John Covici wrote:
> I am trying to do something very simple, with the config file supplied
> from Debian, I need to do a make bzImage and possible a make modules,
> how can dI do this? Do I need to change the config in some way in
> order to do this?
be patient and start reading - free means fr
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:47:29 -0400,
deloptes wrote:
>
> John Covici wrote:
>
> > Google did not give me that at all. I am not trying to build a Debian
> > package,just trying to compile the kernel.
>
> Then just do
>
> make deb-pkg
>
> You could read more about the make system used by the ker
John Covici wrote:
> I am doing a straight makebzImage not trying to build a deb package.
> In Debian 9, I could do this with no problem.
Obviously you are trying to build the kernel from debian source. You have to
use the original source, without the debian directory. IF there is debian
director
John Covici wrote:
> Google did not give me that at all. I am not trying to build a Debian
> package,just trying to compile the kernel.
Then just do
make deb-pkg
You could read more about the make system used by the kernel
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
or in the directory
$ less R
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:20:53PM -0400, John Covici wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:10:27PM -0400, John Covici wrote:
> > > So, how do I turn this off so I can compile the thing?
> >
> > "dpkg-buildpackage -b" considers it a warning and skips it.
> > At least it does so for me.
>
> I am d
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:05:16 -0400,
deloptes wrote:
>
> John Covici wrote:
>
> > debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/BuildADebianKernelPackage
>
> I hope you can read - also find a good search engine - first hit
>
>
Google did not give me that at all. I am not t
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:15:38 -0400,
Reco wrote:
>
> Please do not top post.
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:10:27PM -0400, John Covici wrote:
> > So, how do I turn this off so I can compile the thing?
>
> "dpkg-buildpackage -b" considers it a warning and skips it.
> At least it does so for me.
I
Please do not top post.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:10:27PM -0400, John Covici wrote:
> So, how do I turn this off so I can compile the thing?
"dpkg-buildpackage -b" considers it a warning and skips it.
At least it does so for me.
Reco
So, how do I turn this off so I can compile the thing?
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:02:02 -0400,
Reco wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:46:41PM -0400, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. I am getting an error while compiling the kernel 4.19-0-6-amd64.
> >
> > CC kernel/rseq.o
> >
John Covici wrote:
> debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem
https://wiki.debian.org/BuildADebianKernelPackage
I hope you can read - also find a good search engine - first hit
On 2019-09-30 15:46 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I am getting an error while compiling the kernel 4.19-0-6-amd64.
>
> CC kernel/rseq.o
> AR kernel/built-in.a
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> 'debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem', needed by
> 'certs/x509_certif
Hi.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:46:41PM -0400, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I am getting an error while compiling the kernel 4.19-0-6-amd64.
>
> CC kernel/rseq.o
> AR kernel/built-in.a
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> 'debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem', needed
Hi. I am getting an error while compiling the kernel 4.19-0-6-amd64.
CC kernel/rseq.o
AR kernel/built-in.a
make[1]: *** No rule to make target
'debian/certs/debian-uefi-certs.pem', needed by
'certs/x509_certificate_list'. Stop.
What package do I need to fix this prob
I spoke too soon, someone in the ubuntu forums had the same problem,
installed libssl-dev and it worked.
Sorry to trouble y'all.
Curt-
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Curt Howland wrote:
> So, there I was, doing a compile of the new kernel, 4.3
>
> I get the following interesting error:
>
> ===
So, there I was, doing a compile of the new kernel, 4.3
I get the following interesting error:
===
scripts/extract-cert.c:21:25: fatal error: openssl/bio.h: No such file
or directory
#include
^
compilation terminated.
===
I'm accustomed to getting compile time
csanyi...@gmail.com writes:
> Gary Dale writes:
>
>> On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel
>>> Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux .
>>>
>>> But this kernel doesn't have support for
Gary Dale writes:
> On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel
>> Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux .
>>
>> But this kernel doesn't have support for the rtl8192cu kernel-module.
>>
>> One
On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel
Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux .
But this kernel doesn't have support for the rtl8192cu kernel-module.
One can to get the kernel source fr
Hi,
I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel
Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux .
