On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 6:26 AM Curt wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-22, Reid wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry I irked you so much Curt, but you don't have to be rude.
>
> I'm Curt.
Let's be serious. You be Frank and I'll be Earnest.
On 2024-04-22, Reid wrote:
>
> I'm sorry I irked you so much Curt, but you don't have to be rude.
I'm Curt.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:02:09PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> >> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
> >> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
> > but perhaps without all the decepti
>> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
>> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
>> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
> but perhaps without all the deception crap, unless you really mean
> to impugn the developers' motives.
Yu
ents - where were they - under the /firmware
> directory?
Thank you for the very helpful reply Andrew.
I always use Debian's "Graphical Installer" option.
I'm not sure what Calamares is, but will look into it.
However, I will also re-word what I now believe to be the primary
- Original message -
From: Curt
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
>
>> How can you be taken seriously when you can't even wrap your lines
>> according to our venerable guidelines?
>> Get a popular setting going, buddy.
>>
>> And, though it's true I extolled Proust recently, being succinct
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:31:03AM -0700, Reid wrote:
> Debian's policy change on non-free-firmware has made much of the Debian.org
> website very misleading, and some Debian OS installers have become very
> Free Software UNfriendly and deceptive. The following is my experience,
>
On 2024-04-22, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> I endure this on many other mailing lists unrelated to Debian,
> particularly from groups.io that have a Web interface.
It's a violation of Debian mailing list posting rules, guidelines, and
tips.
It irks me that in certain cases these guidelines are evoke
* On 2024 22 Apr 09:39 -0500, Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
> > You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
> > release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
> > not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy",
On 2024-04-22, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
>
>> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
>>> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
>>> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
>>> not what the Debian.or
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
>> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
>> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
>> not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We
On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
> not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We
> Are / What We Do" pages are current
On Sun Apr 21, 2024 at 9:58 PM BST, Reid wrote:
> If the Installers are not ALL going to give users the choice to opt-in
> or opt-out of non-free components, then those above-mentioned
> promotional pages really need to be updated so as to not be misleading
> users.
I'm sure the Debian WWW team wo
tional pages really need to be
> updated so as to not be misleading users.
I'm saying that _this hasn't changed_ between Bullseye and Bookworm.
Reading the release notes or the installation guide has been very
strongly recommended practice for a _very_ long time; and the
_documented_
On Sun 21 Apr 2024 at 21:59:21 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
>
> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
but perhaps without all the deception crap, un
> Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
Stefan
s
>> of the new policy on the download pages.
>
> Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
> extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
> It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
inent warnings
>> of the new policy on the download pages.
>
> Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
> extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
> It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
do you think the debian gods are listening
ges.
Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
Stefan
You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is not
what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We Are /
What We Do" pages are currently promoting Debian as.
That's not
omatically installing 29 non-free components with neither
> permission nor warning is not Free Software friendly).
Did you look through the installation guide, reading which before
installing Debian is _highly recommended_?
Out of Bookworm's installation guide:
Section 2.2 "Devices Requirin
Debian's policy change on non-free-firmware has made much of the Debian.org
website very misleading, and some Debian OS installers have become very Free
Software UNfriendly and deceptive. The following is my experience, and the
reasons why I believe Debian must re-word their promotiona
On Mon 22 Jan 2024 at 00:05:08 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 21/01/2024 23:33, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > The repair:
> >
> > wget
> > http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb
> >
> > sudo dpkg
On 21/01/2024 23:33, Geert Stappers wrote:
The repair:
wget
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb
sudo dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html
On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 17:33:57 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> [7.854942] iwlwifi :02:00.0: reporting RF_KILL (radio disabled)
> [7.860452] iwlwifi :02:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio.
> [8.356275] iwlwifi :02:00.0 wlp2s0: renamed from wlan0
Run rfkill and, if i
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Here on a laptop does `ip link` see a WIFI device,
> but `nmcli device` does not.
>
> How to make NetworkManager aware of a WIFI device?
>
Have the firmware for WIFI card ins
On 2023-12-06 17:20:16, Sven Joachim wrote:
Maintainer uploads to (old)stable are staged in proposed-updates, so you
would have to enable bookworm-proposed-updates to install the new
version of firmware-nvidia-gsp.
I missed the non-free-firmware for bookworm-updates and
bookworm-proposed
On 2023-12-06 15:24 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I have tried to upgrade to 12.3, but apparently the dependencies
> of the new nvidia-kernel-dkms version cannot be fulfilled.
