Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]

1999-03-06 Thread Ed Cogburn
Rick Macdonald wrote: George Bonser wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote: This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always been afraid to do that. Yes, you can do that.

Re: forcing dselect to downgrade

1999-03-06 Thread Pedro Guerreiro
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 06:21:39PM -0800, George Bonser wrote: You can not do it in dselect. Just ftp the package to your system and use dpkg like this: dpkg --install --force-downgrade package.deb I just do this: dpkg --install package.deb It gives a warning about downgrading to a

forcing dselect to downgrade

1999-03-05 Thread Tommy
I have been experiencing some problems due to my carelessly mixing releases. In order to fix the problem I would like to bring my system back to a state where only Stable components from my Debian 2.0 cd are on it, so that everything works correctly. And I can move forward from there if I choose.

Re: forcing dselect to downgrade

1999-03-05 Thread Stephen Pitts
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 09:17:52PM -0500, Tommy wrote: I have been experiencing some problems due to my carelessly mixing releases. In order to fix the problem I would like to bring my system back to a state where only Stable components from my Debian 2.0 cd are on it, so that everything

Re: forcing dselect to downgrade

1999-03-05 Thread Tommy
Stephen Pitts wrote: You don't. Downgrading packages has undefined results. A better option would be to tell the list about your problems and we'll help you fix them -- Currently dselect marks 90% of the package on my system as broken. And there are a lot of them. I tried switching to

dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]

1999-03-05 Thread Rick Macdonald
Tommy wrote: When I upgraded the package lists of stable, unstable, contrib, and non-free dselect ... This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always been afraid to do that. -- ...RickM...

Re: forcing dselect to downgrade

1999-03-05 Thread Stephen Pitts
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 10:42:23PM -0500, Tommy wrote: Stephen Pitts wrote: You don't. Downgrading packages has undefined results. A better option would be to tell the list about your problems and we'll help you fix them -- Currently dselect marks 90% of the package on my system

Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]

1999-03-05 Thread Jim Foltz
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 08:01:43PM -0800, George Bonser wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote: This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always been afraid to do that. Yes, you can do

Re: forcing dselect to downgrade

1999-03-05 Thread Marshall Savage
I have been following your thread you have my sympathy. I'm too ignorant to have any ideas or suggestions. Your problems sound like mine except on a bigger scale. The Debian people keep claiming that dpkg dselect are so great but in my experience they are at best medium in practice.

Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]

1999-03-05 Thread Rick Macdonald
George Bonser wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote: This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always been afraid to do that. Yes, you can do that. Just make sure you go in the

Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]

1999-03-05 Thread Rick Macdonald
George Bonser wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote: Does it merge stable and unstable and just show the newest version of each package, Yes. or keep them separate so I can choose? No Hmmm, that doesn't seem much different than if you just define unstable, except for

Re: forcing dselect to downgrade

1999-03-05 Thread Tommy
Marshall Savage wrote: I have been following your thread you have my sympathy. I'm too ignorant to have any ideas or suggestions. Your problems sound like mine except on a bigger scale. The Debian people keep claiming that dpkg dselect are so great but in my experience they are at best

Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]

1999-03-05 Thread Rick Macdonald
George Bonser wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote: Hmmm, that doesn't seem much different than if you just define unstable, except for packages that are only in one or the other. The intersection of stable and unstable would just be the same as unstable anyway. Right? For

Re: forcing dselect to downgrade

1999-03-05 Thread Ed Cogburn
Stephen Pitts wrote: On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 09:17:52PM -0500, Tommy wrote: I have been experiencing some problems due to my carelessly mixing releases. In order to fix the problem I would like to bring my system back to a state where only Stable components from my Debian 2.0 cd are on

Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]

1999-03-05 Thread Ed Cogburn
Rick Macdonald wrote: Tommy wrote: When I upgraded the package lists of stable, unstable, contrib, and non-free dselect ... This is something that I've always wondered about. Can you actually tell dselect about both stable and unstable at the same time? I've always been afraid to do