But this kernel doesn't have support for the rtl8192cu kernel-module.
One can to get the kernel source from here:
https://github.com/Excito/community-b3-ker
The same problem, with kernel 3.10, was present
with Wheezy 486 on same computer.
Thanks
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1383829602.35782
The same problem, with kernel 3.10, was present
with Wheezy 486 on same computer.
Thanks
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1383828867.2
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:07:58 -0500 (EST), Antispammbox-debian wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I try compiling kernel 3.10 on Squeeze 6.0.7. with cpu
> Intel Centrino1 32bit.
>
> Unpack source in /usr/src, and:
> adduser user src
> chown -R root:src /usr/src
> chmod -R g+w
Hi all
I try compiling kernel 3.10 on Squeeze 6.0.7. with cpu
Intel Centrino1 32bit.
Unpack source in /usr/src, and:
adduser user src
chown -R root:src /usr/src
chmod -R g+w /usr/src
cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
make menuconfig, but don't change any!
make deb-pkg
Sorry, my mistake, nothing about 64 bit. I compiled the 32bit kernel in xfs.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds
wrote:
> I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default.
> How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the disk data is in a
> non-fixed si
I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default.
How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the disk data is in a
non-fixed size file, not compressed. Sorry I forgot how to say this in
English, by non-fixed size, I mean the VM software just allocate the
actual disk space
On 27/06/10 10:51 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
> Thank you guys.
> I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It
> seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB,
> but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space
> was just empty
On Monday 28 June 2010 12:12:23 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> So I guess we're still looking for an example of a non-English name
> that can't be pronounced right. Can't think of any.
It isn't a case of whether it can be correctly pronounced, but of whether it
is.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:20:05 -0400 (EDT), Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Op 28-06-10 13:12, Tzafrir Cohen schreef:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am no
Op 28-06-10 13:12, Tzafrir Cohen schreef:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
>>
>>> PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English
>>> country. Some people cannot pronounce my name righ
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
>
> > PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English
> > country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this
> > pseudonym.
>
> That does
On Monday 28 June 2010 08:44:15 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
> > PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English
> > country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this
> > pseudonym.
>
> That doesn't stop me fro
On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
> PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English
> country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this
> pseudonym.
That doesn't stop me from using my real name ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussio
Thank you guys.
I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It
seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB,
but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space
was just empty and wasted.
I attached another disk to get the job done.
PS
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:34:29 -0400 (EDT), Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 09:10 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> That is not the correct command syntax. I suggest that you read
>>
>>http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm
>>
>> Kernel building in Debian is a complex task fraught with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/25/2010 09:10 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Magicloud Magiclouds? That can't be your real name!
> Can't you give us your real name? At least a first name?
>
> That is not the correct command syntax. I suggest that you read
>
>http://www.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:55:41 -0400 (EDT), Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
>
> I am using debian unstable 64. Recently I wanted to compile a 2.6.34 kernel.
> Well, the source package is 64MB. Before `make-kpkg linux-image
> linux-headers --initrd` finished, the source directory took 6GB space,
> made t
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 18:25, Magicloud Magiclouds <
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using debian unstable 64. Recently I wanted to compile a 2.6.34
> kernel.
> Well, the source package is 64MB. Before `make-kpkg linux-image
> linux-headers --initrd` finished, the source dir
Hi,
I am using debian unstable 64. Recently I wanted to compile a 2.6.34 kernel.
Well, the source package is 64MB. Before `make-kpkg linux-image
linux-headers --initrd` finished, the source directory took 6GB space,
made the volume full.
Tried a few times, the problem is still there, and alwa
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:11:08AM -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
>> Yes. In addition, I would highly recommend using kernel-package to
>> compile your kernel to generate a deb. Here's a nice primer:
>>
>> http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
>
> I would recommend using the 'make-kp
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:59:48AM -0700, deb...@toursbymexico.com wrote:
I have a doubt about kernel compilation. Two days ago I compiled by hand
2.6.31.6 and it crashed during the boot process. The configuration was
made by hand, starting from the default configuration and
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:59:48AM -0700, deb...@toursbymexico.com wrote:
> I have a doubt about kernel compilation. Two days ago I compiled by hand
> 2.6.31.6 and it crashed during the boot process. The configuration was
> made by hand, starting from the default configuration and perhaps I missed
Hello
I have a doubt about kernel compilation. Two days ago I compiled by hand
2.6.31.6 and it crashed during the boot process. The configuration was
made by hand, starting from the default configuration and perhaps I missed
something.
