Re: starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-10-04 Thread José Alburquerque
libre fan wrote: libre fan wrote: Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range I reconfigured several times trying to correct errors, and I compared the original Xfree config file with the

Re: starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-10-03 Thread libre fan
libre fan wrote: Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range I reconfigured several times trying to correct errors, and I compared the original Xfree config file with the present xorg.config. I really

Re: starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-09-25 Thread José Alburquerque
libre fan wrote: Hello, I have a Debian Etch+Sid and Xubuntu Dapper dual-boot. Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range Though X is started (I typed startx on a terminal) Wdm (my display manager)

Re: starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-09-25 Thread libre fan
Jos? Alburquerque-3 wrote: libre fan wrote: Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range Sounds to me like the error your getting is because your monitor settings are not correct in your

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-06 Thread jeroen
Could have found what's causing the issue. I have no idea what he's talking about though... Looking in to it now, but any help is appreciated. Jeroen --- start quote --- Framebuffer/X notes New - I managed to replace the atyfb code of 2.4.27 with the one of 2.4.16. This means

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-06 Thread jeroen
This is starting to look like a blog ;) I installed the kernel found on the previously mentioned page (http:// gefechtsdienst.de/uman/c1ve-general.html). It doesn't look really nice. Full screen console is built in but is shifted (not placed correctly, with white band down the screen).

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-06 Thread jeroen
continuing blog i installed the x-server from woody, x starts up fine now, jeej! i guess this issue is closed, unless this was a bad idea. Thx for reading my ramblings, Jeroen On 06 Sep 2005, at 21:06, jeroen wrote: This is starting to look like a blog ;) I installed the kernel found on the

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread Oliver Lupton
jeroen wrote: Hello all, --intro I'm trying (finally) to get debian to work on my Vaio PCG-C1VE. Using the latest version of the installer (floppy images) i succeeded in installing 3.1 on the little b*st*rd. Previous versions didn't support USB disks (at least not on a noob level) so

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread Kent West
jeroen wrote: I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still have to after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here). Take a look at /etc/network/interfaces (also man interfaces for examples). Once

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread Kent West
Kent West wrote: jeroen wrote: With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a window manager I don't think so; this looks like a video sync -type issue. You can double-check this possibility by installing another wm (aptitude install icewm, etc), or make sure

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread jeroen
On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote: I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works. #gdm returns a command not found On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:25, Kent West wrote: jeroen wrote: I used apt to get me the

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread jeroen
Sorry if this came in double, the resend i did might have tricked your mail rules (it did trick mine) Jeroen On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote: I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works. #gdm returns

Re: starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello cfk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Thank you very much for the tip. I did do a 'apt-get install x-window-system', and a number of good things happened. I can now do a startx and get twm. I can also right-click and get a tclsh8.4. Thats the good news. Unfortunately, being unfamiliar with

Re: starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Sebastian Kapfer
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 04:00:12 +0100, cfk wrote: after a search of archives and it seems to be working. After that, I wonder what the incantation is to start kde and perhaps more importantly, where I can go to figure out a few steps after that, other then googling. tasksel helps a lot with

Re: starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:59:01PM -0800, cfk wrote: On Saturday 18 December 2004 18:14, Sam Watkins wrote: Dear Sam: Thank you very much for the tip. I did do a 'apt-get install x-window-system', and a number of good things happened. I can now do a startx and get twm. I can also

Re: starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Sam Watkins
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 12:18:14PM +0100, Sebastian Kapfer wrote: Since you're into KDE, I suggest kdm. Though, being a GNOME geek, I also have to point out that GDM is much better ;-) maybe we need an uber-display manager that lets the user choose what display manager they want to use before

Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread Paul Johnson
On Saturday 18 December 2004 5:44 pm, cfk wrote: Gentlemen: Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for a few years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly installed Sarge to start X. Searching through the archives would have told you you need

Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread Robert Vangel
cfk wrote: Gentlemen: Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for a few years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly installed Sarge to start X. I try the incantation startx from either a user or root command prompt and get command not found.

Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread cfk
On Saturday 18 December 2004 17:42, Robert Vangel wrote: cfk wrote: Gentlemen: Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for a few years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly installed Sarge to start X. I try the incantation startx

Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread Sam Watkins
startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients. You should: apt-get install x-window-system-core or probably: apt-get install x-window-system you can look at what each of these meta packages depends on with: apt-cache show x-window-system-core you can see

Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread Robert Vangel
Sam Watkins wrote: startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients. You should: apt-get install x-window-system-core or probably: apt-get install x-window-system you can look at what each of these meta packages depends on with: apt-cache show x-window-system-core you

Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread cfk
On Saturday 18 December 2004 18:14, Sam Watkins wrote: startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients. You should: apt-get install x-window-system-core or probably: apt-get install x-window-system you can look at what each of these meta packages depends on

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-15 Thread Micha Feigin
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:08:39AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote: On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:56 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble, running tcpdump when X startx

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-13 Thread Micha Feigin
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:49:29AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote: On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase on this: [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an interface to the resolver

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-13 Thread Steven Satelle
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:56 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble, running tcpdump when X startx shows the name lookup BTW: you know, I think we're barking up the

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-12 Thread Micha Feigin
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:06:41AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote: Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the nameserver is not reachable then ping hostname works but host hostname returns 192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable Nameserver not reachable

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-12 Thread Steven Satelle
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase on this: [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design. The problem is that

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-12 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Steven Satelle: On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design. The problem is that it seems that a few other things seem to be

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout

2004-07-11 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering if anyone else experiences it too. Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed there, then maybe consider filing one. -- Thomas Adam = The Linux

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout

2004-07-11 Thread Steven Satelle
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: --- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering if anyone else experiences it too. Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed there, then

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-11 Thread Micha Feigin
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:33:15PM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote: On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: --- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering if anyone else experiences it too. Have a look

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout

2004-07-11 Thread Steven Satelle
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:53:09 +0200, Otto Wyss wrote: On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: no, its caused by the machine trying to resolve its name over eth0 AFAIR. If the network is up. If you've configured the network, you've set a hostname, so it is trying to

Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-11 Thread Steven Satelle
Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the nameserver is not reachable then ping hostname works but host hostname returns 192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable Nameserver not reachable litshi.luna.local A record not found, try again my /etc/hosts has the following

Re: SOLVED: Re: starting X

2003-01-05 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:26:09PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: it seems weird to me that i'm in the group 'nori' and not 'users', but Debian creates a new user for each group by default. I think it's possible to change that, but I've never felt the need... the permissions on my homedir are

Re: starting X

2003-01-03 Thread sean finney
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:35:35AM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: however, it's segfaulting and refusing to do much once it gets to the 'WindowMaker' line in my ~/.xsession. ~/.xsession-errors tells me it's because i can't create a GNUstep directory, and tells me to run wmaker.inst: why can't

Re: starting X

2003-01-02 Thread sean finney
hey nori, hope your computer has thawed off a bit :) anyways, iirc this is provided by xserver-xfree86. the easy way to make sure you have everything installed that you need for x is to run tasksel and check the box for x windows. sean On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:01:17PM -0500, Nori

Re: starting X

2003-01-02 Thread Jason Pepas
On Thursday 02 January 2003 06:40 pm, sean finney wrote: hey nori, hope your computer has thawed off a bit :) anyways, iirc this is provided by xserver-xfree86. the easy way to make sure you have everything installed that you need for x is to run tasksel and check the box for x windows.

