On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 08:56:27PM +0100, Konrad Mierendorff wrote:
Carel Fellinger wrote:
Okee, so there is more overhead. So more bytes have to be transfered.
But almost doubling it seems a bit overdone, doesn't it. So I'm still
Check the CPU-usage to get this answered.
Thought I did,
Carel Fellinger wrote:
Okee, so there is more overhead. So more bytes have to be transfered.
But almost doubling it seems a bit overdone, doesn't it. So I'm still
wondering... Is the overhead mainly in the extra bytes to be sent,
then a 100Mbs Ethernet card would improve things. Or is the
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 12:35:25PM -0800, aphro wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
look at a network monitor like iptraf when transferring files and look at
how many bytes are transferred during file copy with NFS, are you using
was looking for such a beast, but didn't know
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 12:17:58AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Try adding rsize=8192,wsize=8192 to the mount options in fstab.
that's what I used, much better than the default 1024, but still horrible;(
--
groetjes, carel
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 11:26:05AM +1030, John Pearson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote
using ncftp I get the expected 1.0+MBs transfer copying a large file into
/dev/null. Quite reasonable on a 10Mbs ethernet considering ftp and tcp each
adding their
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
cfelli Okee, so there is more overhead. So more bytes have to be transfered.
cfelli But almost doubling it seems a bit overdone, doesn't it. So I'm still
cfelli wondering... Is the overhead mainly in the extra bytes to be sent,
cfelli then a 100Mbs
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote
Now that I've two machines I'm finally able to experience the full benefits
of Debian GNU/Linux. Reading all I could find on the subject on the HAMM-cd's
I managed to get nfs and nis working, exported /home and did some tests.
the culprit is the lack of support for NFS on linux still, last i heard it
was still very pooly maintained(amazing that SAMBA gets 1000x more
attention then NFS!) there are some tweaks out there but don't expect a
miracle, until the NFS code is cleaned up..its gonna be slow and
buggy. its not as
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Ethernet? or has nfs so much overhead (but ftp does okee)? or is the 486
the culprit?
Try adding rsize=8192,wsize=8192 to the mount options in fstab.
That should do the trick.
Wouter
--
Linux duckman 2.2.14 #1 Wed Jan 5
Now that I've two machines I'm finally able to experience the full benefits
of Debian GNU/Linux. Reading all I could find on the subject on the HAMM-cd's
I managed to get nfs and nis working, exported /home and did some tests.
using ncftp I get the expected 1.0+MBs transfer copying a large file
10 matches
Mail list logo
