Hi,
I see some of you talking about SSHing into your computer from
another. What if the computer you're
using isn't Linux/Unix? I was thinking that you could reboot
that computer and boot up Puppy using a USB drive, or should/can
you do this through any
try putty for windows
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:20:52AM -0600, Telly Williams wrote:
Hi,
I see some of you talking about SSHing into your computer from
another. What if the computer you're
using isn't Linux/Unix? I was thinking that you could reboot
that computer
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:22:25PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
try putty for windows
Thank you.
--
Telly Williams
Knowledge Is Power
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telly Williams escribió:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:22:25PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
try putty for windows
Thank you.
Actually, to be able to connect from a linux machine to a windows
machine you also need a ssh server (well, the same goes for the inverse)
that does not come
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:22:25PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
try putty for windows
no matter how much putty you apply, its still just windows!
rimshot
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
2007/10/11, Telly Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I see some of you talking about SSHing into your computer from
another. What if the computer you're
using isn't Linux/Unix?
if you talk about the target computer being a windows host then cygwin
has an ssh
if you talk about the target computer being a windows host then cygwin
has an ssh daemon, personally I use rdesktop for windows as the shell
is pretty useless on windows imho.
if you talk about another machine being windows and your home machine
- being remote and the target google for
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:48:26PM -0600, Telly Williams wrote:
if you talk about the target computer being a windows host then cygwin
has an ssh daemon, personally I use rdesktop for windows as the shell
is pretty useless on windows imho.
if you talk about another machine being windows
All,
I noticed today that openssh released version 2.9 Monday. Can someone
tell me why debian is using 1.2.3-9.3. Is it that debian is only
supporting ssh1, or is the version numbering just different? Thank you
for your time.
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I noticed today that openssh released version 2.9 Monday. Can someone
tell me why debian is using 1.2.3-9.3. Is it that debian is only
supporting ssh1, or is the version numbering just different? Thank you
for your time.
simple really. when openssh2 came
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:50:43AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed today that openssh released version 2.9 Monday. Can someone
tell me why debian is using 1.2.3-9.3. Is it that debian is only
supporting ssh1, or is the version numbering just different? Thank you
for your time.
I understand that this is not a Debian specific question but I'm
hoping someone out there will be kind and explain this one in
short easy to understand words. :) I'm trying to ssh into my
Debian box on a DSL line setting behind a floppyfw based firewall.
When I am at home I can SSH into that
Perhaps you should try using the -P option, which will use a non-privileged
port for outgoing connections.
Jason
I understand that this is not a Debian specific question but I'm
hoping someone out there will be kind and explain this one in
short easy to understand words. :) I'm trying to ssh
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 10:05:40AM -0700, Ray Percival wrote:
I understand that this is not a Debian specific question but I'm
hoping someone out there will be kind and explain this one in
short easy to understand words. :) I'm trying to ssh into my
Debian box on a DSL line setting behind a
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 10:21:47AM -0800, Forrest English wrote:
i know i can export it just like i would any other time, but i
also set X11Forwarding yes, which i belive should forward it
automaticaly, and here's what i recive when i try and run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] forrest]$ xterm xterm Xt
on Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 07:50:13PM -0600, Richard Cobbe ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Lo, on , January 1, Forrest English did write:
sorry about that, i should have been more specific.
i have my sshd_config file set up on both machines to allow X11Forwarding.
i am trying to connect
This thread has invoked some curiosity in me. If I use ssh to forward
X connections, does that mean I can use X through an IP masquerading
router? I cannot use X in the normal way right now (by setting
DISPLAY to my IP address) because my IP doesn't really exist beyond
the router.
Thanks,
-D
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 04:22:31AM -0500, D-Man wrote:
This thread has invoked some curiosity in me. If I use ssh to forward
X connections, does that mean I can use X through an IP masquerading
router?
Yup, if the box you're sitting at is inside the firewall. It's a bit
trickier the other
on Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 03:29:51AM -0600, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 04:22:31AM -0500, D-Man wrote:
This thread has invoked some curiosity in me. If I use ssh to forward
X connections, does that mean I can use X through an IP masquerading
router?
i know i can export it just like i would any other time, but i also set
X11Forwarding yes, which i belive should
forward it automaticaly, and here's what i recive when i try and run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] forrest]$ xterm
xterm Xt error: Can't open display:
(this is from my other box, which is a
Please set your linewrap to 72 chars.
What's wrong with your shift key?
on Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 10:21:47AM -0800, Forrest English ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
i know i can export it just like i would any other time, but i also
set X11Forwarding yes, which i belive should forward it automaticaly,
Lo, on , January 1, Forrest English did write:
[reformatted for 80 columns]
i know i can export it just like i would any other time, but i also set
X11Forwarding yes, which i belive should forward it automaticaly, and
here's what i recive when i try and run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] forrest]$
on Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 05:17:16PM -0500, David B . Harris ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
To quote kmself@ix.netcom.com,
How are you invoking ssh? You have to specify -X to forward X11
connections, or specify on a per-host basis in your configuration
file.
