Hi.
Way at the end of the build process, when I already have the linux-image
deb ready to install, it stops with the following error message:
-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
install -m 644 Documentation/tips.txt -t
David Baron wrote:
Building rt patched kernel using:
make-kpkg --append-to-version -davidb-rt kernel_image
snip
Whatif you did:
make-kpkg --revision 1 --append-to-version -davidb-rt kernel_image
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Building rt patched kernel using:
make-kpkg --append-to-version -davidb-rt kernel_image
dpkg-gencontrol -DArchitecture=i386 -isp \
-plinux-image-2.6.29-davidb-rt -
P/usr/src/linux/debian/linux-image-2.6.29-davidb-rt/
dpkg-gencontrol: error: package
Question: How accurate is the mini HOW TO at the below quoted site? It
seems not to have been updated for 2.6 series kernels. Is there a better
tutorial?
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
I have the : http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/
Running Debian Unstable
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:13 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and
leave the others. A lot quicker
SNIP
As for the time 'saved', while the compile is chugging
Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and
leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not
used!
How do I know what to change from m to no? If it does not appear on lsmod?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and
leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not
used!
How do I know what to change from m to no? If it does not appear on
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:13:57AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:38:07PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and
leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not
used!
How
David Baron:
Since I am compiling it anyway, why not compile the modules that I need and
leave the others. A lot quicker and less disk space eaten up for stuff not
used!
A good idea.
How do I know what to change from m to no? If it does not appear on lsmod?
It depends. For hardware
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.15 kernel under a stable system using
the debian source packages.
It compiles fine, but when trying to build the actual binary packages
(i.e. debian/rules binary), it fails like this:
for dir in Config docs examples ruleset scripts pkg po; do
Re my earlier post:
So how does this look as a recipe for rebuilding my 2.6.8-2-386
kernel from source:
apt-get install kernel-tree-2.6.8
apt-get install pcmcia-source
cd /usr/src
tar jxf kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2
tar -xvzf pcmcia-cs.tar.gz
cd
I have just done my first Debian install, and one of the things I
want to do before I declare it complete is to make sure I can
recreate the kernel from source so that I know I have the source
for what I am running on hand..
I am doing this on a 233MHz 'Mobile Pentium MMX', and so during
the
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:32:02PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
I have just done my first Debian install, and one of the things I
want to do before I declare it complete is to make sure I can
recreate the kernel from source so that I know I have the source
for what I am running on hand..
I am doing
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:32:02PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
I have just done my first Debian install, and one of the things I
want to do before I declare it complete is to make sure I can
recreate the kernel from source so that I know I have the source
for what I am running on hand..
It can
Great, that was the clue I needed - thanks!
So how does this look as a recipe for rebuilding my 2.6.8-2-386
kernel from source:
apt-get install kernel-tree-2.6.8
apt-get install pcmcia-source
cd /usr/src
tar jxf kernel-source-2.6.8.tar.bz2
tar -xvzf
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 06:38:34AM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
I have just done my first Debian install, and one of the things I
want to do before I declare it complete is to make sure I can
recreate the kernel from source so that I know I have the source
for what I am running on hand..
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:06:51PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
Great, that was the clue I needed - thanks!
So how does this look as a recipe for rebuilding my 2.6.8-2-386
kernel from source:
apt-get install kernel-tree-2.6.8
apt-get install pcmcia-source
cd /usr/src
Jon D. Irish wrote:
I am trying to build a kernel off of 2.6.12.3 I want to do this to get
sound working. Thus, I downloaded everything from www.kernel.org
http://www.kernel.org/ and uncompressed it to /usr/src. Upon running
make xconfig I load the default debian config from /boot.Next, I go
Jon D. Irish wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the help! It fixed my problem and I was able to finish
compiling the kernel. I installed it and tried to boot to it, but I
keep getting a kernel panic. This stinks because right before the
panic I can see ALSA discovering the sound card. The error
Jon D. Irish wrote:
I am trying to build a kernel off of 2.6.12.3 I want to do this to get
sound working. Thus, I downloaded everything from www.kernel.org
http://www.kernel.org/ and uncompressed it to /usr/src. Upon running
make xconfig I load the default debian config from /boot.Next, I go
jon, i don't know where you got the instructions for
building that kernel, but that is not the way i have
read about and have followed instructions from the
kernel sites i have followed.
use your HOWTO's about building a kernel and try
again..
good luck and Peace.ed
Hello,
I need the kernel-build-2.6.8 package for arch. i386 in order to compile
some kernel modules. However, it seems that there is no kernel-build-2.6.8
package available for i386.
