Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-20 Thread Rob Hudson
I've got the G450 also. I'm running dual-head. I think I read somewhere that DRI doesn't work under dual-head. Is this true? On 20010213.2045, Damon Muller said ... Quoth Lee Elliott, I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-17 Thread Lee Elliott
To: Damon Muller Cc: User Debian Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400 I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, but leaving mga as a module and i guess I have the same problem as you. X4.02 crashes my machine at 16 and 32bpp. I guess

RE: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-16 Thread Chun Kit Edwin Lau
] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM To: Damon Muller Cc: User Debian Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400 I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, but leaving mga as a module and i guess I have the same problem as you. X4.02 crashes my machine at 16

RE: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-15 Thread Chun Kit Edwin Lau
- From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM To: Damon Muller Cc: User Debian Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400 I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, but leaving mga as a module and i guess I have

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-15 Thread Lee Elliott
the desktop. -Original Message- From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM To: Damon Muller Cc: User Debian Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400 I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-15 Thread Chun Kit Edwin Lau
Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM To: Damon Muller Cc: User Debian Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400 I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, but leaving mga as a module and i guess I have the same

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-14 Thread Chun Kit Edwin Lau
I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, but leaving mga as a module and i guess I have the same problem as you. X4.02 crashes my machine at 16 and 32bpp. I guess it has to do will drm. When i check the XF86 website, it seems to be that they suggested kernel 2.4.x kernel. I

RE: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-14 Thread Joris Lambrecht
definetly rule the desktop. -Original Message- From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM To: Damon Muller Cc: User Debian Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400 I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-14 Thread Lee Elliott
Hello James, The answer was in there:-) First of all though, I switched to the 2.4.1 kernel, re-compiled, and it made no difference - I still got an error about mga_hal missing. I had a look at matrox.com and found the new drivers that one of the other posters had mentioned, and on the same

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-14 Thread Sean
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 18:12, Lee Elliott wrote: --snip-- Still get the Insufficient memory error when I use 24/32bpp and fps drops to about 5fps :-( Sad, as 32bpp is fine with X3.3.6 utah_glx. At some point I'll try a lower res in 24/32 and if that works I'll consider getting a 32MB

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-13 Thread Damon Muller
Quoth Lee Elliott, I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log I don't know if this will help for your particular

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-13 Thread Lee Elliott
Hello Brian, Thanks for replying. Yes, towards the end of the log I get: ... (==) MGA(0): Write-combining range (0xf200,0x100) (--) MGA(0): 16 DWORD fifo (==) MGA(0): Default visual is TrueColor (II) MGA(0): [drm] bpp: 16 depth: 16 (II) MGA(0): [drm] Sarea 2196+632: 2828 (0): [drm]

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-13 Thread Lee Elliott
Hello Damon, Thanks for replying. I tried a driver from Matrox and it gave me the same results. It was about twice the size of the mga_drv.o generated from the kernel source, so it must be different somehow. I remember having to adjust my monitor quite a bit, but still no h/w acceleration.

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-13 Thread Lee Elliott
Hello James, Something about the tone of your reply makes me think I've missed something obvious:-) Certainly, please do tell me what you did/where I've gone wrong. TIA, LeeE James Dietrich wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:45:34PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote: Quoth Lee Elliott, I'm

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-13 Thread James Dietrich
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:59:45PM +, Lee Elliott wrote: Hello James, Something about the tone of your reply makes me think I've missed something obvious:-) Certainly, please do tell me what you did/where I've gone wrong. Don't read too much into the tone of my reply :) It's just

XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-12 Thread Lee Elliott
Hello List, I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log (II) Setting vga for screen 0. (II) Loading sub module vgahw (II)

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400

2001-02-12 Thread brian moore
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:39:11PM +, Lee Elliott wrote: Hello List, I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log