Re: Starting X on second screen

2002-10-16 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:31:48PM +1000, Russell wrote: Tom Cook wrote: [snip] In this line, I have recently (this morning) discovered the joys of x2x to link two X displays. I have two p2/333s on my desk, and until today I had two keyboards and mice, too. Now I'm writing this on one

Re: Starting X on second screen

2002-10-15 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:36:42PM +1000, Russell wrote: Hi all, When using xdm, there's no where to enter command line parameters to startx or initx (0:1 etc) for using a second monitor, so is there an option for this in .Xsession or some other file? I'm not using XDM at the moment, but

Re: Starting X on second screen

2002-10-15 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 07:52:24PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:36:42PM +1000, Russell wrote: Hi all, When using xdm, there's no where to enter command line parameters to startx or initx (0:1 etc) for using a second monitor, so is there an option for this in

Re: Starting X on second screen

2002-10-15 Thread Tom Cook
On 0, Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Cook wrote: How would you start multiple screens using startx? 'startx -- :0.1' doesn't work for me, but then I don't have multiple screens. I believe this would attempt to start X on the Virtual Desktop #1 on the first (:0) display; what

Re: Starting X on second screen

2002-10-15 Thread Russell
Tom Cook wrote: On 0, Michael Heironimus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 07:52:24PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:36:42PM +1000, Russell wrote: Hi all, When using xdm, there's no where to enter command line parameters to startx or

Re: Starting X on boot. (Not xdm, kdm gdm style)

2002-09-21 Thread Alex Polite
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 11:54:14AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: I suppose the other way to go about doing this is through inittab. X takes an argument for user, IIRC, and so you could have inittab start X for a specific user at a specific runlevel (say 2, the Debian default). This would

Re: Starting X directly

2001-09-10 Thread Danie Roux
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: Hi all, how can I setup my desktop system to directly boot into X and do login? That is, like some distros (i.e. mdk) do, that they boot directly into KDE without asking to log in. Thanks. -- FreeBSD is the power-- Julio

Re: Starting X directly

2001-09-10 Thread Joerg Johannes
Julio Merino wrote: Hi all, how can I setup my desktop system to directly boot into X and do login? That is, like some distros (i.e. mdk) do, that they boot directly into KDE without asking to log in. Thanks. apt-get install gdm or apt-get install kdm hth joerg -- Did you know

Re: Starting X directly

2001-09-10 Thread Julio Merino
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:21:50PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: Fiddle around with /etc/kde/kdmrc There are settings in there to let you log in as a default password and user. Well, I guess this is a security hole...? Thanks.

Re: Starting X directly

2001-09-10 Thread Danie Roux
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:52:41PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:21:50PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: Fiddle around with /etc/kde/kdmrc There are settings in there to let you log in as a default password

Re: Starting X directly

2001-09-10 Thread Julio Merino
What I meant as security hole... I wanted to say if that kdm autologin is a security hole exploitable remotely? Thanks. PS: This is not a real reply... I've erased all topic threads :p -- FreeBSD is the power-- Julio Merino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 18961975 pgpSSFIMbolcZ.pgp Description: PGP

Re: Starting X directly

2001-09-10 Thread Tom Massey
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:36:59PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: What I meant as security hole... I wanted to say if that kdm autologin is a security hole exploitable remotely? No, it's only a problem if you have evil people who have physical access to the machine so that they could reboot it and

Re: Starting X directly

2001-09-10 Thread Danie Roux
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:36:59PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: What I meant as security hole... I wanted to say if that kdm autologin is a security hole exploitable remotely? Thanks. No, but don't quote me on that. -- Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix

Re: Starting X directly

2001-09-10 Thread Julio Merino
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:55:27PM +1000, Tom Massey wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:36:59PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: What I meant as security hole... I wanted to say if that kdm autologin is a security hole exploitable remotely? No, it's only a problem if you have evil people who have

Re: Starting X/Gnome

2001-06-07 Thread Dada
Hi HawkY, under /root or your home directory create a file called .xinitrc (be careful! there's a dot before the 'x') and put in it simply: gnome-session In so doing, when you issue startx a gnome session will be run. This is a powerful way of customizing your desktop. For instance I have a

Re: Starting X/Gnome

2001-06-07 Thread Andrew Sione Taumoefolau
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:04:27PM +0200, HawkY wrote: Where can I define what I want to launch at startup? (I don't want X to be started at startup.) Your default runlevel is specified in /etc/inittab (it's probably 2), and the programs that are launched for each runlevel are specified in its

