Re: Sorry

On 2024-04-18 at 11:15, Hans wrote: > Sorry, the spam tag appears because of DCIM in the header. > > Not my fault. But it did not appear on *this* message from you to the list. Is there a reason you couldn't edit the Subject: lines of the replies you're sending, before you send them,

Sorry

Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2024, 17:08:53 CEST schrieb Hans: Sorry, the spam tag appears because of DCIM in the header. Not my fault. Best Hans > Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2024, 11:53:38 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > Hi Tomas, > > this is by debian servers, I talked about this

Re: Sorry for the misattribution [was: ZFS performance (was: Re: deduplicating file systems: VDO] withDebian?)

inted out to me, the OP wasn't hede. It was hw. Sorry for the > mis-attribution. > > Cheers What I was saying is something like that the number of failures out of some number of disks doesn't show the numbers of storage space failing (or however you want to call it). For example, when

Sorry for the misattribution [was: ZFS performance (was: Re: deduplicating file systems: VDO] withDebian?)

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 07:22:19PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > I think what hede was hinting at was that early SSDs had a (pretty) > limited number of write cycles [...] As was pointed out to me, the OP wasn't hede. It was hw. Sorry for the mis-attribution. Cheers

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:31:02PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote: > > Good afternoon. > Thank You > > We dont use WIFI. > > Desktops > > We do > connect with cable to the WWW. > Also mouse and keyboard is with cable. > OK: in many ways that makes it easier. I would still suggest the

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:32:23 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote: ... > Firmware is executable code that runs inside of a device (such as a > network interface) rather than in your CPU. > > Many modern devices require some non-free firmware in order to perform > their duties correctly. This is

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:41:07PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote: > What does mean > > firmware is free > firmware is not free? Firmware can be free OR non-free. Firmware for wireless interfaces is ALMOST ALWAYS non-free, because of proprietary secrets that the wireless chip manufacturer is

AW: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 07:18:48PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 17:24:29 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM

AW: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry Am Montag, 25. April 2022, 12:58:48 CEST schrieb Schwibinger Michael: Best version, if you do not want to have administration work, would be Debian-11 (which is bullseye). You should choose "s

AW: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:27:39PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote: > What is firmware? > Do I need it? > Is it dangerous? Firmware is executable code that runs inside of a device (such as a network interface) ra

AW: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry Hello Sophie, > > > > > > > > > > Good afternoon. > > > > Thank You. > > > > We do backup eve

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:27:39PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote: > What is firmware? > Do I need it? > Is it dangerous? Firmware is executable code that runs inside of a device (such as a network interface) rather than in your CPU. Many modern devices require some non-free firmware in order

AW: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > Hello Sophie, > > > > > > > > > > _

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 07:18:48PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 17:24:29 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > > On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Sophie, > > > > > > > >

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 17:24:29 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > > > Hello Sophie, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > Hello Sophie, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good afternoon. > > > > > > > > Thank You. > > > > > > > > We do backup

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Hello Sophie, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good afternoon. > > > > > > Thank You. > > > > > > We do backup every evening. > > > > > > What version of Debian from Debian URL is the best do

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

Hello Sophie, > > > > > > > > > > Good afternoon. > > > > Thank You. > > > > We do backup every evening. > > > > What version of Debian from Debian URL is the best do download and burn on > > CD? > > We still don't know what the actual computer you use is

Re: AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

Am Montag, 25. April 2022, 12:58:48 CEST schrieb Schwibinger Michael: Best version, if you do not want to have administration work, would be Debian-11 (which is bullseye). You should choose "stable", which is well tested and does not have much changes in the future. Of course you will chose the

AW: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

09:55 An: Schwibinger Michael Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry Am Montag, 25. April 2022, 11:35:38 CEST schrieben Sie: If you have no important data, a fresh installation will do the best. Do

AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry

at all. Maybe you should spend some money and pay someone to fix your system, who offers such as a commercial service. We can try on, but I think, only looking from the far, at the end we will loose. Sorry for that! Best regards Hans Von: Hans

Re: sorry for off-topic, i really curious some picture that have [Brian May] <- Queen?!

