* From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com
* Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600
Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into
things.
* From: Jes#xFA;s M. Navarro jesus.nava...@undominio.net
* Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200
There's neither carnot
* From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com
* Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600
Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into
things.
* From: Jes#xFA;s M. Navarro jesus.nava...@undominio.net
* Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200
There's neither carnot
* From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com
* Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600
Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into
things.
* From: Jes#xFA;s M. Navarro jesus.nava...@undominio.net
* Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200
There's neither carnot
From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600
... carnot is already on the public internet
with 142.103.107.138?
OK, we've discussed two distinct configurations and
that wasn't clear. Friday I reinstated the old configuration
and checked just now that carnot is
From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:55:04 -0600
Excellent diagram! Thank you very much for sharing it.
Welcome. Until I have a definite plan, the old configuration with carnot on
the
AT 3612TR is restored. All of these should work as long as the old disk drives
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
http://142.103.107.138/
So now I am really confused. carnot is already on the public internet
with 142.103.107.138? I thought that you had it on a private network
and were trying to tunnel it onto the public internet. I am really
confused now. Sorry.
My network is
Given linux router dalton, eth 3, connected to a local machine
carnot, eth0, with a cross-over cable, I need some help to set
the configurations properly.
#dalton:/etc/network/interfaces
...
iface eth3 inet static
address 172.24.2.1
up route add -host 142.103.107.138
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
Given linux router dalton, eth 3, connected to a local machine
carnot, eth0, with a cross-over cable, I need some help to set
the configurations properly.
#dalton:/etc/network/interfaces
...
iface eth3 inet static
address 172.24.2.1
up route
From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:00:20 -0600
So dalton has address 172.24.2.1 in the RFC1918 private address space.
Dalton has external address 142.103.107.137 and several internal addresses
including 172.24.2.1.
Here is an old sketch. Dalton is on the left.
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
So dalton has address 172.24.2.1 in the RFC1918 private address space.
Dalton has external address 142.103.107.137 and several internal addresses
including 172.24.2.1.
Here is an old sketch. Dalton is on the left. We're not concerned with
Andrew others,
At Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:42:41 -0700 A.S-W. wrote,
that does not mean that a rule for POP3 is not needed. I don't
remember if shorewall is case sensitive, but I bet it is in the
context of defining a rule. maybe post the actual config line to
produces the error?
My
Folk,
At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
... if you want to really understand it use
shorewall after reading shorewall-doc.
ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
I wonder why rules are needed for FTP but not
for POP3. In fact, a rule for POP3 produces a
complaint
Folk,
At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
... if you want to really understand it use
shorewall after reading shorewall-doc.
ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
I wonder why rules are needed for FTP but not
for POP3. In fact, a rule for POP3 produces a
complaint
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 16:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folk,
At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
... if you want to really understand it use
shorewall after reading shorewall-doc.
ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
I wonder why rules are needed for
Folk,
At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
... if you want to really understand it use
shorewall after reading shorewall-doc.
ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
I wonder why rules are needed for FTP but
a rule for POP3 produces a complaint about
... unknown
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:01:39PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folk,
At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
... if you want to really understand it use
shorewall after reading shorewall-doc.
ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
I wonder why rules are needed
Paul others,
At Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:33:50 -0700 Paul Johnson wrote,
... the FTP server connects to the client: Two
connections are maintained ...
As I am aware, ssh uses only one connection but it
also gets ACCEPT rules. So I still don't understand why
some protocols, dns, ftp and ssh, need
Douglas,
dt Now you're using shaw.ca for your home domain. Do you own that? Would
you like to e.g. relay mail for all of shaw.ca?
Not really.
OK, I've invented the domain name petershouse;
the current hosts file follows. Please let me know of any
remaining errors.
Isn't there a place to
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:07:32AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas,
dt Now you're using shaw.ca for your home domain. Do you own that? Would
you like to e.g. relay mail for all of shaw.ca?
Not really.
OK, I've invented the domain name petershouse;
the current hosts file
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:07:32AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dt Now you're using shaw.ca for your home domain. Do you own that? Would
you like to e.g. relay mail for all of shaw.ca?
Not really.
Didn't think so :)
OK, I've invented the domain name petershouse;
the current
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:20:24AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dt if you don't own peasthope.yi.org, then I wouldn't use it even locally.
But I do own the machine and the name.
OK
I, personally, for the 127.0.0.1 would only use localhost and
localhost.localdomain
yi.org is a dynamic dns
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 08:12:44PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:38:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# /etc/hosts file
127.0.0.1 peasthope.yi.orgjoule localhost
^^
this should be:
Douglas,
dt if you don't own peasthope.yi.org, then I wouldn't use it even locally.
But I do own the machine and the name.
yi.org is a dynamic dns service. Not
already being allocated is a precondition
to assigning peasthope.yi.org to my computer.
dt It is a valid name.
So ... I miss
Douglas others,
dt Now you will have three networks. ...
... You shouldn't have to add routes like this ...
Right oh.
dt change this to 172.23.5.1, and change heaviside's to 172.23.5.2
The revised configuration follows. Everything
appears OK now. There is no hub consuming
power and two
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:38:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas others,
dt Now you will have three networks. ...
... You shouldn't have to add routes like this ...
Right oh.
dt change this to 172.23.5.1, and change heaviside's to 172.23.5.2
The revised configuration
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:40:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folk,
My LAN has a Debian router, joule, and two subordinate
machines, curie and heaviside. The three connect to an
old Linksys 10Base-T hub. joule connects to a
cable modem through a second NIC and runs
ipmasq.
Folk,
My LAN has a Debian router, joule, and two subordinate
machines, curie and heaviside. The three connect to an
old Linksys 10Base-T hub. joule connects to a
cable modem through a second NIC and runs
ipmasq.
Currently I want to add a third NIC to joule,
remove the hub and connect each
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:40:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My LAN has a Debian router, joule, and two subordinate
machines, curie and heaviside. The three connect to an
old Linksys 10Base-T hub. joule connects to a
cable modem through a second NIC and runs
ipmasq.
Currently I
28 matches
Mail list logo
