On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 01:27:07PM +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 Apr 2021 at 14:21, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > That means you've to carry a funny dongle with you all the time?
> > Or is the "second factor" that oh-so-secure "smart" phone?
>
> Three choices for second factor:
>
> 1
days but also need to relay
authentication to the company's server.
I would like to use IMAP to access email in order to
circumvent Outlook, but AFAIK there is no way for fetchmail
or other command line tools to authenticate via web page and
use the IMAP Server then (Thunderbird is able to do
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 01:11:08PM +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Dystopian is right. Our organization, using O365, has moved to
> "multi-factor authentication" without consultation and I can no longer
> use gnus, for instance. Absolutely horrible.
That means you've to carry a funny dongle with yo
Dystopian is right. Our organization, using O365, has moved to
"multi-factor authentication" without consultation and I can no longer
use gnus, for instance. Absolutely horrible.
--
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50 & org 9.4.5 on Debian bullseye/sid
es. Especially this
> 3D authentication is not likely to be implemented in the opensource
> software and non of it works for me.
Yes. Half-a-life ago, while in dystopian Bigcorp environment, I had
to bribe Windows admins to keep up Outlook's IMAP with... NTLM auth.
Fetchmail worked fine [1]
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> I think IMAP should work regardless. My workplace uses federated
> authentication, and davmail works fine for me.
I think it depends how it is setup and what policy applies. Especially this
3D authentication is not likely to be implemented in the opensource
software and n
pany's server.
>
> I would like to use IMAP to access email in order to
> circumvent Outlook, but AFAIK there is no way for fetchmail
> or other command line tools to authenticate via web page and
> use the IMAP Server then (Thunderbird is able to do this but
> I don't want
no way for fetchmail
or other command line tools to authenticate via web page and
use the IMAP Server then (Thunderbird is able to do this but
I don't want to use Thunderbird).
I hoped davmail would be able to do that but I have no clue
how to tell davmail to authenticate in this way. AFAIK the
On Lu, 06 apr 20, 10:33:36, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > Long term you might need a hold or pin for that (my preference would be
> > a pin).
>
>hi Andrei,
>I felt that the description of the pinning process is rather
>confusing, either in th
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Long term you might need a hold or pin for that (my preference would be
a pin).
hi Andrei,
I felt that the description of the pinning process is rather
confusing, either in the apt-get man or the aptitude man.
Can you tell me what whould be
On Du, 05 apr 20, 19:21:31, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
>
> > let them remove getmail if thay are not able to support it.
> > As I'm perfectly happy with the present Debian version,
> > I'll just keep it, disabling my upgrade process, until getmail support
>
On 2020-04-04 21:46, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 04 apr 20, 19:30:05, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> You have to keep also a Python 2 interpreter for it.
same question: why would it disapear ?
Because it's not supported upstream anymore.
https://legacy
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
let them remove getmail if thay are not able to support it.
As I'm perfectly happy with the present Debian version,
I'll just keep it, disabling my upgrade process, until getmail support
reappears.
actually, I was too drastic: as "apt-get upgrade" g
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020, songbird wrote:
Celejar wrote:
...
https://marc.info/?l=getmail&m=157365887605305&w=2
let them remove getmail if thay are not able to support it.
As I'm perfectly happy with the present Debian version,
I'll just keep it, disabling my upgrade process, until getmail supp
Celejar wrote:
...
> https://marc.info/?l=getmail&m=157365887605305&w=2
well that didn't happen and as soon as anyone
expressed any interest in carrying patches Osamu
pretty much just said take over the package because
he wasn't interested in it any more. and then the
topic dropped because nobo
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 06:34:41 -0400
songbird wrote:
> Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> >>>> I have the following problem with fetchmail:
> >>>> fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server
> >>>> imap.gmail.com.
> >
> >hi,
&g
On Sb, 04 apr 20, 19:30:05, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > You have to keep also a Python 2 interpreter for it.
>
> same question: why would it disapear ?
Because it's not supported upstream anymore.
https://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0373/
Debia
songbird wrote:
...
> in my nosing around i've found this:
>
> https://gitlab.com/dkg/getmail/commits/python3
i meant that to be:
https://gitlab.com/dkg/getmail
songbird
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> You have to keep also a Python 2 interpreter for it.
