On 04/06/2024 02:08, Chris M wrote:
I am needing a "refresher course" on mail clients that use the .mbox
format to store emails.
It's been years since I've used this kind of mail client.
You may configure local IMAP server (e.g. dovecot) to store your
archive. It allows to av
On Mon 03 Jun 2024 at 14:08:46 (-0500), Chris M wrote:
> I am needing a "refresher course" on mail clients that use the .mbox
> format to store emails.
> It's been years since I've used this kind of mail client.
>
> Is there any "dangers" I need to kn
Felix Miata wrote:
As I'm up 24/7, I never bother going "offline" in SM.
What I meant was, I always click in SM:
File > Offline > Work Offline
That way SM isn't doing anything in the background while I am compacting
folders. OLD bad habit, I know.
Chris M composed on 2024-06-03 14:08 (UTC-0500):
> Is there any "dangers" I need to know about? Like, keeping the mailbox a
> certain size?
> or a certain amount of emails per folder etc?
...
> I always go offline, and then compact my folders after I get done
> reading emails.
In SM at least,
I am needing a "refresher course" on mail clients that use the .mbox
format to store emails.
It's been years since I've used this kind of mail client.
Is there any "dangers" I need to know about? Like, keeping the mailbox a
certain size?
or a certain amount of emails per f
Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz writes:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:58:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
Mutt isn't designed with the concept of folders in mind. It merely
acknowledges the concept because the mails need to be stored
/somewhere/.
You mean it doesn't work out of the box and
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Could you please elaborate on that? As far as I can tell it's just a
matter of configuring mutt correctly (the defaults are not really
optimal). Mutt + Gmail, now that is a challenge!
On Lu, 22 oct 12, 15:41:48, lee wrote:
Have you looked at the documentation of mutt? It talks about mail
folders. It also talks about directories. It cannot rename folders or
directories and it cannot (re-)move them (the argument is that mutt
isn't a file manager), and it doesn't really
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
Here's the snippet I use:
# Use everything that looks like a mailbox in ~/Maildir/
# except the ones explicitely excluded
mailboxes ! + `\
for file in ~/Maildir/.*; do \
box=$(basename $file); \
if [ ! $box = '.' -a ! $box = '..' \
On Sb, 20 oct 12, 06:54:21, lee wrote:
Wally wants to learn some C programming, thus I suggested he learn emacs
and might use gnus and try out vim and/or joe, whatever he likes best.
Perhaps I should have mentioned mutt as well, but mutt with imap can be
rather awkward.
Could you please
On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 20 oct 12, 06:54:21, lee wrote:
Wally wants to learn some C programming, thus I suggested he learn emacs
and might use gnus and try out vim and/or joe, whatever he likes best.
Perhaps I should have mentioned mutt as well, but mutt with imap can
On Du, 21 oct 12, 11:10:09, Erwan David wrote:
On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Mutt + Gmail, now that is a challenge!
Not really, the challenge is mutt + heavy html emails...
GMail is easy once you activate imap and use mutt as an imap reader (in
that case it's better to use the
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Sb, 20 oct 12, 06:54:21, lee wrote:
Wally wants to learn some C programming, thus I suggested he learn emacs
and might use gnus and try out vim and/or joe, whatever he likes best.
Perhaps I should have mentioned mutt as well, but mutt with
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:58:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
Mutt isn't designed with the concept of folders in mind. It merely
acknowledges the concept because the mails need to be stored
/somewhere/.
You mean it doesn't work out of the box and requires some configuration?
Hey, JFYI most good
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:35:31 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:48:30 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
...
with mbox and searching strings in Icedove is bit slow if mbox files
are big (measured in GiB :-P).
If you're still doing on-demand searching, have you considered using a
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:01:28 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:35:31 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:48:30 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
...
with mbox and searching strings in Icedove is bit slow if mbox files
are big (measured in GiB
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 03:29:05 Ron Johnson wrote:
Next time you attach such a file, I suggest that you add a .txt so
that your email/webmail app knows that it is a text file, instead of
base64 encoded application/octet-stream.