> firmware-nvidia-gsp (= 525.147.05) is missing. I tried several
> repositories.
Note that Debian 12.3
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:45:41PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 2023-12-06 15:55:58, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> >
> > Which ones?
> >
>
> ftp.de.debian.org
> ftp2.de.debian.org
> deb.debian.org
>
> > That package is in the non-free-firmwa
On 2023-12-06 15:55:58, Michael Kjörling wrote:
Which ones?
ftp.de.debian.org
ftp2.de.debian.org
deb.debian.org
That package is in the non-free-firmware component; are you bringing
that in?
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/firmware-nvidia-gsp
There is still the old version
On 6 Dec 2023 15:24 +0100, from harald.dun...@aixigo.com (Harald Dunkel):
> I have tried to upgrade to 12.3, but apparently the dependencies
> of the new nvidia-kernel-dkms version cannot be fulfilled.
> firmware-nvidia-gsp (= 525.147.05) is missing. I tried several
> repositories.
Hi folks,
I have tried to upgrade to 12.3, but apparently the dependencies
of the new nvidia-kernel-dkms version cannot be fulfilled.
firmware-nvidia-gsp (= 525.147.05) is missing. I tried several
repositories.
Hopefully I am not too blind to find the bug report (the new
version fixes a CVE, ie
would have thought you'd have firmware-ath9k-htc installed to
> run that device. You could download it from:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=firmware&searchon=names&suite=sid§ion=all
> by means of your old installation if necessary.
>
> Package firmwa
001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>
> >From above outut i figure out my adapter is:
> Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0cf3:9271 Qualcomm Atheros Communications AR9271
> 802.11n
I would have thought yo
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Marco M. wrote:
> Am 01.11.2023 um 13:59:51 Uhr schrieb Martin:
>
> Do you have USB NICs?
> Does your computer has an Ethernet NIC (wired)?
>
> Then use them for installing the packages.
I have one computer with wifi connection to internet.
The problem i
Am 01.11.2023 um 13:59:51 Uhr schrieb Martin:
> The problem is that my wifi receiver is not recognized by installer.
Do you have USB NICs?
Does your computer has an Ethernet NIC (wired)?
Then use them for installing the packages.
> My wifi adapter is TP-LINK TL-WN722N
Relevant is the USB-ID/PC
Hello,
I am currently using Sid version of Debian - in /etc/apt/sources.list i have:
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
non-free-firmware
non-free and non-free-firmware I have because of drivers I need for my machine
(most acute is wifi receiver, but i guess for
ve been
>> routine
>> for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU installed,
>> and
>> whether or not a firmware-brand-graphics .deb exists and is installed
>> for it.
> It would be useful to give an example of these messages, as well as a
> li
unning a GUI) lend themselves better toward a server installation
than to a workstation setup.
> It turns out you need free firmware to use wifi? But I can use wifi, but
> only with some DE. I just can't use it just from the start without DE.
"Non-free" firmware. Often readily dist
#x27;t see it helping.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=initramfs-tools-core;dist=unstable
The way I see it, it's not a bug. Initramfs-tools is not responsible for
deciding what firmware a specific device or machine needs. It is only
reporting that a module to be included lists
d_modname\\>" /proc/modules
> "${CONFDIR}/modules"; then
> echo "W: Possible missing firmware
> /lib/firmware/${firmware} for module
> fi
Mostly gibberish to this non-programmer. Comment out what, 3 lines? 1? 2? The
one
I'm loo
all goes wrong.
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
4322/23580 18%
if grep -q "^$kmod_modname\\>" /proc/modules
"${CONFDIR}/modules"; then
echo "W: Possible missing firmware
/lib/firmware/${firmware} for module
fi
ve been
>> routine
>> for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU installed,
>> and
>> whether or not a firmware-brand-graphics .deb exists and is installed
>> for it.
> It would be useful to give an example of these messages, as well as a
> l
ve been
>> routine
>> for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU installed,
>> and
>> whether or not a firmware-brand-graphics .deb exists and is installed
>> for it.