What can I do? are there any alternative packages available?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
I need the kernel-build-2.6.8 package for arch. i386 in order to compile
some kernel modules. However, it seems that there is no kernel-build-2.6.8
package available for i386.
What can I do? are there any alternative packages available?
Regards,
Saman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 7/19/05, Saman Ghannadzadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I need the kernel-build-2.6.8 package for arch. i386 in order to compile
some kernel modules. However, it seems that there is no kernel-build-2.6.8
package available for i386.
What can I do? are there any alternative packages
Hi Leute!
Ich wollte 2.6.12 ausprobieren und bin auf ein merkwuerdiges Problem
gestossen:
Das uebersetzten geht glatt, hab ich aber den Kernel in den Lilo und
versuche zu booten bekomme ich 'nen -- crc error --. Also hab ich alle
Optimierungen zurueckgenommen und neu uebersetzt -- crc error --.
Also sprach Richard Mittendorfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sun, 19 Jun 2005
14:04:06 +0200):
hmm? Was ist da kaputtgegangen? Habt Ihr eine Idee?
Da war was ordentlich hinueber. Was genau kann ich nicht sagen denn ein
altes Backup hat's gerichtet :)
Uebrigens: der 12er kernel gefaellt mir, alles
When trying to install the kernel image I get numerous 'unresolved
symbols' errors - could somebody explain why (I had presumed the 'make
menuconfig' and subsequent 'make-kpkg' would have ensured all
dependencies were resolved) and whether I can ignore them (I presume
not).
Thanks, Michael
Here's
Using make menuconfig, initrd set to built-in under device drivers /
block devices
After configuring run make-kpkg buildpackage following debs produced:
kernel-doc-2.6.7_10.00.Custom_all.deb
kernel-image-2.6.7_10.00.Custom_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.7_10.00.Custom_i386.deb
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:21:30PM +0100, robin wrote:
Using make menuconfig, initrd set to built-in under device drivers /
block devices
You don't need an initrd for kernels you compile yourself. Remove it, and
ensure you compile in (statically) support for block IDE, and your
filesystem(s).
In the interests of (trying) to read my macdisk, I decided to build a
new kernel using Sid/Sarge source.
Why do computers hate me so?
Look what happened:
gcc -D__KERNEL__
-I/home/summer/kernels/kernel-image-2.4.26-i386-2.4.26/build-386/include
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
Ben Edwards wrote:
Maybe I am not building the kernel in the most elegent way. I seem to
be using a mixture of EXTRAVERSION and -rev. Not quite sure of the
ramifications of these. Douse the .deb file put stuff into
/lin/modules? What would you recomend to be the best use of
Ben Edwards wrote:
Colin wrote:
Do a make-kpkg clean before changing the revision number should do
the trick.
Ta, that did the trick.
When I dpkg -i the image it complaines that '/lib/modules/2.6.3 (may)
belongs to a old install', I have been moving it to .old but douse this
mean that if I
I have sucsesfult managed to build a 2.6 kernel (whitch I am now
using). This is great as CD burning works out of the box and
startup/application launch is noticably faster.
