On 2023-03-05 16:22:25 +0800, Ken Young wrote:
> 1. scp
> pros: the native tool in the OS
> cons: you will either input password or put key pairs into servers for
> authentication.
I would not see this as a cons.
> 2. rsync
> pros: it can transfer data by increasement
> cons: you need to setup
For standalone backup I am using Liteserver's VPS, 512G disk for only 2.4
EUR/m.
Then I setup rsyncd on it, and rsync data from clients via crontab for
backup purpose.
Sincerely,
Ken Young
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 9:21 AM Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 14:05:37 +0100
> to...@tuxteam.de
On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 14:05:37 +0100
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 07:23:49PM +0800, Ken Young wrote:
> > What provider do you recommend then?
>
> Around here (West Europe), for example, mailbox.org [1]. But they
> are far from the only one (I'm not a customer, nor associated
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 06:41:58PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 05/03/2023 15:22, Ken Young wrote:
> >
> > 1. scp
>
> Notice that in bookworm (next release) scp uses SFTP protocol. This
> ssh-based protocol can be used in the current stable release as well. Do not
> confuse it with ftps that
On 05/03/2023 15:22, Ken Young wrote:
1. scp
Notice that in bookworm (next release) scp uses SFTP protocol. This
ssh-based protocol can be used in the current stable release as well. Do
not confuse it with ftps that is traditional FTP over TLS.
On 3/5/23 00:22, Ken Young wrote:
Hello,
The methods I know,
1. scp
pros: the native tool in the OS
cons: you will either input password or put key pairs into servers for
authentication.
2. rsync
pros: it can transfer data by increasement
cons: you need to setup rsyncd server and make the
On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 16:22:25 +0800
Ken Young wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The methods I know,
>
> 1. scp
> pros: the native tool in the OS
> cons: you will either input password or put key pairs into servers for
> authentication.
Not so much of a con. I now automatically add my public keys to a
machine
That's smart. Thanks
Sincerely,
Ken Young
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 3:43 AM Linux-Fan wrote:
> Ken Young writes:
>
> > Hello,[1;5B
> >
> >
> > The methods I know,
> >
> > 1. scp
> > pros: the native tool in the OS
> > cons: you will either input password or put key pairs into servers for
> >
Ken Young writes:
Hello,[1;5B
The methods I know,
1. scp
pros: the native tool in the OS
cons: you will either input password or put key pairs into servers for
authentication.
Works for simple cases.
2. rsync
pros: it can transfer data by increasement
cons: you need to setup rsyncd
Hi Ken,
For short, I use scp and rsync too. Work fine with my scripts. Ftp works
fine on old servers. I saw old servers work with this, but with monitoring
in the FTP port for recovery. Another is to mount an NFS directory at
/etc/fstab. Work fine, too. If you have a critical script at the
Thanks for the suggestion. I will give it a try on mailbox.org.
Sincerely,
Ken Young
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 9:05 PM wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 07:23:49PM +0800, Ken Young wrote:
> > What provider do you recommend then?
>
> Around here (West Europe), for example, mailbox.org [1]. But
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 07:23:49PM +0800, Ken Young wrote:
> What provider do you recommend then?
Around here (West Europe), for example, mailbox.org [1]. But they
are far from the only one (I'm not a customer, nor associated with
them, but I do know a few happy customers).
Whenever they don't
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 4:00 AM Kamil Jońca wrote:
> Ken Young writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The methods I know,
>
> Short answer: it depends.
>
> I use:
> scp
> rdbms (central server with data + clients)
> git
> samba
>
> FuseSSH with the FISH protocol in Dolphin.
> I cannot say I "prefer"
What provider do you recommend then?
Sincerely,
Ken Young
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 6:54 PM wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 11:31:42AM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
> > Le 5 mars 2023 tomas a écrit :
> >
> > > The others I'd only use when forced to. Well, rclone, I think,
> > > I'd even refuse
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 11:31:42AM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
> Le 5 mars 2023 tomas a écrit :
>
> > The others I'd only use when forced to. Well, rclone, I think,
> > I'd even refuse when forced to. Eek.
>
> Do you have an alternate solution for cloud storage like google one ?
I don't "do"
Le 5 mars 2023 tomas a écrit :
> The others I'd only use when forced to. Well, rclone, I think,
> I'd even refuse when forced to. Eek.
Do you have an alternate solution for cloud storage like google one ?
Le 5 mars 2023 Ken Young a écrit :
> 2. rsync
> pros: it can transfer data by increasement
> cons: you need to setup rsyncd server and make the correct authorization.
Definitely rsync over ssh : easy and secure. You can further filter
commands and automate with proper ssh keys.
> 4. rclone
>
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:22:25PM +0800, Ken Young wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The methods I know,
>
> 1. scp
> pros: the native tool in the OS
> cons: you will either input password or put key pairs into servers for
> authentication.
Sometimes. From the command line, and if I only have to transfer a
Ken Young writes:
> Hello,
>
> The methods I know,
Short answer: it depends.
I use:
scp
rdbms (central server with data + clients)
git
samba
I cannot say I "prefer" any of them.
KJ
--
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
On 5/3/23 16:22, Ken Young wrote:
Hello,
The methods I know,
1. scp
pros: the native tool in the OS
cons: you will either input password or put key pairs into servers for
authentication.
2. rsync
pros: it can transfer data by increasement
cons: you need to setup rsyncd server and make the
20 matches
Mail list logo
