Re: Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread jacques
Le 02/10/2011 23:24, Charlie a écrit : Used claws mail for a few years without any problems. Fast and efficient. +1 just add that CM developpement is very active. Charlie J. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread Charlie
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:18:57 +0100 "Richard Bown richard.b...@blueyonder.co.uk" suggested this: >Hi >me again >Up to about a year ago I was using Claws Mail which has some very nice >filter capabilities, expire on age in folders for instance. >I moved to Evo as Claws would crash and freeze the w

Re: Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread Walter Hurry
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:29:35 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > I've never had issues with Claws. Whether filtering or not. Nor me. I used Claws-Mail for a considerable time without any issues at all, but have since moved to Sylpheed (of which CM is a fork anyway). But I don't filter within the MUA i

Re: Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread Claudius Hubig
[resent to the list] Hello Richard, Richard Bown wrote: >On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 17:11 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote: >> I am currently using Claws Mail 3.7.10 on Testing and don’t see any >> crashes whatsoever. There have been a few problems with libgnutls >> breaking POP support, but they have bee

Re: Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:18:57 +0100 Richard Bown wrote: Hello Richard, > Has anyone had any problems with Claws mail crashing ?, it would do > this regularly when filtering. I've never had issues with Claws. Whether filtering or not. Occasionally, somebody does have issues, as you did, but the

Re: Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread Claudius Hubig
Richard Bown wrote: >Hi >me again >Up to about a year ago I was using Claws Mail which has some very nice >filter capabilities, expire on age in folders for instance. >I moved to Evo as Claws would crash and freeze the whole machine, That >was using Fedora, >Has anyone had any problems with Claws

Re: Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:18:57 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: (...) > Has anyone had any problems with Claws mail crashing ?, it would do this > regularly when filtering. If its stable in squeeze I might go back to > it.as the Evo annoys me with it max 80 characters /line Can you expand that "80 chara

Re: Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread Joe
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:18:57 +0100 Richard Bown wrote: > Hi > me again > Up to about a year ago I was using Claws Mail which has some very nice > filter capabilities, expire on age in folders for instance. > I moved to Evo as Claws would crash and freeze the whole machine, That > was using Fedora

Mailers

2011-10-02 Thread Richard Bown
Hi me again Up to about a year ago I was using Claws Mail which has some very nice filter capabilities, expire on age in folders for instance. I moved to Evo as Claws would crash and freeze the whole machine, That was using Fedora, Has anyone had any problems with Claws mail crashing ?, it would do

Re: Mailers and In-reply-to; was Re(4): Postscript: Grub2 in current Squeeze

2010-02-05 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:58:05 -0500 (EST), peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > When a message was created by clicking the Reply button > in that mailer, a correct In-reply-to parameter was included. > No complaint. > > The problematic case is where a message in the archive is > read with the browser and

Mailers and In-reply-to; was Re(4): Postscript: Grub2 in current Squeeze

2010-02-05 Thread peasthope
Tixy, > ... both the message I just quoted and the one I originally replied to > have an "In-reply-to" header ... In http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/02/author.html or http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/02/author2.html or http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/02/author3.html d

Re: Transparent reply-to-mailing-list for broken mailers

2009-09-06 Thread Paul Johnson
t; >> > >> * ^Return-Path: > >> > >> | $FORMAIL -i "Reply-To: " > >> > >> (Note that my name is in the Return-Path.) > >> > >> No addy editing, no buttons that don't exist on all my broken email > >> client

Re: Transparent reply-to-mailing-list for broken mailers

2009-09-02 Thread Rakotomandimby Mihamina
09/02/2009 05:10 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.: It's not transparent. It's rare, but some users do actually set the Reply-To header (and expect you to use it); this trumps their setting irrecoverably. Hitting "Reply-To-List" is natural when you want to reply to a list... I dont understand the nee

Re: Transparent reply-to-mailing-list for broken mailers

2009-09-02 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
>> (Note that my name is in the Return-Path.) >> >> No addy editing, no buttons that don't exist on all my broken email >> clients, and no surprises for others on the debian-user list... > >Wow, transparent reply-to-list for broken mailers: Very nice! It's

Transparent reply-to-mailing-list for broken mailers

2009-09-01 Thread Paul Johnson
ver: > > FORMAIL=/usr/bin/formail > > :0Hfhw > * ^Return-Path: > | $FORMAIL -i "Reply-To: " > > (Note that my name is in the Return-Path.) > > No addy editing, no buttons that don't exist on all my broken email > clients, and no surprises for ot

Re: good mailers (was "Re: Has anyone ever thought ...")