Since I had to restore my old slackware bakcup to recover som
On 29.10.09 1311 (+0530), surreal wrote:
> I am getting some problems while compiling kernel 2.6.31 using Debian Lenny
> make-kpkg
>
> The messages are -
>
> make[3]: Entering directory `/root/linux-2.6.31'
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/l
I am getting some problems while compiling kernel 2.6.31 using Debian Lenny
make-kpkg
The messages are -
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/linux-2.6.31'
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
CALL
Amax wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:50:10 +0200, Bernard wrote:
<- snip -->
The initrd.img that I have on my working system, as well as those
initrd.img that 'mkinitrd' generates when requested, are not compressed
files. Filenames are : initrd.img-2.6.20-16-386 for instance. No .gz
b
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:50:10 +0200, Bernard wrote:
<- snip -->
> The initrd.img that I have on my working system, as well as those
> initrd.img that 'mkinitrd' generates when requested, are not compressed
> files. Filenames are : initrd.img-2.6.20-16-386 for instance. No .gz
> behind. I s
Bernard wrote:
>>
>>You really could use the recent 2.6.30.4. There were different problems
>>with 2.6.20 to 2.6.30. I find 2.6.30.4 the best I've had since 2.6.20.
>>
>>
> I tried 2.6.30.4. Same result as with 2.6.26.2 : compiles without
> errors, but crashes on boot.
>
so you are missing som
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root
without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub
temporary)
I just tried that. Raid compiled int
Bernard wrote:
> Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
>
>>Bernard wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root
>>without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub
>>temporary)
>>
>>
> I just tried that. Raid compiled into the kernel
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root
without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub
temporary)
I just tried that. Raid compiled into the kernel instead of modules. No
initrd. Still cra
Bernard wrote:
>
> 2.6.30.4 does compile all right, so does 2.6.26, but 2.6.20 does not.
you find out why in the archives
> Problem is that I still can't boot those I compiled, i.e. 2.6.26. because
> the initrd.img is buggy. I did find something, still it is not enough to
> get the process to w
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Sorry forgot to write
Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc
The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last
version from kernel.org.
2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine
Just to be objective the gnu
> From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Emanoil Kotsev
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 1:55 PM
>
> Bernard wrote:
>
> > Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> >
> >>Bernard wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel)
> ?!
> >>
> >>you
Bernard wrote:
> Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
>
>>Bernard wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel) ?!
>>
>>you also can just disable the loading of the sound modules to make it more
>>simple.
>>
>>
>
> Things would be easy if all sound support
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
try compiling the necessary modules _in_ the kernel.
This is the way it has been done.
So, I re-tried compiling after de-activating raid0 in the config,
leaving only raid1... to the same end result.
In the config it should be [*] not [M] if booting fro
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
do you have a not raid boot partition, where you can put the initrd image?
My boot partition is not raid, or, at least, even though it is mirrored,
it remains in ext2fs, while the rest is in LVM2. So, the initrd image
that I am trying is available at start,
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Bernard wrote:
why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel) ?!
you also can just disable the loading of the sound modules to make it more
simple.
Things would be easy if all sound support were in modules. But some
functions are part
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> Sorry forgot to write
>
> Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc
>
> The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last
> version from kernel.org.
>
> 2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine
>
Just to be objective the gnu compiler people
Sorry forgot to write
Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc
The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last version
from kernel.org.