(Iceweasel/Thunderbird seems to peek into it, probably using
On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:01 -0400 ml...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
My output with the suggestion above.
debian:~# dpkg --dry-run --purge $(join -v2 (awk '{if
($2==install)
print $1}'
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:05 -0500 ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:01 -0400 ml...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
My output with the suggestion above.
debian:~# dpkg
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:29:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
Attached for you convenience!
sourced from: Debian Lenny
Next time you attach such a file, I suggest that you add a .txt so
that your email/webmail app knows that it is a text file, instead
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:22:38PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Mail clients known to reply funky:
Outlook, Outlook Express (top posted by default, no viable fix except
switching)
GMail (breaks threading, any workarounds??).
SMTP ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arafangion wrote:
George Borisov wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
[snip]
You may be required to use the proprietary Ximian Evolution which is
the same as the free version, but it contains a module that allows it to
talk to Exchange.
That
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
And both Evolution and Thunderbird as IMAP clients are PITA to work
with . Thunderbird sometimes can't copy the outgoing message into Sent
Items folder [1].
Yup, but this seems to be more of a problem with Exchange IMAP
component. In the same client I am connected to my
George Borisov wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
I use Thunderbird with our Exchange through IMAP. Depends if your server
has it enabled.
Hope
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 07:25:32PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
If the Exchange server is recent enough it supports IMAP. Talk to your
system admin and ask about
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
MS Outlook on Wine ?
Ace.
--
Random Quotes From Megas XLR
Coop: You see? The mysteries of the Universe are revealed when you break
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
I use Thunderbird with our Exchange through IMAP. Depends if your server
has it enabled.
Hope this helps,
--
George Borisov
wrote:
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
I use Thunderbird with our Exchange through IMAP. Depends if your server
has it enabled.
Hope this helps,
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
malebo
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
malebo
desktop. There was a commercial solution from HP, called
OpenMail, but it is not available anymore.
You may find something useful on this page, though:
http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/exchange.html
On 5/23/06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than
I've been using squirrelmail as my web-mail interface.
But I'm wondering what else it out there in Debian packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take a look at http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/openwebmail/
It's pretty full-featured, and runs fairly nicely there's an online
demo on that page somewhere that you can try out to get a feel for it.
Tom Allison wrote:
I've been using squirrelmail as my web-mail interface.
But I'm wondering what
Tom Allison wrote:
I've been using squirrelmail as my web-mail interface.
But I'm wondering what else it out there in Debian packages.
Horde is 'da bomb. In addition to webmail, it also has a password
changer (no need for shell access to change password),
addressbook/contact manager (can connect
Andreas van Hulst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
Kann Dir spamassassin ans Herz legen. Der erschlägt hier wirklich fast
alles, lernt mit und ist für jeden User einfach einzurichten.
Der
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
Schau Dir mal das Paket mailfilter an. Das kann den Müll schon vom
Server löschen.
ja und nein. was ist mit false positives ? einfach löschen und Pech für
den Absender ?
ich habe
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:40, Manfred Schmitt wrote:
Michael Dominok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 07:34, Andreas van Hulst wrote:
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
fetchmail? D.h. Du
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:00:09 +0100
Christian Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Rainer,
Rainer Unkenstein, 19.02.2004 (d.m.y):
Schau Dir mal das Paket mailfilter an. Das kann den Müll schon vom
Server löschen.
Man muss ihm nur sagen, was Muell ist...;-)
Hallo,
mailfilter
Michael Dominok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oder woher soll mailfilter wissen ob eine mail spam ist, viel mehr als
das am absendenden server festzumachen geht ansonsten ja nicht?
man mailfilterrc
OK, Fehler meinerseits, bei mailfilter denke ich immer an meine .mailfilter,
die gehoert aber
Tach auch,
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 07:34, Andreas van Hulst wrote:
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
fetchmail? D.h. Du holst Dir den Spam erst von wo 'runter um ihn dann
mit Deinem Client zu Filtern?
Kuck Dir mal
Am 2004-02-19 07:34:40, schrieb Andreas van Hulst:
Hallo,
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
Ich kenne nur eine Lösung mit 'procmail'
viele grüße
und danke schon mal
Andreas
Greetings
Michelle
--
Registered
Am Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:34:40 +0100
Andreas van Hulst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
Schau Dir mal das Paket mailfilter an. Das kann den Müll schon vom
Server löschen.
