Re: Boot Order Change

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:41:42 -0500 Felix Miata <mrma...@earthlink.net> wrote: > Dan Norton composed on 2018-02-22 16:05 (UTC-0500): > > > Installs of both stretch and buster modify the boot order such that > > "debian" is first under "UEFI Boot Sources"

Re: Boot Order Change

Dan Norton composed on 2018-02-22 16:05 (UTC-0500): > Installs of both stretch and buster modify the boot order such that > "debian" is first under "UEFI Boot Sources". After installation, the > bios menu has to be edited in order to boot from DVD or CD or USB > d

Boot Order Change

Installs of both stretch and buster modify the boot order such that "debian" is first under "UEFI Boot Sources". After installation, the bios menu has to be edited in order to boot from DVD or CD or USB drive. Also "Hard Drive" has been replaced with "debian&q

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:11:22 -0400 Alan McConnell <a...@his.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:27:10AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > > > > > boot order. No matter what key I press, the system continues > > > on with a re-boot of my old wheezy. > &

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:11:22 -0400 Alan McConnell <a...@his.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:27:10AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > > > > > boot order. No matter what key I press, the system continues > > > on with a re-boot of my old wheezy. > &

Re: Changing Boot Order -- Happiness!

On Sat 26 Mar 2016 at 22:44:36 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Saturday 26 March 2016 21:50:42 Felix Miata wrote: > > As long as PS/2 ports have existed, it's unfathomable that BIOS makers > > apparently still have not figured out how to have either port support a > > keyboard at POST time.

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Monday 28 March 2016 10:35:11 chrisb@localhost.localdomain wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 06:35:36PM +0100, jdd wrote: > > Le 26/03/2016 17:11, Alan McConnell a écrit : > > > Press to run BIOS setup, or to run boot menu > > ^^^ > Weird

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 06:35:36PM +0100, jdd wrote: > Le 26/03/2016 17:11, Alan McConnell a écrit : > > > Press to run BIOS setup, or to run boot menu ^^^ Weird ... I guess that is supposed to be F11, which makes me wonder is the shift key

Re: Changing Boot Order

r from a USB thumb device, if one is plugged in? If your system uses UEFI and has EFI boot manager entries for CD/DVD and USB, then you can manipulate the order with efibootmgr. Use 'efibootmgr -n' to change the boot order for the next boot only. I'm not sure how to create a new entry for a devic

Re: Changing Boot Order -- Happiness!

Lisi Reisz composed on 2016-03-26 22:44 (UTC): > I didn't know that the "wrong" one worked in the OS!! I wasn't conscious of any such thing. Alan proved it does at least in Wheezy. > I last put the mouse in > the keyboard one, and vice versa, in the days before they were colour coded, > when

Re: Changing Boot Order -- Happiness!

On Saturday 26 March 2016 21:50:42 Felix Miata wrote: > Alan McConnell composed on 2016-03-26 14:57 (UTC-0400): > >...I think it fortunate > > that this E-list contains an expert of the quality of... > > Please, let's not think of me so much expert as experienced. I can't count > the times

Re: Changing Boot Order -- Happiness!

Alan McConnell composed on 2016-03-26 14:57 (UTC-0400): ...I think it fortunate that this E-list contains an expert of the quality of... Please, let's not think of me so much expert as experienced. I can't count the times I've fumbled a keyboard connector into the top port and found

Re: Changing Boot Order -- Happiness!

Alan McConnell wrote: ... > Yes. My keyboard was plugged into the _green_ port. (my > mouse is elsewhere). So I shut down, changed my keyboard > cord to the purple port . . . Voila! That did the > trick. I can now press F11 and Del and both work as > the manual

Re: Changing Boot Order -- Happiness!

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > *If* your motherboard has two round ports, stacked or side by side > depending on your orientation, it's time to take another look at > your motherboard's manual, in particular, the "Back Panel Quick > Guide" or similar that depicts

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Sat 26 Mar 2016 at 12:11:22 (-0400), Alan McConnell wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:27:10AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > > > > > boot order. No matter what key I press, the system continues > > > on with a re-boot of my old wheezy. > > > >

Re: Changing Boot Order (correction)

Alan McConnell composed on 2016-03-26 12:11 (UTC-0400): I am using a PS2 keyboard, I believe. A white cable from the keyboard back into the top orifice at the back of my standard case. *If* your motherboard has two round ports, stacked or side by side