2004-02-08 Thread David T-G
David, et al -- ...and then David P James said... % ... % As an aside, are there any mailers for Windows that have a reply-list % button/function? Eudora? Pegasus? The Bat? I've not used them so I % really don't know but to my knowledge none of them do. Why, there's always

Re: kmail and console mailers

2002-05-01 Thread Thorsten Haude
Moin, * craigw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-05-01 22:48]: >On Wed May 01, 2002 at 08:24:44PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: >> >> Ok, so I lied. Mutt knows POP3, but nobody recommends it. >> >I do. I highly recommend it. If you don't have any fancy needs for >> >complicated mail handling. >> So you're t

Re: kmail and console mailers

2002-05-01 Thread craigw
On Wed May 01, 2002 at 08:24:44PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: > > >> Ok, so I lied. Mutt knows POP3, but nobody recommends it. > >I do. I highly recommend it. If you don't have any fancy needs for > >complicated mail handling. > So you're the one! I heard somewhere that some guy does this, but >

Re: kmail and console mailers

2002-05-01 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * craigw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-05-01 02:29]: >On Tue Apr 30, 2002 at 11:57:09PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: >> * craigw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-30 18:25]: >> >On Tue Apr 30, 2002 at 10:36:38AM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: >> >> Mutt can read mboxes, but Mutt cannot 'get' the mail there.

Re: kmail and console mailers

2002-04-30 Thread craigw
On Tue Apr 30, 2002 at 11:57:09PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: > Hi, > > * craigw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-30 18:25]: > >On Tue Apr 30, 2002 at 10:36:38AM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: > >> * Zdzislaw A. Kaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-30 09:23]: > >> >2. How to configure fetchmail to put mail

Re: kmail and console mailers

2002-04-30 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * craigw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-30 18:25]: >On Tue Apr 30, 2002 at 10:36:38AM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: >> * Zdzislaw A. Kaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-30 09:23]: >> >2. How to configure fetchmail to put mail in kmail folders at once? >> My Fetchmail feeds the mails to the local MTA,

Re: kmail and console mailers

2002-04-30 Thread craigw
On Tue Apr 30, 2002 at 10:36:38AM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: > Hi, > > * Zdzislaw A. Kaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-30 09:23]: > >2. How to configure fetchmail to put mail in kmail folders at once? > My Fetchmail feeds the mails to the local MTA, which in turn uses a > MDA to deliver it to mb

Re: kmail and console mailers

2002-04-30 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * Zdzislaw A. Kaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-30 09:23]: >2. How to configure fetchmail to put mail in kmail folders at once? My Fetchmail feeds the mails to the local MTA, which in turn uses a MDA to deliver it to mboxes (the format KMail uses) in ~/Mail. >1. Which console mail progam can

kmail and console mailers

2002-04-30 Thread Zdzislaw A. Kaleta
May be someone will be so kind to share his knowledge ;-/ 1. Which console mail progam can I use to get mail to the same folders as mail I get with kmail? 2. How to configure fetchmail to put mail in kmail folders at once? zakend -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: mailers

1999-05-14 Thread Rob Browning
Brian Schramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > alias support for addresses > grouping of addresses > threading of email (for lists) > some kind of sorting on reciept of a massage ( for news reports) > easy to use > reliable file transfer (for attached documents) > find a message on a search of the he

mailers

1999-05-12 Thread Brian Schramm
OK, I know that this is almost as bad as 'editor wars' but I have to ask. I want an email program that works in X and has the following capabilities: alias support for addresses grouping of addresses threading of email (for lists) some kind of sorting on reciept of a massage ( for news reports) e

mailers machine name

1998-12-08 Thread Marcus Geiger
Hi, sometimes I get serious problem when posting to some systems. I installed smail on my local machine (connected to my ISP via ppp) and forwad all mail which smail cannot send by itself to my ISP's mailhost (smarthost !?). But some servers refuse my mail. I think this depends on my unregistere

