On 2017-02-10, Jeremy Voorhis wrote:
>
> I've used Software Collections for deployment of server software, and I can
> say they do a lot less than tools like flatpak or snap. Besides being
Less or more? Or is less more, more or less?
> agnostic to
I've used Software Collections for deployment of server software, and I can
say they do a lot less than tools like flatpak or snap. Besides being
agnostic to desktop sessions, they try to address the problem of outdated
versions of CentOS/RHEL packages which are difficult to replace (like
Python),
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Floris wrote:
>
> This sounds like flatpak
> http://flatpak.org/
>
> and is available in Debian
>
Thanks much. But sadly, from http://flatpak.org/faq.html
"Flatpak is designed to run inside a desktop session and relies on certain
session
Op Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:51:20 +0100 schreef Curt <cu...@free.fr>:
On 2017-02-10, Darac Marjal <mailingl...@darac.org.uk> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:55:24AM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
Does Debian support the "software collections" machinery from RedHat?
O
On 2017-02-10, Darac Marjal <mailingl...@darac.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:55:24AM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>>Does Debian support the "software collections" machinery from RedHat? Or will
>>it support them in the near future? Goo
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:55:24AM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
Does Debian support the "software collections" machinery from RedHat? Or will
it support them in the near future? Googling indicates that the answer is "no"
but I can't find a flat-out statement so far.
Does Debian support the "software collections" machinery from RedHat? Or
will it support them in the near future? Googling indicates that the answer
is "no" but I can't find a flat-out statement so far. Thanks...Nick G
7 matches
Mail list logo