On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 01:52:27AM +, Robin wrote:
> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
>
> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
> updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but
> everything else segfaults.
On 22 February 2014 01:52, Robin wrote:
> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
>
> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
> updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but
> everything else segfaults.
> Looks like a
On 22 February 2014 07:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 22 feb 14, 01:52:27, Robin wrote:
>> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
>>
>> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
>> updating libc6. Applications that were open are still func
On Sb, 22 feb 14, 01:52:27, Robin wrote:
> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
>
> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
> updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but
> everything else segfaults.
> Looks like a
**This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but
everything else segfaults.
Looks like a reinstall
--
rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
I noticed if you set this to upgrade in Synaptic it will require you to
pretty much remove your entire Debian install package by package.
On Jun 21, 2013 3:40 AM, "David Baron" wrote:
>
> These packages are "held back" right now because of a changeover from
package:arch to package-arch, it seems.
These packages are "held back" right
now because of a changeover from
package:arch to package-arch, it seems.
Ready to play, or should be back off for
a while?
On 5/13/2010 1:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-05-12 23:24 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
I've learned today that when there are circular conflicts while upgrading, e.g.
libcairo2 has to be upgraded to install xulrunner-1.9.1, but upgrading
libcairo2 breaks xulrunner-1.9, it helps to use the dpk
On 2010-05-12 23:24 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
>> On 2010-05-11 22:11 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
>
>>> I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
>>> dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade
>>> faile
On 5/12/2010 4:24 PM, Chris Austin wrote:
I've learned today that when there are circular conflicts while upgrading, e.g.
libcairo2 has to be upgraded to install xulrunner-1.9.1, but upgrading
libcairo2 breaks xulrunner-1.9, it helps to use the dpkg --auto-deconfigure
option before the -i action
Hi,
> On 2010-05-11 22:11 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
>> I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
>> dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade
>> failed because libc-bin was not installed.
> How could this
Hi,
Looking on http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/libc-bin and clicking on the
list of files for i386, shows that ldconfig should be in /sbin/.
I had been using KPackage, and found that the downloaded .deb's were in
the .kpackage subdirectory of my home directory. I created a temporary
directory
Hi,
I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade
failed because libc-bin was not installed. Now dpkg is broken. I tried a
manual reinstall of the lenny libc6, as suggested in another thread on
this
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 16:05:04 Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> > How can this be fixed? And shouldn't there be a big warning that trying
> > to upgrade libc6 can break dpkg, on the Debian website page for libc6?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Chris Austin.
>
> What should really be the "big warning" is mix
On 2010-05-11 22:11 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
> I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
> dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade
> failed because libc-bin was not installed.
How could this happen, given that libc6 depend
I don't see
this as possible however. How is dpkg to know that the libc6 upgrade is not
for security patches or point release? I suppose something could be put in
place so that the security repo is treated differently.
The best way to avoid this: Don't mix releases. When necessary, its
Hi,
I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade failed
because libc-bin was not installed. Now dpkg is broken. I tried a manual
reinstall of the lenny libc6, as suggested in another thread on
Hi all,
I am running into this issue, there is the solution.
Just for archival purpose.
http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-18679-view-previous.html
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+
On 05/09/2009 13:16, Sven Joachim wrote:
You can set LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that the dynamic linker searches in /lib
before /usr/local/lib:
# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib rm -f /usr/local/lib/tls/libc.so.6
Thanks
This made it.which is a really good news since this machine is
located about
On 2009-09-05 12:27 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> I did just upgrade some packages (one of them is libc6) on a server
> running etch.
>
> It seems (from what I can see in the backups of this server) that an
> old version of libc6 is lying in /usr/local/lib/tls (maybe a leftover
> from some previou
Hi,
I did just upgrade some packages (one of them is libc6) on a server
running etch.
It seems (from what I can see in the backups of this server) that an old
version of libc6 is lying in /usr/local/lib/tls (maybe a leftover from
some previous install).
As a matter of fact, i'm unable to r
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:45:02 +0800, linux china wrote:
>From your subject line "3.1 to 5.0".