Re: Changing Boot Order

Alan McConnell composed on 2016-03-26 12:11 (UTC-0400): I am using a PS2 keyboard, I believe. A white cable from the keyboard back into the top orifice at the back of my standard case. *If* your motherboard has two round ports, stacked or side by side

Re: Changing Boot Order

On 26 March 2016 at 16:53, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Saturday 26 March 2016 16:11:22 Alan McConnell wrote: > > I have been told by a kind responder that my keyboard > > is inadequate, and I should borro(buy?) a new one. Since > > my present keyboard

Re: Changing Boot Order

Perhaps someone can post an example of > an /etc/default/grub where the boot order is explicitly described? > > I have found the paper manual for this, aftee some searching. > It is labeled like the picture that appears on the boot., except > that it has Z97 and H97 on the bottom, and

Re: Changing Boot Order

Le 26/03/2016 17:11, Alan McConnell a écrit : Press to run BIOS setup, or to run boot menu (finish) And there you have it. The last line of the excerpt is exacly the text that appears on my

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Saturday 26 March 2016 16:11:22 Alan McConnell wrote: > I have been told by a kind responder that my keyboard >    is inadequate, and I should borro(buy?) a new one.  Since >    my present keyboard works fine for all purposes up to now, >    I don't see why my

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:27:10AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > > > boot order. No matter what key I press, the system continues > > on with a re-boot of my old wheezy. > > Question: Are you using an USB keyboard ? No, I am using a PS2 keyboard

Re: Changing Boot Order

> boot order. No matter what key I press, the system continues > on with a re-boot of my old wheezy. Question: Are you using an USB keyboard ? I remember having the problem some time back, where a default setting of the BIOS had to be changed to enable the BIOS to contr

Re: Changing Boot Order

Alan McConnell a écrit : > > I am running wheezy, and would like to upgrade to jessie. To > that end I've bought a CD and a USB stick from LinuxCollections. > My problem: when booting I can't get into my bios to change the > boot order. No matter what key I press, the s

Re: Changing Boot Order

Le 25/03/2016 23:52, Michael Fothergill a écrit : ​Try this:​ ​http://www.easyuefi.com/index-us.htm​l ​It says it can be installed on linux machines. don't think so. It's a windows app that can also manage linux uefi entries on nvram (not tested with wine?) jdd

Re: Changing Boot Order

confusion here. > >You are telling me which of the several kernels > >I have that I can boot. But when I wrote "Boot Order" > >I was referring to being able to boot first from > >the flash drive, then from the DVD drive, and > >

Re: Changing Boot Order

Alan McConnell composed on 2016-03-25 19:21 (UTC-0400): When I turn on the computer, the keyboard lights up just fine. And everything else works fine. It is just that I can't boot from anything but my /boot, with its functioning grub. In other words, the

Re: Changing Boot Order

to select. the default if you haven't changed anything is 0. i.e. the first item on that list. OK, I must apologize. Massive confusion here. You are telling me which of the several kernels I have that I can boot. But when I wrote "Boot Order"

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:44:52PM -0430, Jhon Prada wrote: > > HI don't waste your time with Debian explanations. Plug the keyboard and > see if the lights are lighting. If don't, it's the keyboard that is not > activating in the boot. Look for another keyboard or plug into another > port and

Re: Changing Boot Order

ult if you haven't changed > anything is 0. i.e. the first item on that list. OK, I must apologize. Massive confusion here. You are telling me which of the several kernels I have that I can boot. But when I wrote "Boot Order" I was referring t

Re: Changing Boot Order

Perhaps someone can post an example of > an /etc/default/grub where the boot order is explicitly described? > > I have found the paper manual for this, aftee some searching. > It is labeled like the picture that appears on the boot., except > that it has Z97 and H97 on the bottom, and

Re: Changing Boot Order

ve done anything. Perhaps someone can post an example of > > an /etc/default/grub where the boot order is explicitly described? > > i just tried this to make sure it worked as described > and it worked so i'm not sure what you didn't do correctly. > > when your grub boot screen f

Re: Changing Boot Order

Alan McConnell wrote: ... > Others have suggested changing /etc/default/grub. I've tried > that too, and have run 'update-grub' afterward. It doesn't seem > to have done anything. Perhaps someone can post an example of > an /etc/default/grub where the boot order is explicitly des