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 7:54 AM 황병희 wrote: > Dear Brad, > > On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote: > > [...snip...] > >>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?! > > > > Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's > > guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial.

Re: sorry for off-topic, i really curious some picture that have [Brian May] <- Queen?!

Dear Brad, On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote: > [...snip...] >>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?! > > Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's > guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial. Thus making it > unlikely they're the same person. Ah

Re: sorry for off-topic, i really curious some picture that have [Brian May] <- Queen?!

On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:58:07 +0900 황병희 wrote: Hello 황병희, >Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?! Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial. Thus making it unlikely they're the same person. -- Regards _

sorry for off-topic, i really curious some picture that have [Brian May] <- Queen?!

Hello i'm Queen's fan, however i did discover [Brian May] in lists of Maintainers file [1], when i sent mail to requ...@bugs.debian.org with "getinfo maintainers" in body. Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?! Sincerely, Byung-Hee from South Korea. [1]

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

In Article , Ben Caradoc-Davies writes: > On 21/10/17 19:49, arne wrote: >>> I am in a desperate situation, thanks! >> https://paste.debian.net/ does not work at the moment either :( >> I am out of luck > > You can upload to

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

Curt wrote: > The future is now, I guess; we've been enlisted as (un)knowing slaves by > our digital machines. The real catch is that it is the same for whatever > we do on the global network; it's all being harvested, digested, > utilized; soon they will know us so much better than we know them,

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On 2017-10-21, Darac Marjal wrote: > > A car is a small passenger vehicle. A van is not a car, a truck is not a > car. I'm not entirely sure if an SUV is a car and Utes are just... well, > thankfully I've not had to decide about one of them in a Captcha yet. A pipe

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:47:38 +0100 Darac Marjal wrote: Hello Darac, >A car is a small passenger vehicle. A van is not a car, a truck is not a >car. I'm not entirely sure if an SUV is a car and Utes are just... well, And there's the problem, at least in part; Ute is

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On 21/10/17 19:49, arne wrote: I am in a desperate situation, thanks! https://paste.debian.net/ does not work at the moment either :( I am out of luck You can upload to your Google Drive, share the link (this turns on link sharing, anyone with the link can view by default), and paste the

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On 21/10/17 18:07, arne wrote: I am not a robot. I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sign. I tire of car and street sign CAPTCHAs. My favourites: KittenAuth: https://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2006/04/6554-2/ http://origin.arstechnica.com/staff.media/kittencaptcha.jpg

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On 21/10/17 12:20, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:58:41 + (UTC) > Curt wrote: > > Hello Curt, > >> whether a section containing part of the support (pole or whatever) for >> the sign constitutes something I should click on or not; then, after > The pole doesn't

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On 2017-10-21, Brad Rogers wrote: > --Sig_/C/xj3njr+UxhCQ2w_j=VGJl > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:58:41 + (UTC) > Curt wrote: > > Hello Curt, > >>whether a section

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On Saturday 21 October 2017 07:20:57 Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:58:41 + (UTC) > Curt wrote: > > Hello Curt, > > >whether a section containing part of the support (pole or whatever) > > for the sign constitutes something I should click on or not; then, > >

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On Saturday 21 October 2017 02:49:22 arne wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:35:02 +0200 > > arne wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:15:09 -0700 > > > > Weaver wrote: > > > On 2017-10-21 15:12, arne wrote: > > > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:07:21 +0200 > > > > >

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:58:41 + (UTC) Curt wrote: Hello Curt, >whether a section containing part of the support (pole or whatever) for >the sign constitutes something I should click on or not; then, after The pole doesn't count as part of the sign but sometimes there's a

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

arne wrote: > It would be nice to find another one other than imgur to show a > picture :) http://postimages.org/ is very suitable for this purpose. There are several other filehosters though.