>
>same question: why would it disapear ?
>
> best regards,
because eventually it stops being packaged or kept up
and gets left behind long enough that nobody cares to
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
You have to keep also a Python 2 interpreter for it.
same question: why would it disapear ?
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
On Sb, 04 apr 20, 12:44:38, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, songbird wrote:
>
> > yes, but don't get too complacent as eventually
> > getmail goes away if nobody ports it to python3.
> >
>thank you for the advice, but I imagine it will not disappear from my disk,
>even if it
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, songbird wrote:
yes, but don't get too complacent as eventually
getmail goes away if nobody ports it to python3.
thank you for the advice, but I imagine it will not disappear from my disk,
even if it is no more supported.
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
>>>> I have the following problem with fetchmail:
>>>> fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server
>>>> imap.gmail.com.
>
> hi,
>the fix I found was to abandon fetchmail. I'm using now getmail, which
I have the following problem with fetchmail:
fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server
imap.gmail.com.
hi,
the fix I found was to abandon fetchmail. I'm using now getmail, which
works perfectly
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
On 3/29/20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 06:35:04PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
>> hi,
>> I have the following problem with fetchmail:
>> fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server
>> imap.gmail.com.
>> here is
On 2020-03-29 13:24, Reco wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 01:46:12PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
Mike fetchmail, getmail gives a Time Out
OP
did you select "allow non-standard email client" or whatever it is at
gmail ?
use SimpleIMAPSSLReciever ?
[retriever]
type=SimpleIMAPSS
Please CC the list. And please refrain from top posting.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 01:46:12PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> Mike fetchmail, getmail gives a Time Out
Two options left.
> >1) Try using POP3 instead of IMAP.
> >
> >3) Make a forward to your gmx mailbox from gmail.
Reco
Hi.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:06:19AM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> as requested, here is the output of fetchmail -v
So, login's good:
> fetchmail: IMAP> A0002 LOGIN "pierre.frenkiel" *
> fetchmail: IMAP< * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE Q
Pierre Frenkiel writes:
> as requested, here is the output of fetchmail -v
> you can see at the end "reading message ...", but I can't find it
>
> please reply pierre.frenk...@gmx.com
>
[...]
> fetchmail: IMAP> A0004 EXPUNGE
> fetchmail: IMAP< A000
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 06:35:04PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have the following problem with fetchmail:
> fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server imap.gmail.com.
> here is my .fetchmailrc
If I followed correctly, you're trying to ac
On 2020-03-29 09:06, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
as requested, here is the output of fetchmail -v
you can see at the end "reading message ...", but I can't find it
with gmail you have to select "allow non-conforming clients" or
something.
I had problems with fetchmai
as requested, here is the output of fetchmail -v
you can see at the end "reading message ...", but I can't find it
please reply pierre.frenk...@gmx.com
fetchmail: starting fetchmail 6.4.0.beta4 daemon
fetchmail: 6.4.0.beta4 querying imap.gmail.com (protocol IMAP) at Sun 29
Pierre Frenkiel writes:
> poll imap.gmail.com with proto IMAP auth password
It is just side comments. There is alternative software. The name is
getmail[*]. The getmail supports Gmail's label. It is available to
downloading messages from each Gmail's label. Personaly i use getmail
with Gnus. Alw
Cindy Sue Causey writes:
> ..
> While checking trending one more time to see if there were any current
> references, a new trending topic is that Twitter direct messages are
> taking a hit right now. It all seems an understandable, predictable
> social networking side effect in light of our W
On 3/28/20, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have the following problem with fetchmail:
> fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server
> imap.gmail.com.
> here is my .fetchmailrc
Poking my nose in to say that Gmail AND Youtube were down in last
couple days. I
Hi.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 06:35:04PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have the following problem with fetchmail:
> fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server imap.gmail.com.
> here is my .fetchmailrc
fetchmail -v
Reco
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 06:35:04PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have the following problem with fetchmail:
> fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server imap.gmail.com.
> here is my .fetchmailrc
>
>
> set logfile "/data/home/frenkiel/lo
hi,
I have the following problem with fetchmail:
fetchmail: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server imap.gmail.com.
here is my .fetchmailrc
set logfile "/data/home/frenkiel/log/fetchmail"
set pidfile "/data/home/frenkiel/.fetchmail.pid"
set postmaster "f
;> Hello all.