2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine
>>
>> So, upon my failures to recompile kernel 2.6.20-16-386, I tried
>> downloading 2
Bernard wrote:
> Hi to Everyone,
>
> I need to re-compile my kernel so that it does not include sound support
> inside. I am running Debian 3.1 (Sarge). My system is on RAID1. My /boot
> partition is from /dev/sda1 (mirror on /dev/sdb1) installed on /dev/md0
> (ext3), while my '/' partition is fr
Hi to Everyone,
I need to re-compile my kernel so that it does not include sound support
inside. I am running Debian 3.1 (Sarge). My system is on RAID1. My /boot
partition is from /dev/sda1 (mirror on /dev/sdb1) installed on /dev/md0
(ext3), while my '/' partition is from /dev/sda2 and /dev/sd
Hi all,
My box is on debian/testing, and I have compiled kernel by the debian
way. Because it's testing and kernel-patches are often provided, I
wonder whether I have to compile the kernel again after retrieving a
kernel patch or even a new kernel via aptitude full-upgrade operation.
Thanks for y
On Wed, 9 May 2007 15:32:08 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007 17:29:38 -0500
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm. I should amend that to say: Step 5 does require (fake)root
>> privileges.
> Huh? Here's a longer excerpt:
Oops. I think I mis
On Tue, 08 May 2007 17:29:38 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:54 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele More
On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:54 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and
On Tue, 8 May 2007 20:50:13 +0200 (CEST), pizzapie linuxanchovies <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> Thanks to everyone who replied with ideas about my post. Let me give
> quick replies to the questions you asked me:
> Manoj--yes, dpkg is in /usr/bin, and is in the user's path, but no
> normal user
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:50:13PM +0200, pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote:
>
>
> Andrew (and anyone else who can do a make-kpkg under a non-root
> account)--what permissions do YOU see when you say ls -l /usr/bin/root?
I was referring to the general case of compiling source as a user and
installi
On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as root
> > if unnecessary, but for kernel (and program) compile I
Thanks to everyone who replied with ideas about my post. Let me give quick
replies to the questions you asked me:
Manoj--yes, dpkg is in /usr/bin, and is in the user's path, but no normal user
has execute access to dpkg:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/dpkg
-rwxr-x--- 1 root root 174040 May 26 2005 /usr/b
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> 2007/5/8, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
> >"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> >> con
On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as root
> if unnecessary, but for kernel (and program) compile I can not picture
> 'make-kpkg' or 'configure && make' doing something regrettable.
2007/5/8, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> considered such a bad habit.
It's generally considered a bad idea to do anything as root unl
On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> considered such a bad habit.
It's generally considered a bad idea to do anything as root unless it's
absolutely necessary. I suppose i
Raffaele Morelli wrote:
I just changed:
1. Processor type and features -> Paravirtualization support
(EXPERIMENTAL) OFF
2. Processor type and features -> Timer frequency (1000 HZ)
3. Processor type and features -> Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel
(Low-Latency Desktop)
I just changed:
1. Processor type and features -> Paravirtualization support
(EXPERIMENTAL) OFF
2. Processor type and features -> Timer frequency (1000 HZ)
3. Processor type and features -> Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel
(Low-Latency Desktop))
4. Device Drivers -> Graphics support -> Logo
pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote:
I was following a tutorial
(http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for compiling
a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this:
"fakeroot make-kpkg clean"
However, this command generated a bunch of errors saying this:
dpkg-a
pizzapie_linuxanchovies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was following a tutorial
> (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
> compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run
> this: "fakeroot make-kpkg clean"
>
> However, this command generated a bunch of
On Tue, 8 May 2007 05:37:58 +0200 (CEST), pizzapie linuxanchovies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I was following a tutorial
> (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
> compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run
> this: "fakeroot make-kpkg clean" Howe
I was following a tutorial (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this: "fakeroot
make-kpkg clean"
However, this command generated a bunch of errors saying this:
dpkg-architecture: failure: dpkg --print
Mario de Frutos wrote:
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my 2.6.14.2 kernel in my server to a 2.6.17.4 or
> higher using my current .config. There isn't any problem in compiling
> time and in grub i put the same config but with different "vmlinuz"
> file, but when i reboot i get a kernel panic error like t
shahim essaid.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am somewhat new to Debian and Iam not sure if this is possible. I want
> to compile a 2.6.16 from source but the minimum requirement listed under
> Documentation/Changes are not satisfied under Sarge. udev, for example,
> has to be 071 or higher.
I've neve
Hi everyone!
