On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:39:29PM +, mick crane wrote:
> Appears that to retain permissions need root at both ends of rsync.
Not necessarily. If the server filesystem supports xattrs, you can use
the --fake-super option with the rsync server, running as a non-root user
that can write to the
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 05:06:33PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:24:43 +0100
> wrote:
>
> > Care to name some of those limitations?
> >
> > (of course, rsync /is not/ a backup program in itself, but lets you
> > build one with 10-30 lines around it).
>
> Why build one
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:24:43 +0100
wrote:
> Care to name some of those limitations?
>
> (of course, rsync /is not/ a backup program in itself, but lets you
> build one with 10-30 lines around it).
Why build one (which I have done) when you can get a perfectly good one
from the Debian repos?
On 2021-02-18 12:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 06:59:03PM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
* 2021-02-18 11:13:25-0500, Gary Dale wrote:
rsync is a quick & dirty backup tactic but it's got limitations.
1) files may stay around forever in the backup even if you've deleted
them
On 2021-02-18 10:57, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-02-15 12:39, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-02-13 19:20, David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-02-13 01:27, mick crane wrote:
I made a mistake and instead of getting a PC for backup I got a NAS.
I'm struggling to get to grips with it.
If rsync from PC to
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 07:21:01PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> In my opinion the point still stands, rsync (by itself) has significant
> limitations as a backup program, which is probably also the reason why
> several backup programs using rsync exist.
Care to name some of those
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 06:59:03PM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2021-02-18 11:13:25-0500, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> > rsync is a quick & dirty backup tactic but it's got limitations.
> >
> > 1) files may stay around forever in the backup even if you've deleted
> > them from your main computer
On Jo, 18 feb 21, 18:59:03, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2021-02-18 11:13:25-0500, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> > rsync is a quick & dirty backup tactic but it's got limitations.
> >
> > 1) files may stay around forever in the backup even if you've deleted
> > them from your main computer because you don't
* 2021-02-18 11:13:25-0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> rsync is a quick & dirty backup tactic but it's got limitations.
>
> 1) files may stay around forever in the backup even if you've deleted
> them from your main computer because you don't need them.
>
> 2) you only have one copy of a file and that
On 2021-02-18 16:13, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2021-02-18 10:57, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-02-15 12:39, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-02-13 19:20, David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-02-13 01:27, mick crane wrote:
I made a mistake and instead of getting a PC for backup I got a
NAS.
I'm struggling to get
On 2021-02-15 12:39, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-02-13 19:20, David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-02-13 01:27, mick crane wrote:
I made a mistake and instead of getting a PC for backup I got a NAS.
I'm struggling to get to grips with it.
If rsync from PC to NAS NAS changes the owner/group of files
On 2021-02-13 19:20, David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-02-13 01:27, mick crane wrote:
I made a mistake and instead of getting a PC for backup I got a NAS.
I'm struggling to get to grips with it.
If rsync from PC to NAS NAS changes the owner/group of files to
me/users which is probably no good
On 2021-02-13 01:27, mick crane wrote:
I made a mistake and instead of getting a PC for backup I got a NAS.
I'm struggling to get to grips with it.
If rsync from PC to NAS NAS changes the owner/group of files to me/users
which is probably no good for backing up.
There's that problem then
On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 09:27:54 +
mick crane wrote:
> I made a mistake and instead of getting a PC for backup I got a NAS.
> I'm struggling to get to grips with it.
> If rsync from PC to NAS NAS changes the owner/group of files to
> me/users which is probably no good for backing up.
Can you
Is there an alternative if you want an incremental backup?
Obviously you could use tar-ed archives with unprivileged permissions. If you
did, you would get a huge network overhead.
thks
Toni Mas
GPG 3F42A21D84D7E950
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
En
Hello,
Disclaimer: I do not use and am not familiar with Sinology hardware and
software and generally speaking, I am not knowledgeable in networking
I would say that:
- the owner:group names of a file on the PC you backup and the
owner:group names of the backup files on the synology
16 matches
Mail list logo