> >>>>> A colleague has very recently upgraded his Debian system at home
> >>>>> from Jessie (not sure which version) to Stretch (9.9) and from
> >>>>> that moment, fetchmail has failed to collect emails. I/we are
> >>>
that moment, fetchmail has failed to collect emails. I/we are
relatively inexperienced with diagnosing & fixing such problems
and are looking for any advice people here may be able to give us
to overcome this problem. When fetchmail polls the email server,
we get the following error message:
Ju
ot sure which version) to Stretch (9.9) and from
> > >> that moment, fetchmail has failed to collect emails. I/we are
> > >> relatively inexperienced with diagnosing & fixing such problems
> > >> and are looking for any advice people here may be able
>> On Thursday 13 June 2019 09:58:39 pm Joe Aquilina wrote:
>> Hello all.
>> A colleague has very recently upgraded his Debian system at home from
>> Jessie (not sure which version) to Stretch (9.9) and from that moment,
>> fetchmail has failed to colle
On Thursday 13 June 2019 09:58:39 pm Joe Aquilina wrote:
> Hello all.
> A colleague has very recently upgraded his Debian system at home from
> Jessie (not sure which version) to Stretch (9.9) and from that moment,
> fetchmail has failed to collect emails. I/we are relatively
> ine
Hello all.
A colleague has very recently upgraded his Debian system at home from
Jessie (not sure which version) to Stretch (9.9) and from that moment,
fetchmail has failed to collect emails. I/we are relatively
inexperienced with diagnosing & fixing such problems and are looking
for any ad
* On 2018 19 Nov 02:10 -0600, mick crane wrote:
> fetchmail for me had a problem with the ssl certificate of gmail which keeps
> changing seemingly depending on which server connect to. Probably is fixable
> but was easier to use getmail.
I don't have a gmail account so I haven&#
On 2018-11-19 00:33, Nate Bargmann wrote:
I installed the Sid version on this Buster installation and it works
just fine. I simply downloaded it and installed it manually. Aptitude
puts it in the Obsolete and Locally Created Packages section. Shrug.
- Nate
fetchmail for me had a problem
I installed the Sid version on this Buster installation and it works
just fine. I simply downloaded it and installed it manually. Aptitude
puts it in the Obsolete and Locally Created Packages section. Shrug.
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 8:43 PM Brian wrote:
> How does Dovecot get into a thread about fetchmail?
Well, a little confusion, a little impatience, and a little panic.
I was using Thunderbird, and I did something to the DCot config, and
email quit working. I'd spent a couple days fight
spool could be quarrantined and if you haven't read most of
that mail you could end up loosing all of it.
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Glenn English wrote:
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:27:55
> From: Glenn English
> To: debianUsers
> Subject: Re: fetchmail
> Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov
On Sun 18 Nov 2018 at 20:27:55 +, Glenn English wrote:
> Thanks much, all.
>
> Dovecot's config was bent. Working version recovered from backup. Not
> at all sure what was wrong.
How does Dovecot get into a thread about fetchmail? The mind boggles.
> Dovecot, IMHO,
Thanks much, all.
Dovecot's config was bent. Working version recovered from backup. Not
at all sure what was wrong.
Dovecot, IMHO, is a mixed blessing...
But I'm going to look into getmail and isync. I didn't know they
existed. Mutt rules, I think.
--
Glenn English
On Sun 18 Nov 2018 at 19:05:48 +, Glenn English wrote:
> It seems that fetchmail doesn't exist in Buster (Buster's apt and
> aptitude say it doesn't exist -- aptitude in Stretch shows a package).
>
> This means I can't use Mutt if my email is in a bo
> Anybody know: am I wrong somehow; why fetchmail went away; if Buster'd
> be upset with the Stretch package?
Yup - see this bug for details:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768843
You might consider an alternative such as getmail, or isync.
Steve
--
https://steve.fi/
Hi.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 07:05:48PM +, Glenn English wrote:
> It seems that fetchmail doesn't exist in Buster (Buster's apt and
> aptitude say it doesn't exist -- aptitude in Stretch shows a package).