Re: Changing Boot Order

the top entry, and that's that. Others have suggested changing /etc/default/grub. I've tried that too, and have run 'update-grub' afterward. It doesn't seem to have done anything. Perhaps someone can post an example of an /etc/default/grub where the boot order is explicitly described? I have found

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Thu 24 Mar 2016 at 16:44:54 (-0400), Alan McConnell wrote: > Assembled Wisdom! > > I am running wheezy, and would like to upgrade to jessie. To > that end I've bought a CD and a USB stick from LinuxCollections. > My problem: when booting I can't get into my bios to change t

Re: Changing Boot Order

Alan McConnell composed on 2016-03-24 16:44 (UTC-0400): I am running wheezy, and would like to upgrade to jessie. To that end I've bought a CD and a USB stick from LinuxCollections. My problem: when booting I can't get into my bios to change the boot order. No matter what key I press

Re: Changing Boot Order

On Thursday 24 March 2016 20:44:54 Alan McConnell wrote: > Assembled Wisdom! > > I am running wheezy, and would like to upgrade to jessie. To > that end I've bought a CD and a USB stick from LinuxCollections. > My problem: when booting I can't get into my bios to change t

Re: Changing Boot Order

Alan McConnell wrote: > Assembled Wisdom! > > I am running wheezy, and would like to upgrade to jessie. To > that end I've bought a CD and a USB stick from LinuxCollections. > My problem: when booting I can't get into my bios to change the > boot order. No matter what key I

Re: Changing Boot Order

On 24 March 2016 at 20:44, Alan McConnell <a...@his.com> wrote: > Assembled Wisdom! > > I am running wheezy, and would like to upgrade to jessie. To > that end I've bought a CD and a USB stick from LinuxCollections. > My problem: when booting I can't get into my bios to ch

Re: Changing Boot Order

process. By using a USB keyboard instead of the wireless, I was able to enter setup and change the boot order. HTH Tom Ashley On 03/24/2016 04:44 PM, Alan McConnell wrote: Assembled Wisdom! I am running wheezy, and would like to upgrade to jessie. To that end I've bought a CD and a USB stick

Changing Boot Order

Assembled Wisdom! I am running wheezy, and would like to upgrade to jessie. To that end I've bought a CD and a USB stick from LinuxCollections. My problem: when booting I can't get into my bios to change the boot order. No matter what key I press, the system continues on with a re-boot of my

Re: Insert a script into systemd boot order at a specific location

Hello, What you probably want, is hook into basic.target or sysinit.target, use DefaultDependencies=no, and specify the dependencies/orderings explicitly. a post from debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org helped me further: I do not have to change anything, just calling update-rc.d for my init

Re: Insert a script into systemd boot order at a specific location

Am 16.03.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Christoph Pleger: Hello, What you probably want, is hook into basic.target or sysinit.target, use DefaultDependencies=no, and specify the dependencies/orderings explicitly. a post from debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org helped me further: I do not have to

Re: Insert a script into systemd boot order at a specific location

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:20:53AM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote: Hello, for many years and up to Debian 7, I am using update-rc.d to define a specific location in the boot order, where a script is executed which automatically performs some administrative tasks. The script is executed after

Insert a script into systemd boot order at a specific location

Hello, for many years and up to Debian 7, I am using update-rc.d to define a specific location in the boot order, where a script is executed which automatically performs some administrative tasks. The script is executed after only very basic tasks have been performed, and before all other tasks

Re: Insert a script into systemd boot order at a specific location

Hello, According to http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html you can specify After= and Before= in order to force your unit to start in a specified position. The documentation suggests that you typically list your After= units also in Requires= so that starting your

Re: Insert a script into systemd boot order at a specific location

Quoting Christoph Pleger (christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de): Hello, According to http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html you can specify After= and Before= in order to force your unit to start in a specified position. The documentation suggests that you

Re: Insert a script into systemd boot order at a specific location

Am 2015-03-13 16:03, schrieb Christoph Pleger: [Unit] Description=Installation and configuration Requires=basic.target Before=multi-user.target After=basic.target [Install] RequiredBy=multi-user.target Then, I called systemctl to set the correct symlinks for script.target and script.service.

