On Tue 15 Feb 2022 at 19:28:48 (+0100), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 14 feb 22, 17:23:52, David Wright wrote:
> > > On 2/14/2022 10:19 AM, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not sure about the Debian installer (except that it does boot and
> > > > run Linux, but not sure it ever switches to
On Ma, 15 feb 22, 11:59:59, David wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 07:57, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 14 feb 22, 10:41:52, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> > > How does it decide which partition to boot from? I think this is what
> > > the OP is asking.
>
> > As far as I understand the path to
On Lu, 14 feb 22, 17:23:52, David Wright wrote:
> > On 2/14/2022 10:19 AM, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > >
> > > Not sure about the Debian installer (except that it does boot and
> > > run Linux, but not sure it ever switches to another kernel
> > > midway), but the Grub bootloader is kind of a
With respect to the original problem, this response is moot.
On Sun 13 Feb 2022 at 18:50:43 (+0100), Hans wrote:
> > If you want to boot A, just select it from the menu presented by B's
> > grub.
> >
> > When you boot and run A, you can update-grub¹ and that will scan
> > and see both systems,
On Sun 13 Feb 2022 at 19:26:51 (+0100), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 13 feb 22, 11:01:48, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > Typically, one would have a primary, "master" linux system which would
> > be used to write an MBR pointing to itself. The other, legacy system
> > would have its grub.cfg kept
On Mon 14 Feb 2022 at 10:18:13 (+1100), David wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 05:27, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 13 feb 22, 11:01:48, David Wright wrote:
>
> TLDR:
> On the topic of grub automatic configuration
> 1) suggestions how to avoid it
> 2) why I prefer to do that
>
> Disclaimer:
On 2022-02-15, David wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 10:24, David Wright wrote:
>
>> Effectively, Grub has two shells, Grub> and Grub rescue>, depending on
>> whether the "normal" module has been loaded, and about the only thing
>> you can sensibly do without normal is to find it and insmod it.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 10:24, David Wright wrote:
> Effectively, Grub has two shells, Grub> and Grub rescue>, depending on
> whether the "normal" module has been loaded, and about the only thing
> you can sensibly do without normal is to find it and insmod it.
> But most people will never see
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 07:57, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 14 feb 22, 10:41:52, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > How does it decide which partition to boot from? I think this is what
> > the OP is asking.
> As far as I understand the path to search for the second stage, modules
> and grub.cfg is
On Mon 14 Feb 2022 at 12:13:20 (-0500), Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 2/14/2022 10:19 AM, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > On 2022-02-14 10:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I think I did mis-remember this, and the behavior I described
> > > is more like the
> > > behavior of the Debian installer
On Mon 14 Feb 2022 at 10:41:52 (-0500), Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 2/13/2022 11:23 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 13 feb 22, 02:40:27, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > > This is my understanding of how grub works.
> > >
> > > It looks you are using the old MBR partitioning scheme. The logical
On Lu, 14 feb 22, 10:41:52, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> That's a good clarification that the active partition is a Microsoft thing
> implemented by the bootcode Microsoft installs in the MBR of the device
> chosen to boot from. Now for an unanswered question: What
> does bootcode installed by
On 2/14/2022 10:19 AM, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
On 2022-02-14 10:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I did mis-remember this, and the behavior I described is more
like the
behavior of the Debian installer (i.e., it boots an image (with a Linux
kernel) into RAM to use temporarily for the
On 2/13/2022 11:23 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 13 feb 22, 02:40:27, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
This is my understanding of how grub works.
It looks you are using the old MBR partitioning scheme. The logical
partition indicates that.
So I also assume you are using the legacy booting (not
On 2022-02-14 10:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I did mis-remember this, and the behavior I described is more like the
behavior of the Debian installer (i.e., it boots an image (with a Linux
kernel) into RAM to use temporarily for the installation.