True. The reason for the removal was #768843, currently
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 07:05:48PM +, Glenn English wrote:
> It seems that fetchmail doesn't exist in Buster (Buster's apt and
> aptitude say it doesn't exist -- aptitude in Stretch shows a package).
>
According to the package tracker [0], the migration has been
It seems that fetchmail doesn't exist in Buster (Buster's apt and
aptitude say it doesn't exist -- aptitude in Stretch shows a package).
This means I can't use Mutt if my email is in a box on the other side
of the LAN?
Anybody know: am I wrong somehow; why fetchmail went
Hi
Independent of our recent issues, we've had a longstanding problem with
fetchmail.
from /var/log/syslog:
"Warning: the connection is insecure, continuing anyways. (Better use
--sslcertck!)"
It's something we've tried to resolve from time to time but gave u
To all who have helped me so far, a huge thank you! I
soon realized that the subject line of this message is incorrect
since pop3 covers only the delivery task and I got that working
a couple of weeks or so ago. The indescribably joyful experience
of being able to successfully authenticate
Quoting Martin G. McCormick (mar...@server1.shellworld.net):
> Paul E Condon writes:
> > I use msmtp, not exim, even though exim comes already installed by
> > Debian. Msmtp has its own tiny config file which can be located at
> > ~/.msmtprc You can put there whatever you need to satisfy you ISP a
Paul E Condon writes:
> I use msmtp, not exim, even though exim comes already installed by
> Debian. Msmtp has its own tiny config file which can be located at
> ~/.msmtprc You can put there whatever you need to satisfy you ISP and
> have no fear of exim mucking about with it. Of course, don't rem
David Wright writes:
A number of very good suggestions
> The other thing you could try is a handcrafted email, which takes
> about 5 minutes, by typing the following into a bash prompt:
>
>
> $ echo -e -n '\0marti...@suddenlink.net\0SECRET' | base64
> aBase64stringIsEmitted=
> $ openssl
Paul E Condon writes:
> I use msmtp, not exim, even though exim comes already installed by
> Debian. Msmtp has its own tiny config file which can be located at
> ~/.msmtprc You can put there whatever you need to satisfy you ISP and
> have no fear of exim mucking about with it. Of course, don't rem
I believe in learning by doing, so I posted an example that one can
actually do. However, private emails show that it's caused a little
confusion. To make it as easy as I could, I wrote the example using
the information posted by the OP, and using the OP's own placeholder,
SECRET, as the password.
Quoting David Wright (deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk):
> Quoting Martin G. McCormick (mar...@server1.shellworld.net):
> > The mainlog file displays the error that
> > smtp.suddenlink.net is reporting
> >
> > 2015-07-11 06:29:26 1ZDsyD-0001Rm-PO ** mar...@shellworld.net R=smarthost
> > T=remote_smtp_sma
; Here is a short snippet from their instructions for
> using pop:
>
>Incoming Mail Server: pop.suddenlink.net
>Incoming mail port: 110
>Incoming mail port (SSL): 995
>
> end of snippet
>
> It all starts out OK:
>
> fetchmail: 6.3.18 querying p
Quoting Martin G. McCormick (mar...@server1.shellworld.net):
> David Wright writes:
> > I don't see what the issue is. "People" with different usernames
> > send mail from this system.
>
> Correct. After looking at what I posted, it is confusing. Let's
> try again.
>
> > Do you mean /etc/mailname
On 2015-07-11, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
>
>
> The smarthost sees mar...@suddenlink.net and what it should see
> in the From: line is marti...@suddenlink.net
> Here are all the non-comments from update-exim4.conf.conf
>
Cannot this be defined in /etc/email-addresses?
mar...@suddenlink.net: mart
On Sat 11 Jul 2015 at 07:43:49 -0500, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
> David Wright writes:
> > I don't see what the issue is. "People" with different usernames
> > send mail from this system.
>
> Correct. After looking at what I posted, it is confusing. Let's
> try again.
>
> > Do you mean /etc/mai
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
If I hope to send mail through smtp.suddenlink.net,
it must see marti...@suddenlink.net plus the
password also used to retrieve pop3 mail and the
retrieval does work.
Does your MUA set "From:" to marti...@suddenlink.net,
and also set the envel
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015, David Wright wrote:
dc_smarthost='smtp.suddenlink.net::587'
Syntax is correct. I've not tried that port. Must do
so sometime.
