Re: System hacks more than one year.

2021-03-22 Thread Brian
professional I don't > > now > > what to do. Because they crossed the line. They now are impared me to work. > > Distroied all my cell phones. Hacks every email account I have. And put > > something inside every hardware and computer I bought buy the way I have the >

Re: System hacks more than one year.

2021-03-22 Thread Gene Heskett
w what to do. Because they crossed the line. > > They now are impared me to work. Distroied all my cell phones. Hacks > > every email account I have. And put something inside every hardware > > and computer I bought buy the way I have the source code. Thouso guy > > are her

Re: System hacks more than one year.

2021-03-22 Thread Brian
are impared me to work. > Distroied all my cell phones. Hacks every email account I have. And put > something inside every hardware and computer I bought buy the way I have the > source code. Thouso guy are here to stolen workes banks account. From people. > All my posts on Debian

System hacks more than one year.

2021-03-22 Thread Leandro neto
Hi devs. And users. I am brig jacks since October of 2019 by the same person. By the way the uses Debian system to do it. I am not a professional I don't now what to do. Because they crossed the line. They now are impared me to work. Distroied all my cell phones. Hacks every email account I

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-10 Thread Dieder Vervoort
When you go to the site www.sogosearch.com http://www.sogosearch.com you are redirected to a server out of a cluster of servers also called a server farm. They have add a server wich was not configured yet. read more here about servers clusters: http://www.skullbox.net/cluster.php John W

are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread Rick Pasotto
Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for www.sogosearch.com 2) A page with nothing but the words It works! on it There is no pattern. It could happen on a refresh of a page or when going to another page on the site. Often refreshing

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread John W Foster
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 12:20 -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for www.sogosearch.com 2) A page with nothing but the words It works! on it This is most likely the default page of the server. It

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread Harry Rickards
On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:20, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for www.sogosearch.com 2) A page with nothing but the words It works! on it There is no pattern. It could happen on a refresh of a

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread Rick Pasotto
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:29:26PM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote: On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:20, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for www.sogosearch.com 2) A page with nothing but the words It

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread Harry Rickards
On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:40, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:29:26PM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote: On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:20, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread Rick Pasotto
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:07:59PM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote: On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:40, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:29:26PM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote: On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:20, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: Occasionally on some websites I visit daily

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread Harry Rickards
Quoting Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net: On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:07:59PM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote: On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:40, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:29:26PM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote: On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:20, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote:

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread David Fox
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for www.sogosearch.com 2) A page with nothing but the words It works! on it I get a picture of flowers no matter what word I

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:02, David Fox dfox94...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for www.sogosearch.com 2) A page with nothing but the words

RE: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread owens
Original Message From: r...@niof.net To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: are these hacks? Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:20:34 -0400 Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for www.sogosearch.com 2) A page with nothing

Re: are these hacks?

2009-04-09 Thread John W Foster
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:02 -0700, David Fox wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote: Occasionally on some websites I visit daily I'll get one of two incorrect results: 1) The home page for www.sogosearch.com 2) A page with nothing but the words It

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian übernehmen

2002-09-03 Thread Jens Benecke
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:21:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jens Benecke wrote: ... Aber was machst du z.B. mit ... - einer 3Com Etherlink-III ISA, die nur mit einem DOS-Tool konfigurierbar ist und _keinerlei_ Rückschlüsse auf momentane Konfiguration zuläßt?

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian übernehmen

2002-09-02 Thread Kristian Rink
Quoting Michael Bramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:16:12 +0200 ] : IMHO will (und soll) Debian Software distribuieren und keine neue Software machen. Daher sollten für Debian die Aussagen der Zustimmung meinerseits. Software-Entwickler etc. vollkommen ausreichen sein. Ein Blick

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian übernehmen

2002-09-02 Thread Jens Benecke
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:16:12PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: IMHO will (und soll) Debian Software distribuieren und keine neue Software machen. Du magst also dpkg, apt usw. nicht? ;-) Oder das Debian-XFree86, welches aus dem upstream-Xfree86 plus über hundert Patches besteht, die vielen

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian übernehmen

2002-09-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jens Benecke wrote: ... Aber was machst du z.B. mit ... - einer 3Com Etherlink-III ISA, die nur mit einem DOS-Tool konfigurierbar ist und _keinerlei_ Rückschlüsse auf momentane Konfiguration zuläßt? ... apt-get install nictools-nopci man el3diag man 3c5x9setup

Debian Hardware-Datenbank (was Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debianübernehmen)

2002-09-01 Thread Kristian Rink
Quoting Marcus Jodorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ 01 Sep 2002 01:37:06 +0200 ] : [Hardwaredatenbank für Debian-User] schon und ich hab's nur noch nicht gesehen, oder, falls nicht, gibt's Gründe dafür, warum's sowas noch nicht gibt? Ich halte das vom Aufwand her einfach nicht für praktikabel.