Re: boot order

Well, this is embarrassing. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote: give me a break! 2014/06/16 0:46 Chris Bannister elided-by-request: [off-list comments that I responded to on-list] :-/ (I'm pretty sure Chris didn't mind, but I think we could have had a

Re: boot order

On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 01:46 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: echo ${SHUTDOWNBODY} | mail -s ${SHUTDOWNSUBJECT} ${EMAIL} sleep 4 RETVAL=$? i can't comment on the rest of the script, but you probably want RETVAL to be the exit status of the pipeline that sends the mail.

Re: boot order

On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 01:46 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: echo ${SHUTDOWNBODY} | mail -s ${SHUTDOWNSUBJECT} ${EMAIL} sleep 4 RETVAL=$? i can't comment on the rest of the script, but you probably want RETVAL

Re: boot order

On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 09:34 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 01:46 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: echo ${SHUTDOWNBODY} | mail -s ${SHUTDOWNSUBJECT} ${EMAIL} sleep 4 RETVAL=$? i can't

Re: boot order

My apologize for the PPS, but without the it also seems to work: [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat .msmtp.mail/fraud.mail | msmtp -a default ralf.mard...@rocketmial.com; RETVAL=$?; echo $RETVAL 0 The 0 is displayed with delay, IOW RETVAL=$?; echo $RETVAL has to wait until the sending of the mail

Re: boot order

My mega-apologize for the PPPS :S [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ RETVAL=foo_bar [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat .msmtp.mail/fraud.mail | msmtp -a default ralf.mard...@rocketmial.com; RETVAL=$?; echo $RETVAL 0 [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ RETVAL=foo_bar [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat

Re: boot order

On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 09:56 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: My mega-apologize for the PPPS :S [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ RETVAL=foo_bar [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat .msmtp.mail/fraud.mail | msmtp -a default ralf.mard...@rocketmial.com; RETVAL=$?; echo $RETVAL 0 [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$

Re: boot order

No, but if all of us decide not to like it, and kill-file you as I am now doing, it might become your problem if you wanted help. all of us? have your fear to manage alone the situation? so you ask help to all of us... I don't want waste my time, from now I don't reply you again P. -- To

Re: boot order

Pol Hallen: Lisi: No, but if all of us decide not to like it, and kill-file you as I am now doing, it might become your problem if you wanted help. all of us? have your fear to manage alone the situation? so you ask help to all of us... I don't want waste my time, from now I don't

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On 2014-06-15, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: However an English to German dictionary mentions, that the OP's address https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ Code of conduct ... Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive the lists via *

Re: boot order

It's a pity that your reactions are defensive. You might learn a lot from what people here are trying to make clear to you - if you are receptive to it. Hi Siard, thanks for your reply. I don't want be unpleasant but I only wrote an email on the ML. In the life always there's (and will there)

Re: boot order

I'd rather reply to you off-list to keep the noise level down, but -- On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Pol Hallen deben@[_expletive_deleted_].org wrote: -- replying to your e-mail address is going to screw up my filter heuristics. I don't know how you got you domain name approved, but it's the

Re: boot order

On 6/15/2014 6:20 AM, Pol Hallen wrote: It's a pity that your reactions are defensive. You might learn a lot from what people here are trying to make clear to you - if you are receptive to it. Hi Siard, thanks for your reply. I don't want be unpleasant but I only wrote an email on the ML.

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On 6/15/2014 5:48 AM, Curt wrote: On 2014-06-15, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: However an English to German dictionary mentions, that the OP's address https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ Code of conduct ... Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 05:44:59AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: colorful language. Since the vocabulary used for the OP's address is less vulgarly, less obscenely than lyrics of common English radio and TV songs in the daytime, But who posts lyrics here? I don't see the connection. I guess we

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On 2014-06-15, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote: Curt, Anyone who sends unfiltered content from the Internet over any amateur radio mode is asking for trouble. I wouldn't know; I'd never heard of such a technology before reading the prescriptions of the Debian mailing list

Re: Off-topic: boot order

i had hoped that this bikeshedding BS over OP's domain name would blow over after ralf wisely reminded us to assume good faith. alas... On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Curt wrote: On 2014-06-15, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: However an English to German dictionary mentions, that the

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 11:05 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Anyone who sends unfiltered content from the Internet over any amateur radio mode is asking for trouble. Keep in mind, that at least in Germany, you need a license to do amateur radio, it's not citizens' band, at least not in Germany.