Rainer
--
Hast
Moin Kristian!
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:02:05 +0100 Kristian Rink wrote:
apt-cache show amavis-ng
Da leg ich doch gleich eine Frage nach. Ersetzt amavis das fetchmail?
Wie darf ich mir dann den Weg einer Mail vom Server in mein Cyrus
vorstellen?
Derzeit habe ich
ProviderPOP3 - fetchmail -
Michael Dominok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 07:34, Andreas van Hulst wrote:
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
fetchmail? D.h. Du holst Dir den Spam erst von wo 'runter um ihn dann
mit Deinem
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2004-02-19 07:34:40, schrieb Andreas van Hulst:
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
Ich kenne nur eine Lösung mit 'procmail'
Das impliziert aber natuerlich nicht das
Hallo Michael,
* Michael Holtermann schrieb [19-02-04 18:44]:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:02:05 +0100 Kristian Rink wrote:
apt-cache show amavis-ng
Da leg ich doch gleich eine Frage nach. Ersetzt amavis das fetchmail?
Wie darf ich mir dann den Weg einer Mail vom Server in mein Cyrus
Hallo Rainer,
Rainer Unkenstein, 19.02.2004 (d.m.y):
Schau Dir mal das Paket mailfilter an. Das kann den Müll schon vom
Server löschen.
Man muss ihm nur sagen, was Muell ist...;-)
Gruss,
Christian
--
Herr Doktor, der Patient von Zimmer 345, der Simulant, ist letzte Nacht
gestorben. - Oha,
Am 2004-02-19 18:44:22, schrieb Michael Holtermann:
Moin Kristian!
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:02:05 +0100 Kristian Rink wrote:
apt-cache show amavis-ng
Da leg ich doch gleich eine Frage nach. Ersetzt amavis das fetchmail?
Wie darf ich mir dann den Weg einer Mail vom Server in mein Cyrus
vorstellen?
Am Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:00:09 +0100
Christian Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hallo Rainer,
Rainer Unkenstein, 19.02.2004 (d.m.y):
Schau Dir mal das Paket mailfilter an. Das kann den Müll schon vom
Server löschen.
Man muss ihm nur sagen, was Muell ist...;-)
Jo, genau :-) Und das
Hallo,
In mein Postfach laufen mittlerweile ca 100 - 150 spam mails am tag ein,
mit dem Mozilla junk mail habe ich die sache schon mal im griff,
jetzt bin ich aber in der situation das ich mich auf einen Mail Client
festlegen muss, und das schmeckt mir nicht wirklich!
Mein System arbeitet mit
Hallo Andreas,...
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:34:40 +0100
Andreas van Hulst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mein System arbeitet mit fetchmail, postfix, cyrus,
gibt es da eine möglichkeit die über diesen weg zu regeln?
apt-cache show amavis-ng
Amavis-ng ist in einem ähnlichen Setup (nur, daß wir Post
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:12:41 -0800
Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:31 AM 12/18/02 +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
Sorry for taking so long to get back to this -- it's been one of those weeks.
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
That version of Sylpheed doesn't
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Shawn Lamson wrote:
Did you right click on Mailbox (MH) folder and rebuild folder tree ?
No, but that does seem to fix it. I wonder why it keeps getting off in
its counts.
http://hank.org/images/sylpheed.png
That image looks just like mine - it looks like you
At 08:31 AM 12/18/02 +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
Sorry for taking so long to get back to this -- it's been one of those weeks.
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
That version of Sylpheed doesn't seem to deal well with counting new
messages, and when I use the threaded view I
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
That version of Sylpheed doesn't seem to deal well with counting new
messages, and when I use the threaded view I seem to miss new
messages. I need to figure out how to show messages in *received*
order.
Must be a temporary breakage. I'm
At 06:33 PM 12/17/02 -0500, Shawn Lamson wrote:
Short answer yes it can be used withouth KDE; as to your particular
problem I don't know... have you tried sylpheed-claws as a mail agent? It
is a lot lighter than say Evolution.
I have tried sylpheed-claws -- I've tried using it a few times, quite
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:25:31AM -0500, Chris Hilts wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
(and to know that they're in maildir format), then run all your old
messages back through procmail again.