I'm fairly sure the upgrade from Sarge to Lenny is not supported. For one
thing, the upgrade from Sarge to Etch was problematic for many people,
especially those who didn't read the release notes before t
2009/3/15 linux china :
> when I do the aptitude dist-upgrade, I got errors while upgrading libc6,
>
>
> Get:153 http://www.anheng.com.cn stable/main libdevmapper1.02.1
> 2:1.02.27-4 [54.0kB]
> Get:154 http://www.anheng.com.cn stable/main makedev 2.3.1-88 [42.3kB]
> ... ...
> Get:245 http://www.anh
when I do the aptitude dist-upgrade, I got errors while upgrading libc6,
Get:153 http://www.anheng.com.cn stable/main libdevmapper1.02.1
2:1.02.27-4 [54.0kB]
Get:154 http://www.anheng.com.cn stable/main makedev 2.3.1-88 [42.3kB]
... ...
Get:245 http://www.anheng.com.cn testing/main usbutils 0.73-
If one tries to place all the env iterms in /etc/environment, then csh fails
with "unable to load" lib6 objects. Live and learn!
I can run sh successfully from csh but not as the user's default shell.
Bash is having problems with [ experssion ] syntax
in /etc/bashrc, /etc/bash.bashrc and /etc/p
> David Baron wrote:
> > Sid is now in its post-release fun state. After upgrading libc6, locales,
> > system was entirely broken. I booted up knoppix and made a few symlinks
> > and could now boot. Also saw most apps worked just fine ... if I was not
> > in bash. Bash gives errors about accessing
David Baron wrote:
Sid is now in its post-release fun state. After upgrading libc6, locales,
system was entirely broken. I booted up knoppix and made a few symlinks and
could now boot. Also saw most apps worked just fine ... if I was not in bash.
Bash gives errors about accessing the new librar
Sid is now in its post-release fun state. After upgrading libc6, locales,
system was entirely broken. I booted up knoppix and made a few symlinks and
could now boot. Also saw most apps worked just fine ... if I was not in bash.
Bash gives errors about accessing the new library symlinks. Everythi
YES!! So I didn't have to reinstall, I found out from a bug
report that in one case the lsbdev package was the problem. So I
did a dpkg -P lsbdev, and then apt-get let me upgrade libc6 just
fine. So I guess this is a bug in the lsbdev package?
-spencer
here's a copy of the email I sent describin
Hello,
So with no progress on fixing this, is my best option to
reinstall? How much would I probably need to get rid of? What's
the best "debian way" to reinstall all the packages? Thanks!
-spencer
here's a copy of the email I sent describing the problem:
Hello,
I'm trying to upgrade libc from 2.3.2.ds1-19 to 2.3.2.ds2-20, and
apt-get install libc gives the following error message:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_i386.deb
(--unpack):
unable to install new version of `./lib/ld-2.3.2.so': Device or resource busy
dp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 17 January 2002 7:16 am, Rob Weir wrote:
> Howdy
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently i ran into quite a lot of trouble with my Debian Gnu/Linux
> > system. I can't exactly recall w
Howdy
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently i ran into quite a lot of trouble with my Debian Gnu/Linux system. I
> can't exactly recall what triggered the mayhem but i think it had something
> to do with setting up an unstable entry in sources.lis
Hi,
Recently i ran into quite a lot of trouble with my Debian Gnu/Linux system. I
can't exactly recall what triggered the mayhem but i think it had something to
do with setting up an unstable entry in sources.list
After correcting this i found a number of stable-packages to be in the obsolote
Subject: Re: libc6 upgrade question
On Monday Oct 01 11:40 Gerald Richter wrote:
> ** Hello Timo!
> ** Thanks for the reply, but I've allready made the described step, AND I
> ** recompiled the kernel against the new libc6. -Maybe that might be where
> *
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:40:30AM +0200, Gerald Richter wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, but I've allready made the described step, AND I
> recompiled the kernel against the new libc6. -Maybe that might be where
> your slowlyness came from? At least I hope it for my case :)
Kernels aren't linked ag
ompiled the kernel against the new libc6. -Maybe that might be where
your slowlyness came from? At least I hope it for my case :)
-can you give me any pointers, how I could test the fact of having
slowed down my system with my actions?
