Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-14 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 14 aug 14, 09:48:45, Joel Rees wrote: > > A four-four draw in the technical committees should have been a call > to open the discussion to a wider user base, not a call for one member > of the committee to make an arbitrary decision. Things are not > functioning correctly "up" there, even i

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-13 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 8/13/14, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:10:19PM +0200, Slavko wrote: >> Ahoj, >> >> Dňa Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:01:05 +1200 Chris Bannister >> napísal: >> >> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: >> > > >> > > Our priorities are our users and free software

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-13 Thread Joel Rees
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:19:09AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Chris Bannister >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:09:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: >> >> Well, yeah, but ask any marriage counselor what

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-13 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:19:09AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Chris Bannister > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:09:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > >> Well, yeah, but ask any marriage counselor what tends to happen when > >> one partner decides arbitrarily what

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-13 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:10:19PM +0200, Slavko wrote: > Ahoj, > > Dňa Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:01:05 +1200 Chris Bannister > napísal: > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: > > > > > > Our priorities are our users and free software > > > > > > We will be guided by the nee

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-11 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:01:05 +1200 Chris Bannister napísal: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: > > > > Our priorities are our users and free software > > > > We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software > ^ >

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-11 Thread Joel Rees
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:09:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Chris Bannister >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: >> >> >> >> I consider these posts as not OT. Consider De

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-11 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 8/11/14, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:09:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Chris Bannister >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: >> >> >> >> I consider these posts as not OT. Consider Debian social contract:

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-11 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:09:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Chris Bannister > wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: > >> > >> I consider these posts as not OT. Consider Debian social contract: > > > > Think again. > > > > > >> Our prio

Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-10 Thread Joel Rees
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: >> >> I consider these posts as not OT. Consider Debian social contract: > > Think again. > > >> Our priorities are our users and free software >> >> We will be guided by the needs of

Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)

2014-08-10 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote: > > I consider these posts as not OT. Consider Debian social contract: Think again. > Our priorities are our users and free software > > We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software ^