On Sat, Aug 23, 1997 at 01:41:44AM -0500, Dave Cinege wrote:
> I've made my objections clear. Release revisions should be fixed, and not
> have 10
> different versions, with the same number on them.
They don't. There is a revision number -- lots of free software
has them in some form or another
On 22 Aug 1997 12:24:04 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>Hi,
>>>"Fire" == Fire Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Fire> I have to admit that I like 1.3.1 or 1.3.2 (or even 1.3.2.1)
>Fire> better than 1.3.r1-fruit-files_your_mom.another-minor-change.
>
> The last bit is a wee bit of FUD.
>
Hi,
>>"Fire" == Fire Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Fire> I have to admit that I like 1.3.1 or 1.3.2 (or even 1.3.2.1)
Fire> better than 1.3.r1-fruit-files_your_mom.another-minor-change.
The last bit is a wee bit of FUD.
Fire> Mainly, pick a numbering system -- *then_stick_with_it*.
On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Fire Brand wrote:
> Thanks Paul -
>
> Putting SPI's articles of incorporation and bylaws on the
> website sounds like a very good idea. That, and listing the
> officers and the board of directors will allow anyone that
> wants to know to check it out. If this information
Thanks Paul -
Putting SPI's articles of incorporation and bylaws on the
website sounds like a very good idea. That, and listing the
officers and the board of directors will allow anyone that
wants to know to check it out. If this information is
available to everyone it will kill some of the t
5 matches
Mail list logo