-how do I revert my last libc6-upgrade? just excluding the woody
Subject: Re: libc6 upgrade question
On Tuesday Sep 25 13:07 Gerald Richter wrote:
> ** Hello Debusers!
> **
> ** I'm running a potato 2.2.19-pre17
> ** installed reiserfs-patch... OK
> ** kernel compiled OK
> ** installing reiserfsprogs caused a depen
pdate/upgrade, and indeed openoffice was broken. I am running unstable
on both machines with the 2.4.9 kernel.
Has anyone had similar problems with this and/or other programs? Do you
think my suspicion of the libc6 upgrade is correct? Can I safely
downgrade libc6 to the previous version to tes
ndeed openoffice was broken. I am running unstable
on both machines with the 2.4.9 kernel.
Has anyone had similar problems with this and/or other programs? Do you
think my suspicion of the libc6 upgrade is correct? Can I safely
downgrade libc6 to the previous version to test the theory, an
Hello Debusers!
I'm running a potato 2.2.19-pre17
installed reiserfs-patch... OK
kernel compiled OK
installing reiserfsprogs caused a dependency-problem requiring libc6
>=2.2.7, currently installed libc6: 2.1.3-xy.
The reiserprogs did install though... so I guess I will experience
problems withou
On 15 Aug 2001 10:30:13 -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 07:51:56AM -0700, Stephen Handley wrote:
> > In an attempt to get the IPMASQADM package up and running I went and
> > upgraded to libc6 2.2.3-9 (or whatever the trailing numbers are). Well now a
> > heap of stuff has compa
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 07:51:56AM -0700, Stephen Handley wrote:
> In an attempt to get the IPMASQADM package up and running I went and
> upgraded to libc6 2.2.3-9 (or whatever the trailing numbers are). Well now a
> heap of stuff has compatibility issues. I tried removing the new libc6 to
> reinst
Hi all,
In an attempt to get the IPMASQADM package up and running I went and
upgraded to libc6 2.2.3-9 (or whatever the trailing numbers are). Well now a
heap of stuff has compatibility issues. I tried removing the new libc6 to
reinstall the old one .. just to make sure that's what had caused all
Okay, so I've brought this on myself. I was trying to install
openafs-client, which seemed to require openafs-krb5, which seemed to
require libc6 from testing. So, on my potato 2.2r3 machine, I downloaded
libc6_2.2.3-9_i386.deb and did dpkg --install libc6_2.2.3-9_i386.deb. It
seemed to work fine,
Brian Stults wrote:
> I actually have two questions here. First... What is the next logical
> step?
Attaching strace to the process (strace -p pid) and getting a log.
--
see shy jo
I recently updated through dselect, and the process hangs when it tries
to upgrade libc6. I am using testing. Here is what I get:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.2.1-1 (using libc6_2.2.1-3_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 .
It will hang there for at least an hour (yes, I let it run for th
original-
De: jerome [mailto:jerome]En nombre de jerome Moliere
Enviado el: lunes 5 de febrero de 2001 12:17
Para: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Asunto: Libc6 upgrade & Potato
Hi all debian gurus,
I'd like to install a Java 2 platform on my linux box running Debian 2.2
Potato,
Hi all debian gurus,
I'd like to install a Java 2 platform on my linux box running Debian 2.2
Potato, this is a production box!!! It seems that the jdk 1.2 or 1.3
requires an upgrade of glic:
Depends: libc6 (= 2.1.3-15) but 2.2.1-1 is to be installed
I'd like to know if this upgrade is a dangerou
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 06:08:00 +
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pollywog/cvs/licq/licq/share'
> > Making all in src
> > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/pollywog/cvs/licq/licq/src'
> > c++ -DHAVE_CONF
A lingering problem of mine since things were fixed:
/etc/init.d/apache start
*
syntax error on line 133 of /etc/apache/srm.conf:
Invalid command 'AddDefaultCharsetName', perhaps mis-spelled
or defined by a module not included in the server
configuration
*
I was told this problem is definitely a problem with my system, and I just
upgraded libc6 yesterday (to ver 2.1.94-3 ). Will I have to downgrade to the
stable Potato version? Is the problem that I failed to upgrade something else
when I upgraded libc6?
tnx
--
Andrew
>
> make[2]: Nothing to
I am running an original hamm system but upgraded to libc6 (v 2.1.1) and
kernel 2.2.10.