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian übernehmen

2002-09-01 Thread Michael Bramer
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 10:40:09AM +0200, Kristian Rink wrote: Aber nur sehr wenige dieser oft sehr speziellen Lösungen lassen sich in eine Distribution übernehmen, die einen viel breiteren Anwendungsbreich(und auch eine breitere User-Base) hat. Sorry, daß ich diesen Thread wiederbelebe.

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian übernehmen

2002-08-31 Thread Kristian Rink
Quoting Jens Benecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:42:39 +0200 ] : Und weil die Knoppix ja auf Debian beruht frage ich mich dann manchmal, warum die viele Arbeit und Liebe zum Detail die da drin steckt nicht in die richtige Debian zurück fließt? Ich habe auf dem

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian übernehmen

2002-08-29 Thread Jens Benecke
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:26:03AM +0200, Holger Rauch wrote: und _ist_ ein Rumprobierchaos. Anders als durch Rumprobiererei kann man Hardware nicht halbwegs automatisiert erkennen, vor allem nicht solche, die sich nicht zu erkennen gibt. Hm. Ich gebe ja zu, daß ich mich mit

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian bernehmen

2002-08-28 Thread Holger Rauch
Hallo Jens! Vielen Dank für Deine reply! On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Jens Benecke wrote: [...] und _ist_ ein Rumprobierchaos. Anders als durch Rumprobiererei kann man Hardware nicht halbwegs automatisiert erkennen, vor allem nicht solche, die sich nicht zu erkennen gibt. Hm. Ich gebe ja zu, daß

Re: Knoppix-Hacks in Debian bernehmen

2002-08-27 Thread Holger Rauch
Hallo Jens! On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Jens Benecke wrote: [...] Die Konversationen verliefern fast immer etwa so: Debianer: Wie hast du das und das gemacht? Klaus:$UEBLER_HACK Debianer: Igitt! Bezog sich das auch auf die Art und Weise der automatischen HW-Erkennung?

Re: Subject Prefix - Procmail Hacks

2002-06-25 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 05:27:51PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote: | On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: | | The subject prefix is widely used by sites running majordomo. | One example is PostgreSQL. I've been on several lists there for | years and never heard anyone complain about the

Re: Subject Prefix - Procmail Hacks

2002-06-24 Thread Thomas Good
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: The subject prefix is widely used by sites running majordomo. One example is PostgreSQL. I've been on several lists there for years and never heard anyone complain about the [SQL] subject prefix (or any other.) Odd. Until you find that you

Re: Subject Prefix - Procmail Hacks

2002-06-24 Thread Bob Proulx
But supposing I like it...is there a procmail hack to prepend to the subject header? I could do it in perl but if procmail can do it, why reinvent the wheel? (I'd rather be sipping a pint... ;-) You will get 10 postings of how to do this. So perhaps I can only add a pointer to a reference

Re: GL screen hacks corrupting display

2000-12-11 Thread Andrea Vettorello
Rob VanFleet wrote: I'm using potato with the /dev/3dfx - Mesa combo for 3D. When I run a GL screen hack like gears or morph3d, it runs accelerated and looks nice. The problem is that when I exit them, the display in X is completely whacked; I can't do anything. So far, I've just been

Re: GL screen hacks corrupting display

2000-12-11 Thread Rob VanFleet
to mention that it is from helixcode, so the problem may be confined just to that particular version. I'll try to get the regular potato version to see if it has the same problem, although I'm figuring that hacks such as gears and morph3d haven't changed too much over time. -Rob

GL screen hacks corrupting display

2000-12-09 Thread Rob VanFleet
I'm using potato with the /dev/3dfx - Mesa combo for 3D. When I run a GL screen hack like gears or morph3d, it runs accelerated and looks nice. The problem is that when I exit them, the display in X is completely whacked; I can't do anything. So far, I've just been Alt-F1'ing back to a console

Where do i put the sendmail HACKS?

1998-10-23 Thread trio
Hi, I'm spending a lot of time reading the stuff at sendmail.org. I've found all kinds of explanations of the check_rcpt HACK, but no explanation as to where i put it. Does it go in sendmail.cf somewhere? Where? Does it get listed in sendmail.mc? But then how do i get the .m4 to relate to

Re: Where do i put the sendmail HACKS?

1998-10-23 Thread dpk
On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, trio wrote: Hi, I'm spending a lot of time reading the stuff at sendmail.org. I've found all kinds of explanations of the check_rcpt HACK, but no explanation as to where i put it. Does it go in sendmail.cf somewhere? Where? Does it get listed in

Re: Where do i put the sendmail HACKS?

1998-10-23 Thread trio
On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, dpk wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, trio wrote: I'm spending a lot of time reading the stuff at sendmail.org. I've found all kinds of explanations of the check_rcpt HACK, but no explanation as to where i put it. Does it go in sendmail.cf somewhere? Where?

Re: Where do i put the sendmail HACKS?

1998-10-23 Thread trio
Thank you to all who helped with this. It turns out that all you have to do is define the HACKs in sendmail.mc and (as long as your sendmail was configured properly) sendmailconfig goes to the .../hack directory and puts the code right into the sendmail.cf file when you allow it to build