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 11:50 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: i had hoped that this bikeshedding BS over OP's domain name would blow over after ralf wisely reminded us to assume good faith. alas... On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Curt wrote: On 2014-06-15, Ralf Mardorf

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sunday 15 June 2014 16:50:01 david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: i had hoped that this bikeshedding BS over OP's domain name would blow over after ralf wisely reminded us to assume good faith. There is no sensible way that his reply to Brian can be taken as meaning good faith. This list,

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 17:56:49 +0200 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: The OP's Internet address name is idiotic, but it shouldn't be a reason to make mountains out of molehills. Sometimes it sounds like querulous paranoia to me, when people start kill-filing people for ever single

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 17:03 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 15 June 2014 16:50:01 david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: i had hoped that this bikeshedding BS over OP's domain name would blow over after ralf wisely reminded us to assume good faith. There is no sensible way that his reply

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On 2014-06-15, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: such a mail, but you couldn't resist. It's idiotic that we have each week a discussion about top-posting, fools-language etc.. Inform people off-list and don't hijack threads. You do seem to be the one the most ardent in fucking

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:12:00 +0200 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: It's idiotic to send a response to such a mail, but you couldn't resist. It's idiotic that we have each week a discussion about top-posting, I wouldn't be that sure about top-posting: even when a thread is

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 18:29 +0200, B wrote: On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:12:00 +0200 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: It's idiotic to send a response to such a mail, but you couldn't resist. It's idiotic that we have each week a discussion about top-posting, I wouldn't be

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On 2014-06-15, Curt cu...@free.fr wrote: On 2014-06-15, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: such a mail, but you couldn't resist. It's idiotic that we have each week a discussion about top-posting, fools-language etc.. Inform people off-list and don't hijack threads. You do seem

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On 2014-06-15, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: You do seem to be the one the most ardent in fucking this fly in the ass. No, you're mistaken, but indeed I tend to feed trolls like Lisi, OTOH, she kill-filed me, so I can't feed her. I don't think anybody in their right mind

Re: Off-topic: boot order

On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:42:32 +0200 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: No, you're mistaken, but indeed I tend to feed trolls like Lisi, OTOH, she kill-filed me, so I can't feed her. Me too, may be we should group and create the debian-trolls mailing-list (with a simple and obvious

Re: boot order

give me a break! 2014/06/16 0:46 Chris Bannister elided-by-request: On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 08:46:18PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: I'd rather reply to you off-list to keep the noise level down, but -- On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Pol Hallen deben@[_expletive_deleted_].org wrote: Just

boot order

Hi all :-) on debian stable I added a script to /etc/init.d/, that script sends an email when the system boot and when the system shutdown I need run that script before that postfix has killed what's the best way to fill: cat /etc/init.d/systememail #!/bin/sh ### BEGIN INIT INFO #

Re: boot order

On Sat 14 Jun 2014 at 20:09:41 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote: on debian stable I added a script to /etc/init.d/, that script sends an email when the system boot and when the system shutdown But you are are not going to show this script to us. It is a secret. so we do not know whether it is a viable,

Re: boot order

On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:16:08 +0100 Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote: You might want to look at @reboot with cron for the startup. Don't say I didn't help you. Not to mention there are tons of howtos about this matter on the web, as it is the most basic of monitoring… -- @rondoudou hi,

Re: boot order

But you are are not going to show this script to us. :-) See at the end of email You might want to look at @reboot with cron for the startup. thanks :-) The domain for your email address is [...] domain (mine) of email (mine) is not your problem and if you don't like it's not my

Re: boot order

On Saturday 14 June 2014 22:11:05 Pol Hallen wrote: domain (mine) of email (mine) is not your problem and if you don't like it's not my problem ;-) No, but if all of us decide not to like it, and kill-file you as I am now doing, it might become your problem if you wanted help. Lisi -- To

Off-topic: boot order

On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 23:20 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2014 22:11:05 Pol Hallen wrote: domain (mine) of email (mine) is not your problem and if you don't like it's not my problem ;-) No, but if all of us decide not to like it, and kill-file you as I am now doing, it

Re: boot order

hi. EMAIL=root RESTARTSUBJECT=[`hostname` `date`] – System Startup SHUTDOWNSUBJECT=[`hostname` `date`] – System Shutdown RESTARTBODY=This is an automated message to notify you that `hostname` started successfully. Start up Date and Time: `date` SHUTDOWNBODY=This is an automated message to

Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:35:41 +1000 yudi v yudi@gmail.com wrote: I see this, at least at startup. It's been reported here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544651 Celejar That's almost 2 yrs old. From the limited experience I have with this setup, I don't think

LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.