I ran "apt-get update" to potato succesfully. When I try
apt-get install libc6
the error message
(Reading database ... 6883 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6
the file /etc/init.d/devpts.sh in the new libc6 on unstable has a
syntax error that halts installation. I changed an unbalanced left
"{" near the top of the file to "}" and the installation proceeded
fine.
>make_devpts()
>{
>[ -d /dev/pts ] || mkdir --mode=755 /dev/pts
>{
^
This bracket s
Upgrading from bo to slink isn't that straightforward due to the change
to libc6. There are specific things you need to do to avoid breaking
your system. You should read the following before proceeding:
ftp:/ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/upgrade-older-i386/README-upgrade
Bob
On Mon,
Hi all
When installing libc6 over libc5 i am getting these error messages :
ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libstdc++.so
ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libc.so
ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libg++.so
libc.so is a link pointing to : libc.so -> /lib/libc.so.
Sarel Botha wrote:
>
> > Having updated libc6, I didn't know whether a reboot was in order, since
> > that is a fairly important library for just about everything. Well,
> > this was a bad idea, since my machine hung rebooting, and then nothing
> > would run once the kernel finished starting. Co
> Having updated libc6, I didn't know whether a reboot was in order, since
> that is a fairly important library for just about everything. Well,
> this was a bad idea, since my machine hung rebooting, and then nothing
> would run once the kernel finished starting. Couldn't log in, rescue
> disk d
Here is the error that was occurring when I attempted to reboot, as I
describe below:
/bin/sh: error in loading shared libraries
: undefined symbol: rl_ignore_some_completions_function
Dan wrote:
>
> Greetings--
>
> I just made an attempt at upgrading my installed libc6 using
> libc6_2.0.
Greetings--
I just made an attempt at upgrading my installed libc6 using
libc6_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb. I have a 2.0 complete install, but I was
going to try GnuCash, which requires guile 1.3, which requires a few
things that are newer than Deb2.0.
Anyway, it didn't go so well, apparently, since so
how do i upgrade my libc6? i've got the .deb of 2.07u, i suppose i
have to get the libc6-dev version of it too?
when i've got both, can i just install them, and have the slink
programs work?
regards,
leon
--
__ _
Leon Breedt-o) / / (_)__ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm about to received Debian 2.0, and I was
> wondering what effect upgrade will have on programs
> that I currently use. Besides the usual GNU
> programs, I also have WordPerfect, Maple, and etc.
>
> Will these programs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> that I currently use. Besides the usual GNU
> programs, I also have WordPerfect, Maple, and etc.
>
> Will these programs work with Libc6, or are there
> patches that I have to download?
Debian 2.0 is libc5 compatible.
They run without patches.
Hi,
I'm about to received Debian 2.0, and I was
wondering what effect upgrade will have on programs
that I currently use. Besides the usual GNU
programs, I also have WordPerfect, Maple, and etc.
Will these programs work with Libc6, or are there
pat
Clare Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CJ> On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Ed Cogburn wrote:
EC> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AT> Should I be wary of ubgrading from libc6 2.0.6 to 2.0.7? Or can
AT> I just blithely replace the library?
EC>
EC> As long as you aren't t
t; blithely replace the library?
> >
> > Andrew Tarr
> >
>
>
> As long as you aren't talking about a libc5 to libc6 upgrade, then
go
> ahead and let dselect/apt do their thing.
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Should I be wary of ubgrading from libc6 2.0.6 to 2.0.7? Or can I just
> blithely replace the library?
>
> Andrew Tarr
>
As long as you aren't talking about a libc5 to libc6 upgrade, then go
ahead and let dselect/apt d
On Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 10:27:36AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Should I be wary of ubgrading from libc6 2.0.6 to 2.0.7? Or can I just
> blithely replace the library?
