If you have your original debian net-inst dvd, it's probably time to
put the dvd into the drive then reboot the computer into rescue mode.
Then run fsck.ext4 -c /dev/sda1 enter and watch the fun. This will
use badblocks nondestructively and set off a repair operation which
should end up with
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Jude DaShiell jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:
If you have your original debian net-inst dvd, it's probably time to
put the dvd into the drive then reboot the computer into rescue mode.
Funny thing (actually not so) - my optic drive is dead. But why do I
have to
On 2013-11-09, darkestkhan darkestk...@gmail.com wrote:
I created ext3 on sda1 (using mke2fs -j) and it worked for last 20 days.
But after tiday reboot it stopped working - if it would be bad entry in fstab
I would still be able to mount it by hand, but I can't. I have some data
on it that I
On 11/09/2013 04:09 AM, darkestkhan wrote:
Funny thing (actually not so) - my optic drive is dead. But why do I
have to reboot
into recovery mode? System itself works correctly - /boot is on sda2
and everything
else is on LVM at sda3
If I understand you correctly that you can boot and use
Josef Huber josef-hu...@gmx.net wrote:
Yes, that's quite annoying: I had a similar problem once, because of
hibernation with lenny and xp. Later I had to find out that if you use
only Linux-OSs, the problem occurs as well. Why there isn't any warning
with the file system not being saved
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:45:52 -0400
Frank debianl...@videotron.ca wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
One thing I noticed...in Ubuntu's fstab, sda2 is referred to as
/dev/sda2
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:17:35 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
Further to this problem (I'm getting tired of re-booting)...I have
tried copying mail in SYlpheed from Ubuntu (sda3) to Squeeze (sda2)
several times..with and without manually unmounting sda2 before
rebooting. If I unmount sda2 before
Frank put forth on 9/14/2010 12:17 PM:
Further to this problem (I'm getting tired of re-booting)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:28:26 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
I have been having (minor?) problems with the ext3 file systems on my
machine. I have Ubuntu installed on /dev/sda3, with Squeeze on
/dev/sda2. Nearly everytime I go into Ubuntu, then back to Squeeze,
the file system check recovers the
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:41:32 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:28:26 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
I have been having (minor?) problems with the ext3 file systems on my
machine. I have Ubuntu installed on /dev/sda3, with Squeeze on
/dev/sda2.
that!
Josef Huber
Betreff:
Re: ext3 file system
Von:
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com
Datum:
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:41:32 -0400 (EDT)
An:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:28:26 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
I have been having (minor
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
One thing I noticed...in Ubuntu's fstab, sda2 is referred to as
/dev/sda2 while the Ubuntu partition is referenced by the UUID..I
wonder if this is a problem ?
You said Ubuntu both times. Which is Debian and which is Ubuntu?
It shouldn't
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
One thing I noticed...in Ubuntu's fstab, sda2 is referred to as
/dev/sda2 while the Ubuntu partition is referenced by the UUID..I
wonder if this is a problem ?
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
One thing I noticed...in Ubuntu's fstab, sda2 is referred to as
/dev/sda2 while the Ubuntu partition is referenced by the UUID..I
wonder if this is a
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:02:54 -0400
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
One thing I noticed...in Ubuntu's fstab, sda2 is referred to as
/dev/sda2 while the Ubuntu
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:01:08 -0400
Paul Cartwright deb...@pcartwright.com wrote:
Ubuntu is using the graphical logon/logoff so I can't see what's
going on, but yes the shutdown is clean. I **assume** the file system
is being unmounted, but I'd have to disable graphics to see for sure.
El día 8 de agosto de 2010 00:47, Jose Pablo Rojas
jrcarra...@gmail.com escribió:
yo tambien soy del pensamiento que a ext4 hay que darle un poco más de
tiempo para que llegue a su punto,
en lo personal, en mi laptop tengo ext3 y cada cierto tiempo me da problemas
la particion de que indica
yo tambien soy del pensamiento que a ext4 hay que darle un poco más de
tiempo para que llegue a su punto,
en lo personal, en mi laptop tengo ext3 y cada cierto tiempo me da problemas
la particion de que indica que está en uso y la única solución es bajar
todos los servicios que pueden estar
El 05/08/10 00:33, Camaleón escribió:
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:44:45 +0200, Javier Barroso escribió:
2010/8/4 Camaleón:
(...)
