> [...] it could be of interest to you to take a look at text mail clients,
> like mutt ou sup.
Also Gnus is not bad, i think...;;;
Sincerely,
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
Hi, Karen -
I'm not at all sure this is the solution but I think it's worth considering:
https://safe-mail.net
It offers a few interface designs. I use the 'Fast' one, which trims away
icons and other graphic niceties. Since I don't normally use lynx or
elinks, I'm not sure how navigable it
My experience of sight loss is not what motivates my use of a web browser
to access this account.
Instead, it is that I must, in the course of work and research, direct
other individuals to this inbox in public places.
Karen
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Curt wrote:
On 2019-11-19, Reco wrote:
On the contrary,
One member provided an article listing email companies, another reminded
me that I might consider the email option provided by my dsl company
itself.
All perfectly helpful, and perfectly focused on the single question I
asked.
so, the thread, or some of it, was most
I have no problem with that situation.
Better screen on my own leaving open a possibility I might miss
otherwise, then eliminate a prospective option based on a non-common
dictionary .
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 19/11/2019 18:54, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Nope, do not
Mark,
neither of the methods you outline are what I choose.
first, let me use dreamhost as an example.
Asking the company in no way shape or form insures I will learn how a
company programs fully, because many technicians and customer service
people work from a script leaving them less than
because my first post says so smiles.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, John Hasler wrote:
Why do you have to use Webmail at all?
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Karen Lewellen writes:
> Nope, do not need webmail software names at all. just need to visit,
> test, and move on. no more, no less.
Then this entire discussion is pointless. No one here has a complete
list of Webmail providers but a Web seach using your favorite search
engine will provide one.
On 19/11/2019 19:03, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Aside from the lack of practical processes
Really, there is no real world lack of practical processes.
> a company might configure their web interface to be perfectly
> functional for me without using any of these webmail software
> programs, at
On 19/11/2019 18:54, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Nope, do not need webmail software names at all.
> just need to visit, test, and move on. no more, no less.
But you do realise that you're going to be seeing the same webmail
software over and over again that way, much of which might not work for you.
On 19/11/2019 18:19, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> And as I have said, more than once, is that I am not going to have a
> say in, or a reasonable way to, screen what services provide in
> terms of the webmail software they incorporate.
Yes, I have seen you say this several times now. There are two
Mark,
Does that mean you will agree to disagree, allowing the list to move on?
for my part the exchange is over. Others provided a list of possible
e-mail companies which was first, last, and only the goal for information
here.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 19/11/2019
Why do you have to use Webmail at all?
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 19/11/2019 18:37, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
>>
>> What these pieces of software do need is to be hosted somewhere. The
>> easiest and best way for that to be done is to be hosted by an ISP or
>> email service provider. In other words, you simply obtain
not at all.
Aside from the lack of practical processes, a company might configure
their web interface to be perfectly functional for me without using any
of these webmail software programs, at all.
Therefore my own method of a simple visit is perfectly fine...for me,
which is the point.
I have no interest in reading the email account I am seeking via
anything at all whatsoever but a web browser.
Not only for myself, but others who must access the account when I am
conducting research in public places.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, John Hasler wrote:
Karen Lewellen writes:
yet
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
You don't need to have any say in what webmail software they use. But,
due to your specific requirements, the fact remains that you will have
to choose your email hosting company depending on the webmail software
they offer because, as you have
On 19/11/2019 18:44, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> i. have. no. interest. in. finding. webmail software!
Yes, you want to find an email hosting company.
*But specifically you need to find an email hosting company that
provides webmail software that works as you need it to*.
Knowing what webmail
Karen Lewellen writes:
> yet another reason to find another email provider...
[Ancient news elided] Of course they read your mail (or rather their
software does). They are an advertising agency. Did you think that
they provided Gmail for free as a charity?
Newsguy (
On 19/11/2019 18:40, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Not at all, just answer the question asked...as others have done.
I really have done -- at very considerable length and in detail. :-)
--
Mark Rousell
i. have. no. interest. in. finding. webmail software!
Your method does not provide a firm and absolute way of determining the
presence of such webmail software.
My own method, which is how I checked out Protonmail, involved visiting
their webmail interface via a link from their site..and I
On 19/11/2019 18:11, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> I am going to have no say whatsoever in the webmail software they use.
You don't need to have any say in what webmail software they use. But,
due to your specific requirements, the fact remains that you will have
to choose your email hosting company
Not at all, just answer the question asked...as others have done.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 19/11/2019 18:07, Karen Lewellen wrote:
I asked specifically for email companies, not webmail software.
I say this in the nicest possible way but you are quite a hard
person to
On 19/11/2019 18:07, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> I asked specifically for email companies, not webmail software.