I believe procmail comes with a utility called 'formail'
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
begin Alan James quotation:
I'd like to give maildir a go, so how do I convert MH to MailDir ?
If you use procmail, just set up new empty maildir folders corresponding
to each of your old MH folders, edit .procmailrc to use
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:59:15PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
begin Alan James quotation:
Are you still using MH folders ? How'd you get mutt to show a list of MH
folders with the new message count for each ?
I converted my MH folders to maildir and now I use that. Mutt seems to
begin Alan James quotation:
I'd like to give maildir a go, so how do I convert MH to MailDir ?
If you use procmail, just set up new empty maildir folders corresponding
to each of your old MH folders, edit .procmailrc to use the new folders
(and to know that they're in maildir format), then
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
(and to know that they're in maildir format), then run all your old
messages back through procmail again.
I believe procmail comes with a utility called 'formail' which you might
find useful for this.
Chris Hilts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:06:10 -0800
Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net wrote:
I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
a slow but substantial one. I was often leaving Sylpheed running
for days, but after a
On 24 Feb 2002 20:28:56 +
Patrick Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:55, Bill Moseley wrote:
At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
Although I read that IMAP can be slow if you have many mailboxes (I have
almost 100), and hundreds of messages a day.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:53:02 -0300 Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:06:10 -0800
Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net wrote:
I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
a
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:00:03 -0600
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
a slow but substantial one. I was often leaving Sylpheed running
for days, but
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:36:18 -0500
Bob Thibodeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I'd try Sylpheed after seing mention of it on this
list, but never felt like configuring another client. Now that
I've read it doesn't play nice with mutt, I'll just remove it.
I've got it working reasonable
.
This is only a very minor annoyance though, and I think I'll stick
with this configuration for a while.
I found it a major annoyance, but maybe I just receive a lot more mail
than you do.
To me, also, there was the basic question, why do I need two different
mail clients? Aside from the lack of point
need two different
mail clients? Aside from the lack of point-and-click to select messages,
mutt has a pretty decent UI, and it's customizable enough that I was
able to work around the things that annoyed me the most about it. So
now I just use mutt.
Are you still using MH folders ? How'd you get
begin Alan James quotation:
Are you still using MH folders ? How'd you get mutt to show a list of MH
folders with the new message count for each ?
I converted my MH folders to maildir and now I use that. Mutt seems to
handle maildir better, and it's a better format in general (you don't
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
I was using RedHat 7.2 for a while and I actually liked the KDE setup,
although a bit heavy weight. But I also like how light-weight of a setup I
now have with Debian. (I suppose I'll need a desktop environment at some
point.)
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
And not related to email, anyone have a replacement suggestion (other than
Emacs ;) for my old basic friend on the windows side of Program File Editor
(pfe)?
Don't waste time with emacs and vi. Try jed. It's the best console
editor
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 05:55, Timothy R. Butler wrote:
I was using RedHat 7.2 for a while and I actually liked the KDE setup,
although a bit heavy weight. But I also like how light-weight of a setup I
now have with Debian. (I suppose I'll need a desktop environment at some
point.)
xfce
On 23/02/02 Bill Moseley did speaketh:
My head is swimming a bit trying to limit my choices of mail clients to test.
My personal preference is Mutt, but coming from browsers and Eudora, you
might want to try something simpler to begin with.
Evolution is not ready, IMHO. Even at 1.0
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:38:37 -0800
From: Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
. . . Like many, I'm coming from a Windows environment. I've got
three linux machines under my desk and for a year now I've booted Win98
used basically only browsers and Eudora (3.0) on my Win98
begin Michael P. Soulier quotation:
Sylpheed is excellent I'm told.
Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
to Sylpheed after we decided that Outlook Express was too dangerous, and
At 08:46 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Wendell Cochran wrote:
So, to start off with, I'm looking to make the transition to full-time
Linux easy by finding similar tools to I'm used to using.
[snip]
Similarities can be confusing. Maybe -- maybe -- you'd do better
to accept differences, even seek them out.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
to Sylpheed after we decided that Outlook Express was too dangerous, and
she's
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
Yes, in Woody and Sid.