Ná, yo siempre monto ReiserFS. Ext4 es demasiado novedoso para mi
gusto, un par de añitos más de rodaje y estará en su punto.
¿Alguna razón para elegir ReiserFS?
Para cuando se te quede frito un servidor, si es debian lleva las magic
sysrq de serie,
alt+petsis+s
alt+petsis+u
alt+petsis+b
Un saludo
Buenas.
Pensaba que esto venia de serie en los GNU/linux. ¿Esta dentro de ese
paquete? Entiendo que es esto:
Pulsamos las teclas ALT y la de “Imprimir
El Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:18:54 +0200, jmramirez escribió:
Para cuando se te quede frito un servidor, si es debian lleva las magic
sysrq de serie,
alt+petsis+s
alt+petsis+u
alt+petsis+b
Gracias... pues mira, eso no lo sabía (que estaba habilitado de manera
predeterminada). De momento no he
El 04/08/10 15:14, mmejiav escribió:
Saludos
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo casero
deseo conocer según lo que han leído o probado cual es mejor para
dicho montaje: ext3 o ext4?
gracias
Si es un equipo casero y no tienes datos altamente crítico
El 4 de agosto de 2010 15:14, mmejiav mauricio.meji...@gmail.com escribió:
Saludos
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo casero
deseo conocer según lo que han leído o probado cual es mejor para
dicho montaje: ext3 o ext4?
gracias
--
J Mauricio
2010/8/4 mmejiav mauricio.meji...@gmail.com
Saludos
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo casero
deseo conocer según lo que han leído o probado cual es mejor para
dicho montaje: ext3 o ext4?
SI usas la rama testing, con un kernel reciente, olvidate de
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:43:50 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/8/4 mmejiav
Saludos
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo casero
deseo conocer según lo que han leído o probado cual es mejor para dicho
montaje: ext3 o ext4?
SI usas la rama
2010/8/4 darias dariass...@gmail.com:
El 4 de agosto de 2010 15:14, mmejiav mauricio.meji...@gmail.com escribió:
Saludos
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo casero
deseo conocer según lo que han leído o probado cual es mejor para
dicho montaje:
El 4 de agosto de 2010 15:57, Damian Montaldo
damianmonta...@gmail.comescribió:
2010/8/4 darias dariass...@gmail.com:
El 4 de agosto de 2010 15:14, mmejiav mauricio.meji...@gmail.com
escribió:
Saludos
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo
2010/8/4 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:43:50 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/8/4 mmejiav
Saludos
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo casero
deseo conocer según lo que han leído o probado cual es mejor para dicho
2010/8/4 Marc Aymerich glicer...@gmail.com
2010/8/4 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:43:50 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/8/4 mmejiav
Saludos
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo casero
deseo conocer según lo que han
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:54:07 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/8/4 Camaleón
SI usas la rama testing, con un kernel reciente, olvidate de ext3 :)
¿Y eso?
ext4 tiene todo y mas de lo que tiene ext3[1] y además lo desbanca en
rendimiento[2].
Ah, pensaba que decías que no estaba
2010/8/4 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:54:07 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/8/4 Camaleón
SI usas la rama testing, con un kernel reciente, olvidate de ext3 :)
¿Y eso?
ext4 tiene todo y mas de lo que tiene ext3[1] y además lo desbanca en
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:40:13 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/8/4 Camaleón
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:54:07 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
ext4 tiene todo y mas de lo que tiene ext3[1] y además lo desbanca en
rendimiento[2].
Ah, pensaba que decías que no estaba disponible, qué susto :-)
El mié, 04-08-2010 a las 13:14 -0500, mmejiav escribió:
estoy planeando instalar squeeze en un disco duro de 1 tb nuevo en un
equipo casero
deseo conocer según lo que han leído o probado cual es mejor para
dicho montaje: ext3 o ext4?