I'm trying to upgrade my 2.6.14.2 kernel in my server to a 2.6.17.4 or
higher using my current .config. There isn't any problem in compiling
time and in grub i put the same config but with different "vmlinuz"
file, but when i reboot i get a kernel panic error like that "Kernel
panic:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:23:20PM -0700, shahim essaid.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am somewhat new to Debian and Iam not sure if this is possible. I want to
> compile a 2.6.16 from source but the minimum requirement listed under
> Documentation/Chan
Hi all,
I am somewhat new to Debian and Iam not sure if this is possible. I want
to compile a 2.6.16 from source but the minimum requirement listed under
Documentation/Changes are not satisfied under Sarge. udev, for example,
has to be 071 or higher.
I did try backports.org but there were to
Hello everybody. I am trying to install anbd on a PIII cluster, and for
that I have to compile the module that they provide. But unfortunately,
I am not being capable of compile this module agaist the
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-686-smp. make menuconfig works nicely, but when I
try to make or make modul
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:51:55AM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote:
> lemme see if I understand what you meant: The kernel-source files that I
> downloaded is common to all linux distribution while the kernel-header
> files is particular to a certain version and distribution.
...not so much the
me out,
Amish
- Original Message -
From: "Almut Behrens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: compiling kernel module question
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 05:36:26PM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to comp
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 05:36:26PM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been trying to compile and insert a simple kernel module but
> without luck. This is what I did.
> Since the freshly installed debian sarge 3.1 distro did not have any
> source files under /usr/src, I di uname -a to
Hi,
I have been trying to compile and insert a simple
kernel module but without luck. This is what I did.
Since the freshly installed debian sarge 3.1 distro
did not have any source files under /usr/src, I di uname -a to make sure of the
kernel version that is installed:
Linux test 2.4.27-2-3
On 9/22/05, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1L.V.Gandhi on Monday 19 Sep 2005 12:46 wrote:> I have found the problem with debian apt-get kernel which contains> debian patches.Debian shipped kernels don't come with with bootsplash patch include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
L.V.Gandhi on Monday 19 Sep 2005 12:46 wrote:
> On 9/17/05, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't know whether this is a stupid doubt, but are you using
>> `pristine' kernel sources or Debian patched kernel sources (apt-got
>> ones)?
On 9/17/05, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know whether this is a stupid doubt, but are you using
> `pristine' kernel sources or Debian patched kernel sources (apt-got
> ones)? I generally have had no problems applying the bootsplash
> patches to pristine kernel sources.
I hav
David R. Litwin wrote:
Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is
dual-boot and the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting
Down every Evening. In addition, I shall be getting a lap-top soon. (By
the bye, why doesn't Debian have Bootsplash as a standard?)
I
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 05:38:03AM +0530, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
>I have 2.6.8 kernel source. I tried the following both patches separately
>in the same order. ie second time src previous patched source was deleted
>and new src was installed.
>bootsplash-3.1.6-2.6.8.diff
>bootsplash-
On 9/14/05, Pooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2005/9/6, mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> | Basically, the steps are:> |> | 1. Download the kernel source> |> | 2. Extract it to /usr/src, or wherever you'd prefer
> |> | 3. Download the bootsplash patch from http://www.bootsplash.de/files/> |> | 4. 'cd'
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:06:10 +0530
"L.V.Gandhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is this boot-icons package. I don't have in stable repository.
Hmmm, I guess boot-icons never made it out of unstable.
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=boot-icon&searchon=names&subword
2005/9/6, mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | "David R. Litwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is dual-boot
> and
> | > the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting Down every
On 9/14/05, Seeker5528 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:01:47 +0530"L.V.Gandhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > On a side note I had installed the boot-icons package sometime in the
> > past and never got around to getting it operational and it started> > working too.> >> > I install
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:01:47 +0530
"L.V.Gandhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On a side note I had installed the boot-icons package sometime in the
> > past and never got around to getting it operational and it started
> > working too.
> >
> > I installed it. It shows tux image. No show of % pro
On 9/13/05, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The link I provide let me set up Splashy with relative ease. I should
think, off hand, that you need to edit the config.xml file located in
the splashy directory. Read the readme that comes along with your theme.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthr
1 - 100 of 508 matches
Mail list logo