There is an upgrade path to the Debian 2.0 distribution, which you have to
follow or things may break. There are several a
Should I be wary of ubgrading from libc6 2.0.6 to 2.0.7? Or can I just
blithely replace the library?
Andrew Tarr
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate"
|___
http://multinet.co.nz/personalhomepages/locusmeus/antechamber.html
|~~~
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubsc
On Mon, 6 Jul 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After running dselect and trying to upgrade all my old hamm packages
> including libc6, nothing works now it seems the libc6 package is corrupted
> or something, i've tried to mount the file system and run dpkg -i
> --root=/mnt --admindir=/mnt/var/lib.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> After running dselect and trying to upgrade all my old hamm packages
> including libc6, nothing works now it seems the libc6 package is corrupted
> or something, i've tried to mount the file system and run dpkg -i
> --root=/mnt --admindir=/mnt/var/lib libc6xxx.deb b
After running dselect and trying to upgrade all my old hamm packages
including libc6, nothing works now it seems the libc6 package is corrupted
or something, i've tried to mount the file system and run dpkg -i
--root=/mnt --admindir=/mnt/var/lib libc6xxx.deb but it complains
about preinstall a
On Thu, 7 May 1998, Damon Muller wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I was considering upgrading to hamm, but my wonderfull ISP just decided
> that it was going to charge $0.25 for every Meg over 300M downloaded
> each month. Given that I almost use that anyway, it'll take me about a
> year to download hamm
Hi Folks,
I was considering upgrading to hamm, but my wonderfull ISP just decided
that it was going to charge $0.25 for every Meg over 300M downloaded
each month. Given that I almost use that anyway, it'll take me about a
year to download hamm without it costing me a fortune...
Anyway, I would li
On Fri, 30 Jan 1998, I sent a message to the testing list and to
Craig noting that I had found two bugs that cause v0.17 of autoup to
fail. I included diffs from v0.17 to my v0.18. As of yesterday, both
Craig's ftp site and yours still had v0.17.
If you wish, I can send these diffs to
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, dpk wrote:
> I'm feeling kind of sassy today, and thought I might try upgrading to
> hamm. I have seen a script posted that help do this. I still have it
> somewhere, however I was wondering where I could find the most recent
> version of this and instructions/tips for using
I'm feeling kind of sassy today, and thought I might try upgrading to
hamm. I have seen a script posted that help do this. I still have it
somewhere, however I was wondering where I could find the most recent
version of this and instructions/tips for using it?
Dennis
--
dpk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Skreeg) writes:
> Error update: This problem only occurs when I launch Dselect from KDE
> like this;
>
> sudo -u root Dselect
>
> If I log into a console and use dselect as root it installs fine. Defo
> a permissions thing.
>
I've seen similar permissions problems with
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Skreeg)
> Subject: Gzip + Dselect after libc6 upgrade
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org (Debian List)
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 09:30:09 + (GMT)
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
> Resent-Message-ID: <"f
This week I tried compiling a kernel (2.0.32) for the first time since
upgrading to libc6 about a month ago. I can't get past `make dep.' It
fails with the following message:
debian# make dep
make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.32/arch/i386/boot'
make[1]: Nothing to be done f
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Skreeg)
> Subject: Gzip + Dselect after libc6 upgrade
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org (Debian List)
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 09:30:09 + (GMT)
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
> Resent-Message-ID: <"f
Hi folks, `fraid I`m still having bother with gzip and dselect. I`ve
upgraded to libc6 quite successfully. Everything works hunkydory but
dselect always gives this error when installing. dpkg -i works fine
on it`s own.
Error;
gzip: stdout: Broken pipe
dpkg-deb: subprocess gzip -dc returned error
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> I tried to be clear but... anyway, my /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like this:
>
> #---cut here to damage your monitor--
> # /etc/nsswitch.conf
> #
> # Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch functionality.
> #
>
> passwd: c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Nils Rennebarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As for documentation try the command
> info libc
>then look at the section
>* Name Service Switch
Well you could also just read the /usr/doc/nis/nis.debian.howto.gz
file which explains everything in detail.