Pues la verdad es que todavía no he probado el ext4, pero
2010/8/4 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com:
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:54:07 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/8/4 Camaleón
SI usas la rama testing, con un kernel reciente, olvidate de ext3 :)
¿Y eso?
ext4 tiene todo y mas de lo que tiene ext3[1] y además lo desbanca en
rendimiento[2].
Ah,
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:44:45 +0200, Javier Barroso escribió:
2010/8/4 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com:
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:54:07 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/8/4 Camaleón
SI usas la rama testing, con un kernel reciente, olvidate de ext3
:)
¿Y eso?
ext4 tiene todo y mas de lo
El Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:44:45 +0200, Javier Barroso escribió:
2010/8/4 Camaleón:
(...)
Ná, yo siempre monto ReiserFS. Ext4 es demasiado novedoso para mi
gusto, un par de añitos más de rodaje y estará en su punto.
¿Alguna razón para elegir ReiserFS?
Dos razones y media, principalmente.
1/
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:53:00PM +, Bhasker C V wrote:
Bhasker C V wrote:
Bhasker C V wrote:
[ 41 lines sniped]
hardware issue ... please ignore...
Could you please trim your replies on this list.
--
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Bhasker C V wrote:
Hi all,
This is strange.
I created a file system on top of luks and does not have any data yet.
The very first fsck gives an error in the freshly created file system !
$ sudo mke2fs -j /dev/mapper/cryptvol
mke2fs 1.41.2 (02-Oct-2008)
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block
Bhasker C V wrote:
Bhasker C V wrote:
Hi all,
This is strange.
I created a file system on top of luks and does not have any data yet.
The very first fsck gives an error in the freshly created file system !
$ sudo mke2fs -j /dev/mapper/cryptvol
mke2fs 1.41.2 (02-Oct-2008)
Filesystem label=
OS
Ola Marcos e Eduardo
Desculpe a demora porem testei os 2 comandos e me atendeu super bem.
Obrigado.
2009/7/10 Marcos Paulo Serafim mpsera...@gmail.com:
Olá,
Dá uma olhada no tune2fs:
-C mount-count
Set the number of times the filesystem has been mounted.
If set to a
Olá,
Dá uma olhada no tune2fs:
-C mount-count
Set the number of times the filesystem has been mounted.
If set to a greater value than
the max-mount-counts parameter set by the -c option,
e2fsck(8) will check the filesystem
at the next reboot.
Viva Tadeu,
pode efectuar o comando shutdown -rF now
Ele ira fazer fsck toda a vez que você reiniciar o servidor.
---
Eduardo Silvestre
nfsi telecom, lda.
eduardo.silves...@nfsi.pt
Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301
http://www.nfsi.pt/
- Original Message -
From: Tadeu
Hi,
today i realised that tune2fs is able to change the uuid of the journal
(partition/fs?) so i was able to fsck the volume and i am looking
forward to get it back online within the day.
Thouh i am still unclear about the semantics of the 'force' flag of
tune2fs.
Any hints?
greets
Felix Resch
Masatran / Deepak, R. masat...@freeshell.org writes:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my laptop
to my work computer, the UIDs on the Ext3 partition are used for the
permissions, so I
Stefan Monnier wrote:
does it apply on CF cards? The name says flash, so I would assume yes?
But still, I think it really reasonable to consider the life of the
media.
Yes, same thing. BTW, regarding the life of the media: let's say the
internal maximum write speed is 50MB/s, an expected
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Why ext2 rather than ext3?
I think you trimmed that line a bit prematurely in that it went on to
say flash drive. ext2 is arguably better than ext3 for flash drives
because of the reduced number of writes to disk.
The extra writes of ext3 have 2 consequences:
1 -
does it apply on CF cards? The name says flash, so I would assume yes? But
still, I think it really reasonable to consider the life of the media.
Yes, same thing. BTW, regarding the life of the media: let's say the
internal maximum write speed is 50MB/s, an expected lifetime of
10-writes,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:15:33AM +, Bob Cox wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 22:14:59 -0700, Mike McClain (mike.j...@nethere.com)
wrote:
Which versions of Windows can read ext2?
