On Thu, 22 May 2014 18:38:37 -0500
John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com wrote:
Joe writes:
But you normally only get one spam at a time from one ISP, which
suggests they do spot the problem themselves fairly quickly...
It suggests that the spammers are quite sophisticated in their use of
On 5/23/2014 3:02 AM, Joe wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 18:38:37 -0500
John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com wrote:
Joe writes:
But you normally only get one spam at a time from one ISP, which
suggests they do spot the problem themselves fairly quickly...
It suggests that the spammers are quite
On Fri, 23 May 2014 09:15:07 -0400
Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/23/2014 3:02 AM, Joe wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 18:38:37 -0500
John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com wrote:
Joe writes:
But you normally only get one spam at a time from one ISP, which
suggests they do spot
Hello,
I use the spamhaus blacklist for exim (CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS).
First of all what are the differences between CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS and
CHECK_RCPT_DOMAIN_DNSBLS ??
Make it sense to use both? if yes can I also use zen.spamhaus.org for this?
Is there also a way to report spam servers
Hello,
Iuse the spamhaus blacklist for exim (CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS).
First of all what are the differences between CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS and
CHECK_RCPT_DOMAIN_DNSBLS ??
Make it sense to use both? if yes can I also use zen.spamhaus.org for this?
Is there also a way to report spam servers
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:44:49PM +0200, basti wrote:
Hello,
I use the spamhaus blacklist for exim (CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS).
First of all what are the differences between CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS and
CHECK_RCPT_DOMAIN_DNSBLS ??
Make it sense to use both? if yes can I also use zen.spamhaus.org
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti mailingl...@unix-solution.de wrote:
Actually I get some spam from 84.19.164.45but this ip is not blocked
at the moment.
Forward the message including all headers to the abuse contact for the
IP address.
You can look this up using whois.
whois
On 5/22/2014 6:16 AM, Henning Follmann wrote:
I thought that this is handled via ACLs.
And not by Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:47:50PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti mailingl...@unix-solution.de wrote:
Actually I get some spam from 84.19.164.45but this ip is not blocked
at the moment.
Forward the message including all headers to the abuse contact
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:47:50PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti mailingl...@unix-solution.de wrote:
Actually I get some spam from 84.19.164.45but this ip is not blocked
at the
On Thu, 22 May 2014 22:27:28 +0200
Jan Ingvoldstad frett...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying:
Send an _e-mail_ to the abuse contact point for the IP address block
owner.
Don't simply blacklist. Well, feel free to add the IP address in
question to a local blacklist, but if you can't be
Joe writes:
But you normally only get one spam at a time from one ISP, which
suggests they do spot the problem themselves fairly quickly...
It suggests that the spammers are quite sophisticated in their use of
their bots.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To
On 5/22/2014 4:15 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:47:50PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti mailingl...@unix-solution.de wrote:
Actually I get some spam from 84.19.164.45but this ip is not blocked
at the moment.
Forward the message
13 matches
Mail list logo