I just wanted to try to correct this
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 09:04:50 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> The way I understand it (but I may be misremembering), grub temporaily
> boots into a, well I'll say restricted Linux kernel and OS which is used
> by grub until it boots up the main system. The kernel used in grub may
> not
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 05:27, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 13 feb 22, 11:01:48, David Wright wrote:
TLDR:
On the topic of grub automatic configuration
1) suggestions how to avoid it
2) why I prefer to do that
Disclaimer: contains generalisations and lacks full justifications of
points made.
On Du, 13 feb 22, 11:01:48, David Wright wrote:
>
> Typically, one would have a primary, "master" linux system which would
> be used to write an MBR pointing to itself. The other, legacy system
> would have its grub.cfg kept up-to-date, but would never touch the
> MBR by running grub-install.
Hi David,
yes, that is what I thought, would be working. But sadly did not.
I expected, after using update-grub, that os-prober would detect both
partitions with the menu.lst or grub.cfg inside and create two entries in the
boot menu.
However, this did not work, only one (the last
Hi,
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > It looks you are using the old MBR partitioning scheme. The logical
> > partition indicates that.
> > So I also assume you are using the legacy booting (not UEFI).
Not necessarily. It is specified that the EFI System Partition may
be marked by a MBR partition
On Sat 12 Feb 2022 at 10:04:43 (+0100), Hans wrote:
>
> I am thinking of a solution of a problem. But I have an understanding
> problem,
> maybe you can give some background knowledge.
>
> The problem: I have one harddrive, there are two linuces installed.
>
> The partitions are as followed:
On Du, 13 feb 22, 02:40:27, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> This is my understanding of how grub works.
>
> It looks you are using the old MBR partitioning scheme. The logical
> partition indicates that.
> So I also assume you are using the legacy booting (not UEFI). So the first
> thing that
>
On 2/12/2022 4:04 AM, Hans wrote:
Dear list,
I am thinking of a solution of a problem. But I have an understanding problem,
maybe you can give some background knowledge.
The problem: I have one harddrive, there are two linuces installed.
The partitions are as followed:
kali-linux: 1st
ully understood how grub is
working, and what it is doing.
Any hints are welcome, and if this does never work at all, please drop me a
line.
Best regards
Hans
It's not a stupid question -- it's an observation of how complexity
grows as the number of items grows.
I have found it is better to inst
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 04:04:43 AM Hans wrote:
> But how can I tell grub, to use the kernel of the second /boot?
>
> I dunno, if it is possible at all, to get a dual boot, the way I want it.
> With a combination of Windows + Linux on one harddrive this is working,
> however, just because
12 Feb 2022, 19:04 by hans.ullr...@loop.de:
> Dear list,
>
> I am thinking of a solution of a problem. But I have an understanding
> problem,
> maybe you can give some background knowledge.
>
> The problem: I have one harddrive, there are two linuces installed.
>
> The partitions are as
Dear list,
I am thinking of a solution of a problem. But I have an understanding problem,
maybe you can give some background knowledge.
The problem: I have one harddrive, there are two linuces installed.
The partitions are as followed:
kali-linux: 1st primary -> /boot
2nd >
Hi Karl,
Thanks for the tip.
I just enforced Alt+w to be å using:
xmodmap -e "keycode 25 = w W aring Aring aring Aring"
Not it is just a matter to add it into my .xinitrc. Not sure nowadays the
desktop environments read it, but at the least it will be saved in some
place I can easily find.
[Alt Gr] [o] [a] should work.
http://stefaanlippens.net/accented-characters-on-qwerty-keyboard/
/Staffan
2018-03-30 15:08 GMT+02:00 Helio Loureiro :
> Hi,
>
> It is probably a dumb question for most of people here but... I do have all
> my keyboards in English. I can use
Hi,
It is probably a dumb question for most of people here but... I do have all
my keyboards in English. I can use it to write in English and Portuguese,
where I can create characters like "ç" using +"," or '+c. For é,
'+e. For ô, ^+o.