Re: Mailers

1997-07-28 Thread Kai Grossjohann
> David R Kohel writes: David> This is not really Debian specific, but is relevant to David> handling the volume of mail from this mailing list. [...] David> Emacs? Are the mail handling tools of emacs worth looking David> into? I am an Emacs aficionado. I use the Gnus combined mai

Re: Mailers

1997-07-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, I use Emacs VM for personal mail, and GNUS for mailing lists and newsgroups (using the mailagent system for filtering, separating, vacation, and simple remote command execution). Works wonderfully for me. manoj -- "If Jesus came back today, and saw what was going

Re: Mailers

1997-07-10 Thread Peter S Galbraith
"David R. Kohel" wrote: > Or is there a good text-based user interface > to mh which would be programmable and have a compatible system of > directories and mail handling tools? Before getting too deeply > into mh and (e)xmh, and chopping up my current mail folders, I > wou

Re: Mailers

1997-07-09 Thread Shaya Potter
On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, David R. Kohel wrote: > I found mutt in unstable, but slang 0.99.38 is not available, > giving a conflict. Where do I get the complete package for > mutt? The new version of Slang is still stuck in Incoming last I checked. > > I don't find PGP on the mirror here (Singapor

Re: Mailers

1997-07-09 Thread jdassen
On Jul 9, David R. Kohel wrote > I found mutt in unstable, but slang 0.99.38 is not available, giving a > conflict. S-lang 0.99.38 is still in master's Incoming (it's a non-maintainer release by me; presumably it cannot be automatically processed (the FTP maintainer is currently on holiday)). >

Re: Mailers

1997-07-09 Thread Frank Barknecht
David R. Kohel hat gesagt: // David R. Kohel wrote: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I found mutt in unstable, but slang 0.99.38 is not available, > giving a conflict. Where do I get the complete package for > mutt?

Re: Mailers

1997-07-09 Thread David R. Kohel
I found mutt in unstable, but slang 0.99.38 is not available, giving a conflict. Where do I get the complete package for mutt? I don't find PGP on the mirror here (Singapore). Where is PGP usually located on non-US mirrors? David Frank Barknecht dijo: > Hamish Moffatt hat gesagt: // Hamish Mo

Re: Mailers

1997-07-08 Thread Emilio Lopes
> "HM" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Emacs? Are the mail handling tools of emacs worth looking into? HM> Obscure keystrokes. Not at all if you have the reference card around. :-) I read my mail and my news with Gnus (comes with Emacs), both with the same interface. With

Re: Mailers

1997-07-08 Thread Vebjorn Forsmo
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > mutt can handle message status (read or unread) in folders > other than your inbox where elm does not. It is very elm-like > but seems faster and smaller yet just as functional to me. > For the same reason, it may be too elm-like to meet your requiremen

Re: Mailers

1997-07-08 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hamish Moffatt hat gesagt: // Hamish Moffatt wrote: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > mutt can handle message status (read or unread) in folders > other than your inbox where elm does not. It is very elm-like > but seems faster and smaller yet just as functional to me. > For the same reason, it may be too el

Re: Mailers

1997-07-08 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jul 07, 1997 at 06:04:13PM +0800, David R. Kohel wrote: > I've been using elm for years. But as far as I can tell, it > does not handle multiple active folders. Before investing in > converting all of my mail archives to a new system, I'd like > to know what I'm getting into. > > I wo

Mailers

1997-07-07 Thread David R. Kohel
This is not really Debian specific, but is relevant to handling the volume of mail from this mailing list. I've been using elm for years. But as far as I can tell, it does not handle multiple active folders. Before investing in converting all of my mail archives to a new system, I'd like to