On 10/10/13 22:06, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
>
>> In the same priority range, the package which will be installed is the
>> one with the highest priority, so it is fine to have one set of
>> package with 500 ( or I could take 600 or any other value ) for low
>>
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
> Le 10.10.2013 23:06, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit :
>> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
>>
>>> In the same priority range, the package which will be installed is
>>> the one with the highest priority, so it is fine to have one set of
>>> package with 500 ( or
Le 10.10.2013 23:06, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit :
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
In the same priority range, the package which will be installed is
the
one with the highest priority, so it is fine to have one set of
package with 500 ( or I could take 600 or any other value ) for low
prior
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
> In the same priority range, the package which will be installed is the
> one with the highest priority, so it is fine to have one set of
> package with 500 ( or I could take 600 or any other value ) for low
> priority, and the other at 900 ( or 800 or... ),
Le 09.10.2013 19:28, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit :
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to
stay
with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less
outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is
not
a ne
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
> Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to stay
> with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less
> outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is not
> a need but a question of comfort, I admit ), so
Le 09.10.2013 11:17, Marko Randjelovic a écrit :
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:12:46 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 08.10.2013 22:42, Sven Joachim a écrit :
> On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>> Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I d
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:12:46 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 08.10.2013 22:42, Sven Joachim a écrit :
> > On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> >
> >> Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to
> >> stay
> >> with stable on t
Le 08.10.2013 22:42, Sven Joachim a écrit :
On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to
stay
with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less
outdated versions, like development libraries or i
On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to stay
> with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less
> outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is not
> a need but a question
Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to stay
with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less outdated
versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is not a need but
a question of comfort, I admit ), so I want to use apt-pining.
I have set all p
11 matches
Mail list logo