I think we're learning here in this thread to avoid
generalizations, but 587 is known as the "submit"
port. I have had good luck with it.
Th
David Wright writes:
> I don't see what the issue is. "People" with different usernames
> send mail from this system.
Correct. After looking at what I posted, it is confusing. Let's
try again.
> Do you mean /etc/mailname? What's actually in there?
wb5agz.swbell.net
That should never show up on
Quoting Bob Bernstein (poo...@ruptured-duck.com):
> Maybe it's me; I'm not as spry as I used to be, but I am having
> difficulty following you.
Ditto
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
>
> >dc_smarthost='smtp.suddenlink.net::587'
>
> That looks fine to me, if the syntax for speci
Quoting Martin G. McCormick (mar...@server1.shellworld.net):
> Bob Bernstein writes:
> > what do you put in exim's config as the name of your smarthost?
>
> dc_smarthost='smtp.suddenlink.net::587'
>
> I have figured out the first thing that is wrong but am
> not sure how to fix it. When reg
Maybe it's me; I'm not as spry as I used to be, but I
am having difficulty following you.
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
dc_smarthost='smtp.suddenlink.net::587'
That looks fine to me, if the syntax for specifying a
port is correct for exim (I simply don't know one way
or t
Bob Bernstein writes:
> what do you put in exim's config as the name of your smarthost?
dc_smarthost='smtp.suddenlink.net::587'
I have figured out the first thing that is wrong but am
not sure how to fix it. When registering a user ID on
Suddenlink's email gateway, I had to pick a slightl
. Please fix your /etc/hosts setup."
which I ignore as it appears to have no effect both at home and
in motels etc.
mail sent by smarthost; received via SMTP or fetchmail (sets
dc_eximconfig_configtype)
foo (my hostname, sets /etc/mailname)
smtp.xxx.xxx.xxx::25025;smtp.yyy.yyy (smarthosts, s
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
The job now is to get the out-bound
authentication to work to the smtp server.
what do you put in exim's config as the name of your
smarthost?
--
I am not a loony. Why should I be tarred with the epithet
'loony' merely because I have a pet
The job now is to get the out-bound authentication to
work to the smtp server. One should use dpkg-configure
exim4-config to set exim to use a smarthost for out-bound
messages and rely on fetchmail for the incoming mail. Most of
this is relatively easy and straight-forward except for one
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
but ALL DAMN DAY every day it got IP attacks
purportedly from china.
It's of course still like that out there, ALL DAMN
DAY, the Wild West, Main St., Dodge City, only it's
mostly (I think) SSH brute force attempts. I show
skeptical friends my l
op3.slingshot.co.nz with protocol pop3
> user cbannister
> password
>
> which I call with an alias 'fm':
>
> alias fm='fetchmail -e 50 -m /usr/bin/maildrop'
>
> Maybe the clue is in the phrase '... *most* POP3 mailhosts ...'
>
urther squawks. I don't know whether to feel stupid
> or joyful.
Just to throw a fly in the ointment:
tal% less ../.fetchmailrc
poll pop3.slingshot.co.nz with protocol pop3
user cbannister
password ****
which I call with an alias 'fm':
alias fm='fetchmail -e 50 -m
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
Lisi Reisz writes:
As someone else has pointed out, it looks as though
your username is wrong.
I don't know whether to feel stupid or joyful.
You get to feel both at the same time. Enjoy!
--
"No matter how big the problem is, you can always
Lisi Reisz writes:
> As someone else has pointed out, it looks as though your username is
> wrong.
> Most POP3 mailhosts require the full email address, with the @domain bit.
>
> Lisi
This one is no exception. Thank you!! I don't know how many
times I have read and re-read the lines in that .fet
ologize.
>
> Here is the slightly obfuscated .fetchmailrc file. The
> only obscured part is the password.
>
> #./fetchmailrc for martin
> # This file must be chmod 0600, owner fetchmail
> # set polling time (10 minutes)
> #
> set daemon 600
> set no bouncemail
part is the password.