Re: Starting X through INIT and kdm

2001-05-07 Thread ktb
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:22:00PM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: Hi all Until now i start X with the startx command. I'd like to set it up that init X starts with the kdm interface. How do i do this on debian. I think that has somethiing to do with the alternatives System... Do i have

Re: Starting X through INIT and kdm

2001-05-07 Thread Raffaele Sandrini
On Monday 07 May 2001 18:55, ktb wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:22:00PM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: Hi all Until now i start X with the startx command. I'd like to set it up that init X starts with the kdm interface. How do i do this on debian. I think that has somethiing to do

Re: starting x manually as non-root

2001-02-11 Thread Bernd Sokolowsky
David B Harris writes: dbh Check /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config . Changing allowed_users from rootonly to console had the desired effect. Thx, Bernd. -- Bernd Sokolowsky @ home

Re: starting x

2000-03-21 Thread Beavis
using /dev/saux works fine! thankx for all the replies everyone thankx A. Sullivan On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 06:17:26PM -0800, Beavis wrote: Detected PS/2 Mouse Port. i am using the /dev/ttyS01 during config. my systems says ttyS01 at do u think it could be the mouse? Using

Re: starting x

2000-03-18 Thread Erik Ryberg
In xf86config when it asks where your mouse is, default /dev/mouse, try /dev/psaux. Also tell it youhave a ps/2 mouse when it asks what kind of mouse you have. you can also do this in XF86Setup. Erik Ryberg Beavis wrote: hello, i am slowly coming along in terms of setting up x.i have gotten

Re: starting x

2000-03-18 Thread Andrei Ivanov
my mouse doesn't move and the tab keys don't do anything either. My pointer just sits in the middle of the screen. dmesg reads: Detected PS/2 Mouse Port. i am using the /dev/ttyS01 during config. my systems says ttyS01 at If you are using PS/2 mouse, your mouse is located on

Re: starting X apps as root

1999-01-20 Thread Henning Makholm
Robert Vollmert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: is there a comfortable way of starting programs as root when I'm logged in as a normal user? Look into the sudo package. -- Henning Makholm http://www.diku.dk/students/makholm

Re: Starting X From .bash_profile

1999-01-06 Thread Tongyu Wang
I have a Diamond Sonic Impact sound card. Which driver should I use? My system is Debian 2.0.

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-27 Thread Joost Kooij
On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Alain Toussaint wrote: i think i found the problem,if i do a cat /etc/init.d/xdm,there's nothing who's writen on screen but if i do a cat /etc/init.d/xdm.dpkg-dist,then i have this output (it will be shown after my message),does it's possible that dpkg failed to update

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-27 Thread Alain Toussaint
Actually, I've had this happen before to me too. I don't remember what the exact circumstances were, so I didn't submit a bug report. Can you describe the exact procedure that led to this situation? i don't know,it's just that i looked in the boot sequence (to be exact,in the /etc/init.d/

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-27 Thread David Wright
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Alain Toussaint wrote: Actually, I've had this happen before to me too. I don't remember what the exact circumstances were, so I didn't submit a bug report. Can you describe the exact procedure that led to this situation? i don't know,it's just that i looked in the

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-26 Thread Alain Toussaint
i think i found the problem,if i do a cat /etc/init.d/xdm,there's nothing who's writen on screen but if i do a cat /etc/init.d/xdm.dpkg-dist,then i have this output (it will be shown after my message),does it's possible that dpkg failed to update the /etc/init.d/xdm ??? Alain

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-26 Thread Alain Toussaint
it work !! i copied the xdm.dpkg-dist file over xdm and now,i boot with X enabled !! Alain p.s.something to check next time that a user run into this problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-25 Thread Alain Toussaint
What version of grep do you have there? Version 2.1-7 is broken, that might also be the cause. In any case, you can always look at /var/log/xdm-errors i dont even have this file ( /var/log/xdm-error) and grep is version 2.0 thanks for your help. Alain Cheers, Joost -- To