Windows 95/98/2000/XP/NT definitely. Not sure about Vista.
Google for explore2fs.
Found it, DL'd it.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 22:14:59 -0700, Mike McClain (mike.j...@nethere.com)
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition. The
Mike McClain wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my
snip
Why so many difficult
Why so many difficult answers?
If you normally use ext3, use ext2(ext3 without journalizing) on your
Why ext2 rather than ext3?
Google for explore2fs.
It claims to support both ext2 and ext3.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:04:27 -0400, Stefan Monnier
(monn...@iro.umontreal.ca) wrote:
Why so many difficult answers?
If you normally use ext3, use ext2(ext3 without journalizing) on your
Why ext2 rather than ext3?
I think you trimmed that line a bit prematurely in that it went on
Why ext2 rather than ext3?
I think you trimmed that line a bit prematurely in that it went on to
say flash drive. ext2 is arguably better than ext3 for flash drives
because of the reduced number of writes to disk.
The extra writes of ext3 have 2 consequences:
1 - slow things down
2 - wear
2009/3/12 Bob Cox debian-u...@lists.bobcox.com:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 22:14:59 -0700, Mike McClain (mike.j...@nethere.com)
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one
Mark Allums wrote:
Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R.:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32
partition, and
one Ext3 partition.
Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash
Sam Leon wrote:
Mark Allums wrote:
Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R.:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32
partition, and
one Ext3 partition.
Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition.
Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash
drives probably don't have smart wear levelling.
ext3 is not significantly different in this respect from most other FSes
Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my laptop
to my work computer, the UIDs on the Ext3 partition are used for the
permissions, so I am not able to access the
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:19:09AM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Let's us all start a movement, an exFat on Linux movement.
exFAT is written by a known patent troll who is already suing a Linux
company for a patent that may or may not be valid.
I'd stay away from exFAT.
Sam Leon wrote:
Mark Allums wrote:
Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R.:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32
partition, and
one Ext3 partition.
Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R. wrote:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition. The problem is that when I transfer files from my
snip
Why so many difficult answers?
If you
Masatran / Deepak, R.:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition.
Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash
drives probably don't have smart wear levelling.
The problem is that when I transfer files from my laptop
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R.:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition.
Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash
drives probably don't have smart wear
Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Masatran / Deepak, R.:
Recently, I re-partitioned my flash drive. I made one FAT32 partition, and
one Ext3 partition.
Is ext3 on a flash medium really a good idea? At least cheap flash
drives probably
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:30:26PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-10-15 11:05:24, schrieb Adam Hardy:
Is there a basis for the file name restrictions on ext3, i.e. can I say,
well ext3 is based on a standard, so I'm going to restrict the file names
on macs, otherwise they won't be
Am 2008-10-15 11:05:24, schrieb Adam Hardy:
Is there a basis for the file name restrictions on ext3, i.e. can I say,
well ext3 is based on a standard, so I'm going to restrict the file names
on macs, otherwise they won't be backed up?
There are none. You can even have a backslash in the
.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 12:37 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: List Debian User
Subject: Re: ext3 filesystem and file name restrictions
Tammo Schuelke on 15/10/08 11:15, wrote:
-Original Message- From
Adam Hardy wrote:
After finding out all I could about Mac file systems and names, my
conclusion is that macs are pretty special, especially their file
systems.
Funny thing is, the colon is a restricted character in Mac filesystems,
too... the colon at least until OS X (and possibly still in the
On 2008-Oct-15, at 6:05 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
I created a samba share on one of my debian boxes with a ext3 file
system and unfortunately I can't write files with certain file names
from Mac OSX.
This disrupts the back-up process which takes about an hour every
time to fail when I want
Adam Hardy wrote:
Hi,
I created a samba share on one of my debian boxes with a ext3 file
system and unfortunately I can't write files with certain file names
from Mac OSX.
This disrupts the back-up process which takes about an hour every time
to fail when I want to try it out again.
For
Have you tried creating a file with a colon in its name by hand?
I just tested it, both ext3 and samba don't have a problem with it (only
Windows clients don't like it).
With which error message does it fail?
