On Du, 11 iul 21, 06:54:31, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-11 at 03:31, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > While your testing + stable as needed mix is pretty simple[1] the
> > reverse mix stable + select packages from testing requires adequate
> > pinning and can quickly become problematic for
On 2021-07-11 at 03:31, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 10 iul 21, 14:38:39, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2021-07-10 at 14:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> It depends :)
>>>
>>> In my opinion I'd say the order from less to more dangerous
>>> would be:
>>>
>>> 1. stable + select packages from
On Sb, 10 iul 21, 14:38:39, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-10 at 14:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > On Sb, 10 iul 21, 06:51:43, Brian Thompson wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
> >>
On Sat 10 Jul 2021 at 13:48:12 -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Testing doesn't have any direct security support
>
> Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
Almost, for most of the time and in normal circumstances.. It
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 01:48:12PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed response, Andrei.
>
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Testing doesn't have any direct security support
>
> Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
>
Thank you for the detailed response, Andrei.
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Testing doesn't have any direct security support
Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/testing-security
when I was talking about
On Sat 10 Jul 2021 at 14:38:39 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> I'm a little surprised to see that you don't even mention the mix which
> I've been running for the last decade-plus: stable + testing, which
Most likely an oversight.
--
Brian.
On 2021-07-10 at 14:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 10 iul 21, 06:51:43, Brian Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
>>
>> Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites?
>
> It
On Sb, 10 iul 21, 06:51:43, Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
>
> Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites?
It depends :)
In my opinion I'd say the order from less to more
9 matches
Mail list logo
