Hello Jochen,
Am 2008-07-09 01:36:10, schrieb Jochen Antesberger:
> The device naming was changed. Instead of /dev/hda you've got /dev/sda
> now. To make it boot you'll have to adjust menu.lst to give the kernel the
> right argument for the boot partition. Also you'll have to change the
> entries
Am Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:00:46 +0200 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> Hello Anthony,
>
> Am 2008-06-30 10:14:02, schrieb Anthony Campbell:
>> I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
>> mwwage:
>>
>> "target filesystem doesn't have bootarg"
>>
>> This is followed by:
>> "/bin
Hello Anthony,
Am 2008-06-30 10:14:02, schrieb Anthony Campbell:
> I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
> mwwage:
>
> "target filesystem doesn't have bootarg"
>
> This is followed by:
> "/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off"
I am using Etch with 2.6.18
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:36:33AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 02 Jul 2008, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > On 02 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry, I hadn't read the e2label line properly. But I don't t
On 02 Jul 2008, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 02 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I hadn't read the e2label line properly. But I don't think it
> > > would affect the issue I encountered here, which was a change
On 02 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I hadn't read the e2label line properly. But I don't think it
> > would affect the issue I encountered here, which was a change in the
> > actual partition referred to. The label
On 02 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 09:09:00AM +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
>
> > I think you should be asking yourself how the old kernel boots with hdb9.
> > Grub numbering system starts from 0 so hd(0,0) is hda1 and hda(1,9) is
> > hdb10 etc. Are you sure you don't h
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 09:09:00AM +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
> I think you should be asking yourself how the old kernel boots with hdb9.
> Grub numbering system starts from 0 so hd(0,0) is hda1 and hda(1,9) is
> hdb10 etc. Are you sure you don't have another debian/linux install on
> hdb9 :).
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:37:19AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:40:12PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> > and did you use a vga= parm? And did that work?
>
> $ dmesg | grep vga\=791
> [0.00] Kernel command line: root=LABEL=sid ro vga=791
>
> $ uname -a
> L
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Sorry, I hadn't read the e2label line properly. But I don't think it
> would affect the issue I encountered here, which was a change in the
> actual partition referred to. The label would still be referring to
> the wrong partiti
Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 02 Jul 2008, Bob Cox wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 07:51:20 +0100, Anthony Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I don't understand label in this context. Where is it set?
This was explained by Florian Kulzer earlier in this thread. (It was
such a good explanation
On 02 Jul 2008, Bob Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 07:51:20 +0100, Anthony Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > I don't understand label in this context. Where is it set?
>
> This was explained by Florian Kulzer earlier in this thread. (It was
> such a good explanation I kept it
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:40:12PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> and did you use a vga= parm? And did that work?
$ dmesg | grep vga\=791
[0.00] Kernel command line: root=LABEL=sid ro vga=791
$ uname -a
Linux think 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Jun 12 16:26:30 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
Regard
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 07:51:20 +0100, Anthony Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I don't understand label in this context. Where is it set?
This was explained by Florian Kulzer earlier in this thread. (It was
such a good explanation I kept it for future reference!)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008
On 01 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:02:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> > Well, I finally found the answer but it's very odd. I don't think it
> > should work but it does. I put the "wrong" root entry in
> > /boot/grub/menu.lst. All previous kernels have had
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:02:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Well, I finally found the answer but it's very odd. I don't think it
> should work but it does. I put the "wrong" root entry in
> /boot/grub/menu.lst. All previous kernels have had /dev/hdb9 but this
> kernel seems to need /dev/h
On 01 Jul 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Anthony Campbell wrote:
>> On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:28:10PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>>>
> Uh-oh, speaking of initrds: I forgot that in my previous message; you
> should probably rebuild it if you cha
Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:28:10PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
Uh-oh, speaking of initrds: I forgot that in my previous message; you
should probably rebuild it if you change your fstab to labels or UUIDs.
How do you do that? I c
On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:28:10PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> > > Uh-oh, speaking of initrds: I forgot that in my previous message; you
> > > should probably rebuild it if you change your fstab to labels or UUIDs.
> >
> > How do you do that? I chang
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:28:10PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > Uh-oh, speaking of initrds: I forgot that in my previous message; you
> > should probably rebuild it if you change your fstab to labels or UUIDs.