BTW -- why would using an X mail application exclude you from also
running mutt?
It's not so much prevented as made sufficiently painful. I tried
using Sylpheed and mutt together several
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:41:54 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
to Sylpheed after
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:05:13 -0800 Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
Yes, in Woody and Sid.
BTW -- why would using an X mail application exclude you from also
running mutt?
It's not so much
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 01:00:15PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:05:13 -0800 Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
Yes, in Woody and Sid.
BTW -- why would using an X mail
At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
I believe nmh uses .mh_sequences or some such. So, that would probably
be the standard way. Sylpheed uses it's own sequence file, so it
won't even jibe with the mh way of managing mail. This is something
the Sylpheed folks should fix. I tried
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:55, Bill Moseley wrote:
At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
Although I read that IMAP can be slow if you have many mailboxes (I have
almost 100), and hundreds of messages a day.
I have the same problem. The truth is that most mail cleints that
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 14:28, Patrick Kirk wrote:
Evolution is a heavy application and has some quirks. but it is a very
good IMAP client in that it allows shortcuts to your frequently used
mailboxes and only asks you to select from mailboxes as opposed to all
files.
I run an IMAP server to
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:22:22 -0800
Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin Michael P. Soulier quotation:
Sylpheed is excellent I'm told.
Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:41:54 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
to Sylpheed after
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:56:23 -0800
Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net wrote:
Possibly dead?
Sylpheed: (which I just read about on this list).
Works pretty well. Is fairly lightweight. I noticed it leaks a
significant amount of memory over time (days). No idea about
IMAP support
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:30:17PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:56:23 -0800
Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net wrote:
Possibly dead?
Sylpheed: (which I just read about on this list).
Works pretty well. Is fairly lightweight. I noticed it leaks a
choices of mail clients to test.
I'm wondering if someone can help narrow my choices.
Background: Like many, I'm coming from a Windows environment. I've got
three linux machines under my desk and for a year now I've booted Win98
used basically only browsers and Eudora (3.0) on my Win98 machine
My head is swimming a bit trying to limit my choices of mail clients to test.
I'm wondering if someone can help narrow my choices.
Background: Like many, I'm coming from a Windows environment. I've got
three linux machines under my desk and for a year now I've booted Win98
used basically only
lighter in
Debian than RedHat. The nice thing is you could stick to a very light weight
KDE here - maybe just kdebase, konqueror, and konsole - or something like
that.
So, for graphical mail clients: Knowing that I'm coming from a simple life
with Eudora (and have never liked Outlook), any
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
Evolution:
No comment other than lots of eye candy and resource demands.
Several like it. It and its brethren nautilus are just to
resource intensive for my old hardware.
Mahogany:
No idea.
Aethera:
No idea.
on Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 11:53:42AM +, Phillip Deackes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On 24 Dec 2001 17:44:44 -0500
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, but when a business chooses degenerate mail and forces everyone to
use it, I'd be pretty suspicious of high-level idiocy within
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
I now there is gnupop-3d.
I used it and it worked quite good
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:22:29PM -0500, Dwight Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
What is the name of the debian pop package? I do not see one in
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:22:29PM -0500, Dwight Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
What is the name of the debian pop package? I do not see one in the list
of packages. I do not want imap.
apt-cache search pop will give pages full of packages,
you'll have a little
I must configure my debian box so my wife can read and send her mail
using Eudora from her Win95 box which is delivered to her mailbox
(/var/mail/user) on the debian box using fetchmail/procmail/exim.
Normal TCP/IP networking is already working on the network. The debian
box is configured as an
Hi Dwight,
read this on debian-user, but there was a different mailing-list
refered to in the To: header, so I'm cc-ing you/debian-user instead.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:33:58PM -0500, Dwight Johnson wrote:
...
When she tries to read her mail using Eudora, she gets a message that
her
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:33:58PM -0500, Dwight Johnson wrote:
...
When she tries to read her mail using Eudora, she gets a message that
her connection has been refused. When she tries to send mail, she gets
a message
Well,
there is one email client that will do most of what Outlook Express does.
XFmail. Not used alone though, but together with exim and fetchmail it works
great for me. I have two accounts dealt with fine using XFmail. Using filters,
and the option to set a custom From for every folder it is
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