Tammo
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
PS: the file with a colon in its name comes from a Mac? From what I just read,
the Mac OS FS (HFS+) doesn't support colons in filenames.
http://www.xvsxp.com/files/forbidden.php
Tammo
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Have you tried creating a file with a colon in its name by hand?
I just tested it, both ext3 and samba don't have a problem with it (only
Windows clients don't like it).
With which error message does it fail?
Tammo
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Adam Hardy:
For instance, there is one file name like this:
2AE2EAEE-57AC-46D8-B619-C2167D4C6786:ABPerson.abcdp
which has a colon in it that I guess is the problem.
I am not sure either, but I'd bet on that, too. I guess this is not even
a problem with neither MacOS X or ext3 -- it might
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Jochen Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Hardy:
For instance, there is one file name like this:
2AE2EAEE-57AC-46D8-B619-C2167D4C6786:ABPerson.abcdp
which has a colon in it that I guess is the problem.
I am not sure either, but I'd bet on that, too. I
Tammo Schuelke on 15/10/08 11:15, wrote:
-Original Message- From: Adam Hardy
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008
12:05 PM To: List Debian User Subject: ext3 filesystem and file name
restrictions
Hi,
I created a samba share on one of my debian boxes with a
Adam writes:
Is there a basis for the file name restrictions on ext3, i.e. can I say,
well ext3 is based on a standard, so I'm going to restrict the file names
on macs, otherwise they won't be backed up?
You can use any printable character other than '/'. ':; is entirely legal
and often used:
Armin ranjbar wrote:
Dear all ,
there is an Ext3 partition which have been mkfs.ext3 by mistake , there
are very few inodes available in file system now but tools like lde shows
that majority of data is still available on disk , the problem is that how
its possible to take back disconnected
Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
Armin ranjbar wrote:
Dear all ,
there is an Ext3 partition which have been mkfs.ext3 by mistake , there
are very few inodes available in file system now but tools like lde shows
that majority of data is still available on disk , the problem is that
how
its possible
Carlos Ribeiro escreveu:
Conforme a saída do parted, há uma certa confusão no particionamento.
Veja que a partição 3, extendida, deveria ir dos 16GB até 80GB que é o
final do disco, mas tem apenas 4GB !!!.
Minha sugestão é que refaça as partições 3, 4 e 5, corrigindo a 3 para
os valores
Carlos Ribeiro escreveu:
Faz a gentileza de nos mostrar como ficou a saída do comando parted -l
ou fdisk -l .
Obrigado.
CR
2008/6/6 Pedro Debian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Carlos Ribeiro escreveu:
Conforme a saída do parted, há uma certa confusão no
Carlos Ribeiro escreveu:
Até agora não tive problemas no uso do Gparted, semelhante a esse citado
por ti. A diferença, e que até certo fica incompreensível para mim, é a
existência de uma partição extendida com 4GB. Caso tenhas interesse na
discussão, me diz como esses 4GB estão sendo usado,
Pedro Debian escreveu:
Olá pessoal,
Através do Gparted eu transformei duas partições em uma grande. Nesta
partição já está o SO instalado.
Qdo executo o fdisk/cfdisk sobre a partição, ele reconhece o novo
tamanho. Mas o sistema ainda está mostrando o tamanho anterior antes
da execução do
David F. A. B. Fante escreveu:
Pedro Debian escreveu:
Olá pessoal,
Através do Gparted eu transformei duas partições em uma grande. Nesta
partição já está o SO instalado.
Qdo executo o fdisk/cfdisk sobre a partição, ele reconhece o novo
tamanho. Mas o sistema ainda está mostrando o tamanho
Conforme a saída do parted, há uma certa confusão no particionamento. Veja
que a partição 3, extendida, deveria ir dos 16GB até 80GB que é o final do
disco, mas tem apenas 4GB !!!.
Minha sugestão é que refaça as partições 3, 4 e 5, corrigindo a 3 para os
valores corretos, eliminando a 4 que
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
Is there a way to recover single file at ext3 file system? Is it usable
in Debian Etch, if there is a way?
If you mean recovering a deleted file, then no. The ext3 file system
does not allow for recovery of deleted files.