Some Swedish characters do work fine, like ö and ä using
Just to be sure in case I misunderstand and do something really stupid:
When pvdisplay says
april:/farhome/hendrik# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/md0
VG Name VG1
PV Size 673.62 GiB / not usable 3.00 MiB
Allocatable
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:26:09 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Just to be sure in case I misunderstand and do something really stupid:
When pvdisplay says
april:/farhome/hendrik# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/md0
VG Name VG1
PV Size
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:53:30 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:26:09 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Just to be sure in case I misunderstand and do something really stupid:
When pvdisplay says
april:/farhome/hendrik# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:33:06 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:53:30 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
does that mean that /dev/md0 still has 59037*4.00 = 236148 mebibytes
of free space left to be allocated to logical volumes?
Mmm... I've been reading the man page for pvdisplay
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
april:/farhome/hendrik# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/md0
VG Name VG1
PV Size 673.62 GiB / not usable 3.00 MiB
Allocatable yes
PE Size
Just to be sure in case I misunderstand and do something really stupid:
When pvdisplay says
april:/farhome/hendrik# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/md0
VG Name VG1
PV Size 673.62 GiB / not usable 3.00 MiB
Allocatable
hi list,
how do i get rid of the message of a new (of course much valued)
maintainer Christian about MTA'S and cron when updating squeeze on the
commandline before using startx? apt-get upgrade hangs on this message
and i do not know the protocol to go on in this situation (if there is
Hello !
just enter `q' !
hth,
Jerome
On 13/05/10 14:37, steef wrote:
hi list,
how do i get rid of the message of a new (of course much valued)
maintainer Christian about MTA'S and cron when updating squeeze on the
commandline before using startx? apt-get upgrade hangs on this message
and i
On 5/13/2010 1:37 AM, steef wrote:
hi list,
how do i get rid of the message of a new (of course much valued)
maintainer Christian about MTA'S and cron when updating squeeze on the
commandline before using startx? apt-get upgrade hangs on this message
and i do not know the protocol to go on in
On Thu,13.May.10, 08:37:31, steef wrote:
hi list,
how do i get rid of the message of a new (of course much valued)
maintainer Christian about MTA'S and cron when updating squeeze on
the commandline before using startx? apt-get upgrade hangs on this
message and i do not know the protocol
On 05/13/2010 08:37 AM, steef wrote:
hi list,
how do i get rid of the message of a new (of course much valued)
maintainer Christian about MTA'S and cron when updating squeeze on the
commandline before using startx? apt-get upgrade hangs on this message
and i do not know the protocol to go on
godo schreef:
On 05/13/2010 08:37 AM, steef wrote:
hi list,
how do i get rid of the message of a new (of course much valued)
maintainer Christian about MTA'S and cron when updating squeeze on the
commandline before using startx? apt-get upgrade hangs on this message
and i do not know the
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:34:50AM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:59:10PM +0300, Stuart Gall wrote:
Does a higher weight mean that the route will be used more or used less ?
[snip]
Furthermore, if you really want to do this, you probably also want to look at
Hello,
SO I have scoured the internet, the man pages, groups. I just cant find
a definitive answer.
weight NUMBER - is a weight for this element of a multi-
path route reflecting its relative bandwidth or quality.
So more weight = better quality = preferred
e.g.
ip route add
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:59:10PM +0300, Stuart Gall wrote:
Hello,
SO I have scoured the internet, the man pages, groups. I just cant find
a definitive answer.
weight NUMBER - is a weight for this element of a multi-
path route reflecting its relative bandwidth or quality.
So
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:59:10PM +0300, Stuart Gall wrote:
Does a higher weight mean that the route will be used more or used less ?
Citation from
Linkname: Re: Loadbalancing the gat: msg#00055
URL:
Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't like it, but I also don't like reloading. :-)
Ah, ya puss! Burn a backup CD and do it. Think of all those doors
opening up for you. You can try anything! =[8]-)
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)
Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't like it, but I also don't like reloading. :-)
Ah, ya puss! Burn a backup CD and do it. Think of all those doors
opening up for you. You can try anything! =[8]-)
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)
On Wed, 2007.09.26 12:52, Mike McCarty wrote:
Fedora I would not recommend to anyone not interested in
eternally fiddling with the machine, broken interfaces,
and churn. It's for people whose hobbies include fiddling
with new installs and reloading.