Installed Debain i386 twice and both times the order of LVM and LUKS is not correct. I have one LUKS container with LVM on top. At boot time, LVM logical volumes try to load first before I get prompted with the LUKS passphrase and at shutdown, the order is in reverse, tries to close LVM volumes

Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:46:10 +1000 yudi v yudi@gmail.com wrote: Installed Debain i386 twice and both times the order of LVM and LUKS is not correct. I have one LUKS container with LVM on top. At boot time, LVM logical volumes try to load first before I get prompted with the LUKS

Re: LVM and LUKS boot order incorrect in initrd image.

I see this, at least at startup. It's been reported here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544651 Celejar That's almost 2 yrs old. From the limited experience I have with this setup, I don't think this should cause any trouble what so ever. I might generate a new initrd,

Re: changing grub boot order

On Sb, 15 ian 11, 16:24:17, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: GRUB_DEFAULT=4 set default=4 And you do have 5 entries in grub.cfg? You might want to attach the full grub.cfg, maybe someone can spot why the 'set default' is ignored. Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and

Re: changing grub boot order

On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:56:09 +0200 Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: On Sb, 15 ian 11, 16:24:17, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: GRUB_DEFAULT=4 set default=4 And you do have 5 entries in grub.cfg? You might want to attach the full grub.cfg, maybe someone can spot why the 'set

changing grub boot order

as per the wiki I change the default in /etc/default/grub from 0 to 4. I ran update-grub. The same entry boots by default, i.e. it didn't work. Anyone know why ? Brian For reference: Configuring grub v2 The configuration file is /boot/grub/grub.cfg, but you shouldn't edit it directly. This

Re: changing grub boot order

On Sb, 15 ian 11, 14:55:08, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: as per the wiki I change the default in /etc/default/grub from 0 to 4. I ran update-grub. The same entry boots by default, i.e. it didn't work. Anyone know why ? Please post the outputs of 'grep default= /boot/grub/grub.cfg' and

Re: changing grub boot order

On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:36:07 +0200 Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: On Sb, 15 ian 11, 14:55:08, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: as per the wiki I change the default in /etc/default/grub from 0 to 4. I ran update-grub. The same entry boots by default, i.e. it didn't work.

Re: Boot order / Grub / USB installer

Where do I do that from the debian installer ? (I used option LVM on entire disk). If you use LVM then every logical volume already has a name (independently from the label you may have set or not on each file system). So just use that insted of a UUID. I.e. use something like

Re: Boot order / Grub / USB installer

Dne, 04. 06. 2010 17:54:31 je Mathieu Malaterre napisal(a): Where do I do that from the debian installer ? (I used option LVM on entire disk). Gosh, I've never used LVM in my life, so can't be of any help here. However, I seem to remember at least one thing correctly: there *is* a step

Boot order / Grub / USB installer

Hi there, I am trying to install a stable debian 504 using an USB key. Here is what I did: $ wget http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz $ wget http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.4/amd64/iso-cd/debian-504-amd64-netinst.iso $

Re: Boot order / Grub / USB installer

Dne, 04. 06. 2010 17:07:51 je Mathieu Malaterre napisal(a): However after installation it looks like grub switch its internal hd0 / hd1 (device map file) in between /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1. I had to manually invert them, re-run grub-install. This happen on a DELL Precision WorkStation T7500. Does

Re: Boot order / Grub / USB installer

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Klistvud quotati...@aliceadsl.fr wrote: Dne, 04. 06. 2010 17:07:51 je Mathieu Malaterre napisal(a): However after installation it looks like grub switch its internal hd0 / hd1 (device map file) in between /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1. I had to manually invert them,

Re: Boot order, PCMCIA and external SCSI drive

Ed == Ed Falis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ed I have a jaz drive attached to my machine via a SCSI card plugged Ed into a PCMCIA slot (kernel 2.4.3). Is there a way to get it to Ed automount during boot by getting the PCMCIA services started Ed before processing fstab? Or some other option? I

Boot order, PCMCIA and external SCSI drive

I have a jaz drive attached to my machine via a SCSI card plugged into a PCMCIA slot (kernel 2.4.3). Is there a way to get it to automount during boot by getting the PCMCIA services started before processing fstab? Or some other option? Thanks, - Ed

  1   2   >