>
> How do you do that? I changed to UUID and I got the same message with
> 2.6.2
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 15:28:10 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 30 Jun 2008, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 13:45:44 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > > >
On 30 Jun 2008, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 13:45:44 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > > I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
> > > >
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 13:45:44 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
> > > mwwage:
> > >
> > > "target filesystem doesn't
On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
> > mwwage:
> >
> > "target filesystem doesn't have bootarg"
> >
> > This is followed by:
> > "/bin/sh: can't access tty
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
> mwwage:
>
> "target filesystem doesn't have bootarg"
>
> This is followed by:
> "/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off"
>
> 2.6.23 still boots norm
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:50:03 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 30 Jun 2008, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
> > > mwwage:
> > >
> > > "target filesystem doe
On 30 Jun 2008, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:50:03AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> > On 30 Jun 2008, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> > No error messages. I do get:
> > aetting up linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 (2.6.25-6) ...
> > Running depmod.
> > Finding valid ramdisk cr
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:50:03AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 30 Jun 2008, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> No error messages. I do get:
> aetting up linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 (2.6.25-6) ...
> Running depmod.
> Finding valid ramdisk creators.
should be fine
> The kernel is corr
On 30 Jun 2008, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> > I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
> > mwwage:
> >
> > "target filesystem doesn't have bootarg"
> >
> > This is followed by:
> > "/bin/sh: can't access t
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
> mwwage:
>
> "target filesystem doesn't have bootarg"
>
> This is followed by:
> "/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off"
>
Mine works here, but wa
I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2 from Sid. Boot fails with a
mwwage:
"target filesystem doesn't have bootarg"
This is followed by:
"/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off"
2.6.23 still boots normally.
Google shows a number of people with similar problems, mainly on Ubuntu.
I a
Benedict Verheyen schreef:
I didn't use ocfs2 nor hostf to do what i wanted.
I moved the homedirectories to the uml and it works for me.
Regards,
Benedict
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benedict Verheyen schreef:
Hi,
i want to run ocfs2 to load a shared filesystem for 3 uml's.
ocfs2 allows 2 or more uml's to load the same filesystem so it should
solve the limitations of hostfs.
Anyway, i compiled ocfs2 support into the kernel and made a
/etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf file.
Howe
Hi,
i want to run ocfs2 to load a shared filesystem for 3 uml's.
ocfs2 allows 2 or more uml's to load the same filesystem so it should solve
the limitations of hostfs.
Anyway, i compiled ocfs2 support into the kernel and made a
/etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf file.
However, when i want to start th
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 05:45:46PM +, Paladin wrote:
> > exotic tests that take a couple of hours to get to. I cut back
> > the cpu/memory speed in the BIOS and mine now runs solidly, but
>
> In the mean while, I ran memtest86 over night and it doesn't show
> any error report! I ran all th
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:26:40 -0800
Michael Epting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have one of these boards and have problems with memory errors.
> Have
> you tried running a memory test (before booting, such as the one
> on the Linux BBC) overnight? Mine tends to fail on the more
> exotic test
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 05:00:49PM +, Paladin wrote:
> From some time now I've been experiencing some problems with my sarge
> debian box, ranging from gcc crashes (any of the three versions I have
> installed), to corrupted files (in particular the /var/dpkg/status),
> and I don't know how to
Hi to all!
>From some time now I've been experiencing some problems with my
sarge debian box, ranging from gcc crashes (any of the three
versions I have installed), to corrupted files (in particular the
/var/dpkg/status), and I don't know how to discover where the
problem is! I've even used the me
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 20:11:44 +0100
Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 the mental interface of
> Jacob S. told:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 11:48:03 -0600 (CST)
> > Russ Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > My hard drive is set up with /dev/hda1 /boot
> > >
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 the mental interface of
Jacob S. told:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 11:48:03 -0600 (CST)
> Russ Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My hard drive is set up with /dev/hda1 /boot
> > and /dev/hda2 /
> > /dev/hda3 is my swap space.