Mike.
--
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 09:18:55AM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> > > passwd: db files
> > > group: db files
> > > shadow: db files
> > For these three replace "db files" with "compat" and you should be done.
> How should it read? The HOW
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> Also, I am in Panic Mode now.
> * If I am unable to log in as root, how do I fix what I did to
> nsswitch.conf? I was sensible enough to backup the old file before
> making the changes. I am unable to locate my emergency disk (or
> whatev
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 1998 at 09:26:27PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> > After the upgrade, I am unable to log into my machine with a username in
> > YP.
> > $ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf
> > passwd: db files
> > group: db files
> > shadow: db files
On Tue, Jan 13, 1998 at 09:26:27PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> After the upgrade, I am unable to log into my machine with a username in
> YP.
>
> $ cat /etc/passwd
>
> ...some stuff...
>
> +::0:0:::
OK
> $ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf
> passwd: db files
> group: db files
Hi,
Thanks to the help of the fine folks in this mailing list, I was able to
upgrade to hamm reasonably easily. I am still poking around my system
to find out problems with the upgrade.
After the upgrade, I am unable to log into my machine with a username in
YP.
$ cat /etc/passwd
...some stuff
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Scott Ellis wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
>
> > * I am downloading the entire hamm binary-i386, contrib and non-free
> > tree to a directory (actually, my home directory) on an NFS server. Is
> > there a possibility that NFS might stop working
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> I read the mini HOWTO and reports in this mailing list about unstable
> being "stable enough". My machine is kind of a production server. The
> world would not end if it goes down for a day or so. But still it is
> important to have it up a
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
> * I am downloading the entire hamm binary-i386, contrib and non-free
> tree to a directory (actually, my home directory) on an NFS server. Is
> there a possibility that NFS might stop working during the upgrade
> process?
Why don't you just u
I read the mini HOWTO and reports in this mailing list about unstable
being "stable enough". My machine is kind of a production server. The
world would not end if it goes down for a day or so. But still it is
important to have it up and running ASAP. I am planning on upgrading to
hamm later tod
After upgrading to libc6 via the libc5-libc6 HOWTO, and running dselect to
install all the hamm packages, ftp or ncftp no longer works.
Here's what I see:
kanga:[21]~% ftp
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
kanga:[22]~% ldd /usr/bin/ftp
libreadline.so.2 => /lib/libreadline.so.2 (0x4000f000
>> Though I have not tried this yet (the machine with the
>> development environment has not yet been upgraded) but I
>> presume that by "... first purge all the '-dev' packages
>> ..." he is referring to using dselect or dpkg ...
Yes, exactly. Dselect handles this directly (though I'm the
wrench
Mark, I agree with you. Indeed, in retrospect, I can see that it was a rather
bad idea for me to even mention using
"--force" in a message with that subject!
Scott's mini-HOWTO is quite good and there is only ONE statement that is not
completely clear to me.
"If you wish to do libc6 developmen
> I have used --force-depends now quite a few times without being
Not to pick on you in particular, but I can't emphasize this enough:
if you use --force-depends while doing an upgrade from libc5 to libc6,
you *will* hurt yourself. Practically guaranteed. Really, honest! :-)
There are *other*
Remco wrote:
...
> One really important thing: do not force dpkg to install or remove
> anything. The dependancies and conflicts are there for a reason. There
> have already been many that screwed up by forcing dpkg to do not-so-smart
> things. I am one of them, but I upgraded before the HOWTO was
On Sat, 15 Nov 1997, Matthew Majka wrote:
> Can someone give me a pionter to some info on upgrading a
> system to libc6? I'd like to start using XFree86-3.3.1 for
> some of it's bug fixes and the new debian packages are libc6
> dependent.
Read the Libc5 to Libc6 mini-HOWTO that is posted to this
Can someone give me a pionter to some info on upgrading a
system to libc6? I'd like to start using XFree86-3.3.1 for
some of it's bug fixes and the new debian packages are libc6
dependent.
Matt
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Troub
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
