use ssh but the software we're using only knows about telnet.
It's a private lan too so I'm not too concerned.). I've set everything
up so inetd should spawn the telnet daemon but when I try to connect I
get
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 07:01:12PM +0100, José Miguel Sisó Espitia wrote:
Hola:
Tengo un problema y no se me ocurre como solucionarlo.
He conseguido conectar dos ordenadores en red un k6 y un 386sx.
Hasta ahi todo bien, cuando intento arrancar desde el
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:42:05AM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote:
Hi!
I'm setting up a debian potato box with most parts on a disk which is read
only. When I try to run telnet localhost, instead of the password prompt,
I get
telnetd: /usr/lib/telnetd/login: Permission denied
this
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 05:09:19 -0900
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:42:05AM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote:
Hi!
I'm setting up a debian potato box with most parts on a disk which is read
only. When I try to run telnet localhost, instead of the password
...
- Original Message -
From: Anders Lindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chrazy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian Se debian-user-swedish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: telnet med ssh
Chrazy wrote:
Hur får jag in det i min debian dist? Eller hur kan jag kolla så att
- Original Message -
From: Anton Emmerfors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Se debian-user-swedish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: telnet med ssh
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 10:02:55AM +0100, Chrazy wrote:
Var vänlig och CC:a inte mig, jag
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 06:08:23PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
Debian User wrote:
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.
a quick fix would probably be to comment out all lines in
/etc/hosts.deny,
Adding a line to
Mine is this:
smtpstream tcp nowait mail/usr/sbin/exim exim -bs
Thanks alot Michael. I actually inserted that
line myself - hence the mistake :-).
Your suggestion was spot on.
Thanks a million.
T:Irvine
Debian User wrote:
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.
a quick fix would probably be to comment out all lines in
/etc/hosts.deny,
or comment out the exim line in inetd.conf and restart exim by
/etc/init.d/exim start. i
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 05:11:54AM +0200, Debian User wrote:
In /etc/exim.conf I have
local_domains = localhost:debian and
host_accept_relay = localhost
In /etc/inetd.conf I have
smtpstream tcp waitmail/usr/sbin/exim
exim -bs
Mine
Tendrás que modificar el inetd.conf miralo y verás como funciona,
pero si has modificado el /etc/services y le has puesto el mismo nombre a
los servicios en el puerto 23 y 24 no va a funcionar.
Tienes que poner:
/etc/services
23: telnetd
24: telnetdd (por ejemplo)
Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:-
socrates tmp$ telnet localhost 80
telnet: could not resolve localhost/80: Temporary failure in name resolution
FWIW I have exactly the same problem. Just started recently. I have
a dial-up connection too. The problem only exists when I'm not
connected to the
:: Neil Booth writes:
FWIW I have exactly the same problem. Just started recently. I have
a dial-up connection too. The problem only exists when I'm not
connected to the internet. As soon as pppd is up, the problem
vanishes, and it reappears when I disconnect.
I haven't a clue either.
+ Jeronimo Pellegrini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Telnet complains about a Temporary failure in name resolution
Anything else I could try?
Any other woody users having the same problem?
I have the same problem. I do not know what is exactly the reason for,
but I remember it worked some versions and
:: Kai Weber writes:
I have the same problem. I do not know what is exactly the reason for,
but I remember it worked some versions and on potato before.
I tried something on /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/host.conf but with no
effect.
There is no network traffic if I try to telnet or ssh with
Subject: telnet doesn't find localhost
Date: Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 10:45:11PM -0200
In reply to:Jeronimo Pellegrini
Quoting Jeronimo Pellegrini([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello...
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed
:: Wayne Topa writes:
Thanks for replying, Wayne.
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
resolve localhost.
Just tried to telnet to localhost and it works fine (potato).
Oh, I'm using woody...
On 23-Oct-2000 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
It was commented out, I enebled it, and still that didn't work.
lo was already up before this. Telnet complains about a Temporary
failure in name resolution
Anything else I could try?
Any other woody users having the same problem?
I don't have
Hello...
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
resolve localhost.
--snip--
I am a bit confused. man 5 hosts didn't help...
Any ideas?
Do you have an alias for localhost,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 03:20:47AM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
iface lo inet loopback
It was commented out, I enebled it, and still that didn't work.
I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these commands:
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net
:: Michael P Soulier writes:
I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these commands:
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.0
Hm, I did
socrates:/home/jeronimo# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
socrates:/home/jeronimo# route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask
:: Christoph Simon writes:
Hello...
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
resolve localhost.
Do you have an alias for localhost, something like
127.0.0.1 localhost
I remember having had a similar problema (long time ago), and since
then I always give a local address to ``mybox.mynet'', which is
different from 127.0.0.1
What do you mean? How did you do that? (Or, where can I find some more
info about it?)
127.0.0.1 localhost
:: Michael P Soulier writes:
I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these
commands:
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.0
Hm, I did
socrates:/home/jeronimo# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
socrates:/home/jeronimo# route add -net 127.0.0.0
201 - 300 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