I'm not into that, either, for these large
On 9/27/07, Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started using Linux with FC2 (or FC3 maybe) and was just thrilled with it
(with Linux, really). Then I got annoyed with FC's bleeding edge software and
also decided that I shouldn't have to reinstall every 6 months in order to
stay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/26/07 11:58, Mike McCarty wrote:
Wayne Topa wrote:
Mike McCarty([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Ok, so how does one get a newer kernel, install it, and get
all the memory available?
That question indicates, to me at least,
Ron Johnson wrote:
I know how to do the necessary admin with FC. Debian I'm much less
capable with. I wouldn't call FC turnkey. But it uses a completely
different set of admin tools.
Why did you push Debian on her, when your expertise lies in FC?
Push is a four letter word :-)
I got her a
Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't like it, but I also don't like reloading. :-)
Ah, ya puss! Burn a backup CD and do it. Think of all those doors
opening up for you. You can try anything! =[8]-)
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)
Leon ha scritto:
Marco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi everybody,
with lsmod I see the modules loaded, but what should I type in order
to see what options they were loaded with?
Maybe `modinfo'?
Hi Leon,
I have tried with modinfo, but I don't see what I want to see :-(
Any idea?
klatt-st ha scritto:
-+--+-in reply to:
subj: Kernel modules stupid question [0.4K/0L]
from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (To debian-user@lists.debian.org)
date: 21May2006 @ 22:32 (141th doy|1148247145 sse)
-+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--
hi Marco,
have a look at /sys/module
At 1148251289 past the epoch, Leon wrote:
Marco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
with lsmod I see the modules loaded, but what should I type in
order to see what options they were loaded with?
Take a look through /proc/modules. Is the information you want present
there?
--
Jon Dowland
At 1148299046 past the epoch, Marco wrote:
klatt-st ha scritto:
have a look at /sys/module/*/parameters.
Thanks for that, very informative...
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everybody,
with lsmod I see the modules loaded, but what should I type in order
to see what options they were loaded with?
Ex.
modprobe ipw2200 led=1
lsmod -- ipw2200
I would like to see:
modprobe ipw2200 led=1
command -- ipw2200 led=1
Thanks a lot...
Bye
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Marco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi everybody,
with lsmod I see the modules loaded, but what should I type in order
to see what options they were loaded with?
Maybe `modinfo'?
--
Leon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Paul Johnson writes:
UNIX is a trademark of ATT.
No. It's a trademark of The Open Group.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:37:44 -0500
John Galatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unsubscribe
John, as it says at the bottom of every email that comes through this list:
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A
Ivan Teliatnikov wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:17 +0700, mslinuz wrote:
Andy Anderson wrote:
Okay, I'm sure everyone here knows how to do this
except me...
I have a server with some disk space shared using
Samba. Each user has an account and a home share.
When a
mslinuz wrote:
Ivan Teliatnikov wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:17 +0700, mslinuz wrote:
Andy Anderson wrote:
Okay, I'm sure everyone here knows how to do this
except me...
I have a server with some disk space shared using
Samba.
Hello Andy,
Am 2006-02-19 20:49:16, schrieb Andy Anderson:
Okay, I'm sure everyone here knows how to do this
except me...
I have a server with some disk space shared using
Samba. Each user has an account and a home share.
When a user logs in to a workstation, I'd like their
home share on
Ivan Teliatnikov wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:17 +0700, mslinuz wrote:
Andy Anderson wrote:
Okay, I'm sure everyone here knows how to do this
except me...
I have a server with some disk space shared using
Samba. Each user has an account and a home share.
mslinuz wrote:
I'm sorry if I misunderstand, but after reading your mail, I have 2
assumtions:
Your assumptions are correct. Actually, I have only Debian users,
and they all use gnome/gdm, so your #1 solution is the one that
I'm interested in.
