Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2014-02-28 Thread theartloy
On 10/10/13 22:06, Dmitrii Kashin wrote: > berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes: > >> In the same priority range, the package which will be installed is the >> one with the highest priority, so it is fine to have one set of >> package with 500 ( or I could take 600 or any other value ) for low >>

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-11 Thread Dmitrii Kashin
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes: > Le 10.10.2013 23:06, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit : >> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes: >> >>> In the same priority range, the package which will be installed is >>> the one with the highest priority, so it is fine to have one set of >>> package with 500 ( or

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-10 Thread berenger . morel
Le 10.10.2013 23:06, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit : berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes: In the same priority range, the package which will be installed is the one with the highest priority, so it is fine to have one set of package with 500 ( or I could take 600 or any other value ) for low prior

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-10 Thread Dmitrii Kashin
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes: > In the same priority range, the package which will be installed is the > one with the highest priority, so it is fine to have one set of > package with 500 ( or I could take 600 or any other value ) for low > priority, and the other at 900 ( or 800 or... ),

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-10 Thread berenger . morel
Le 09.10.2013 19:28, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit : berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes: Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to stay with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is not a ne

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-09 Thread Dmitrii Kashin
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes: > Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to stay > with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less > outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is not > a need but a question of comfort, I admit ), so

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-09 Thread berenger . morel
Le 09.10.2013 11:17, Marko Randjelovic a écrit : On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:12:46 +0200 berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 08.10.2013 22:42, Sven Joachim a écrit : > On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > >> Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I d

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-09 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:12:46 +0200 berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > > > Le 08.10.2013 22:42, Sven Joachim a écrit : > > On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > > > >> Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to > >> stay > >> with stable on t

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-08 Thread berenger . morel
Le 08.10.2013 22:42, Sven Joachim a écrit : On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to stay with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less outdated versions, like development libraries or i

Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-08 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to stay > with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less > outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is not > a need but a question

apt-pinning, strange behavior

2013-10-08 Thread berenger . morel
Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to stay with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is not a need but a question of comfort, I admit ), so I want to use apt-pining. I have set all p