I say this in the nicest possible way but you are quite a hard
person to help. :-)
I do understand that you'd like a list of email companies but a list of
webmail software might very
Hi again,
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
What these pieces of software do need is to be hosted somewhere. The
easiest and best way for that to be done is to be hosted by an ISP or
email service provider. In other words, you simply obtain the webmail
service from the service provider
And as I have said, more than once, is that I am not going to have a say
in, or a reasonable way to, screen what services provide in terms of the
webmail software they incorporate.
making a list of such software options not productive for my stated needs.
Karen
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark
No, you sent me to a site listing webmail software, which is not an
specific company, or the suggestion that I seek a specific local company
for email.
I am going to have no say whatsoever in the webmail software they use.
Meaning bell.net might or might not work out, but it is a company
I asked specifically for email companies, not webmail software.
While I respect that for some gmail is both a company providing email
services , and one with its own web interface, my goal is the former not
the latter . I am not qualified to quiz companies on the interfaces they
offer or
On 19/11/2019 17:27, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> all of the software in the article one source offered, requires an
> e-mail server .
No, the software listed at the link I provided
(https://opensource.com/alternatives/gmail) does *not* require that you
have your own email server. The software
On 19/11/2019 22:21, ghe wrote:
On 11/19/19 9:16 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
yet another reason to find another email provider, not to be confused
with a webmail program requiring an email server I do not have for a
computer i do not own running a Linux distribution I cannot access.
Sorry, I
Actually, no.
Protonmail does not work in either links or elinks, as it requires a
different configuration of JavaScript.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, ghe wrote:
On 11/19/19 9:16 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
yet another reason to find another email provider, not to be confused
with a webmail
all of the software in the article one source offered, requires an e-mail
server .
While another person provided a list of actual e-mail companies, which is
what I am seeking.
I am not in a position to change shell services for example, or dsl
providers.
my ability to Gage if the e-mail
I should add that (although I did not suggest that Karen should host her
own email) I did mention the possibility of Karen having a webmail
client of her own choice running in a web hosting account. This is not
necessarily the shocking thing that it might sound and it is not the
same as Karen
entioned, there are plenty of open source webmail
> > clients. I'd have thought that some of these can be configured to
> > operate without resorting to Javascript. In addition to the link that
> > Didier provided here is another handy list of open source webmail
> >
On 11/19/19 9:16 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> yet another reason to find another email provider, not to be confused
> with a webmail program requiring an email server I do not have for a
> computer i do not own running a Linux distribution I cannot access.
Sorry, I misspoke. Protonmail isn't
On 19/11/2019 16:42, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 18 November 2019 17:48:30 Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
> To repost Karen's original plea for help since so many have apparently
> miss-interpreted her situation. To me it reads like google changed
> something and that shaming them into reversing
On 19/11/2019 16:41, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Do you know if Roundcube works well without Javascript?
> Yes: It does not. Roundcube very heavily uses JavaScript.
>
> Webmail-Frontends which does not use JavaScript for its main
> functionality are (the already mentioned) Squirrelmail and Prayer
>
On 19/11/2019 16:16, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
> yet another reason to find another email provider, not to be confused
> with a webmail program requiring an email server I do not have for a
> computer i do not own running a Linux distribution I cannot access.
Sorry to butt in here but my impression
On Monday 18 November 2019 17:48:30 Karen Lewellen wrote:
To repost Karen's original plea for help since so many have apparently
miss-interpreted her situation. To me it reads like google changed
something and that shaming them into reversing that change might be the
best fix. But based on my
Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 19/11/2019 08:34, juh wrote:
>> open source software like roundcube.
> Do you know if Roundcube works well without Javascript?
Yes: It does not. Roundcube very heavily uses JavaScript.
Webmail-Frontends which does not use JavaScript for its main
functionality are
On 19/11/2019 08:34, juh wrote:
> open source software like roundcube.
Do you know if Roundcube works well without Javascript?
--
Mark Rousell
On 19/11/2019 16:23, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>> Support your local internet provider or web hoster. Look for a service
>> that offer a web interface to email based on open source software like
>> roundcube.
>
> Now, that is a meaningful suggestion. thank you!
Note that this is what I
On 19/11/2019 15:59, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> while I respect your perspective, I stated my specific goals because
> I know what could and could not be possibly managed by me.
> I smile when folks tell me that over time I will not be able to do
> something
To be clear, I'm not saying you can't
upgraded, but for most of what I
require JavaScript to do, which is honestly very little, Elinks is fine
most of the time.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, didier.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Karen
A quick web search for "gmail alternatives" gives plenty of answers, for
exam
Hi,
Support your local internet provider or web hoster. Look for a service
that offer a web interface to email based on open source software like
roundcube.