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On 2017-10-21, arne wrote: > I am not a robot. > I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sign. I've had problems with the street sign "captcha" (?) myself, not knowing whether a section containing part of the support (pole or whatever) for the sign constitutes

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:35:02 +0200 arne wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:15:09 -0700 > Weaver wrote: > > > On 2017-10-21 15:12, arne wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:07:21 +0200 > > > arne wrote: > > > > > >> I am not a

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

need to slow down. > If you don't have yourself under control, it's impossible to control > the situation you're in. > Right now i am angry, not towards you, not in any case. I am fed up with a bug, lasting for years. that's what my anger is about. Sorry to have bothered you.

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:07:21 +0200 arne wrote: > I am not a robot. > I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sign. > It would be nice to find another one other than imgur to show a picture :) Pain in the ass that imgur It took me over 100 windows clicks with no

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

I am not a robot. I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sign.

Re: attach a big picture This username is already in use. Stupid Yahoo mail won't let me in I am sorry, Cars Street signs etc,

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:50:40 -0700 Weaver wrote: > On 2017-10-21 14:44, arne wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 06:38:55 +0200 > > arne wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> How can I attach a big picture to the mail I need to send to > >> explain my problem? Does

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

On Mon 31 Oct 2016 at 15:44:37 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:11:34PM +0300, Reco wrote: > > Other convenience scripts of similar nature get their own packages and > > put into 'contrib'. > > The ones you have mentioned already (b43-fwcutter, flashplugin-nonfree and

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:11:34PM +0300, Reco wrote: > Other convenience scripts of similar nature get their own packages and > put into 'contrib'. The ones you have mentioned already (b43-fwcutter, flashplugin-nonfree and ttf-mscorefonts-installer) do nothing useful without additional, non-free

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

On Mon 31 Oct 2016 at 17:11:34 +0300, Reco wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:15:51PM +, Brian wrote: > > > Pass on the rest because packaging is not something I know much about, > > so I'm most likely to rely on the expertise of the maintainers. The > > changelog might give you some clue

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

Hi. On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:15:51PM +, Brian wrote: > On Sun 30 Oct 2016 at 18:24:50 +0300, Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:20:44 + > > Brian wrote: > > > > > > printer-driver-hpcups and printer-driver-hpijs would be sufficient

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

Hi. On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 07:58:19PM +0100, deloptes wrote: > IMO hplip also supports multifunction devices. Yup. Happen to have one of those. > If you want to use HP device only for printing ... non of this is required. And if I do want to use an HP device for scanning I need

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

On Sun 30 Oct 2016 at 19:58:19 +0100, deloptes wrote: > IMO hplip also supports multifunction devices. Correct. > If you want to use HP device only for printing ... non of this is required. Correct. It can, however, depend on which backend you want to send data to the printer if you are fussy.

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

IMO hplip also supports multifunction devices. If you want to use HP device only for printing ... non of this is required. If you want to do a scanning etc it is understandable that a kind of gui has to be provided. It is funny to read your arguments while you are sliding into the Ric's "I think

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

On Sun 30 Oct 2016 at 18:24:50 +0300, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:20:44 + > Brian wrote: > > > > printer-driver-hpcups and printer-driver-hpijs would be sufficient for > > just printing. That is why the packages are provided. > > 'Should be'

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

ting up a USB printer. First, that logic did not stop them from forcing one to install a PolicyKit, for instance. Second, said USB printer can be shared over the network by CUPS, so such dependency is actually justifiable. > > 5) Aforementioned backends. Worth mentioning as another part of th

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

orth mentioning as another part of the > puzzle actually related to the printing (filters) resides in > 'printer-driver-hpcups' (which is by itself is ok). Apparently because > reasons. Sorry; don't follow. > 6) A bunch of symlinks to assorted python scripts from 'hplip-data', > note agai

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

Reco wrote: > 1) Python as a dependency, again. Wait, haven't we install one already > with 'hplip-data'? Some python modules too, yet the package does not > contain a single python script (see pt 6). IMO python should be banned from real development. I dislike the new KDE most of all because

Re: [OT] Sorry state of hplip (was: [SOLVED] Re: [jessie] recording line-in using ALSA?)

