Am 2006-12-24 17:37:42, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think we already had this discussion -- see Michelle's sex in the
archives.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/09/msg00515.html
Or was she being sarcastic?
Currently the European Court of Justice is working
on the legalization of
Am 2006-12-24 16:03:28, schrieb s. keeling:
David Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It could be what lines up along the rail of a sinking ship,
but I think she meant rat's tail.
This was the missing word in my vocabulary
To the best of my knowledge, Michelle is still a he. :-)
Not if you
Michelle Konzack wrote:
AFAIK Michele (only with one l) if female in Italy.
Well, no, it isn't. Michele is male, Michela is female :)
--
FORZA VECCHIO CUORE BIANCOROSSO!
1905 - 2005 (+1)... la storia continua
---=== Powered by Debian
David Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:55:43AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Michelle Konzack writes:
Passwords long as a rat-queue are realy secure...
What is a rat-queue?
It could be what lines up along the rail of a sinking ship,
but I think she meant rat's
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 04:03:28PM +, s. keeling wrote:
David Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:55:43AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Michelle Konzack writes:
Passwords long as a rat-queue are realy secure...
What is a rat-queue?
It could be what lines
Am 2006-12-15 00:56:28, schrieb Jacques Normand:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:45:40AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
I've often seen this touted as a good security measure and I've
always wondered why. I can think of a few possibilities, but I
really don't know. Could someone please explain it
Am 2006-12-15 16:04:50, schrieb Erik Persson:
Grok Mogger wrote:
I've often seen this touted as a good security measure and I've always
wondered why. I can think of a few possibilities, but I really don't
know. Could someone please explain it to me?
Thanks,
- GM
1. When a hacker
Michelle Konzack writes:
Passwords long as a rat-queue are realy secure...
What is a rat-queue?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:55:43AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Michelle Konzack writes:
Passwords long as a rat-queue are realy secure...
What is a rat-queue?
It could be what lines up along the rail of a sinking ship,
but I think she meant rat's tail.
--
David Jardine
Running Debian
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 08:57:04PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
As an example look at my system(s). I have a handful of accounts. Some
for friends and family, some for processes I don't want trampling all over my
hard drive, and in the middle of that is mine. Mine is the only one that has
Olive wrote:
This answer in't entirely convincing. For example if you can sudo with
the normal password account, I do see any difference in security in
allowing root ssh or not.
Operative word, if. That's a big series of ifs.
If sudo is installed.
If it is configured to allow
Neither, yo.
If you want security you need grsecurity's gradm RBAC patch installed. I bet I
could hack your system in 12 seconds.
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olive wrote:
This answer in't entirely convincing. For example if you can sudo with
the normal password account, I do see any
Sue Kim wrote:
Neither, yo.
If you want security you need grsecurity's gradm RBAC patch installed. I
bet I could hack your system in 12 seconds.
Pardon me if I am less than impressed by someone posting from an anonymous
account, making spurious claims and begins their missive with the
Because, to login from outside you will need to guess a valid username
and the corresponding password. After that the root password will have
to be guessed locally which would leave a fat trace in the logs. In
addition, most of the bots around try to guess the root password and do
not spend a
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:35:50PM +0100, Olive wrote:
Because, to login from outside you will need to guess a valid username
and the corresponding password. After that the root password will have
to be guessed locally which would leave a fat trace in the logs. In
addition, most of the bots
Well, if sudo is well configured, it does not give complete root access,
It should be limited to mostly inoffensive command options and require
the password for the rest. As for the logs, you are right in the case
where they are kept local, but any reasonable size network will use a
separate node
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:09:54PM +0100, Olive wrote:
Well, if sudo is well configured, it does not give complete root access,
It should be limited to mostly inoffensive command options and require
the password for the rest. As for the logs, you
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:09:54PM +0100, Olive wrote:
Well, if sudo is well configured, it does not give complete root access,
It should be limited to mostly inoffensive command options and require
the password for the rest. As for the logs, you are right in the case
where they are kept
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:38:51AM -0600, Jacques Normand wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:09:54PM +0100, Olive wrote:
Well, if sudo is well configured, it does not give complete root access,
It should be limited to mostly inoffensive command
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:03:37PM +0100, Albert Dengg wrote:
This way to setup sudo does not make sense to me. It is giving full root
access to every user, which is plain bad. It must be a configuration for
single workstation used by one person only.
well, not exactly...
normally, that
Grok Mogger wrote:
I've often seen this touted as a good security measure and I've always
wondered why. I can think of a few possibilities, but I really don't
know. Could someone please explain it to me?
Thanks,
- GM
1. When a hacker tries to attack a site he (or she) has to guess 2
On Friday, 15.12.2006 at 15:55 +0800, Tim Post wrote:
Leaving root enabled via SSH, you're doing half of the hacker's work
for them.
A half-way house option is to only allow root logins via public/private
key, rather than via password. To do this, put
PermitRootLogin without-password
into
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:35:50PM +0100, Olive wrote:
Because, to login from outside you will need to guess a valid username
and the corresponding password. After that the root password will have
to be guessed locally which would leave a fat trace in the logs. In
addition, most of the bots
I've often seen this touted as a good security measure and I've
always wondered why. I can think of a few possibilities, but I
really don't know. Could someone please explain it to me?
Thanks,
- GM
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 /
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:45:40AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
I've often seen this touted as a good security measure and I've
always wondered why. I can think of a few possibilities, but I
really don't know. Could someone please explain it to me?
Because, to login from outside you will need
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 01:45 -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
I've often seen this touted as a good security measure and I've
always wondered why. I can think of a few possibilities, but I
really don't know. Could someone please explain it to me?
Thanks,
- GM
Think of a username and password
26 matches
Mail list logo