> It would be useful to give an example of these messages, as well as a
&
Hi Vladimir,
As you've found, Debian doesn't yet distribute firmware for the Cirrus
CS35L41, although there is an open bugreport to add support for it
that you can subscribe to:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031912
The recommended symlinks to create after installin
Hi,
What did you try to accomplish?
install debian bookworm on Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6
What has happened (wrongly) instead?
a) multiple errors in boot log saying 'failed to load
cirrus/cs35l41...wmf', and after fix attempt 'invalid magic' and 'Cannot
Initialize Firmwa
grep MODULES /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
> # MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ]
> MODULES=dep
> #
>
> These many per transaction $SUBJECT initrd construction messages have been
> routine
> for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU instal
| list ]
MODULES=dep
#
These many per transaction $SUBJECT initrd construction messages have been
routine
for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU installed, and
whether or not a firmware-brand-graphics .deb exists and is installed for it. Is
there something that can be
omething like
>Detected ethernet HW, renamed to eth0 (succeed)
>then... :
>Failed to load mt7821 firmware (lots of this)
>hardware init failed
>[ loaded modules]
>[ stack trace ]
>
>rfkill
>wiphy
>ieee802
>
>
>Any ideas or workaround for this?
There's a bug i
he installer (Net or DVD) tries to detect the HW, the
> installer
> >stops blank.
> >
> >The last thing I see in dmesg is something like
> >Detected ethernet HW, renamed to eth0 (succeed)
> >then... :
> >Failed to load mt7821 firmware (lots of this)
>
On Wed 29 Mar 2023 at 09:39:01 (-0600), Ismael Farfán wrote:
> I tried with these 2 installers:
> 7da925a34f6f7ab6e39ad64514139afb debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> 547c0e2f85ec04ffec6d08a1e84c64e6
> debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-netinst.iso
>
> both con
escribió:
>
> > Could it be Debian hasn't got your firmware in any of its installations?
> > That points at very new firmware.
> >
> >
> The issue is that the installation should continue anyway and get packages
> from the DVD, instead the installer hangs ther
El mié, 29 mar 2023 a la(s) 10:33, Jude DaShiell (jdash...@panix.com)
escribió:
> Could it be Debian hasn't got your firmware in any of its installations?
> That points at very new firmware.
>
>
The issue is that the installation should continue anyway and get packages
from the
Could it be Debian hasn't got your firmware in any of its installations?
That points at very new firmware.
-- Jude "There are four boxes to be used in
defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and amo. Please use in that
order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Ismael Far
I tried with these 2 installers:
7da925a34f6f7ab6e39ad64514139afb debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-DVD-1.iso
547c0e2f85ec04ffec6d08a1e84c64e6
debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-netinst.iso
both contain firmware-misc-nonfree_20230117-2_all.deb
which is, I guess, where it's trying to loa
in dmesg is something like
> Detected ethernet HW, renamed to eth0 (succeed)
> then... :
> Failed to load mt7821 firmware (lots of this)
> hardware init failed
> [ loaded modules]
> [ stack trace ]
>
> rfkill
> wiphy
> ieee802
>
>
> Any ideas or workaround for thi
load mt7821 firmware (lots of this)
hardware init failed
[ loaded modules]
[ stack trace ]
rfkill
wiphy
ieee802
Any ideas or workaround for this?
I also tried with the advanced installer from the DVD but it always wants
to try detecting the network HW and stops there.
--
Do not let me induce y
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:24:00PM +0800, lsg wrote:
> installer seems very buggy
>
> bullseye installer can't find firmware after i insert usb disk
>
> after lots of frustration and effort, i realize i shall copy firmware to
> sda1, which use vfat FS, then installer c
installer seems very buggy
bullseye installer can't find firmware after i insert usb disk
after lots of frustration and effort, i realize i shall copy firmware to
sda1, which use vfat FS, then installer can get firmware without
prompting me.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:18:30 +0100
Computer Enthusiastic wrote:
> The web page used to search packages in Debian repositories at:
>
> https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
>
> seems not to search for packages in the recently created
> "non-free-firmware"
Hello,
The web page used to search packages in Debian repositories at:
https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
seems not to search for packages in the recently created
"non-free-firmware" section for bookwork and sid.
To whom this should be reported ?
Thanks.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:31:27 +
piorunz wrote:
> On 10/02/2023 04:29, Gary Dale wrote:
> > Thanks. That points then to a problem with the package.debian.org
> > page - it doesn't seem to search the new section. I found the
> > announcement when I searched for debia
On 10/02/2023 04:29, Gary Dale wrote:
Thanks. That points then to a problem with the package.debian.org page -
it doesn't seem to search the new section. I found the announcement when
I searched for debian non-free firmware. Right now if you don't know it
exists, you can'
ter that used to use it. That really only required downloading
the correct firmware package that contained the brcmfmac module. That
package no longer exists in Bookworm.