> >
> > When I edit /etc/fstab to set /dev/hda2
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 11:48:03 -0600 (CST)
Russ Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My hard drive is set up with /dev/hda1 /boot
> and /dev/hda2 /
> /dev/hda3 is my swap space.
>
> When I edit /etc/fstab to set /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda1 to ext3 instead
> of ext2, I get the error:
> kernel: ext3: No
My hard drive is set up with /dev/hda1 /boot
and /dev/hda2 /
/dev/hda3 is my swap space.
When I edit /etc/fstab to set /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda1 to ext3 instead
of ext2, I get the error:
kernel: ext3: No journal on filesystem on ide0(3,1)
My file /etc/mtab shows /dev/hda2 mounted as ext3, but /d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 08:54 pm, axacheng wrote:
> .i have 2 partition and 1 swap in my disk
> love:/# df -alhT
> FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda3 xfs 36G 1.2G 35G 4% /
> /dev/hda1 xfs
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:54:13AM +0800, axacheng wrote:
> love:/# xfs_repair /dev/hda1
> xfs_repair: /dev/hda1 contains a mounted filesystem
> fatal error -- couldn't initialize XFS library
> love:/# xfs_repair /dev/hda1
>
> those mean,i should be use boot my system from cdrom than use
> xfs_re
.i have 2 partition and 1 swap in my disk
love:/# df -alhT
FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda3 xfs 36G 1.2G 35G 4% /
/dev/hda1 xfs 89M 8.5M 80M 10% /boot
i tried xfs_repair to check/repair my /dev/hda1 that have a warning appeared on!
l
From: "axacheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello list :
> when i using "xfs_repair" to repair my filesystem, i got a
notic as following:
>
> love:/# xfs_repair /dev/hda
> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> bad primary superblock - bad magic number !!!
>
> what's mean of "bad primary superblo
axacheng said:
> Hello list :
> when i using "xfs_repair" to repair my filesystem, i got a notic as
> following:
>
> love:/# xfs_repair /dev/hda
> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> bad primary superblock - bad magic number !!!
>
> what's mean of "bad primary superblock - bad ma
Hello list :
when i using "xfs_repair" to repair my filesystem, i got a notic as following:
love:/# xfs_repair /dev/hda
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
bad primary superblock - bad magic number !!!
what's mean of "bad primary superblock - bad magic number !!!"
--
Trust & Uniq
Hi Stefan.
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:21:59 -0500
Michael Heironimus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:16:20PM -0500, Stefan Sten wrote:
> > I followed the instructions at the promt tried with 'mount -n -o
> > remount,rw /' and then 'e2fsck dev/hda1'.
>
> If at all possible yo
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:16:20PM -0500, Stefan Sten wrote:
> I followed the instructions at the promt tried with 'mount -n -o
> remount,rw /' and then 'e2fsck dev/hda1'.
If at all possible you should boot from an emergency disk/CD. In any
case, it is dangerous to run fsck on a filesystem that i
Hi,
I just got myself in trouble. In some strange way, when I fired up the machine I got:
"/dev/hda1 contains a file system with errors, check forced. Entry
'20020^@19190017.ksyms in var/log/ksymoops (159509) has illegal characters in its
name. fsck failed"
I followed the instructions at the
G'day all,
I had a few problems with a hard drive.. lots of INODE corrections
and I thought it was dying but its stop finding errors and seems OK,
however there is a whole bunch of stuff in Lost+fond that I can't delete!
I tried chmod ing and chown ing (as root) the but I get the message
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Nuno Carvalho wrote:
> I'm having serials problems with my linux partition ! :(( It happened
> when the power was down ! :((
>
> That's what appears:
>
> - cut here --
> Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98)
> /dev/hda2 contains a file system with
ebian-devel@lists.debian.org
Date: Sunday, October 18, 1998 5:18 AM
Subject: [HELP]: FILESYSTEM ERROR ! :
>Hi,
>
> I'm having serials problems with my linux partition ! :(( It happened
>when the power was down ! :((
>
> That's what appears:
>
>- cut here -
Hi,
I'm having serials problems with my linux partition ! :(( It happened
when the power was down ! :((
That's what appears:
- cut here --
Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98)
/dev/hda2 contains a file system with errors, check failed
/dev/hda2: Unattached inode 70007
55 matches
Mail list logo
