On Jo, 09 iul 20, 11:02:49, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:56:26AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Sounds pretty risky.
> >
> > Sure. On the other hand, what is the point of using LVM if one is not
> > going to use it to adjust partitions when required?
>
On Thu 09 Jul 2020 at 11:02:49 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:56:26AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Sounds pretty risky.
> >
> > Sure. On the other hand, what is the point of using LVM if one is not
> > going to use it to adjust partitions when
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:56:26AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> > Sounds pretty risky.
>
> Sure. On the other hand, what is the point of using LVM if one is not
> going to use it to adjust partitions when required?
You first have to copy stuff, then delete stuff, then shrink, then
On Mi, 08 iul 20, 10:20:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:35:35AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I was under the impression that LVM is used in particular for its
> > flexibility in adjusting your partitions.
>
> But it won't make disappear a separate /usr
On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 18:07:05 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/7/20 3:35 pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:35:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The short answer is that there simply isn't a good reason to do this
> >>> on
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:07:05PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
A line for /usr is in /etc/fstab using it's UUID ... same as root is referenced
by UUID (both are in the same lvm2 volume group).
Why not just reference it by path?
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:35:35AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> I was under the impression that LVM is used in particular for its
> flexibility in adjusting your partitions.
But it won't make disappear a separate /usr partition "by magic".
> What prevents you from merging '/' and
On 8/7/20 3:35 pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:35:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
>>>
>>> The short answer is that there simply isn't a good reason to do this
>>> on a modern system, and there is no volunteer to donate the enormous
>>>
On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:35:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> >
> > The short answer is that there simply isn't a good reason to do this
> > on a modern system, and there is no volunteer to donate the enormous
> > amount of effort required to make
> > something
On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 02:35:09 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:45:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >> On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >>> On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >>>
Hi,
On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:45:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>>> On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>>> > * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
>>> >> On Friday 31
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:45:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
>> On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
> >> On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay.
On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
>
>> On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. BUSYBOX=y is
>>> essential.
>>
>> This is what the install gave me. I
* David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il [2014-11-02 00:28 +0200]:
On Saturday 01 November 2014 22:58:05 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
It's your decision. MODULES=most
On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il [2014-10-31 10:22 +0200]:
On Thursday 30 October 2014 19:46:26 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
To mount /usr at boottime you need to boot with an initramfs.
Therefor you need at least
* David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. BUSYBOX=y is
essential.
This is what the install gave me. I have not touched it.
Where do I tell it to mount
On Saturday 01 November 2014 22:58:05 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. BUSYBOX=y is
essential.
This is what the
On Thursday 30 October 2014 19:46:26 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* Hans hans.ullr...@loop.de [2014-10-30 10:27 +0100]:
Dear maintainers,
completely without starting any flamewars:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well
as /var, /home, /boot and /.
* David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il [2014-10-31 10:22 +0200]:
On Thursday 30 October 2014 19:46:26 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
To mount /usr at boottime you need to boot with an initramfs.
Therefor you need at least
ii initramfs-tools 0.118
ii util-linux 2.25.2-2
Dear maintainers,
completely without starting any flamewars:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well as
/var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
Due to this profile, I get a lot of annoying errors, as systemd does not
Hello Hans!
Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014, 10:27:50 schrieb Hans:
Dear maintainers,
You only reach the systemd maintainers by pure luck this way. I know one is
subscribed to debian-user-german, I am not sure about debian-user.
I suggest you use BTS or dig for a debian systemd maintainers
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Hans wrote:
Dear maintainers,
completely without starting any flamewars:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well as
/var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
Due to
On 10/30/2014 10:27 AM, Hans wrote:
Dear maintainers,
completely without starting any flamewars:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well as
/var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
Due to this profile, I get a lot of
On Thursday 30 October 2014 10:27:50 Hans wrote:
Dear maintainers,
completely without starting any flamewars:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well
as /var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
Due to this
Hi Hans,
have a look on this link:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken/
Best,
Alex
Yes, yes, I know that. I alreadfy filed a bugreport some weeks ago.
However, it is not really a bug, but more a failure by design, I think.
Hope, that the
I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable keeping
of /usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing multi-partition Debian
installations have usr on a separate partition. Historically and even
recent installations (not that I like the partitioning done by the
On 10/30/14, Hans hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote:
I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable
keeping
of /usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing multi-partition Debian
installations have usr on a separate partition. Historically and even
recent installations (not
Le Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:27:50 +0100,
Hans hans.ullr...@loop.de a écrit :
Dear maintainers,
completely without starting any flamewars:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as
well as /var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Hans wrote:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as
well as /var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
If you want this to work, you need to ensure that /usr is mounted by the
On 30/10/14 11:35, David Baron wrote:
I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable keeping of
/usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing multi-partition Debian
installations have usr on a separate partition. Historically and even recent
installations (not that I like
On Thursday 30 October 2014 15:35:53 Peter Nieman wrote:
On 30/10/14 11:35, David Baron wrote:
I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable
keeping of /usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing
multi-partition Debian installations have usr on a separate
On 10/30/2014 10:14 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Hans wrote:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as
well as /var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
If you want this to work,
Le 30.10.2014 15:35, Peter Nieman a écrit :
On 30/10/14 11:35, David Baron wrote:
I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable
keeping of
/usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing multi-partition
Debian
installations have usr on a separate partition. Historically
On 30/10/14 17:48, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Hum... I think I always have seen the installer on all in one partition
(beginners)?
If you have selected this one, then, you should not have problems
because of stuff not mounted.
I guess you're right that there was an option to have
* Hans hans.ullr...@loop.de [2014-10-30 10:27 +0100]:
Dear maintainers,
completely without starting any flamewars:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well as
/var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
Due to
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:30:54 +0100
Peter Nieman gmane-a...@t-online.de wrote:
On 30/10/14 17:48, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Hum... I think I always have seen the installer on all in one
partition (beginners)?
If you have selected this one, then, you should not have problems
37 matches
Mail list logo