Would that be firmware-brcm80211?
That still exists in bookworm; it's just been moved to the new
non-free-firmware
On 2023-02-09 22:07, piorunz wrote:
On 10/02/2023 02:39, Gary Dale wrote:
Interestingly the device works in Bullseye as I installed Bullseye on
the computer that used to use it. That really only required
downloading the correct firmware package that contained the brcmfmac
module. That package
ice works in Bullseye as I installed Bullseye on
> the computer that used to use it. That really only required downloading
> the correct firmware package that contained the brcmfmac module. That
> package no longer exists in Bookworm.
Would that be firmware-brcm80211?
That still exists
On 10/02/2023 02:39, Gary Dale wrote:
Interestingly the device works in Bullseye as I installed Bullseye on
the computer that used to use it. That really only required downloading
the correct firmware package that contained the brcmfmac module. That
package no longer exists in Bookworm.
All
,uas
I'm using KDE/Plasma as my desktop and plasma-nm is loaded. However it
too doesn't seem to think that there is a wifi network.
Interestingly the device works in Bullseye as I installed Bullseye on
the computer that used to use it. That really only required downloading
the corr
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 04:03:51 -0800
"Rick Thomas" wrote:
Hello Rick,
>So what do I need to add to my sources.list file to get them back now?
There was an announcement a few days ago, saying what to do. Typically,
I cannot find it ATM.
However, you simply need to add;
non-fre
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 23:21, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I've got a couple of Debian systems that (for various reasons) are running
> "testing" or "sid".
> I recently did
> apt update && apt upgrade && aptitude search '~o'
&
I've got a couple of Debian systems that (for various reasons) are running
"testing" or "sid". I recently did
apt update && apt upgrade && aptitude search '~o'
on these machines and found that a number of firmware packages are con
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 21:19:55 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Sorry, that was my fault. I should have given the link to outcome of
> the vote as well, it was Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in
> installer, one installer"[1].
Thank you. My question is answered.
--
ven the link to outcome of
the vote as well, it was Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in
installer, one installer"[1].
Cheers,
Sven
1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2022/10/msg1.html
ller to do so. However, I am not
familiar enough with Debian processes to determine which language was
approved, so I could not determine the answer to my question.
> If you are making a wholly new install, I suspect that the change
> will be made for you if the need for non-free firmware is detected
free
> >
> > after:
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
> > non-free-firmware
>
> Will the Debian Installer make this change? And under what
> circumstances will it do so?
>
Hi Charles,
This all follows on the General Resol
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:09:27 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> To use the new section, edit sources.list like this:
>
> before:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
>
> after:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
>
Some news for you who are running unstable or testing/bookworm and have
firmware packages installed from non-free (most users who do not run
Debian in a VM probably have): these firmware packages are being moved
to a new section non-free-firmware, and you should update your
sources.list(5) entries
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 06:51:47PM +0800, lsg wrote:
> but i use hard disk installation method, i put firmware in same place as iso
> image, installer can locate firmware without prompting me
>
Better to use the unofficial .iso image that includes firmware from the start
but i use hard disk installation method, i put firmware in same place as
iso image, installer can locate firmware without prompting me
local10 wrote:
> Dec 7, 2022, 15:42 by to...@tuxteam.de:
>> So a rough approximation to an answer would be "yes".
> That was my thought as well but I was hoping maybe there was some
> automagical way it could refresh itself in RAM.
You can see firmware as kind-of an
On Wed 07 Dec 2022 at 17:43:16 (+0100), local10 wrote:
> That was my thought as well but I was hoping maybe there was some automagical
> way it could refresh itself in RAM.
Downloading firmware and installing it is bread and butter for the
debian-installer, but you have to be able to remo
Dec 7, 2022, 15:42 by to...@tuxteam.de:
> So a rough approximation to an answer would be "yes".
>
That was my thought as well but I was hoping maybe there was some automagical
way it could refresh itself in RAM.
Regards,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 03:52:26PM +0100, local10 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is reboot required after updating firmware-amd-graphics for the updates to
> take effect?
I'd expect the firmware to be loaded when the driver is loaded.
