Why would you want to renumber the partition ? It provides absolutely no
benefit and can break things such as the bootloader which may seek data
on partitions identified by their numbers.
it can get a situation where the partitions are not in the number orde,
and some fdisks complain about
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:33:23 -0500 Frank McCormick
wrote:
> On 14/02/16 07:56 PM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:11:37 -0500
> > Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> On
Frank McCormick composed on 2016-02-15 19:26 (UTC-0500):
> On 15/02/16 06:32 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Lisi Reisz composed on 2016-02-15 23:16 (UTC):
>>> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Why would you want to renumber the partition ? It provides absolutely no
benefit and can break things such
On 15/02/16 06:32 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Lisi Reisz composed on 2016-02-15 23:16 (UTC):
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Why would you want to renumber the partition ? It provides absolutely no
benefit and can break things such as the bootloader which may seek data
on partitions identified by their
Lisi Reisz composed on 2016-02-15 23:16 (UTC):
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Why would you want to renumber the partition ? It provides absolutely no
>> benefit and can break things such as the bootloader which may seek data
>> on partitions identified by their numbers.
> If it ain't broke, don't
On Monday 15 February 2016 20:05:53 Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Why would you want to renumber the partition ? It provides absolutely no
> benefit and can break things such as the bootloader which may seek data
> on partitions identified by their numbers.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it??? ;-)
Lisi
Felix Miata a écrit :
> Pascal Hambourg composed on 2016-02-15 20:52 (UTC+0100):
>
>>> be warned, if you use the partition table edit solution, uuid changes
>>> each time you touch a partition.
>
>> No, UUID don't change unless you change the contents of a partition.
>> They are not in the
Frank McCormick a écrit :
> I have deleted a partition from my HD containing a distro I no longer use.
> As a result, my partitions on /dev/sda are numbered sda1. sda2 (windows)
> and sda4. sda3 contained the distro I dumped.
>
> Can I just use fdisk or fsdisk to dump the existing partition
Pascal Hambourg composed on 2016-02-15 20:52 (UTC+0100):
>> be warned, if you use the partition table edit solution, uuid changes
>> each time you touch a partition.
> No, UUID don't change unless you change the contents of a partition.
> They are not in the partition table. Same with labels.
jdd a écrit :
>
> be warned, if you use the partition table edit solution, uuid changes
> each time you touch a partition.
No, UUID don't change unless you change the contents of a partition.
They are not in the partition table. Same with labels.
Le 15/02/2016 17:51, Frank McCormick a écrit :
I already use UUIDS.
be warned, if you use the partition table edit solution, uuid changes
each time you touch a partition. The better way may be to use labels,
but I don't know if they survive partition change, probably not.
No
On 15/02/16 05:49 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:42:33PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
I have deleted a partition from my HD containing a distro I no longer use.
As a result, my partitions on /dev/sda are numbered sda1. sda2 (windows) and
sda4. sda3 contained the distro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:49:29AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
[...]
> If the now-spare sda3 was large enough, and you were not already using LVM,
> I'd
> recommend formatting sda3 as an LVM PV and create a new LVM VG, then an LVM
> LV;
> then
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:42:33PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> I have deleted a partition from my HD containing a distro I no longer use.
> As a result, my partitions on /dev/sda are numbered sda1. sda2 (windows) and
> sda4. sda3 contained the distro I dumped.
>
> Can I just use fdisk or
On 14/02/16 07:49 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Frank McCormick composed on 2016-02-14 15:42 (UTC-0500):
I have deleted a partition from my HD containing a distro I no longer use.
What motivated doing so? What exactly was/were your goal(s) in doing so?
To put the 15 gigs of space to better use :)
On 14/02/16 07:56 PM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:11:37 -0500
Frank McCormick wrote:
On 14/02/16 05:00 PM, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
On Sun, February 14, 2016 2:42 pm, Frank McCormick wrote:
Can I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:11:37 -0500
Frank McCormick wrote:
>On 14/02/16 05:00 PM, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
>> On Sun, February 14, 2016 2:42 pm, Frank McCormick wrote:
>>> Can I just use fdisk or fsdisk to dump the
Frank McCormick composed on 2016-02-14 15:42 (UTC-0500):
> I have deleted a partition from my HD containing a distro I no longer use.
What motivated doing so? What exactly was/were your goal(s) in doing so?
> As a result, my partitions on /dev/sda are numbered sda1. sda2 (windows)
> and sda4.
On 14/02/16 05:00 PM, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
On Sun, February 14, 2016 2:42 pm, Frank McCormick wrote:
Can I just use fdisk or fsdisk to dump the existing partition record
edit the file to change sda4 to sda3 and then use fdisk or sfdisk to read
the file and create a properly named
On Sun, February 14, 2016 2:42 pm, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Can I just use fdisk or fsdisk to dump the existing partition record
> edit the file to change sda4 to sda3 and then use fdisk or sfdisk to read
> the file and create a properly named partition record ?
To rename partitions, I use
20 matches
Mail list logo