However I have a few questions. I used the hoto at
http://www.desktop-linux.net/debkernel.htm which is nice and
Ben Edwards (lists) wrote:
I use the command
make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.1 kernel_image
to build the kernel, whitch workes fine. However if i use Custom.2 (so
I can keep my old kernel) I get the following:-
blue:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.2 kernel_image
I note
Colin wrote:
Ben Edwards (lists) wrote:
I use the command
make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.1 kernel_image
to build the kernel, whitch workes fine. However if i use Custom.2 (so
I can keep my old kernel) I get the following:-
blue:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.2
snip
Here's my gcc:
laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401)
snip
So I need the qt3 library:
laptop:/home/moseley# apt-get install libqt3-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
g++-3.2
Bill Moseley wrote:
Geeze, I can't get kernel-image-2.6.5 to work right (wireless busted), so
trying to build from source using the new QT interface.
Here's my gcc:
laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is
Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hell, depends on gcc 3.2? Is that true? Do I really need another gcc
install?
Weird. I only have gcc-3.3 (g++-3.3) installed on my system and have no
problems recompiling the kernel (with qt3). I did check, and I had
installed libqt3-mt-dev instead of
hugo vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was a post on this list a while ago on g++-3.3. I find that if I
use *that* on rolling Qt, things fall apart. I now use 3.2 for
everything.
There was a new g++-3.3 last week in testing. I haven't seen any
problems with that one (although,
Geeze, I can't get kernel-image-2.6.5 to work right (wireless busted), so
trying to build from source using the new QT interface.
Here's my gcc:
laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Gustafson wrote:
| I've been doing regular sarge kernel builds (w/ debian kernel-source
| that already has debian patches applied) with 'make-kpkg', in which I
| need to apply some additional 3rd party patches. My goal is to be able
| to have
Greetings!
I've been doing regular sarge kernel builds (w/ debian kernel-source that
already has debian patches applied) with 'make-kpkg', in which I need to
apply some additional 3rd party patches. My goal is to be able to have
instructions others can follow for creating a custom kernel
hallo,
ich benutze sid mit dem 2.6.4er kernel auf 'nem thinkpad r40. Ich habe
das Problem, dass seit dem letzten build einige module nicht mehr
gefunden oder geladen werden. Leider hab ich nicht so viel Ahnung vom
Boot-up-Prozess, deshalb weiss ich nicht woher das Problem kommt. Unter
anderem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathias Peters wrote:
| ich benutze sid mit dem 2.6.4er kernel auf 'nem thinkpad r40. Ich habe
| das Problem, dass seit dem letzten build einige module nicht mehr
| gefunden oder geladen werden. Leider hab ich nicht so viel Ahnung vom
|
ich benutze unstable. Es lief ja auch ne weile alles. Hab jetzt auch auf
den 2.6.5 umgestellt, um zu sehen, obs ein kernel problem ist.
Das hat aber nichts geholfen. Woran kann es leigen, dass ein
Treiber(egal ob als Modul oder einkompiliert) den in menuconfig
auftaucht und angewaehlt wurde,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo
habe mir soeben einen neuen Kernel gebaut.
Version 2.4.24 von kernel.org
wenn ich nun bei den Sound Optionen
CONFIG_SOUND=m und CONFIG_SOUND_AD1980=m
benutze, kriege ich den folgenden Fehler:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
I've updated kernels on all but one of my systems using the backported
2.4.18-12 kernel from the Debian archives. No problems (that I'm aware
of yet).
The remaining system is a Mocha P4 based on the Mini-ITX mobo form
factor. It includes two onboard Ethernet controllers and an SIS
graphics
Hello Karsten!
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 04:56:40AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
[...]
00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
[...]
Neither the Intel 82540EM (e1000) nor Realtek (8139too) controllers are
supported in 2.4.18.
Maybe I
Hi Yall,
I am trying to upgrade to 2.4.22, but after issuing...
make-kpkg --initrd
I eventually get
snip
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.22/drivers/scsi/aacraid'
/usr/bin/make -C aic7xxx modules
make[4]: Entering directory
Hi,
Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard
installation 2.4.18-bf2.4)
It's working as expected but my vga=790 setting in lilo makes trouble.
* If set, my display won't show anything: black is black ;-)
* If unset, all boot messages re-appear, as does xdm
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:09:06 +0200,
Olivier (skyshadow) Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard
installation 2.4.18-bf2.4)
It's working as expected but my vga=790 setting in lilo makes trouble.