You might try to unload the relevant driver (probably so
Hi,
Is reboot required after updating firmware-amd-graphics for the updates to take
effect?
Regards,
# cat /etc/debian_version && uname -a
bookworm/sid
Linux tst 6.0.0-5-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.0.10-1 (2022-11-26)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)
BIOS Version/Date Insyde Corp. V1.09, 2014-07-17
Though it is an old laptop, I was confident that Debian 11 would be
able to bring her to its past glory, and it did! with the exception of
the the Bluetooth capability.
I 'apt install firmware-atheros'
)
BIOS Version/Date Insyde Corp. V1.09, 2014-07-17
Though it is an old laptop, I was confident that Debian 11 would be able
to bring her to its past glory, and it did! with the exception of the
the Bluetooth capability.
I 'apt install firmware-atheros', but the result were most una
On 05/10/2022 05:18, David Wright wrote:
On Mon 03 Oct 2022 at 13:27:13 (-0600), Charles Curley wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 20:53:46 +0300 Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Actually I think I found out what was happening:
- for failed connection attempts trough SSH - the notebook
sometimes switches
On Mon 03 Oct 2022 at 13:27:13 (-0600), Charles Curley wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 20:53:46 +0300 Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>
> > Actually I think I found out what was happening:
> >- for failed connection attempts trough SSH - the notebook
> > sometimes switches to suspend/sleep mode and turns
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 at 06:27, Charles Curley
wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 20:53:46 +0300 Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>>- for high latency - 100 ms and sometimes even more - this problem
>> is in my router probably (I installed OpenWrt on it, the issue may be
>> in my local environment, busy WiFi
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 20:53:46 +0300
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/
>
> it seems that version 72 is not available but I'll try with 71.
I wouldn't bother. I agree with Stefan Monnier
's obse
from kernel log:
[3.453655] iwlwifi :00:14.3: firmware: failed to load
iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-hr-b0-72.ucode (-2)
[3.453695] firmware_class: See https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware
for information about missing firmware
[3.454449] iwlwifi :00:14.3: firmware: failed to load
iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-hr
On 10/3/22 20:00, Stefan Monnier wrote:
These are the entries from kernel log:
[3.453655] iwlwifi :00:14.3: firmware: failed to load
iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-hr-b0-72.ucode (-2)
[3.453695] firmware_class: See https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware for
information about missing firmware
X axis -l unlock
}
This is related to my impatience rather than any system fault.
> These are the entries from kernel log:
>
> [3.453655] iwlwifi :00:14.3: firmware: failed to load
> iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-hr-b0-72.ucode (-2)
> [3.453695] firmware_class: See https://wiki.de
> These are the entries from kernel log:
>
> [3.453655] iwlwifi :00:14.3: firmware: failed to load
> iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-hr-b0-72.ucode (-2)
> [3.453695] firmware_class: See https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware for
> information about missing firmware
> [3.454449]
book
automatically to my network.
What are you using to connect the laptop to a network? Network Manager?
Network manager through applet in KDE.
In kernel log are visible messages for unsuccessful attempts to
load firmware files.
Do those correlate with successful or unsuccessful attempts
On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 12:41:14 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> And that the SSH connection is (at least part of) what seems to be
> dropping out, which is being interpreted as evidence that there's a
> problem with the wireless connection.
Good point. Let's see if the original poster (OP) clarifies th
On 2022-10-02 at 12:33, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 11:49:14 +0300
> Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>
>> I have a notebook (Lenovo) with Intel's WiFi and I have minor issues
>> with it - sometimes works as expected but sometimes I cannot connect
>> to the notebook at first attempt thro
ork, and then check that you have a working network
before you try SSH?
What are you using to connect the laptop to a network? Network Manager?
> In kernel log are visible messages for unsuccessful attempts to
> load firmware files.
Do those correlate with successful or unsuccessful attem
On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 11:49:14 +0300
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Hello Georgi,
>thanks for the advice.
YW. Sadly, that's all the advice I can offer - I have no experience of
using SSH over WiFi, let alone the specific driver set you specified
(nothing here requires those drivers). Maybe somebody el
as expected but sometimes I cannot connect to
the notebook at first attempt throw SSH or sometimes latency is high. In
kernel log are visible messages for unsuccessful attempts to load
firmware files.
Anyway, I'll try to use upstream's firmware files for Linux kernel and
if these issu
1 - 100 of 953 matches
Mail list logo