Hi. On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:36:27 +0100 Brian wrote: > On Sat 29 Oct 2016 at 21:51:48 +0300, Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:54:27 +0200 > > deloptes wrote: > > > > > Reco wrote: > > > > > > > So basically you're

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On Mon 02 May 2016 at 08:44:53 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > > [...] > > > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into > > the bit bucket [...] > > I doubt that part. Especially having already received

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On 05/01/2016 11:44 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: [...] That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into the bit bucket [...] I doubt that part. Especially having

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: [...] > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into > the bit bucket [...] I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejects from some Debian list due to

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On 05/01/2016 10:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote: Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit on the site restrictions. Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are asked, you would get more

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 09:59 -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > I need to re-read Gene Haskett's suggestion again and try to > impliment  > it. Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a > bit  > on the site restrictions. You could probably file a bug about reject notices. As for

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote: > Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit > on the site restrictions. Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are asked, you would get more help faster. Lisi

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On 05/01/2016 04:46 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send anything other than plain text files. I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and

Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > > anything other than plain text files. > > I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and it has not arrived, but >

Correction - sorry - Re: Aptitude message.

On Friday 22 January 2016 13:23:25 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 22 January 2016 11:49:15 Brian wrote: > > On Fri 22 Jan 2016 at 20:55:05 +1000, Weaver wrote: > > > Am receiving this on 'aptitude update'. > > > ~~ > > > root@Telaman:/home/weaver# aptitude update > > > Hit

Ouch, sorry. Re: Jessie sufficiently stable for general use?

Shouldn't rush. My typing is lousy. Herewith again: On Friday 06 March 2015 23:15:12 Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 06 March 2015 15:22:21 Miles Fidelman wrote: Somehow, anything that needs daily updates, or upgrades, does not meet any definition of stable that I'm familiar with.

I'm sorry

Hi all, Five minutes ago I posted a mean, personal attack. Nobody needs that, especially these days. So I just procmailed that particular person to /dev/null, so I won't see his messages and respond to him. I apologize to the list and the person I personally attacked. SteveT Steve Litt

Re: Gratuitous reverse rabble rousing? (was Re: why do we use systemd?) - I AM SORRY

Hello Everyone, I have to admin I use very bad language. I'm sorry, it wasn't appropriate. You are absolutely right. The links that I've shared, aren't mine. I've just found them. The only reason that I wanted to reach, make the system(s) better if we don't get rid of it. I didn't want

Re: Debianly Correct place to add ~/bin to $PATH ? sorry for not responding sooner

On 20131209_181204, Gregory Nowak wrote: On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:14:19PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote: On 20131209_134124, Gregory Nowak wrote: I don't know if xfce has any impact on the execution of ~/.profile at login. Have you tried to run your scripts or looking at the output of

Re: Flashplayer on Squeeze (sorry. :-()

If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can create it, but I need to know where to put it. Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze. Hi Lisi, Instead of setting it up manually, you can

Re: Flashplayer on Squeeze (sorry. :-()

El Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:41:28 + Clive Standbridge list-u...@tgstandbridges.plus.com escribió: If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can create it, but I need to know where to put it.

Flashplayer on Squeeze (sorry. :-()

If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can create it, but I need to know where to put it. Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze. Thanks, Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Flashplayer on Squeeze (sorry. :-()

/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can create it, but I need to know where to put it.

