Hello,
We are about to buy a Fujitsu server:
* Fujitsu Primergy RX300
and I'd like to know if someone has experience with it. I'm afraid that The
server is not supported by debian. They don't list debian in the supported OS
and there are no drivers for this server.
Thank you for your help,
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Adrián Ribao Martínez ari...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
We are about to buy a Fujitsu server:
* Fujitsu Primergy RX300
and I'd like to know if someone has experience with it. I'm afraid that The
server is not supported by debian. They don't list debian in
Thank you very much Javier,
We don't need virtualization in the server, I suppose it's the same and
everything works ok.
Do you have a RAID controller in the system?
Thank you.
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Adrián Ribao Martínez ari...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
We are about to
Adrián Ribao Martínez put forth on 6/7/2010 7:10 AM:
Thank you very much Javier,
We don't need virtualization in the server, I suppose it's the same and
everything works ok.
Do you have a RAID controller in the system?
According to this:
Thank you very much for your help.
Adrián Ribao Martínez put forth on 6/7/2010 7:10 AM:
Thank you very much Javier,
We don't need virtualization in the server, I suppose it's the same and
everything works ok.
Do you have a RAID controller in the system?
According to this:
Am 2006-06-27 15:16:50, schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
My _personal_ recommendation is not to use a hardware-raid (depending on
your data-security considerations). Our hardware-raid-5 controller
recently died just a few weeks before guarantee expired. Had it survived
some more weeks, it
Hi There,
Wondering if any one has any info on the new IBM Series x3650 servers
running with Debian. In particualr with the upgraded ServeRAID-8k SAS
Controller option (25R8064) from IBM? This has full RAID 5 support
with battery backup of 72 hours.
Im guessing that the only issue with this
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:10:45 + (GMT)
ZeroUno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
standard PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the
Kevin Mark ha scritto:
more modern CPU (maybe a dual cpu) and such. If you are not monitoring
your useage, it would be a good way to determine if you need a new
machine.
The current server actually satisfies our current needs, it's not
overloaded. But we are in one of those times when the
Thanks, this brings some relief.
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit scared to find out that only binary
downloads for a restricted range of operating systems are available...
this happened with an IBM machine, and now I'm
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:00:27AM +, ZeroUno wrote:
Kevin Mark ha scritto:
snip
That's why I'm here.
Being sure about this, based only on vendor and official web site
informations, is not possible. They simply tell you that they are sure
their stuff works fine with RH etc., and that
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
standard PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it, and we also want
to consider REAL servers, but... judging
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff (someOS-compatible) is
crap. Just look for good qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
My actual recommendation for server with several responsibilities in
small companies is an Vanerpool enabled Intel-machine for using with
Xen, some gigs
Goran wrote:
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff (someOS-compatible) is
crap. Just look for good qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
My actual recommendation for server with several responsibilities in
small companies is an Vanerpool enabled Intel-machine for using with
Goran wrote:
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff (someOS-compatible) is
crap. Just look for good qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
Thanks, this brings some relief.
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit
ZeroUno wrote:
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit scared to find out that only binary
downloads for a restricted range of operating systems are available...
this happened with an IBM machine, and now I'm looking for an Intel
ZeroUno wrote:
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
standard PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it, and we also want
to consider REAL
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:10 +, ZeroUno wrote:
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
standard PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it, and
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:10:45PM +, ZeroUno wrote:
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
standard PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade
Hello,
I 'am running Apache Webserver on debian/Linux 2.2
and on the webserver I've placed a signed Applet Cab file for Internet Explorer
Clients. But looks like the same cab file which executes properly on Internet
Explorer through Microsoft's IIS does not work on the debian server
20 matches
Mail list logo