Now, that is a meaningful suggestion. thank you!
Karen
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jan Ulrich Hasecke
--
Hostsharing eG – die
ine, for example,
works nicely with it :)
Nicely, although the setup is a bit cumbersome.
Il giorno mar 19 nov 2019 alle ore 10:06 ha scritto:
Hello Karen
A quick web search for "gmail alternatives" gives plenty of answers, for
example:
https://lifehacker.com/ditch-gmail-with-these
On 11/19/19 5:53 AM, fsdu39d wrote:
> Problem with GMail is that it's constantly reading content of your emails and
> works closely with government agencies to hand over and store your private
> email to them.
I'm not sure what your goal is, but as fsdu39d posted from, protonmail
might be a
of these can be configured to
operate without resorting to Javascript. In addition to the link that
Didier provided here is another handy list of open source webmail
clients: https://opensource.com/alternatives/gmail.
In particular, SquirrelMail gets a mention on this list. SquirrelMail
has seen little
On Tue 19 Nov 2019 at 09:34:01 (+0100), juh wrote:
> Am 18.11.19 um 23:48 schrieb Karen Lewellen:
[…]
> > Anyone have a suggestion for an email service?
>
> Support your local internet provider or web hoster. Look for a service
> that offer a web interface to email based on open source software
On 2019-11-19, Reco wrote:
>
> And there's something that escapes me in this thread. If "shell account"
> forces OP to use, say, links2 or w3m. Why bother with web-interface to
> e-mail at all? e-mail is only good and proper if used from a proper MUA,
> be it mutt, pine or gnus.
I seem to
Hi.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:00:03PM +, Mark Rousell wrote:
> In particular, SquirrelMail gets a mention on this list. SquirrelMail
> has seen little development in the last few years and, for that reason,
> probably doesn't rely much on Javascript
In fact, SquirrelMail is
thout resorting to Javascript. In addition to the link that
> Didier provided here is another handy list of open source webmail
> clients: https://opensource.com/alternatives/gmail.
>
> In particular, SquirrelMail gets a mention on this list. SquirrelMail
> has seen little developmen
ing that gmail offers IMAP access and Pine, for example,
> works nicely with it :)
> Nicely, although the setup is a bit cumbersome.
>
> Il giorno mar 19 nov 2019 alle ore 10:06 ha scritto:
>
>> Hello Karen
>>
>> A quick web search for "gmail alternatives&
ebmail
clients: https://opensource.com/alternatives/gmail.
In particular, SquirrelMail gets a mention on this list. SquirrelMail
has seen little development in the last few years and, for that reason,
probably doesn't rely much on Javascript (although I cannot be certain
as I've not tested it). On the
Especially considering that gmail offers IMAP access and Pine, for example,
works nicely with it :)
Nicely, although the setup is a bit cumbersome.
Il giorno mar 19 nov 2019 alle ore 10:06 ha
scritto:
> Hello Karen
>
> A quick web search for "gmail alternatives" give
Hello Karen
A quick web search for "gmail alternatives" gives plenty of answers, for
example:
https://lifehacker.com/ditch-gmail-with-these-alternatives-1829337583
It is possible, though, that you encounter the same problems (javascript
support in text-mode browsers) as
Am 18.11.19 um 23:48 schrieb Karen Lewellen:
> Hi folks,
> One of my gmail accounts is no longer accessible, not in links even with
> some JavaScript. Not in elinks with the same, and most of all, not via
> basic html in lynx.
> I use this account for research, meaning I prefer a low graphics
why? after I have stated my goal is reading using a web interface
comparative to what one finds with gmail?
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, john doe wrote:
On 11/19/2019 2:06 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
For now the web access is a zenith.
I use a shell service exclusively for the internet.
On 11/19/2019 2:06 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> For now the web access is a zenith.
> I use a shell service exclusively for the internet.
> Therefore creating a setup outside of this is not possible.
> Karen
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/2019 22:48, Karen Lewellen
For now the web access is a zenith.
I use a shell service exclusively for the internet.
Therefore creating a setup outside of this is not possible.
Karen
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 18/11/2019 22:48, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi folks,
One of my gmail accounts is no longer
On 18/11/2019 22:48, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Hi folks,
> One of my gmail accounts is no longer accessible, not in links even
> with some JavaScript. Not in elinks with the same, and most of all,
> not via basic html in lynx.
> I use this account for research, meaning I prefer a low graphics web
Hi folks,
One of my gmail accounts is no longer accessible, not in links even with
some JavaScript. Not in elinks with the same, and most of all, not via
basic html in lynx.
I use this account for research, meaning I prefer a low graphics web
interface. I am using a screen reader which also
62 matches
Mail list logo