Does the remote SSH daemon
sorry about that, i should have been more specific.
i have my sshd_config file set up on both machines to allow X11Forwarding.
i am trying to connect from my desktop (thneed) to my server (truffula.net).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh -X truffula.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
Last login: Mon
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 04:18:13PM -0800, Forrest English wrote:
sorry about that, i should have been more specific.
i have my sshd_config file set up on both machines to allow X11Forwarding.
i am trying to connect from my desktop (thneed) to my server (truffula.net).
[EMAIL
Lo, on , January 1, Forrest English did write:
sorry about that, i should have been more specific.
i have my sshd_config file set up on both machines to allow X11Forwarding.
i am trying to connect from my desktop (thneed) to my server (truffula.net).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh -X
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Andrew Hall wrote:
This may be silly, but here goes. I have downloaded the new version os ssh
due to the security
announcement a little bit ago. Looking at its depends I see that it requires
libz1 but I can not
find that package anywhere on the debian site. I do
Hello,
This may be silly, but here goes. I have downloaded the new version os ssh due
to the security
announcement a little bit ago. Looking at its depends I see that it requires
libz1 but I can not
find that package anywhere on the debian site. I do have zlib1g installed.
What's the
Friday i was trying to get PSCP to work, which i had never used before, and
it wouldnt so since it was Friday i gave up for the day. So today im logging
into the box and this is the error im getting: Incorrect MAC received on
packet This comes from Putty and actualy the first time i logged in the
On Sun, 10 May 1998, G. Kapetanios wrote:
Thanks for all the replys. The RSA keys method can be made not to ask for
anything if you put no passphrase, and that is my question. I can do what
I want without a passphrase. But is this safe ??
The man page of ssh-keygen says that if you put
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 09:15:07PM +0100, G. Kapetanios wrote:
Thanks for all the replys. The RSA keys method can be made not to ask for
anything if you put no passphrase, and that is my question. I can do what
I want without a passphrase. But is this safe ??
The man page of ssh-keygen says
Hi,
Have you considered using the tcp wrapper support that ssh has? By the
way, is the Debian ssh package compiled with tcp wrapper support? Anyway,
assuming it is, if you really need to have an empty passphrase I would
strongly suggest that you only allow secure shell logins from trusted
On Mon, May 11, 1998 at 01:16:55PM +1000, Drake Diedrich wrote:
An alternative is to run ssh-agent and ssh-add from your
.login/.profile files, and save the output (export SSH_*=... lines) to a
temporary file for future sourcing. Email me if you want bash versions
(they're on an offline
Hi all,
After some security incident on my network I decided to set up ssh.
I think I have figured most things of interest to me out. However,
before I had rsh in ascript to start my mail program which is another host
through FvwmButtons. Now that I disabled rsh I tried to figure a way to do
On Sun, 10 May 1998, G. Kapetanios wrote:
Hi all,
After some security incident on my network I decided to set up ssh.
I think I have figured most things of interest to me out. However,
before I had rsh in ascript to start my mail program which is another host
through FvwmButtons.
ssh CAN replace both rsh and rlogin, To do things as you would with rsh,
you use 'ssh command'. The trick is that you must first put the public
keys for each system into either /etc/ssh or your .ssh directory (in the
files ssh_known_keys or known_keys respectively). The easiest way to do
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 03:28:40PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
yes, but even then ssh asks for a password, I've tried every authentication
method described in the ssh man page, but I couldn't get it to login without
manual authentication
rhosts with RSA host authentication is what you wish.
Be
Thanks for all the replys. The RSA keys method can be made not to ask for
anything if you put no passphrase, and that is my question. I can do what
I want without a passphrase. But is this safe ??
The man page of ssh-keygen says that if you put no passphrase YOU SHOULD
KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING.
Hope it's useful to some one out there...
Why not make that a mini-HOWTO, and get it into a distribution
somewhere? I fond a use for this, and so, IMHO, will others.
Happy to... does anyone know how I go about doing this or if there is
something already existant that it would be better
Following sent to Adam Shand [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Adam;
I suggest that you 'poke around' a bit at:
http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-doc/
(Debian Documentation Project)
-bill
Get free e-mail and a
For the use of people who may be interested. After my question here is
what I have found you need to do in order to allow a passwordless RSA
authenticated ssh or scp session between hosts.
Hope it's useful to some one out there...
Adam.
Hi...
I'm setting up an automated script which needs the functionality of rsh to
execute some commands on a remote machine, and I need it to *not* prompt
for a pasword. I know that I can do this with SSH using a .shosts file,
but I would like to use one of SSH's additional methods of host
On Thu, 06 Nov 1997 02:48:26 -0900 Adam Shand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm setting up an automated script which needs the functionality of rsh to
execute some commands on a remote machine, and I need it to *not* prompt
for a pasword. I know that I can do this with SSH using a .shosts file,
43 matches
Mail list logo