Re: Flashplayer on Squeeze (sorry. :-()

Made the assumption of you using Firefox/Iceweasel, etc. On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:23 PM, b.g. white bgw...@gmail.com wrote: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put

Re: Flashplayer on Squeeze (sorry. :-()

On Saturday 03 November 2012 22:25:18 b.g. white wrote: Made the assumption of you using Firefox/Iceweasel, etc. On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:23 PM, b.g. white bgw...@gmail.com wrote: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins Thank you! :-) Lisi On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com

Re: Flashplayer on Squeeze (sorry. :-()

On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:47:53 you wrote: If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can create it, but I need to know where to put it. Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze. Thanks, Lisi

Re: Flashplayer on Squeeze (sorry. :-()

On Saturday 03 November 2012 21:43:55 Greg Madden wrote: On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:47:53 you wrote: If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can create it, but I need to know where to put

Re: CIFS and data integrity ; Sorry for the noise

On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 01:15:28 + (UTC) Mark Fletcher mark2...@gmail.com wrote: ... compatibility. I have heard of people wresting their NAS out of the grasp of the OS it comes with and installing Linux on it, presumably by mucking about with firmware etc, but I have never attempted to do

Re: CIFS and data integrity ; Sorry for the noise

On 20120730_122543, Paul E Condon wrote: On 20120730_065640, Mark Fletcher wrote: Joe joe at jretrading.com writes: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 01:50:14 +0900 Mark Fletcher mark27q1 at gmail.com wrote: It looks like what got stored on the NAS is not exactly what was

Re: CIFS and data integrity ; Sorry for the noise

On 30/07/12 04:09 PM, Paul E Condon wrote: On 20120730_122543, Paul E Condon wrote: On 20120730_065640, Mark Fletcher wrote: Joejoeat jretrading.com writes: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 01:50:14 +0900 Mark Fletchermark27q1at gmail.com wrote: It looks like what got stored on the NAS is not

Re: CIFS and data integrity ; Sorry for the noise

Paul E Condon pecondon at mesanetworks.net writes: Having posted this, which I thought was reasonable, I went and looked at the archives to see what OP (Mark Fletcher) had written. It turns out that all of his investigation was done using commands typed in as root. For me, this thread is a

Re: CIFS and data integrity ; Sorry for the noise

On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Mark Fletcher wrote: Paul E Condon pecondon at mesanetworks.net writes: Having posted this, which I thought was reasonable, I went and looked at the archives to see what OP (Mark Fletcher) had written. It turns out that all of his investigation was done using

Re: CIFS and data integrity ; Sorry for the noise

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh hmh at debian.org writes: Well... there is an awlful lot of CIFS and NFS-related fixes in the kernel stable queue. Check that. Also make sure it is not your NIC driver or memory (or the NAS' memory) that went bad... I wondered about this too -- and the

Re: CIFS and data integrity ; Sorry for the noise

On 31/07/12 13:15, Mark Fletcher wrote: Paul -- The NAS is a Buffalo LinkStation 4TB NAS configured to do RAID giving me 2TB of storage. I bought myself it for Christmas from Amazon.co.jp (I live in Japan) at Christmas 2010. I don't know what OS it will be running but doubt it will be Linux

Re: Nvidia drivers problem Geforce 570, Have not used this model GPU, sorry.

On 06/07/2012 08:11 PM, Nathan D'elboux wrote: Hello everyone! I wanted to know has anyone had any issues getting nvidia drivers working for a Geforce 5xx series card under Debian 6 squeeze? I'm running a Geforce 570 running a Dell 27 IPS screen that has a res of 2560 x 1440, the res isn't

RE: Nvidia drivers problem Geforce 570, Have not used this model GPU, sorry.

Sorry was suppose to reply all :) RE: Nvidia drivers problem Geforce 570, Have not used this model GPU, sorry. What model are you using? I also have a 5xxx series and a 8800GTX and 8800GT to swap out and see, i just haven't tried that yet Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:19:49 -0400 From: saqman2

[OT] Sorry for spam.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am sorry if those duplicate messages arrived to this mailing list. Icedove was lagging and I pressed send button many times, so there is possibility that I just send more than five identical emails to this list. - -- Mika Suomalainen gpg

Re: [OT] Sorry for spam.