1. Users use debian with gnome/gdm in the
Opus wrote:
mslinuz wrote:
I'm sorry if I misunderstand, but after reading your mail, I have 2
assumtions:
Your assumptions are correct. Actually, I have only Debian users,
and they all use gnome/gdm, so your #1 solution is the one that
I'm interested in.
1. Users use debian with
Wodzu Wodzowski wrote:
I want to install Debian on laptop, but I want to have ReiserFS/Reiser4 or
XFS file system. I've found that I can convert/create partition with one
of above file system. Can I install Sarge on Reiser/XFS partition??
If you want maximum data security, you might want to
Okay, I'm sure everyone here knows how to do this
except me...
I have a server with some disk space shared using
Samba. Each user has an account and a home share.
When a user logs in to a workstation, I'd like their
home share on the Samba server to be automatically
mounted, and then unmounted
Andy Anderson wrote:
Okay, I'm sure everyone here knows how to do this
except me...
I have a server with some disk space shared using
Samba. Each user has an account and a home share.
When a user logs in to a workstation, I'd like their
home share on the Samba server to be automatically
On Friday 17 February 2006 16:38, Wodzu Wodzowski wrote:
I want to install Debian on laptop, but I want to have ReiserFS/Reiser4 or
XFS file system. I've found that I can convert/create partition with one of
above file system. Can I install Sarge on Reiser/XFS partition??
ReiserFS and XFS are
I want to install Debian on laptop, but I want to have ReiserFS/Reiser4 or XFS
file system. I've found that I can convert/create partition with one of above
file system. Can I install Sarge on Reiser/XFS partition??
Oglądaj Puchar Jedynki 18
Wodzu Wodzowski wrote:
I want to install Debian on laptop, but I want to have ReiserFS/Reiser4 or
XFS file system.
I've found that I can convert/create partition with one of above file
system.
Can I install Sarge on Reiser/XFS partition??
Yes, you can use any partition type you want.
Be
On Thu, 26 May 2005, SA wrote:
You know what they say, there are no stupid questions, only stupid answers ;-)
Anyway,
First thing, I wouldn't count on the release date of sarge, on the other
its rather stable at the moment. As for releases, when its not near its
release date (as sarge IS for
Dear List,
I wanted to install debian on an amd64 / x86_64 SMP machine from IOS images, I
can't find a suitable set of images on the mirrors I have looked for these
but they are absent. I have found amd64.debian.org however I am still a
little confused:
Since sarge is due out at the end of
On 5/26/05, SA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear List,
I wanted to install debian on an amd64 / x86_64 SMP machine from IOS images, I
can't find a suitable set of images on the mirrors I have looked for these
but they are absent. I have found amd64.debian.org however I am still a
little
Certainly a stupid Subject: line (sorry :P)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Probably a stupid question but...
Date: Thursday 26 May 2005 18:20
From: SA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I downloaded the netinst image, put it on a CD and booted my machine with it
- after a few questions
to make it onto the CD
(seems unlikely) or is there a problem with the installer (in which case what
do I do?),
Cheers,
SA
On Thursday 26 May 2005 18:30, SA wrote:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Probably a stupid question but...
Date: Thursday 26 May 2005 18:20
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:05:18PM +0100, SA wrote:
Pissing around with the expert mode of install leads me to belive that some
(possibly all) the network modules are missing from the installer as well as
some other modules. In an attempt to get around this I installed another
network
No I haven't sent this to anyone else (actually just forwarded to
debian-boot). This is the first time I have used debian for 3 years
(previously only once before on an old alpha). Despite many years unix
experience I haven't got the foggest idea what is going on here or if this is
in fact
Well this could explain one of the problems but not the majority:
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerFAQ
Question 22: Why isn't my NIC supported by DebianInstaller, I know the tg3
driver supports it!
Answer: As tg3 contains firmware which does not seem to meet the requirements
I want/need to compile one of the Alan Cox variants of the 2.4.20
kernel (it apparently has better support for the particular Asus
motherboard that I have). I've routinely hand-compiled kernels for
some years, but I've never tried any of the non-standard kernel
branches before.
