Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-08 Thread John Pearson
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 05:25:12PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote On 07 Jan 2000, Pann McCuaig wrote: There was one more pass. You can (or at least could) get it from the same place. $ dpkg -l | grep slrn ii slrn0.9.5.3-6 threaded news reader (fast for slow links)

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-07 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 03 Jan 2000, Pann McCuaig wrote: On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 13:05, Joey Hess wrote: Joey Hess wrote: I have just uploaded slrn 0.9.5.3-5 for stable, which fixes this bug. You can get it temporarily at ... Er I meant to say at http://va.debian.org/~joeyh/slrn_0.9.5.3-5_i386.deb

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-07 Thread Pann McCuaig
There was one more pass. You can (or at least could) get it from the same place. $ dpkg -l | grep slrn ii slrn0.9.5.3-6 threaded news reader (fast for slow links) On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 11:18, Anthony Campbell wrote: On 03 Jan 2000, Pann McCuaig wrote: On Mon, Jan 03, 2000

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-07 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 07 Jan 2000, Pann McCuaig wrote: There was one more pass. You can (or at least could) get it from the same place. $ dpkg -l | grep slrn ii slrn0.9.5.3-6 threaded news reader (fast for slow links) That's the one I have, which no longer works. Anthony -- Anthony

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-04 Thread Pann McCuaig
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 13:05, Joey Hess wrote: Joey Hess wrote: I have just uploaded slrn 0.9.5.3-5 for stable, which fixes this bug. You can get it temporarily at ... Er I meant to say at http://va.debian.org/~joeyh/slrn_0.9.5.3-5_i386.deb Pann, Jim please download that and let me

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-03 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: Y2K problem with slrn? Date: Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 05:49:36PM -0500 In reply to:Brian Servis Quoting Brian Servis([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | *- On 2 Jan, Colin Watson wrote about Re: Y2K problem with slrn? | Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Here is my $HOME

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-03 Thread Pann McCuaig
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 22:09, Colin Watson wrote: Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is my $HOME/.jnewsrc.time: NEWGROUPS 1000102 173956 GMT Looks like there's a 100 where a 2000 ought to be. See: http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=53811 Thanks. Looking at

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-03 Thread Colin Marquardt
Sounds good, but it won't install. Seems that debhelper has to be upgraded as well and 'that' seems to require the perl upgrade. Depbelper fails with DH_VERSION=10 perl -MTest::Harness -e 'runtests grep { ! /CVS/ } [...] I had this problem as well, but the answer I got from the -devel-List

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Brian Servis wrote: The bug by the way is the result of sloppy programming. There is a c library call that returns the year as the number of years from 1900, also used in perl's Time::Local. Authors were using that as the two digit year or just appending it to 19, so you are either seeing

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
I have just uploaded slrn 0.9.5.3-5 for stable, which fixes this bug. You can get it temporarily at ... Pann, Jim please download that and let me know if it really fixes the problem. -- see shy jo

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote: I have just uploaded slrn 0.9.5.3-5 for stable, which fixes this bug. You can get it temporarily at ... Er I meant to say at http://va.debian.org/~joeyh/slrn_0.9.5.3-5_i386.deb Pann, Jim please download that and let me know if it really fixes the problem. -- see shy jo

Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-02 Thread Pann McCuaig
Here is my $HOME/.jnewsrc.time: NEWGROUPS 1000102 173956 GMT Looks like there's a 100 where a 2000 ought to be. Cheers, Pann -- geek by nature, Linux by choice L I N U X .~. The Choice /V\

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-02 Thread Colin Watson
Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is my $HOME/.jnewsrc.time: NEWGROUPS 1000102 173956 GMT Looks like there's a 100 where a 2000 ought to be. See: http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=53811 I imagine there'll be a new release of slrn out soon that solves this problem. --

Re: Y2K problem with slrn?

2000-01-02 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 2 Jan, Colin Watson wrote about Re: Y2K problem with slrn? Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is my $HOME/.jnewsrc.time: NEWGROUPS 1000102 173956 GMT Looks like there's a 100 where a 2000 ought to be. See: http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=53811 I imagine