On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:08:43 +0200, Mika Suomalainen wrote: I am sorry if those duplicate messages arrived to this mailing list. Icedove was lagging and I pressed send button many times, so there is possibility that I just send more than five identical emails to this list. Tsk, tsk... you

Re: [OT] sorry, bad url reference

On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:36:24PM -0500, Randy Kramer wrote: On Sunday 04 March 2012 11:40:56 am Chris Bannister wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:30:13AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: [1] http://thescreamonline.com/essays/essays08-01/basically.html That URL produces 406 Not Acceptable.

[OT] sorry, bad url reference

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:30:13AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: Have a look at: http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101017091521AAqPonZ oops, probably not the best reference since some of the posts use bad English. Basically[1], the answer is: No, grammar is an uncountable noun

Re: [OT] sorry, bad url reference

On Sunday 04 March 2012 11:40:56 am Chris Bannister wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:30:13AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: [1] http://thescreamonline.com/essays/essays08-01/basically.html That URL produces 406 Not Acceptable. Not sure why I included that link without checking it first. :(

Re: Using wheezy or testing in sources.list f ... sorry for the noise

should read with better comprehension. Sorry. There is no difference, at all, between Wheezy and Testing -- They are the same physical thing on the Debian repository server's hard disk. Testing is nothing more than a symlink to Wheezy. When updates go into Testing, they're actually being put

Re: Using wheezy or testing in sources.list f ... sorry for the noise

comprehension. Sorry. No problem at all, Paul! I replied to the other message because I saw it before I saw this one! -- Chris

Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry VERY LONG

Hi, --- On Fri, 11/25/11, John W. Foster jfoster81...@verizon.net wrote: From: John W. Foster jfoster81...@verizon.net Subject: Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry VERY LONG To: Emanoil Kotsev delop...@yahoo.com Cc: debian-user debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Friday, November 25

Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry LONG

John W. Foster wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 09:42 -0600, John W. Foster wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 00:21 +0100, deloptes wrote: John W. Foster wrote: /usr/share/perl5/LaTeXML/texmf you need to setup the environment correctly, so that texmf finds the package i.e. using the

Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry VERY LONG

On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:26 -0800, Emanoil Kotsev wrote: So you run the command manually from the command line and get this error correct ? Yes http://lalashan.mcmaster.ca/theobio/projectsoes - does this has something to do with you? No, this was in the borrowed source code that

Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry LONG

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 00:21 +0100, deloptes wrote: John W. Foster wrote: /usr/share/perl5/LaTeXML/texmf you need to setup the environment correctly, so that texmf finds the package i.e. using the variable TEXINPUTS or so regards Yep, I figured that out from reading on the web

Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry LONG

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 09:42 -0600, John W. Foster wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 00:21 +0100, deloptes wrote: John W. Foster wrote: /usr/share/perl5/LaTeXML/texmf you need to setup the environment correctly, so that texmf finds the package i.e. using the variable TEXINPUTS or so

Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry LONG

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:29:35AM GMT, John W. Foster wrote: See LaTeXMLFyOem3/ltxmlimg.log ^^ Since this is a straight forward setup from debian stable, I'm wondering why latex can not find the file it needs. Is this a bug, maybe? Have you had a look in

Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry LONG

the file it needs. Is this a bug, maybe? Have you had a look in there? -- Raf Yes, sorry that I was unclear. The log files are named, and placed in a newly created directory with each compile. Therefore each error log has a new name/directory. This is a function of workingwiki. This keeps

Re: Need help with Latex error; Sorry LONG

John W. Foster wrote: /usr/share/perl5/LaTeXML/texmf you need to setup the environment correctly, so that texmf finds the package i.e. using the variable TEXINPUTS or so regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

  1   2   3   4   5   >