I downloaded the
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 02:07:02PM -0800, Jim McCloskey wrote:
I want/need to compile one of the Alan Cox variants of the 2.4.20
kernel (it apparently has better support for the particular Asus
motherboard that I have). I've routinely hand-compiled kernels for
some years, but I've never
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 02:07:02PM -0800, Jim McCloskey wrote:
I downloaded the 2.4.20 source from ftp.debian.org, uncompressed it,
un-tarred it. Then I downloaded patch-2.4.20-pre10-ac2 from the same
site, and tried:
patch -p1 patch-2.4.20-pre10-ac2
at the top of the
using rc?.d, but still need
further assistance.
and now the stupid question: why aren't nfs,
the rpcs, and the startup scripts at least an
option during the installation? i understand
that some people may not want these daemons
running, but it should be offered during the
installation just as samba
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:30:10AM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
and now the stupid question: why aren't nfs,
the rpcs, and the startup scripts at least an
option during the installation? i understand
that some people may not want these daemons
running, but it should be offered during
to be specific:
portmap
lockd
mountd
rquotad
statd
// timothy
--
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:30:10AM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
and now the stupid question: why aren't nfs,
the rpcs, and the startup scripts at least an
option during the installation? i understand
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:55:32PM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
to be specific:
portmap
lockd
mountd
rquotad
statd
Yes, and all of them are in the packages I mentioned earlier, with
the exception of rquotad, which is in the quota package.
I'm not terribly familiar with the package
Well, the subject really says it all, doesn't it? I've RTFM, and all I can
find is how to set the display line wrap, but not the send line wrap. I
suppose it should be done through the editor? (I use emacs.) Sorry for
such a silly question, but I've mostly been using Balsa up till now, and
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:31:22PM -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
Well, the subject really says it all, doesn't it? I've RTFM, and all I can
find is how to set the display line wrap, but not the send line wrap. I
suppose it should be done through the editor?
You are correct. Mutt just takes what
Steve Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, the subject really says it all, doesn't it? I've RTFM, and all I can
find is how to set the display line wrap, but not the send line wrap. I
suppose it should be done through the editor? (I use emacs.) Sorry for
such a silly question, but I've
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 15:31:22 -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
I've RTFM, and all I can find is how to set the display line wrap, but not
the send line wrap. I suppose it should be done through the editor?
Yes.
HTH,
Ray
--
LEADERSHIP A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with auto-
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:31:22PM -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
Well, the subject really says it all, doesn't it? I've RTFM, and all I can
find is how to set the display line wrap, but not the send line wrap. I
suppose it should be done through the editor? (I use emacs.) Sorry for
such a silly
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:31:22PM -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
Well, the subject really says it all, doesn't it? I've RTFM, and all I can
find is how to set the display line wrap, but not the send line wrap. I
suppose it should be done through the editor? (I use emacs.) Sorry for
such a silly
I recently helped a friend resurrect an old machine with Debian :-).
There is one little thing that annoyed me, and will annoy him, the more
he learns. The keymappings that I am used to don't always seem to
work. For instance with a 'man man,' I couldn't use the vi(m) like
keybindings for
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, John Travis wrote:
I recently helped a friend resurrect an old machine with Debian :-).
There is one little thing that annoyed me, and will annoy him, the more
he learns. The keymappings that I am used to don't always seem to
work. For instance with a 'man man,' I
On Friday 02 February 2001 12:11, David Purton wrote:
just a thought, but do you have 'less' installed?
I think man uses 'more' if 'less' isn't available and hence you can't
scroll up, etc.
LOL. THWACKKK! (sound of hand hitting forhead). I just assumed
that it got pulled in somewhere
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 09:21:02PM +0100, Gary Jones wrote:
Okay, stupid question time.
What is the best way of connecting to the 'net? I don't mean the
mechanicals, which connection type to use, that sort of thing, but
rather which account(s) should do so. Preferably I don't want
At Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:12:10 + , Matthew Sackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It generally doesn't matter: so long as you are able to dial up then the other
processes take care of themselves.
[...]
the details are
in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/
There are similar files for isdn which I use, and you are of
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo