Hello.
I'd like to help! ... not a clue if this fits your requirements or
whether it is indeed helpful. (Its meant to be my benefit to the
group, rather of awaiting replies to my own inquiries ...)
I use following setup in postfix, which I think is much greater then
exim. (exim and ppp/dialin
Nano Nano wrote:
My first test message to the outside world bounced with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host smtp.comcast.net[216.148.227.125] said:
550
[PERMFAIL] comcast.net requires valid sender (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
exim always added my Sender header for me.
I presume comcast is rejecting
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:39:54AM +0100, Tobias Reckhard wrote:
Nano Nano wrote:
My first test message to the outside world bounced with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host smtp.comcast.net[216.148.227.125] said:
550
[PERMFAIL] comcast.net requires valid sender (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
Nano Nano wrote:
# postconf myorigin
myorigin = $myhostname
# postconf myhostname
myhostname = desk
OK. Some hosts will reject your host's HELO/EHLO, but the comcast thing
was probably due to your MAIL FROM: address' domain not being in the
Internet DNS.
Should I just change mail name during
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Nano Nano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:21:46AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2004-01-30 14:57:37 -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
Aha, that explains why the 2nd message worked: I have a mutt rule that
adds the correct From for list-replies. I
Hi,
* Nano Nano wrote (2004-01-30 07:01):
My first test message to the outside world bounced with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host smtp.comcast.net[216.148.227.125] said:
550
[PERMFAIL] comcast.net requires valid sender (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
exim always added my Sender header for me.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:19:36AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
What's in the log for this message?
from /var/log/mail.log:
Jan 29 23:42:00 desk postfix/smtp[4117]: 8AEF514756:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=smtp.comcast.net[204.127.198.27],
delay=0, status=bounced (host
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:52:13PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:19:36AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
What's in the log for this message?
from /var/log/mail.log:
Jan 29 23:42:00 desk postfix/smtp[4117]: 8AEF514756:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Moin,
* Nano Nano wrote (2004-01-30 08:52):
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:19:36AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
What's in the log for this message?
from /var/log/mail.log:
Jan 29 23:42:00 desk postfix/smtp[4117]: 8AEF514756:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=smtp.comcast.net[204.127.198.27],
delay=0,
Moin,
* Nano Nano wrote (2004-01-30 08:52):
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:19:36AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
What's in the log for this message?
from /var/log/mail.log:
Jan 29 23:42:00 desk postfix/smtp[4117]: 8AEF514756:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=smtp.comcast.net[204.127.198.27],
delay=0,
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
Moin,
* Nano Nano wrote (2004-01-30 08:52):
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:19:36AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
What's in the log for this message?
from /var/log/mail.log:
Jan 29 23:42:00 desk postfix/smtp[4117]: 8AEF514756:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Nano Nano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:53:43PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
Configuration: Internet with smarthost
Append .domain? No
Smtp relay host? My ISPs smtp server
Final destination domains? default choices
---Force synchronous
Hi,
* Nano Nano wrote (2004-01-30 09:16):
Jan 29 21:54:37 desk postfix/pickup[1851]: E6A93145E1: uid=[removed] from=[removed]
Jan 29 21:54:37 desk postfix/cleanup[1856]: E6A93145E1: message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan 29 21:54:37 desk postfix/qmgr[1852]: E6A93145E1: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:28:43PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
I deliver my mails with a valid from address, which [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
not. Maybe you should fix your MUA?
Aha, that explains why the 2nd message worked: I have a mutt rule that
adds the correct From for list-replies. I guess
On 2004-01-30 14:57:37 -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
Aha, that explains why the 2nd message worked: I have a mutt rule that
adds the correct From for list-replies. I guess I'll have to make sure
Mutt adds a valid From or Sender in all cases.
I'll have to make sure all mail-generating programs
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:21:46AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2004-01-30 14:57:37 -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
Aha, that explains why the 2nd message worked: I have a mutt rule that
adds the correct From for list-replies. I guess I'll have to make sure
Mutt adds a valid From or Sender
16 matches
Mail list logo