George.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
George Borisov wrote:
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
Is there a way to recover single file at ext3 file system? Is it
usable in Debian Etch, if there is a way?
If you mean recovering a deleted file, then no. The ext3 file system
does not allow for recovery of deleted files.
George.
Yes, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/21/08 06:56, Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
George Borisov wrote:
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
Is there a way to recover single file at ext3 file system? Is it
usable in Debian Etch, if there is a way?
If you mean recovering a deleted file, then no. The
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
Yes, I meant file deletion.
From http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html
---
Q: How can I recover (undelete) deleted files from my ext3 partition?
Actually, you can't! This is what one of the developers, Andreas Dilger,
said about it:
In order to
On 2008-04-21 13:40 +0200, George Borisov wrote:
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
Is there a way to recover single file at ext3 file system? Is it
usable in Debian Etch, if there is a way?
If you mean recovering a deleted file, then no. The ext3 file system
does not allow for recovery of deleted
Sven Joachim wrote:
That's the official position, but read the following fascinating story
by somebody who had not deleted a single file, but rather his whole home
directory:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html
OK, that's pretty cool - thanks. :-)
George.
--
To
TestDisk adında bi yazılımla sorunsuz kurtarabilirsiniz. Bunun icin
knoppix yada benzeri bi çalışan cd ile bilgisayarınızı açıp Testdisk ile
disk bolumunu kurtarabilirsiniz.
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk
Dosya bazlı kurtarma yapmak istiyorsanız Bunun icin ben kucuk bi dokuman
yazmıstım.
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:51:13PM +0200, Sylvain Sauvage wrote:
Franck Joncourt, dimanche 13 mai 2007, 13:15:58 CEST
[...]
Du coup, n'est il pas possible de creer un fichier de test avec un motif
et une taille specifique sur la partition avec l'option dir_index.
Ensuite, de desactiver
Franck Joncourt, dimanche 13 mai 2007, 13:15:58 CEST
[...]
Du coup, n'est il pas possible de creer un fichier de test avec un motif
et une taille specifique sur la partition avec l'option dir_index.
Ensuite, de desactiver cette option sur la partition, et de refaire la
meme manipulation en
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 12:25:04AM +0200, Sylvain Sauvage wrote:
Franck Joncourt, dimanche 13 mai 2007, 00:03:32 CEST
[...]
Sur une partition non montee :
Pour activer l'option dir_index :
# tune2fs -O dir_index /dev/hdxx
# e2fsc -D /dev/hdxx
petite erreur de frappe au passage :
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 07:40:31PM +0200, Gaëtan PERRIER wrote:
Salut,
Est-il possible de connaître les options activées sur une partition ext3
(genre dir_index, etc.)?
cat /etc/mtab c'est pas ce que tu cherches ?
--
Franck Joncourt
http://www.debian.org
http://smhteam.info/wiki/
GPG
Le Sat, 12 May 2007 20:11:28 +0200
Franck Joncourt [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 07:40:31PM +0200, Gaëtan PERRIER wrote:
Salut,
Est-il possible de connaître les options activées sur une
partition ext3 (genre dir_index, etc.)?
cat /etc/mtab c'est pas ce que tu
OoO Pendant le repas du samedi 12 mai 2007, vers 19:40, Gaëtan PERRIER
[EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Salut,
Est-il possible de connaître les options activées sur une partition
ext3 (genre dir_index, etc.)?
tune2fs -l tapartition
--
panic(Tell me what a watchpoint trap is, and I'll then
Le Sat, 12 May 2007 20:20:21 +0200
Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
OoO Pendant le repas du samedi 12 mai 2007, vers 19:40, Gaëtan
PERRIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Salut,
Est-il possible de connaître les options activées sur une
partition ext3 (genre dir_index, etc.)?
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:18:50PM +0200, Gaëtan PERRIER wrote:
Le Sat, 12 May 2007 20:20:21 +0200
Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
OoO Pendant le repas du samedi 12 mai 2007, vers 19:40, Gaëtan
PERRIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Salut,
Est-il possible de connaître les
1 - 100 of 872 matches
Mail list logo