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-24 Thread Daniel Doro Ferrante
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Alain Toussaint wrote: i was surfing on the internet and viewed some comments on enabling X at boot,i tried the trick down there ( modify /etc/X11/config so the line no-start-xdm look like start-xdm,backup /etc/inittab and modify so when booting,it load into runlevel 5)

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-24 Thread Joost Kooij
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Alain Toussaint wrote: i was surfing on the internet and viewed some comments on enabling X at boot,i tried the trick down there ( modify /etc/X11/config so the line no-start-xdm look like start-xdm,backup /etc/inittab and modify so when booting,it load into runlevel 5)

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-24 Thread Ossama Othman
Have you guys already tried Debian's xbase-configure yet? It is normally run during the xbase package install, but I believe that it will setup xdm to start at boot if you haven't already done so. -Ossama __ Ossama Othman

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-24 Thread Alain Toussaint
# xbase and xserver configuration scripts. :0 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X ---cut--- Look at the last line, I bet it is missing on your system. It tells xdm which xserver to run on what display. If there is no such line, xdm will still be running, you'll just not notice anything you would

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-24 Thread Alain Toussaint
Have you guys already tried Debian's xbase-configure yet? It is normally run during the xbase package install, but I believe that it will setup xdm to start at boot if you haven't already done so. -Ossama i'll check into this. Alain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: starting X at boot

1998-04-24 Thread Joost Kooij
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Alain Toussaint wrote: i think there other thing to play as well but dont know what. Oh. Too bad that it didn't help you then. What version of grep do you have there? Version 2.1-7 is broken, that might also be the cause. In any case, you can always look at

Re: Starting X-Windows 8bpp

1998-04-05 Thread Art Lemasters
Can anyone tell me how to start X-Windows at greater than 8bpp. I am using XFree86 and using an X Server which is capable of this. Try the following from the user account that you want to use for X windows viewing. cd touch .xserverrc [Then use the editor of your choice to edit

Re: Starting X-Windows 8bpp

1998-04-04 Thread Shaleh
Take a glance at xinit or startx's man page. It boils down to a -bpp option. -- --- How can you see, when your mind is not open? How can you think, when your eyes are closed? - Jason Bonham Band, Ordinary Black and White

Re: Starting X in 16 bpp ?

1997-09-10 Thread David
I created the file /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc and it is a text file saying X -bpp 16 and it works, and I think this came from the XFree86 documentation, so perhaps it isn't the debian way of doing things, which is what you asked for, Binary Bar - Australia's first free access internet

Re: Starting X in 16 bpp ?

1997-09-09 Thread jdassen
On Sep 9, Ricardo Muggli wrote What is the debian whay of starting X in 16 bpp? I can do this: startx -- -bpp 16 but I would like to be able to do just startx. Any information as to what file(s) I need to modify would be greatly appreciated. Put DefaultColorDepth 16 in Section

Re: Starting X in 16 bpp ?

1997-09-09 Thread Ralph Winslow
Ricardo Muggli wrote: What is the debian whay of starting X in 16 bpp? I can do this: startx -- -bpp 16 but I would like to be able to do just startx. First, in your .profile or .login or whatever assure that your bin is first. For a .profile with sh or bash or ksh ... export

Re: starting X with another display

1997-06-19 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, BG Lim wrote: What is the command to open a separate display instead of VT7? For startx, it's exec startx -- :1 but I don't know about xdm. ...RickM... -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to

Re: starting X with another display

1997-06-19 Thread Ciccio
On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, BG Lim wrote: What is the command to open a separate display instead of VT7? For startx, it's exec startx -- :1 but I don't know about xdm. This is, if you have another screen attached to your computer. But I suppose you want to run another X server. I had

Re: starting X with another display

1997-06-19 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Ciccio wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, BG Lim wrote: What is the command to open a separate display instead of VT7? For startx, it's exec startx -- :1 but I don't know about xdm. This is, if you have another screen attached to your computer. But