#./fetchmailrc for martin
# This file must be chmod 0600, owner fetchmail
# set polling time (10 minutes)
#
set daemon 600
set no bouncemail
defaults:
mda '/usr/bin/procmail'
antispam -1
batchlimit 0
#server settings
#poll suddenlink.net with
uddenlink.com/Internet/Pages/EmailandNewsServerNames.aspx :
"Note:Username: your full email address, including the @domain.net at
the end (i.e. @suddenlink.net)"
> fetchmail: 6.3.18 querying pop.suddenlink.net (protocol POP3) at Wed Jul 8
> 21:23:25 2015: poll started
> Trying to connect to 20
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
I am trying to get a debian squeeze system to
pull mail from my cable provider's pop3 server.
Is there a special reason you do not post your
.fetchmailrc file?
Or, the output of 'fetchmail --version'?
And, you have given one
oming Mail Server: pop.suddenlink.net
Incoming mail port: 110
Incoming mail port (SSL): 995
end of snippet
It all starts out OK:
fetchmail: 6.3.18 querying pop.suddenlink.net (protocol POP3) at Wed Jul 8
21:23:25 2015: poll started
Trying to connect to 208.180.40.196/110...conn
On 26/11/2014 07:50, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
Fetchmail certainly uses the system ssl library and SSLv3 was recently
disabled system wide for security reasons (see the poodle attack).
[snip]
You'll have to investigate a bit but my theory is that fetchmail is
requesting SSLv3. As it is dis
2014-11-25 21:34 GMT+01:00 Ron Leach :
> Did the trick. Logs show that fetchmail is
> 1. using opportunistic TLS on pop3, but
> 2. Sometimes times out after receiving a certificate, and then
> 3. Fetchmail declines to use TLS with the *next* user, but
> 4. gmx complains about not
On 24/11/2014 21:02, Frédéric Marchal wrote:
The best thing to do when debugging that kind of problem is to have a look at
the content of /etc/init.d/fetchmail, find the actual fetchmail command started
by the script and run the command manually from the shell.
Don't forget to remov
Le Monday 24 November 2014 20:27:25, Ron Leach a écrit :
> List, good evening,
>
> I've looked through the man fetchmail pages and I'd like to get some
> extra logging but I can't seem to pass the -vv parameter to fetchmail.
> Fetchmail starts as a daemon, and I
List, good evening,
We use Fetchmail to collect email from various addresses and
providers. The incoming mail is passed to Exim for delivery to
mailboxes, and served to local MUAs on the network using IMAP provided
by Dovecot. We've had this architecture in place since Debian Etch
(D4
ly noticed the difference in each
> .fetchmailrc. host1 old, had the file to log to, commented
>host2 new, had the file to log to, uncommented
>
> So on host2 logging went to the file...
> Gad what a bozo...
If you do go to a faster alternative to fetchmail, I strongly suggest
th
Brian writes:
> On Mon 11 Aug 2014 at 14:50:30 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> The oldhost is running exim4 light, while newhost is running
>> exim4-heavy.
>
> Exim is only involved after the mail is collected.
>
>> But still the configuration files look the same.. I'm not seeing a
>> reason why
.
>
> I'm afraid I have been screeching wolf when its only a very small
> kitten.
>
> Apparently, my mail is being retrieved... but in total silence.. or
> nearly so and I was dumb enough not to catch on for a bit.
Not sure if this helpful, but I call fetchmail like this
On 8/12/14, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness writes:
>> Use getmail.
>>
>> I have used mpop. getmail maintainer lurks around here, so that's what
>> I'm planning to use when I next stop pop DLing.
>
> No thanks. Fetchmail should be working. I
On Mon 11 Aug 2014 at 14:50:30 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> The oldhost is running exim4 light, while newhost is running
> exim4-heavy.
Exim is only involved after the mail is collected.
> But still the configuration files look the same.. I'm not seeing a
> reason why one is more verbose than th
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:25:52 -0400
Harry Putnam wrote:
> And yet something seems to be causing the verbose setting to produce
> insufficient output on the new host.
> harry > fetchmail -vvvac
> fetchmail: Old UID list from pop.newsguy.com:
> fetchmail:
Brian writes:
> On Mon 11 Aug 2014 at 11:25:52 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> AW writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:01:07 -0400
>> > Harry Putnam wrote:
>> >
>> > > Fetchmail is never a problem... and yet:
>> > > I&
101 - 200 of 2519 matches
Mail list logo