..ok,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:09:06AM +0200, Olivier Robert wrote:
Hi,
Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard
installation 2.4.18-bf2.4)
It's working as expected but my vga=790 setting in lilo makes trouble.
* If set, my display won't show anything: black is
--- Olivier (skyshadow) Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hi,
Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard
installation 2.4.18-bf2.4)
It's working as expected but my vga=790 setting in lilo makes trouble.
* If set, my display won't show anything: black is black
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 02:26:09AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:09:06 +0200,
Olivier (skyshadow) Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Just built a new 2.4.22 kernel.(Previous one was the standard
installation 2.4.18-bf2.4)
It's
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:10:09 +0200, David Creelman wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to rebuild a 2.4.21 kernel on an older machine that I
have, a Pentium 90, with 24Mb RAM.
It boots fine with a kernel that arrives via the boot disks, but when I
try to boot it from my home made kernel, the
Hi,
I've been trying to rebuild a 2.4.21 kernel on an older machine that I
have, a Pentium 90, with 24Mb RAM.
It boots fine with a kernel that arrives via the boot disks, but when I
try to boot it from my home made kernel, the hard drive light goes on
and I can here seeking for a little while
On 01 Jul 2003 22:05:53 +0200
Johan Parin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read through chapter 7 in the Debian Reference and man make-kpkg,
but I'm not sure I'm completely clear on the Debian standard method
to build the kernel. I built my first custom kernel the way it's
described, no problem.
I have driver files for the Logitech QuickCam 4000 Pro and need to install
and build a new kernel. Where should the driver files be copied before I
rebuild the kernel?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I've read through chapter 7 in the Debian Reference and man make-kpkg,
but I'm not sure I'm completely clear on the Debian standard method
to build the kernel. I built my first custom kernel the way it's
described, no problem. I used
--append_to_version -486 --revision=rev.01
Now, I
Paul == Paul Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul What have I missed out of my kernel build ? Under networking
Paul options I have dhcp, bootp and rarp support compiled in. ...
Make sure the CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER options are enabled (and
if they are modules, make sure they get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings:
I am attempting to build a kernel for a slow box that has an sis chipset
mainboard. I keep getting this error, and I am at a loss for what I need to
do to get the kernel to compile. Any help greatly appreciated.
thank you
I have 2 disks on the motherboard controller (440bx); installed
kernel-image-2.4.16, which saw the hpt370 controller I have; now I want to
move the disks on that controller, but it seems that the debian standard
kernel doesn't have support for 'boot offboard chipsets first' compiled in
(that
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Dragos wrote:
I have 2 disks on the motherboard controller (440bx); installed
kernel-image-2.4.16, which saw the hpt370 controller I have; now I want to
move the disks on that controller, but it seems that the debian standard
kernel doesn't have
Theres is also a simple solution:
Just delete .text.edit form the DISCARD section
in kernel-source/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds
Works fine for me with kernel2.4.16 and binutils2.11.92.0.12.3
I read this in some mailing list, don't remember where though...
tom
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at
I've never seen this before when building a kernel. My guess is that it
basically boils down to, Your kernel's too bloody big, stop building it
as a monolith and learn to use modules. Is that right?
Craig
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/compressed'
hi ya craig
did you use make bzlilo or sound like you did make bzImage
if so... take out stuff from the kernel ...
- turn it off if you dont use it
- PNP, Video for linux, ISDN, Linux Telephone,
- turn off all the graphics controllers you're NOT useing
- SCSI is
No, it appears the culprit is binutils. I just tried to compile 2.4.12-ac3
+ Rik's vm patches and ld bombed out with the exact error described at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=116041repeatmerged=yes
Downgrade to 2.11.92.0.5-2 (it resolved the issue for me) and put binutils
on
Daniel T. Chen wrote:
No, it appears the culprit is binutils. I just tried to compile 2.4.12-ac3
+ Rik's vm patches and ld bombed out with the exact error described at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=116041repeatmerged=yes
Downgrade to 2.11.92.0.5-2 (it resolved the issue
I'm trying to rebuild my kernel, and my network card does not come up as an
option.
