On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:01:38AM -, atar wrote:
Hi there!!
Just wanted to know please if there's a way to block a specific
program from accessing the Internet while preserving at the same
time the ability of other programs to access the Internet, and if
there's a way, so how?
may be
On 10.09.2013 01:54, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Lars Noodén a écrit :
Vincent's link suggests that --cmd-owner was removed from iptables
entirely.
Actually it was removed from the kernel part of iptables, not from the
iptables userland.
It would be important to find a more authoritative
Hi there!!
Just wanted to know please if there's a way to block a specific program
from accessing the Internet while preserving at the same time the ability
of other programs to access the Internet, and if there's a way, so how?
Thanks in advance!!
atar.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 09.09.2013 14:01, atar wrote:
Hi there!!
Just wanted to know please if there's a way to block a specific program
from accessing the Internet while preserving at the same time the
ability of other programs to access the Internet, and if there's a way,
so how?
Thanks in advance!!
Just wanted to know please if there's a way to block a specific
program from accessing the Internet while preserving at the same time
the ability of other programs to access the Internet, and if there's a
way, so how?
iptables my friend.. If it's a known program, try gufw in the repositories
Dear atar,
atar wrote:
Just wanted to know please if there's a way to block a specific program
from accessing the Internet while preserving at the same time the ability
of other programs to access the Internet, and if there's a way, so how?
AppArmor and SELinux likely have such features,
Thanks for replying!
Unfortunately, when invoking the 'iptables' command with the arguments
you've suggested, the program says:
iptables v1.4.14: unknown option --cmd-owner
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
Regards!
atar.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 9/9/13 3:14 PM, atar wrote: Thanks for replying!
Unfortunately, when invoking the 'iptables' command with the arguments
you've suggested, the program says:
iptables v1.4.14: unknown option --cmd-owner
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
Regards!
atar.
My
On 09/09/2013 05:54 AM Lars Noodén wrote:
On 9/9/13 3:14 PM, atar wrote: Thanks for replying!
Unfortunately, when invoking the 'iptables' command with the arguments
you've suggested, the program says:
iptables v1.4.14: unknown option --cmd-owner
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for
On 09.09.2013 14:58, ken wrote:
On 09/09/2013 05:54 AM Lars Noodén wrote:
On 9/9/13 3:14 PM, atar wrote: Thanks for replying!
Unfortunately, when invoking the 'iptables' command with the arguments
you've suggested, the program says:
iptables v1.4.14: unknown option --cmd-owner
Try
On 09.09.2013 14:58, ken wrote:
On 09/09/2013 05:54 AM Lars Noodén wrote:
On 9/9/13 3:14 PM, atar wrote: Thanks for replying!
Unfortunately, when invoking the 'iptables' command with the arguments
you've suggested, the program says:
iptables v1.4.14: unknown option --cmd-owner
Try
On 2013-09-09 15:50:10 +0300, Lars Noodén wrote:
So somewhere between the 1.3.5 and 1.4.14, the capability disappeared
Yes, according to
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/32264/per-process-firewall
--cmd-owner was removed because it didn't work properly.
--
Vincent Lefèvre
Lars wrote:
One possible explanation might be SMP:
$ uname -a
Linux debian 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 i686 GNU/Linux
Regards,
/Lars
Sorry, but what's your meaning by 'SMP'?
Regards,
atar.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On 10.09.2013 00:36, atar wrote:
Lars wrote:
One possible explanation might be SMP:
$ uname -a
Linux debian 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 i686 GNU/Linux
Regards,
/Lars
Sorry, but what's your meaning by 'SMP'?
Regards,
atar.
Ken's message had this line:
Lars Noodén a écrit :
Vincent's link suggests that --cmd-owner was removed from iptables
entirely.
Actually it was removed from the kernel part of iptables, not from the
iptables userland.
It would be important to find a more authoritative source on
that like the netfilter list or the
15 matches
Mail list logo