The network card is an rtl8139.
I have the options for 3COM, AMD Lance, and WD cards, but the RealTek option is
grayed out.
I enabled TCP/IP networking.
The last box I had this card in had a vanilla kernel, so I
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 04:22:57PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote:
I'm trying to rebuild my kernel, and my network card does not come up
as an option. The network card is an rtl8139. I have the options for
3COM, AMD Lance, and WD cards, but the RealTek option is grayed out.
I enabled TCP/IP
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 09:52:04AM -0400, David Raeker-Jordan uttered:
ld -m elf_i386 -Ttext 0x0 -s --oformat
ld: unrecognized option '--oformat'
ld: use the --help option for usage information
E?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep oformat ./linux/arch/i386/boot/Makefile
$(LD) -Ttext 0x0
I successfully built a 2.4.2 kernel on an old Pentium but forgot a few
things, so I am need to rebuild.
First, I deleted the /usr/src/linux-2.4.2/ subdirectories and uncompressed
and untarred linux-2.4.2.tar.bz2 into /usr/src/linux-2.4.2/
I then ran:
make clean
make menuconfig
make-kpkg
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 07:52:53AM -0400, David Raeker-Jordan uttered:
Things seem to be going fine until the end of the build, when I get:
(Please excuse any typos, e.g., I can't get the ' to swing the other way ;) )
bbootsect.s: Assembler messages
bbootsect.s:253: Warning: indirect lcall
Steve,
I tried changing -oformat to --oformat in
/usr/src/linux-2.4.2/linux/arch/i386/boot/Makefile but I get the following
new error:
make[2]: Entering directory /usr/src/linux-2.4.2/linux/arch/i386/boot'
gcc -E -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.2/linux/include -D__BIG_KERNEL__
-traditional
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:30:19AM -0700, Nuhn Yobiznez wrote:
Debian is great for newbie kernel building
because it has a wonderful package called kpkg. This
package does ALMOST everything for you! I highly
recommend doing an apt-get for it! It simplifies the
process to the point that
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Tom Hoover wrote:
I've successfully built a new kernel package with make-kpkg, but only if I
use:
fakeroot -- make-kpkg --revision=custom.X.XX. kernel_image
I'll usually run fakeroot make-kpkg ... I've never needed that --
Am I misreading the docs?
I
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Am I misreading the docs?
I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this:
Well, now I know. The make-kpkg man page makes it very clear that the only
target which knows how to deal with rootcmd is buildpackage. I never use it,
though. I
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:11:23PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Am I misreading the docs?
I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this:
Well, now I know. The make-kpkg man page makes it very clear that the only
target which
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 06:57:48PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this:
make-kpkg --revision... build
fakeroot make -f debian/rules kernel-image-deb
fakeroot make-kpkg modules_image
The above sequence has never failed me. It builds the
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Tom Hoover wrote:
Is there any advantage to building the kernel outside of fakeroot?
The fakeroot man page says quite clearly that Thou shall never configure a
anything under fakeroot, so I try to only do the install targets under
fakeroot to avoid hard-to-track problems.
After completing successfully a full install of the Debian 2.2.17 product
with optional kernel packages I am unable to locate the modversions.h header
file. Could somebody please tell me what package this little gem is tucked
away in.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:00:39PM -0700, Keith Goettert wrote:
After completing successfully a full install of the Debian 2.2.17 product
with optional kernel packages I am unable to locate the modversions.h header
file. Could somebody please tell me what package this little gem is tucked
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:00:39PM -0700, Keith Goettert wrote:
After completing successfully a full install of the Debian 2.2.17 product
with optional kernel packages I am unable to locate the modversions.h header
file. Could somebody please tell me what package this little gem is tucked
I'm trying to build a kernel, but I seem to have run into a snag:
debian:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean
Can't locate Getopt/Long.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.005/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.005
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/i386-linux /usr/local/lib/site_perl
/usr/lib/perl5 .) at
Yeah it certainly looks like you need Perl 5.005 (note the .005 in the
path below). I have both 5.004 and 5.005 installed. It's one of the
strange things, Perl, as I installed from 2.1 floppy set, then upgraded to
Potato, and Perl-Base got really mad at me so I had to forcefully remove
it for it
Ok, a more accurate answer:
Long.pm exists in the perl-5.004, and the perl-5.005 packages. Note you
have perl-5.004 installed, but not perl-5.005 (altho you do have the -base
package - buts its not in the base part.). The make-kpkg is looking
specifically for the 5.005 version of that file. I
Corey Popelier wrote:
Yeah it certainly looks like you need Perl 5.005 (note the .005 in the
path below). I have both 5.004 and 5.005 installed. It's one of the
strange things, Perl, as I installed from 2.1 floppy set, then upgraded to
Potato, and Perl-Base got really mad at me so I had to
When building my 2.2.14 kernel I get:
make[1]: as86: Command not found
Where is as86 and what does it do? TIA,
oge
Where is as86 and what does it do? TIA,
package bin86
this is the x86 16-bit-code assembler.
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
If Windows is the answer, I want the problems back!
as86 is in the bin86 package. The bin86 package contains the 16-bit
assembler and loader. Use apt-get install bin86 or whatever method you use
to install it - its under /main/devel.
Cheers,
Corey Popelier
http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas
Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 14 May
Good people--
I built a 2.0.36 kernel today so I could have SCSI support, among other
things. In fact, I did it a few times. Each time, I found that I had lost
support for my NE2000 Ethernet card, which I had previously installed with
modconf. When I ran modconf again, there was hardly anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 6 Jun 1999 21:33:07 -0700, Ron Hale-Evans wrote:
Any thoughts?
make modules
make modules_install
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to
On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Ron Hale-Evans wrote:
Good people--
I built a 2.0.36 kernel today so I could have SCSI support, among other
things. In fact, I did it a few times. Each time, I found that I had lost
support for my NE2000 Ethernet card, which I had previously installed with
modconf. When
Installing a new kernel is much easier if your are using the
kernel-package.
Example:
$ su
# cd /usr/src/linux
# make menuconfig
# make-kpkg clean
# make-kpkg --revision `hostname`.1 kernel_image
# dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.0.36_`hostname`.1_i386.deb
I am trying to build a kernel the Debian way and am stuck. According
to the FAQ, the first thing a need to do (from memory) is:
make-kpkg --install kernel-package_2.0.36_all.deb
However, there is no kernel-package_2.0.36.deb package.
I am in the /usr/src directory, and there are files
On 17-May-99 Bryan Scaringe wrote:
I am trying to build a kernel the Debian way and am stuck. According
to the FAQ, the first thing a need to do (from memory) is:
make-kpkg --install kernel-package_2.0.36_all.deb
I am going back to the old way of doing it because I am still uncertain if
On 17-May-99 George Bonser wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Pollywog wrote:
On 17-May-99 Bryan Scaringe wrote:
I am trying to build a kernel the Debian way and am stuck. According
to the FAQ, the first thing a need to do (from memory) is:
make-kpkg --install
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 10:55:31PM -0400, Bryan Scaringe wrote:
I am trying to build a kernel the Debian way and am stuck. According
to the FAQ, the first thing a need to do (from memory) is:
make-kpkg --install kernel-package_2.0.36_all.deb
However, there is no
On 17-May-99 Bob Nielsen wrote:
Hmmm, I thought that the installation did that, but I haven't an
installed kernel-source package to check. If you have kernel-source, you
don't need the kernel-headers (with hamm you did).
That is what I was confused about, the headers.
thanks
--
Andrew
Hi,
I have a Toshiba laptop and I have Debian 2.0 R1. I also have a PC which
I wanted to use to build a zImage kernel for this laptop since bzImage
and the tecra rescue disk sends the Toshiba to continuous reboot.
My question is:
1) How can I cleanly build a new kernel image (zImage) without
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
